Open Access

Computational modeling and in silico analysis of differential regulation of myo-inositol catabolic enzymes in Cryptococcus neoformans

BMC Molecular Biology20089:88

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-9-88

Received: 29 March 2008

Accepted: 14 October 2008

Published: 14 October 2008

Abstract

Background

Inositol is a key cellular metabolite for many organisms. Cryptococcus neoformans is an opportunistic pathogen which primarily infects the central nervous system, a region of high inositol concentration, of immunocompromised individuals. Through the use of myo-inositol oxygenase C. neoformans can catabolize inositol as a sole carbon source to support growth and viability.

Results

Three myo-inositol oxygenase gene sequences were identified in the C. neoformans genome. Differential regulation was suggested by computational analyses of the three gene sequences. This included examination of the upstream regulatory regions, identifying ORE/TonE and UASINO sequences, conserved introns/exons, and in frame termination sequences. Homology modeling of the proteins encoded by these genes revealed key differences in the myo-inositol active site.

Conclusion

The results suggest there are two functional copies of the myo-inositol oxygenase gene in the C. neoformans genome. The functional genes are differentially expressed in response to environmental inositol concentrations. Both the upstream regulatory regions of the genes and the structure of the specific proteins suggest that MIOX1 would function when inositol concentrations are low, whereas MIOX2 would function when inositol concentrations are high.

Background

Myo-inositol, a key cellular metabolite, is a simple six carbon ring sugar with one hydroxyl group on each carbon. Myo-inositol is the precursor for the synthesis of phosphatidylinositol, an essential membrane lipid, an anchor for proteins, and a core component of signal transduction mechanisms [1, 2]. Inositol and compounds derived from inositol are among the major nonperturbing intracellular osmolytes which accumulate in response to hypertonic stress of the organism or tissue. Stepwise phosphorylation of inositol yields the myo-inositol polyphosphates. Inositol hexakisphosphate, in particular, has been found in soil, bacteria and most animals [2].

Cryptococcus neoformans is an opportunistic pathogen primarily infecting individuals with compromised immune systems. C. neoformans is found worldwide in soil and pigeon droppings. Under environmentally dry conditions, the quiescent fungal spores in the soil or pigeon guano can become airborne. Once in the air mammals can inhale the dehydrated yeast spores. The immune system of a non-immunocompromised individual typically eliminates C. neoformans with out any symptoms of disease. If the host is immunocompromised the pathogen can cause cryptococcosis. C. neoformans infections often localize to the brain and central nervous system (CNS) [3]. C. neoformans is unusual among the fungi in that the pathogen can use inositol as a sole carbon source to support growth. Catabolism of myo-inositol in C. neoformans is through the action of myo-inositol oxygenase (MIOX), though this has not been confirmed as the only pathway [4]. The inositol concentration in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) is high (when compared to plasma levels [5]). C. neoformans localized in the CNS could utilize myo-inositol as a substrate for myo-inositol oxygenase (MIOX) in order to generate glucuronic acid for energy production.

The conversion of myo-inositol to glucuronic acid by MIOX involves the cleavage of the inositol ring between the 6 C and 1 C, and a four-electron transfer with 1 atom of oxygen incorporated into the glonate, xylulose and xyulose-5-phosphate which can then enter the pentose phosphate pathway resulting in energy production.

This enzyme has been extensively studied in many eukaryotic organisms, recently crystallized, and modeled [69]. However, regulation of the MIOX protein in any organism has only recently been examined. Transcription of the MIOX gene in humans has been shown to respond to osmotic response element (ORE) binding proteins and/or the tonicity-responsive enhancer (TonE) binding protein through conserved motifs [7, 10]. Expression of genes regulated by ORE/TonE binding proteins have been shown to increase when an AP-1 protein binding sequence is located downstream. In conditions of high osmolarity, this AP-1 mediated increase in transcription is inhibited by A-Fos or Tam-67 [11]. The promoter of a renal specific oxidoreductase with increased expression in diabetes mellitus, that has been experimentally determined to respond to inositol in media, also contains the conserved ORE motif GGAAA [6]. An additional transcriptional regulating sequence, known as an inositol upstream activation sequence (UASINO), has the conserved core sequence of CANNTG and has been identified upstream of several genes encoding proteins involved in phospholipid metabolism [1].

In this study, three genes on separate chromosomes, encoding the MIOX protein, were identified in the C. neoformans genome. The MIOX promoter region, transcriptional regulatory sequences and myo-inositol binding pocket in C. neoformans were characterized. Examination of the genes revealed differential regulation. This examination includes identification of upstream regulatory sequences such as ORE, UASINO, and TATA boxes, introns, in-frame termination sequences, expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and CpG islands for each sequence. Molecular modeling of the three protein sequences indicated key differences between the isoforms possibly affecting the ability of two isoforms to bind the myo-inositol substrate.

Results

MIOX Gene Identification and Characterization

Examination of the STGC C. neoformans genomic database using BLAST identified a sequence within chr06.b3501.040616 that is a 100% match to the experimentally determined N-terminal sequence [12] of the C. neoformans MIOX protein (Figure 1). The sequence was extracted along with an additional 3000 bases upstream and downstream. A keyword search of the TIGR C. neoformans computationally annotated database revealed three possible MIOX genes on separate chromosomes. TIGR sequence 180.m00186 mapped to chromosome 6, 189.m00292 mapped to chromosome 8 and 177.m03138 mapped to chromosome 7. Sequence 180.m00186 contains the experimentally determined N-terminal region and aligns to contig chr06.b3501.040616 (e-value 0.0) in the STGC C. neoformans database. Sequence 189.m00292 aligns with contig chr09.b3501.040506 (e-value 2e-08) and sequence 177.m03138 aligns with chr07.b3501.040506 (e-value 2e-07). The sequence on chromosome 6 (180.m00186) is referred to as MIOX1, chromosome 8 (189.m00292) is referred to as MIOX2 and on chromosome 7 (177.m03138) is referred to as MIOX3.
Figure 1

Optimal alignment of C. neoformans myo -inositol oxygenase to the Mus musculus myo -inositol oxygenase. MIOX1, MIOX2 and MIOX3 refers to the C. neoformans myo-inositol oxygenase protein isoforms. The predicted consensus secondary structure for each sequence is below the respective amino acid. Helices are represented by h and are in red. Sheets are represented by s and are in green. Each protein is predicted to have 10 helices and four sheets. Conserved amino acids essential to enzyme function are highlighted in blue.

Computational analysis of the promoter region of MIOX1 revealed two possible conserved OREs containing the consensus sequence GGAAA [6]. One of these putative ORE sequences, GGGAAAATTGA, is located at -2137 upstream from the transcriptional start site. Another putative ORE, TGGAAAAAAAGA, is located -645 and is followed by an AP-1 binding sequence (TGATTCA) located at -204. One putative cis-acting inositol upstream activating sequences (UASINO) CATGTGGAAT was located at -397, and matches the experimentally determined sequence [13](Table 1). MIOX1 has one predicted TATA box starting at nucleotide -106. EST b9fo8h9.r1 in the TIGR database aligned with bases -87–229, 280–455 with a 95% identity. EST a7e05cn.r1 aligned with nucleotides 540–764 823–947, and 1007–1058 with 93% identity (Table 2). Thus, the MIOX1 gene contains three introns with GT/AG splice sites confirmed by comparison of the genomic sequence to ESTs. Four in-frame termination signals were located at the end of the genomic sequence.
Table 1

C. neoformans Upstream Regulatory Sequences.

Protein

ORE/TonE Sequence location

ORE/TonE sequence

AP-1 Location

AP-1 sequence

UASINO Location

UASINO Sequence

MIOX3

None

  

None

 

None

MIOX2

-2714

AGGAAAGCTG

 

None

 

None

 

-2636

TGGAAAACTG

    

MIOX1

-2137

GGGAAAATTGA

-204

TGATTCA

-397

CATGTGGAATT

 

-645

GGAAAAAAAGA

    

Within 3000 nucleotides up-stream of the MIOX1 translation start two ORE/TonE sequences, one AP-1 sequence and one UASINO were identified. Within 3000 nucleotides up-stream of the translation start for MIOX2 two ORE/TonE sequences were identified. No consensus ORE/TonE, AP-1 or UASINO sequences were found within 3000 nucleotide sequences upstream of the transcription start site for MIOX3.

Table 2

Identification of Expressed Sequence Tags That Align with C. neoformans MIOX Gene Sequences.

Protein

Expressed sequence Tags (EST)

Nucleotide Match

% identity

MIOX3

None identified

  

MIOX2

d4e08j2.r1

-184–37, 86–264, 322–498

98

 

a9e06cn.r1

664–846, 900–1107

96

MIOX1

b9fo8h9.r1

-87–229, 280–455

95

 

a7e05cn.r1

540–764, 823–947, 1007–1058

93

Two ESTs were identified in the TIGR database for both MIOX1 and MIOX2 with at least 93% identity. No ESTs were found for MIOX3 with an identity above 65%.

The genomic region (TIGR189.m00292 plus +/- 3000 extracted from chr09.b3501.040506 STGC) upstream of the translational start of MIOX2 contains two conserved ORE sequences AGGAAAGCTG and TGGAAAACTG located at -3714 and -3636. Neither sequence was followed by a conserved AP-1 sequence (Table 1). Two ESTs, from the TIGR database were found to align with the coding region of MIOX2. EST d4e08j2.r1 aligns to bases -184–37, 86–264 and 322–498 (98%). EST a9e06cn.r1 aligns with nucleotides 664–846, and 900–1107 (96%) (Table 2). Three introns with GT/AG splice sites were confirmed by comparison of the genomic sequence to ESTs. The AG at the 3'end of the splice site of a fourth computationally predicted intron was confirmed by comparison of the genomic sequence to EST d4e08j2.r1. The GT at the 5' end of this intron has not yet been confirmed by EST data. Four in frame termination signals were identified.

Analysis of the genomic region (TIGR 177.m03138 plus 3000 +/- extracted from STGC chr07.b3501.040506) of MIOX3 upstream from the transcriptional start site for the MIOX3 protein has several computationally identified possible ORE sequences. However, none of the sequences are strictly identical to the experimentally determined ORE sequences and none are followed by a known AP-1 binding site. The MIOX3 sequence was determined to contain only one TATA box starting at nucleotide 27 (Table 1). No corresponding ESTs were identified in the TIGR C. neoformans database with an alignment better than 65% (Table 2). Computational analysis, along with manual alignment of the coding DNA from TIGR database to the genomic sequence, predicted four introns in MIOX3. MIOX3 genomic 3'sequence has four in frame termination signals.

MIOX1 and MIOX2 have a relatively few CpG islands when compared to MIOX3. MIOX3 has five CpG islands in the upstream region that are approximately evenly spaced and several islands located internal to the gene. The five upstream CpG islands are located at -(51..327), -(752..1006), -(1318..1661), -(1746..2007) and -(2817..3080). MIOX2 has 2 CpG islands located from -(457..684), and -(2555..2754). MIOX1 has three CpG islands. One island is close to the transcriptional start located at -(48–373). The other two CpG islands identified in the MIOX1 gene are further from the start site located at -(2325..2545) and -(2609..2881).

As RNA stabilization can effect functional expression, the predicted RNAs were examined. Secondary and tertiary analysis of the computationally predicted RNA showed no significant variance between the corresponding structures of the three genes (data not shown).

MIOX Sequence alignment and Homology Modeling

In the Mus musculus MIOX protein the myo-inositol substrate has been determined to be buried in a pocket formed by two short sections of the protein and a hairpin loop [8]. Multiple sequence alignment of the Mus musculus MIOX protein sequence and the three MIOX protein sequences from C. neoformans reveals 100% identity for the two short sections of the protein (Figure 1). Despite the similarity of the protein sequences and the conservation of several key amino acids, homology modeling of the putative proteins encoded by the three C. neoformans genes revealed some significant differences (Figure 2 and 3). The following amino acid numbering is based on the mouse protein [8]. Amino acid Asp-124 was previously identified to be critical for the binding of iron, which is necessary for optimal protein function. This amino acid (Asp-124) is conserved in all three C. neoformans MIOX proteins [8]. The hairpin loop consisting of 11 residues (Leu-83, Val-84, Asp-85, Glu-86, Ser87, Asp 88, Pro-89, Asp90, Val-91, Asp-92 Phe-93) in the Mus musculus protein has an essential role in binding the myo-inositol by forming a lid that closes over the substrate in the active site. This hairpin loop secures the inositol substrate in place (Table 3). The first eight residues in the hairpin loop sequence are strictly conserved in the MIOX1 protein. The next three amino acids of the hairpin loop in the MIOX1 protein (amino acids nine to eleven) differ as follows: Thr for Val-91 replacing a neutral residue with a non-polar, Ser for Asp-92 inserting a neutral residue in place of an acidic residue and Val for Phe-93 both non-polar residues (Table 4, Figure 3). The first three residues (Leu, Val, Asp) and residues five through eight (Ser, Asp, Pro Asp) in the MIOX2 and the MIOX3 predicted hairpin loops align with the experimentally determined hairpin loop identified in the Mus musculus. The fourth residue of the hairpin loop has a substitution of Ala for Asp in both the MIOX2 and the MIOX3 proteins, replacing an acidic residue for a smaller non-polar residue. Amino acid residues nine and ten of the hairpin loop are the same as those located in the MIOX1 protein (Thr and Ser). The last residue in the hairpin loop is Phe in the Mus musculus MIOX protein, Val in the MIOX1 protein, and Ala in the MIOX2 and MIOX3 proteins.
Figure 2

Computationally Predicted Structure of C. neoformans MIOX1. A. Stereo ribbon diagram, Fe(II) atoms shown in green and inositol in yellow. Key amino acids involved in substrate lid stabilization shown in CPK coloration.

Figure 3

Computationally Predicted Active Site of the C. neoformans MIOX Isoforms. Bonding distances between the key amino acid side chains involved in the salt bridge stabilization of MI substrate lid. Key amino acids shown in CPK colorization. A: MIOX1 protein. B: MIOX2 protein. C: MIOX3 protein.

Table 3

Relative Positions of Amino Acids Involved in the Predicted Hairpin Loop Stabilizing the Binding of the Myo-Inositol Substrate.

Protein

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

MIOX3

Leu-158

Val-159

Asp-160

Ala-161

Ser-162

Asp-163

Pro-164

Asp-165

Thr-166

Ser-167

Ala-168

MIOX2

Leu-110

Val-111

Asp-112

Ala-113

Ser-114

Asp-115

Pro-116

Asp-117

Thr-118

Ser-119

Ala-120

MIOX1

Leu-115

Val-116

Asp-117

Glu-118

Ser-119

Asp-120

Pro-121

Asp-123

Thr-124

Ser-124

Val-125

Mus musculus

Leu-83

Val-84

Asp-85

Glu-86

Ser-87

Asp-88

Pro-89

Asp-90

Val-91

Asp-92

Phe-93

The hairpin loop is strongly conserved between the four proteins with only a few exceptions: a substitution of Ala for Glu-86, and Ala for Phe-93 in MIOX 2 and MIOX3 proteins, a substitution of Ser for Asp 92 in all three MIOX protein sequences and a conservative substitution of Val for Phe-93 in the MIOX1 protein sequence.

Table 4

Amino Acids Involved in Salt-Bridges that Stabilize the myo-Inositol Substrate Lid.

Protein

Amino Acid

Distance

Amino Acid

Distance

Amino Acid

Distance

MIOX3

Asp-160/Lys-201

2.67 Å

Asp-163/Lys-331

2.91 Å

Ser-167/Arg-116

12.15 Å

MIOX2

Asp-112/Lys-153

2.66 Å

Asp-115/Lys-283

2.91 Å

Ser-119/Arg-68

12.15 Å

MIOX1

Asp-117/Lys-157

2.65 Å

Asp-120/Lys-287

2.91 Å

Ser-124/Arg-71

3.55 Å

musculus

Asp-85/Lys-127

2.31 Å

Asp-88/Lys-257

2.97 Å

Asp-92/Arg-39

2.98 Å

The amino acids involved in the myo-inositol substrate lid are conserved among the four proteins with the exception of a substitution of Ser for Asp in all three computationally modeled C. neoformans MIOX proteins. Predicted bonding distances indicate the salt bridge formation is conserved for MIOX1. The distance measured between the substituted Ser and Arg in both computationally modeled MIOX2 and MIOX3 proteins (12.15 Å) does not support the formation of a salt bridge at these locations.

Analysis of the homology models of MIOX2 and MIOX3 proteins in C. neoformans indicates three key differences. The distance measured between Asp-112/lys-153 (2.66Å) and Asp-115/lys-283 (2.91Å) in MIOX2 and Asp-160/lys- 201 (2.67Å) and Asp-163/lys-331 (2.91Å) in MIOX3 protein support the formation of salt bridges similar to the Mus musculus MIOX protein. However, the distances measured between Ser-119/Arg-68 (12.15Å) in MIOX2 protein and Ser-167/Arg-116 (12.15Å) in MIOX3 protein are too great to support the formation of a salt bridges (Figure 3). The homology models generated for MIOX2 protein and MIOX3 protein support main chain hydrogen bonds with Arg-68 and Gln-163 similar to the Mus musculus MIOX. Optimal alignment of the three MIOX proteins with Mus musculus indicates a substitution of Val-61 for Thr-32 in the MIOX2 and Val-109 for Thr-32 in the MIOX3 protein. The substitution does not support the formation of a main-chain hydrogen bond at this location for either the MIOX2 or the MIOX3 protein (Table 5).
Table 5

Stabilizing Amino Acids Involved in Main-Chain Hydrogen Bonds.

Protein

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

Amino Acid

MIOX3

Val 109

Arg-116

Gln-211

MIOX2

Val-61

Arg-68

Gln-163

MIOX1

Glu-66

Arg-71

Gln-168

musculus

Thr-32

Arg-39

Gln-136

The main chain hydrogen bonds involving Arg and Gln are predicted to be conserved in all four proteins. MIOX2 and MIOX3 protein share a substitution of Val for Thr disrupting the main chain hydrogen bond found at that location in the Mus musculus protein. MIOX1 protein has a conservative substitution of Glu for Thr suggesting the preservation of that main chain hydrogen bond.

Discussion

C. neoformans appears to be the only organism in the animal and fungal kingdoms with multiple MIOX genes. Examination of over 60 completed eukaryotic genomes from the animal and fungal kingdoms revealed that if the MIOX gene is present, there is only one highly conserved copy (data not shown). Perhaps the three copies of the MIOX gene in the C. neoformans genome represents a physiological mechanism for survival in various environmental inositol concentrations.

This computational study suggests there are at least two sequences regulating transcription of the C. neoformans MIOX genes, one involves ORE sequences, the other involves UASINO sequences. ORE sequences were originally identified in vertebrates and UASINO sequences were demonstrated in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but these sequences are present in the C. neoformans genome. As a basidiomycete the C. neoformans genome has been shown to contain features similar to other yeasts yet its gene organization is more complex resembling higher eukaryotes [14]. Both MIOX1 and MIOX2 have two ORE/TonE sequences upstream of the genes. MIOX protein expression in humans has been demonstrated to be regulated by ORE/TonE binding proteins [7, 10]. In vertebrates, the experimentally demonstrated binding sites for each transcription factor are slightly different. The core sequence TGGAAA is recognized by ORE binding protein, whereas the core sequence GGAAAA is recognized by TonE binding protein (also known as NFAT5[11]). Interestingly, comparison of the C. neoformans promoter regions of MIOX1 and MIOX2 reveals nucleotide differences in the identified ORE/TonE sequences suggesting differential regulation of the two genes. MIOX1 has two ORE like sequences with the conserved TGGAAA sequence coupled with an AP-1 binding sequence. This would render MIOX1 subject to A-Fos and Tam-67 inhibition. Two TonE like sequences are located in MIOX2 however, no AP-1 sequence was identified. The presence of the TonE and the absence of the AP-1 binding sequences suggests MIOX2 is up-regulated in the presence of inositol but is not subject to inhibition by A-Fos or Tam-67 [11]. Unlike MIOX1 and MIOX2, the MIOX3 gene lacked a conserved ORE/TonE sequence within 3000 base pairs upstream of the transcriptional start site suggesting MIOX3 is not regulated by the ORE or TonE transcription factors.

In addition to the ORE and AP-1 sequences, MIOX1 also contains a UASINO sequence. Several C. neoformans genes involved in phospholipid and phospholipid precursor biosynthesis (including MIOX) have been experimentally found to be regulated by the availability of inositol and choline in the medium [4, 12] Studies of the transcriptional control coordinating expression of these genes in S. cerevisiae led to the identification of an upstream activating sequence (UAS) with a core conserved sequence of CANNTG [1, 15]. The UASINO has been found to specifically regulate genes via the INO2p/INO4p bHLH transcription factor complex in response to inositol and choline [1]. The UASINO sequence experimentally demonstrated to serve for transcription activation is CAT(G/A)TGAA(G/A/T)(T/A) [13]. The presence of a UASINO in the upstream region of the C. neoformans MIOX1 but not MIOX2 or MIOX3 genes further suggests that the genes are differentially regulated. Moreover, MIOX1 may be active when inositol concentration levels are low.

Differential regulation is further supported by the identification of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) for MIOX1 and MIOX2 but not MIOX3. ESTs identified for both MIOX1 and MIOX2 in this study confirmed the computationally predicted start sites. Furthermore the splice site junctions for MIOX1 and MIOX2 are supported by alignment of ESTs to genomic DNA. ESTs for MIOX3 were not found however, the splice sites computationally predicted for MIOX3 are identical to the splice sites predicted by ESTs alignment for MIOX2. Duplicated nonfunctional genes are less likely to have ESTs [16]. Unexpressed genes, genes expressed at very low levels or only under specific conditions are also less likely to have associated ESTs/cDNAs. Therefore the absence of ESTs for MIOX3 suggests either the gene is only expressed under specific conditions or is not expressed at all.

The identity of the MIOX2 and MIOX3 coding sequences (80%) is significantly less than that of their amino acids (91%). This can be attributed to changes in the wobble position. Manual analysis of the aligned sequences revealed the majority (78%) of the base changes to be in the wobble position. The synonymous changes allowed the identity of the DNA sequences to decrease but did not change most of the amino acids encoded, thereby retaining the protein sequence identity. The conservation of the amino acid sequence despite changes in the DNA suggests that the function of the protein is conserved through selective pressure.

The MIOX substrate, myo-inositol, is held in the active site by several key interactions. Three salt bridges created between Asp-85/Lys127, Asp-88/Lys257 and Asp92/Arg-39 form a lid that holds the substrate in the active site, along with main-chain H-bonds with Thr-32, Arg-39 and Gln-136 that stabilize the active site. All residues, essential in myo-inositol binding were found to be conserved in C. neoformans MIOX1 except Thr-32 and Asp-92. Optimal alignment of the Mus musculus and C. neoformans MIOX1 protein sequences indicates a conservative substitution of Thr-32 to Glu and Asp-92 to Ser. Thr and Glu are both neutral residues and capable of participating in hydrogen bonds, indicating that the main chain hydrogen bonds found in Mus musculus are all conserved in MIOX1. Asp-92 interacts with Arg-39 to form a salt bridge (dist 2.98Å) in the Mus musculus MIOX protein. Substitution of Ser for Asp-92 in C. neoformans MIOX1 potentially disrupts the salt-bridge formation however; the homology model generated in this study of MIOX1 indicates the distance between the amino acids (3.44Å) supports the formation of a salt bridge at that location despite the substitution.

Protein sequence alignment and the homology models generated for the MIOX2 and MIOX3 proteins of C. neoformans also indicate three key differences from the mouse MIOX protein. Unlike the changes in the MIOX1 protein where the active site is preserved, mutations in the MIOX2 and MIOX3 residues suggest disruption of the active site for myo-inositol possibly leading to decreased protein activity. Optimal alignment of the mouse MIOX and C. neoformans MIOX2 and MIOX3 protein sequences indicates substitutions of Thr-32 to Val and Asp-92 to Ser. The change from Thr to Val disrupts one of the three main-chain hydrogen bonds that helps stabilize the myo-inositol lid. The loss of the H-bond between Val and the main chain could be the cause of the increased distance between the Ser and Arg salt bridge (12.15Å) making the formation of a salt bridge at that location beyond the acceptable range. The destabilization of the lid may not allow MIOX2 and MIOX3 proteins to function efficiently.

Conclusion

Multiple copies of the MIOX gene is unique to C. neoformans among the animal and fungal kingdoms. This study suggests that the C. neoformans genome has multiple copies of the MIOX gene which appear to be differentially expressed under various physiological inositol conditions. MIOX1 protein is predicted to be efficient in binding the myo-inositol substrate [12]. MIOX1 gene expression is probably active in conditions of low inositol via a UASINO, up-regulated in the presence of inositol, yet possible inhibited by high levels of inositol by A-Fos or Tam-67 at the AP-1 site. This inhibition may be compensated for by the up-regulation of MIOX2. Although the MIOX2 enzyme is not predicted to be as efficient at holding the myo-inositol substrate in the active site, due to loss of disulfide bridges between the lid and main-chain and loss of main-chain hydrogen bonds, expression of MIOX2 should not be inhibited in elevated inositol levels due to the absence of an AP-1 binding sequence. This differentiated regulation of inositol catabolism could facilitate the growth and viability of C. neoformans in various environments.

Methods

MIOX Gene Identification and Characterization

To locate the MIOX gene within the Cryptococcus neoformans genome the N-terminus region of MIOX1 protein (previously isolated in this laboratory) was submitted as a query search to the TBLASTN program via BLAST at the Stanford Genome Technology Center (STGC). A sequence with 100% identity to the MIOX protein N-terminus region plus 3000 bases +/- was then used to search for cDNA's and ESTs in the TIGR C. neoformans gene indices database using BLAST (blastn), and the were aligned with GAP from the Wisconsin sequencing package on the W-H2 server (GCG)[16]. Possible open reading frames (ORF) were located using Map (GCG) Translate (GCG), GENSCAN [17], and ORF Finder [18]. Putative promoter regions were delineated by Promoter Prediction [19], WWW Promoter Scan [20] HCtata [21] Genie [22] and NetStart 1.0 [23] and manual examination. Exon boundaries were predicted using GAP (GCG), NetGene2 [24], Splice Site Prediction [25], Genie [26] and GENSCAN. ORE sequences and UASino sequences were determined by manual analysis of the upstream regions of each MIOX gene sequence. CpG islands were identified using the Vista Genome [27] and European Molecular Biology Laboratory servers [28].

MIOX Secondary Structure Prediction

Predictions of protein secondary structures for MIOX1, MIOX2, MIOX3 were computed using J-pred [29], PredictProtein [30], PSIPRED [31], Discrimination of protein Secondary structure Class (DSC) [32], Hydrophobic cluster analysis (HCA) [33], PSSFinder [34], and SAM_T02 [35] methods. The results from each method were compared and a consensus structure for each MIOX protein was generated based on regions of similarity. Consensus secondary structure sequences for each MIOX protein were generated by comparing results obtained by all servers, and taking into account only the sequence regions that were predicted at least 50% reliability or higher by at least five servers. All alignments were generated with CLUSTALW [36]or GAP then edited manually using Bioedit [37].

Template Identification and Protein Modeling

The SWISS-MODEL Comparative Protein Modeling Server [38], along with Modeler within the Accelerys Insight II program suite, were utilized to generate 3D-models of the putative MIOX proteins. The MIOX protein from Mus musculus (PDB code: 2HUO) was used as a template. Each C. neoformans MIOX protein was manually aligned to the template then submitted to the server. The N-terminal regions of the proteins have a high degree of variation therefore the N-terminal region for each protein was not modeled due to lack of a template. One model was generated in a fully automated way for each MIOX sequence based on user defined alignment then verified using PROCHECK [39].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Beth Eldon and Ilva Cabrera for their comments on the manuscript. These studies were supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI43025) and the Keck foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Life Sciences Department, Irvine Valley College
(2)
Department of Biological Sciences, California State University

References

  1. Carman GM, Henry SA: Phosphatidic acid plays a central role in the transcriptional regulation of glycerophospholipid synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2007, 282(52):37293-37297. 10.1074/jbc.R700038200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Michell RH: Inositol derivatives: evolution and functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9(2):151-161. 10.1038/nrm2334.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Casadevall SA, Perfect JR: Cryptococcus Neoformans. Volume 1. 1st edition. ASM Press; 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Molina Y, Ramos SE, Douglass T, Klig LS: Inositol synthesis and catabolism in Cryptococcus neoformans. Yeast 1999, 15(15):1657-1667. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199911)15:15<1657::AID-YEA493>3.0.CO;2-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Spector R, Lorenzo AV: Myo-inositol transport in the central nervous system. Am J Physiol 1975, 228(5):1510-1518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nayak B, et al.: Modulation of renal-specific oxidoreductase/myo-inositol oxygenase by high-glucose ambience. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102(50):17952-17957. 10.1073/pnas.0509089102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Prabhu KS, Arner RJ, Vunta H, Reddy CC: Up-regulation of human myo-inositol oxygenase by hyperosmotic stress in renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 2005, 280(20):19895-19901. 10.1074/jbc.M502621200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown PM, Caradoc-Davies TT, Dickson JM, Cooper GJ, Loomes KM, Baker EN: Crystal structure of a substrate complex of myo-inositol oxygenase, a di-iron oxygenase with a key role in inositol metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103(41):15032-15037. 10.1073/pnas.0605143103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Arner RJ, Prabhu KS, Krishnan V, Johnson MC, Reddy CC: Expression of myo-inositol oxygenase in tissues susceptible to diabetic complications. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006, 339(3):816-820. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.11.090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim JA, Jeon US, Kwon MS, Lim SW, Kwon HM: Transcriptional activator TonE-binding protein in cellular protection and differentiation. Methods Enzymol 2007, 428: 253-267. 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)28014-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Irarrazabal CE, Williams CK, Ely MA, Birrer MJ, Garcia-Perez A, Burg MB, Ferraris JD: Activator protein-1 contributes to high NaCl-induced increase in tonicity-responsive enhancer/osmotic response element-binding protein transactivating activity. J Biol Chem 2008, 283(5):2554-2563. 10.1074/jbc.M703490200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosario C: Inositol Catabolism and cloning in Cryptococcus neoformans. Long Beach: California State University Long Beach; 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Koipally J, Ashburner BP, Bachhawat N, Gill T, Hung G, Henry SA, Lopes JM: Functional characterization of the repeated UASINO element in the promoters of the INO1 and CHO2 genes of yeast. Yeast 1996, 12(7):653-665. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19960615)12:7<653::AID-YEA953>3.0.CO;2-T.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Loftus BJ, et al.: The genome of the basidiomycetous yeast and human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Science 2005, 307(5713):1321-1324. 10.1126/science.1103773.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrison SC: A structural taxonomy of DNA-binding domains. Nature 1991, 353(6346):715-719. 10.1038/353715a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mounsey A, Bauer P, Hope I: Evidence Suggesting That a Fifth of Annotated Caenorhabditis elegans Genes May Be Pseudogenes. Genome Research 2002, 12(5, , ):770-775.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wisconsin sequencing package on the W-H2 server[http://www.sacs.ucsf.edu/Resources/webgcg/index.html]
  18. GENSCAN Web Server[http://genes.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html]
  19. ORF Finder (Open Reading Frame Finder)[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gorf/]
  20. Promoter 2.0 Prediction Server[http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/Promoter/]
  21. WWW Promoter Scan[http://www-bimas.cit.nih.gov/molbio/proscan/]
  22. BioWareDB.org[http://biowaredb.org/site/index.php?Itemid=31&id=1226&option=com_content&task=view]
  23. Genie: Gene Finder Based on Generalized Hidden Markov Models[http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/genie.html]
  24. NetStart 1.0[http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetStart/]
  25. NetGene2 Server[http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetGene2/]
  26. Splice Site Prediction by Neural Network[http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html]
  27. Reese MG, Eeckman FH, Kulp D, Haussler D: Improved splice site detection in Genie. J Comput Biol 1997, 4(3):311-323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. VISTA[http://pipeline.lbl.gov/cgi-bin/gateway2]
  29. European Molecular Biology Laboratory[http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/]
  30. J-pred A Secondary Structure Prediction Server[http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/~www-jpred/]
  31. PredictProtein[http://www.predictprotein.org/]
  32. PSIPRED[http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/]
  33. Discrimination of protein Secondary structure Class (DSC)[http://www.russell.embl.de/gtsp/secstrucpred.html]
  34. Hydrophobic cluster analysis (HCA)[http://smi.snv.jussieu.fr/hca/hca-form.html]
  35. PSSFinder[http://www.softberry.ru/berry.phtml?topic=pps&group=programs&subgroup=propt]
  36. SAM_T02[http://www.softberry.com/all.htm]
  37. CLUSTALW[http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2/index.html]
  38. Bioedit[http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html]
  39. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC: SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31(13):3381-3385. 10.1093/nar/gkg520.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. PROCHECK[http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/~roman/procheck/procheck.html]

Copyright

© Mackenzie and Klig; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement