- Research article
- Open Access
Bluetongue virus RNA binding protein NS2 is a modulator of viral replication and assembly
© Kar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 15 September 2006
Accepted: 22 January 2007
Published: 22 January 2007
Bluetongue virus (BTV) particles consist of seven structural proteins that are organized into two capsids. In addition, BTV also encodes three non-structural (NS) proteins of which protein 2 (NS2) is the RNA binding protein and is also the major component of virus encoded inclusion bodies (VIBs), which are believed to be virus assembly sites. To investigate the contribution of NS2 in virus replication and assembly we have constructed inducible mammalian cell lines expressing full-length NS2. In addition, truncated NS2 fragments were also generated in an attempt to create dominant negative mutants for NS2 function.
Our data revealed that expression of full-length NS2 was sufficient for the formation of inclusion bodies (IBs) that were morphologically similar to the VIBs formed during BTV infection. By using either, individual BTV proteins or infectious virions, we found that while the VP3 of the inner capsid (termed as "core") that surrounds the transcription complex was closely associated with both NS2 IBs and BTV VIBs, the surface core protein VP7 co-localized with NS2 IBs only in the presence of VP3. In contrast to the inner core proteins, the outer capsid protein VP2 was not associated with either IBs or VIBs. Like the core proteins, newly synthesized BTV RNAs also accumulated in VIBs. Unlike full-length NS2, neither the amino-, nor carboxyl-terminal fragments formed complete IB structures and each appeared to interfere in overall virus replication when similarly expressed.
Together, these data demonstrate that NS2 is sufficient and necessary for IB formation and a key player in virus replication and core assembly. Perturbation of NS2 IB formation resulted in reduced virus synthesis and both the N terminal (NS2-1) and C terminal (NS2-2) fragments act as dominant negative mutants of NS2 function.
In a number of animal and plant viruses the replication and transcription complexes as well as nucleocapsids, assembly intermediates and virions, accumulate in specific virus induced structures within the host cell cytoplasm described as 'virus assembly factories' or 'virus inclusion bodies' (VIBs) [1–6]. Similar to other members of the Reoviridae family, orbiviruses use such specific sites for virus replication and the assembly of virion particles. Bluetongue virus (BTV), the prototype orbivirus, enters the host cells via the two outer capsid proteins, its receptor binding protein VP2 and penetration protein VP5 [7–9]. Once the virion is internalized, both outer capsid proteins are lost within the endosome and the core, consisting of two major (VP3 and VP7), three minor enzymatic (VP1, the viral polymerase; VP4, the capping enzyme and VP6, the helicase) proteins and a genome of ten double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) segments, is released into the cytoplasm. The released core becomes very rapidly associated with a matrix that gradually surrounds the particles to form VIBs. As the infection progresses, these VIBs increase both in size and number and appear to be the sites of orbivirus replication and early viral assembly [5, 10–12]. This has largely been inferred from electron microscopy data on the localization of incomplete virus particles within VIBs.
Beside the seven structural proteins, BTV also produces four non-structural proteins (NS1, NS2, NS3 and NS3A) in infected cells. Recently it has been reported that NS1, which is produced abundantly in infected cells is involved in viral morphogenesis, and the two smallest proteins, NS3 and NS3A are involved in virus egress [13, 14]. The involvement of the 41 kDa NS2 in virus assembly is also gradually being delineated. NS2 is the only BTV protein that undergoes phosphorylation [15, 16]. It is a highly charged hydrophilic protein and exists as a 7S multimeric complex [17–22]. NS2 possesses a single-stranded RNA binding activity and also has a nucleotidyl phosphatase activity [23, 24]. These observations suggest that NS2 may have a role in the recruitment and/or retention of RNA for replication.
Expression of BTV NS2 in both, insect and mammalian cells, results in the formation of inclusion bodies (IBs) that are indistinguishable from the VIBs found in virus-infected cells, indicating that NS2 is the major component of the VIBs [17, 25, 26]. To date, the distribution and localization of BTV proteins and RNAs within the infected cell have mainly been studied by electron microscopy . However, the correlation between what is observed and what is occurring at the molecular level is relatively poor. Nevertheless, the presence of the core, nucleic acids and morphogenic intermediates at the periphery of the VIBs has led to the proposal that replication and assembly of BTV take place within this electron dense structure . In this study we provide experiments to confirm, extend and substantiate the role of NS2 in virus assembly and replication. We describe the generation of several inducible mammalian cell lines expressing complete NS2 as well as different fragments of NS2 including a fragment consisting of the major RNA binding domains [19, 21, 28, 29]. Analysis of these stable cell lines have confirmed that NS2 alone induces the formation of IBs similar to VIBs in BTV infected cells and that they are also capable of recruiting viral core proteins and mRNAs. The IB function of NS2 is essential for virus replication and correct trafficking. Infection of cell lines expressing truncated fragments not only interferes with virus replication but also alters the cellular distribution of BTV particles in accordance with this model.
Expression of full-length NS2 in mammalian cells is sufficient for IB formation
To examine whether the NS2 expressing cells synthesize structures resembling VIBs, cells were analyzed by immunofluorescence using anti-NS2 antibody (Fig. 1B). The presence of different sizes of globular, dense inclusions was easily detectable in the cells expressing NS2 in the absence of doxycycline. These structures morphologically resemble VIBs in BTV infected BSR cells but the sizes in the latter appear to be larger and comparatively less scattered. The globular structures, in the case of the NS2 expressing cells, were not produced in the presence of 1 μg/ml doxycycline (data not shown), which suppresses NS2 protein expression. These results demonstrate that a continuous mammalian cell line with regulated expression of full-length NS2 protein was constructed.
Formation of NS2 IBs is not dependent on either cellular microtubule network or intermediate filaments
For other members of the family a clear association between the virus particle, inclusions and the intermediate filament protein vimentin has been shown which was accompanied by significant changes in the vimentin filament network of the cells resulting in a sheath-like structure surrounding the inclusions . To determine whether this association applied to NS2 IBs and if IBs in NS2 cells have similar effects on vimentin, NS2 expressing cells and BTV infected cells (control), were labeled with anti-vimentin monoclonal antibody (Fig. 2B, green) and anti-NS2 polyclonal antibody (Fig. 2B, red). The distribution of respective proteins was visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Unlike reoviruses, neither NS2 IBs nor BTV induced VIBs were surrounded by cage-like structures. This suggests that the filament network of cells is not involved in VIB formation and that NS2 IB, like VIB, does not require these filaments.
The core proteins of BTV, but not the outer capsid protein VP2, is targeted to NS2 IBs
In contrast, the distribution of VP7 in NS2 expressing cells was different to its distribution in BTV infected cells. Although VP7 was distributed throughout the cytoplasm in NS2 expressing cells similar to the control, uninduced BSR cells (Fig. 3B, left and middle panels), the distribution of VP7 was markedly different in BTV infected cells at 24 h p.i. All VIBs showed co-localization between NS2 and VP7, although there were also some foci of VP7 outside of VIBs (Fig. 3B, right panel). Evidently intracellular VP7 distribution is influenced by the presence of other BTV proteins.
In contrast to VP2 and VP7, the distribution of VP3 relative to IBs was strikingly different. In microscopy studies VP3 was exclusively localized within the VIBs in both NS2 expressing cells and in BTV infected cells (Fig. 3C, middle and right panels). The result was similar to that obtained recently with an EGFP tagged VP3 protein in BTV infected BSR cells . These results are not surprising since VP3 is closely associated with the three core proteins (VP1, VP4 and VP6) that form the transcription complex and the BTV ssRNA. This complex subsequently generates the assembly intermediate, the single layered subcore particle which takes place within the VIBs. This data also confirmed our previous study that used transient expression of NS2 and core proteins . Along with the previous publication, these data support the conclusion that unlike VP7, VP3 and inner transcription complex are closely associated with NS2 and VIBs. VP7 only associates with NS2 and VIBs through its interaction with VP3 or other BTV components. However, VP2 is never recruited within the VIBs.
The distribution of VP7 in IBs alters in the presence of scaffolding protein VP3
To further our understanding of the influence of VP3 on VP7 assembly, we monitored the distribution pattern of both VP7 and VP3 in the presence of NS2 in BSR cells. NS2 expressing cells were co-transfected with plasmids expressing VP7 and VP3 and processed for immunostaining as described in the Materials and Methods. Both VP7 and VP3 were labeled with specific antibodies (Fig. 3D). The distribution of VP7 altered dramatically when co-expressed with VP3 in the NS2 expressing cells (Fig. 3D). Both VP3 and VP7 were perfectly co-localized in a pattern that closely resembled the pattern of NS2 IBs in the cytoplasm. The overall size of these IBs (VP3+VP7+NS2) was larger than that of NS2 IBs when NS2 was expressed singly or when BTV proteins were not associated with NS2 IBs (See Fig. 1 & Fig. 3A, middle column). It could be speculated that this is due to the presence of both VP3 and VP7 in NS2 IBs, thus increasing the overall sizes of NS2 IBs.
RNA transcription takes place in NS2 IBs of a BTV infected cell
Inducible expression of truncated NS2 derivatives in mammalian cells
Inhibitory effects of NS2 fragments on BTV infection
Infectious BTV particles produced in NS2 expressing BSR cells
5.0 × 107
2.3 × 102
8.1 × 107
4.8 × 102
7.1 × 106
3.8 × 104
8.6 × 104
8.2 × 102
Expression of only the RNA binding amino-terminal region of NS2 alters the BTV egress from the infected cell
The interaction of viral proteins and the recruitment of all the necessary components for de novo genomic RNA synthesis and viral core assembly have only recently begun to be illuminated. Reports from different laboratories, including this one, have shown that the different non structural proteins of diverse members of the Reoviridae family are involved in the formation of cytoplasmic inclusions that resemble viral IBs [17, 31, 32]. Despite the lack of sequence homology, functional analysis of rotavirus NSP2 (35 kDa) and reovirus protein σNS (41 kDa) suggests that they may be homologues of BTV NS2 as all three proteins have been implicated in viral genome replication and/or packaging [17, 20, 33]. Direct analysis of infected cells is limited by the fact that all viral proteins are constantly present and the distinction between proteins that are free in the cytoplasm or partially inclusion associated is difficult. In this study we created cell lines constitutively expressing BTV NS2 proteins, the main determinant of the viral inclusion formation, by using the Tet-Off inducible expression system, specifically to examine the association of NS2 with BTV structural proteins in the absence of the complete viral replication-cycle. It is known that BTV structural proteins have inherent affinities for each other as single, double or triple layered capsids can assemble in insect cells in the absence of NS2 or VIB formation [34, 35]. However, in that system the concentration of structural proteins is very high and may obviate the need for facilitating molecules. A very similar phenomenon is observed with the assembly and release of retroviral capsids which proceeds following baculovirus expression without the P6 resident PTAP domain required for physiologically relevant assembly . Thus, a plausible role for the VIBs in virus infected cells might be to coordinate the formation of infectious particles by the recruitment of all the essential structural components followed by the sequential packaging of viral genomes.
Inducible cells expressing NS2 were used to investigate which structural proteins associate with NS2 IBs in the absence of other BTV components. From this analysis it was clear that when the major BTV structural proteins were co-expressed singly with NS2, only the inner core protein VP3 co-localized with NS2 IBs. Neither VP7 nor VP2 protein was found to be associated with IB structures. However, when VP7 was expressed in the presence of VP3, VP7 was readily moved into the NS2 IBs. Thus, VP7 interacts spontaneously with VP3 to generate the core and assembly occurs predominantly at the site of VP3 accretion with NS2. The data also support our earlier findings which showed that VP3 and the three minor proteins that form the BTV transcription complex were always seen together with NS2 IBs when cells were transfected with NS2 plasmids or infected with BTV . Together with our previous report and this current study we suggest that NS2 IBs recruit newly synthesized VP3 and the minor protein enzyme complex, soon after synthesis, in order to enucleate the essential components for virus replication. This model was further substantiated by demonstrating that the newly synthesized BTV transcripts were also localized within the NS2 IBs. This data is consistent with the data described recently which has shown that NS2 has specific binding affinity for BTV transcripts . It seems therefore likely that NS2 IBs are the site where the co-assembly of VP3, the polymerase complex and plus strand BTV RNA species takes place. Studies of VP7 assembly onto the VP3 subcore have suggested that enshrouding begins at a number of discrete sites on the VP3 shell rather than one unique site . Thus, either during subcore assembly or after completion of subcore formation, VP7 'T' trimers begin to attach to the VP3 subcore. The core particle subsequently forms a stable structure ready to release from the VIBs. During BTV infection subcore-like and core-like particles have been observed in IBs by scanning electron microscopy . Neither outer virion structural protein, VP5 or VP2, have affinity for IBs and therefore progeny core particles produced in the VIBs most likely move to periphery of the VIB to be coated by the outer capsid proteins . Interestingly, VP2 has been shown to be associated with the cell cytoskeleton . The eukaryotic cytoskeleton network undergoes considerable rearrangement following infection by certain viruses such as African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) , Vaccinia virus  and reovirus [30, 41].
Some reovirus strains show selective and temporally regulated association of the cytoskeleton with the assembly site , and most mammalian reovirus strains form microtubule associated filamentous factories . By contrast, visualization of BTV infected or NS2 expressing cells, by immunofluorescence, revealed that VIBs and NS2 IBs are globular cytoplasmic inclusions and are not associated with cytoskeleton. Most conclusively, the treatment of cells with a MT-depolymerizing agent, nocodazole, clearly indicated that there was no effect of the drug on VIBs formation in the cytoplasm.
To substantiate further the importance of NS2 and IBs in BTV replication, we generated cell lines expressing NS2 fragments. Two cell lines, one expressing amino terminal fragment and other carboxyl terminal fragment of NS2 fragments were utilized. The amino terminal 115 residues in NS2 have already been shown to contain the predominant RNA binding domain of the protein and thus may delineate functional boundaries within NS2 [20, 28, 29]. Neither fragment formed complete IBs alone but our data suggest that cells expressing the C-terminal fragment of NS2 (residues 116–357) were capable of limited NS2 antigen aggregation (punctuate as opposed to wholly diffuse staining in ΔNS2-1 cells). Protein-protein interactions via the C terminal portion of NS2 would be consistent with RNA interactions predominantly via the N-terminal 115 residues [28, 29]. When the cell lines expressing WT-NS2 were infected with BTV, the constitutive expression of the complete molecule did not have a significant effect on virus yield nor on the distribution of virions between the cell and supernatant. However, BTV infection of the two cell lines expressing NS2 fragments lead to a marked reduction in overall virus yield possibly because both fragments act as dominant negatives through an interaction with the full-length virally expressed NS2. In addition, the relative proportion of virus released from the cell and the kinetics of release were altered. As revealed by pulse-chase and EM of infected cells, ΔNS2-1 cell line expressing the RNA binding region of NS2 severely crippled the ability of NS2 to form IBs and promoted accelerated trafficking of the progeny virus particles. It is known from our previous study that the interaction between RNA and NS2 plays a role in the stable oligomerisation of NS2 . Hence, it can be hypothesized that perhaps ΔNS2-1 competes with the RNA binding activity of full-length NS2 and thereby perturbs the stability of VIBs which requires NS2-RNA interactions. In the case of ΔNS2-2, although the expression of small granular bodies could be observed, they were morphologically different to the functional inclusions formed by full-length NS2. Nevertheless, these small structures have the ability to interact with monomeric NS2 thereby interfering with the function of VIBs in virus replication. Thus, both mutants have the ability to perturb the normal virus replication and trafficking although the exact molecular basis behind these phenomena is not yet understood.
The IBs or virosomes produced in BTV infected cells have been the subject of some debate, split broadly between them being integral to virus replication and assembly or being the inadvertent consequence of another primary function . Our work shows that their previously described complexity (showing the presence of many structural and non-structural proteins) is a result of their key role in the recruitment of viral components. Their make-up is dependent only on a full-length NS2 with the C terminus of the protein being the major functional domain involved. NS2 has an innate propensity to interact with VP3, the inner core protein and through this has the ability to interact with VP7, the surface core protein. RNA binding by the amino terminal domain would complete the requirements for core formation and completed cores, now protected from the possibility of inducing an interferon response, would then be free to acquire the outer layers (VP5 and VP2) outside the IB structures. The data implies that replication and assembly are coordinated events in the IBs. The definition of the precise order of events required for completing BTV assembly and release, with the accompanying increased possibilities for prevention and control, remains an unfinished but achievable goal.
Virus and cells
BTV serotype 10 was plaque purified and propagated as described elsewhere . BSR cells, a derivative of Baby hamster kidney cells (BHK), were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin and streptomycin. BSR Tet-Off cells were maintained as described above with the addition of antibody G418 sulphate to a final concentration of 100 μg/ml. BSR-NS2 cells were maintained in the same manner as BSR Tet-Off cells but with the addition of hygromycin to 100 μg/ml and doxycycline to 1 μg/ml.
DNA manipulation and construction of DNA clones
Plasmid DNA manipulation was done essentially as described . Restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase, DNA polymerase were purchased from New England Biolabs (NEB) and calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase was obtained from Roche (Germany).
Construction of mutant NS2 genes and generation of inducible 'Tet Off' cell line
We used the following primers to clone NS2 mutants; forward primer 5' CGGGATCCCGAAATCCTTGAGTCATGGAGC 3' and reverse primer 5' CGGGATCCCG GTAAGTGTAAAATCCCCCC 3' for WT-NS2; forward primer 5' CGGGATCCCGAAATCCTTGAGTCATGGAGC 3' and reverse primer 5' CGGGATCCCGTTAAACCATCACACCATTATACTGTAC 3' for ΔNS2-1; forward primer 5' CGGGATCCCGATGGACGCTGAAATTAAATACTGTAAG 3' and reverse primer 5' CGGGATCCCGGTAAGTGTAAAATCCCCCC 3' for ΔNS2-2; forward primer 5' CGGGATCCCGAAATCCTTGAGTCATGGAGC 3' and reverse primer 5' CGGGATCCCGAAATCCTTGAGTCATGGAGC 3' for ΔNS2-3; forward primer 5' CGGGATCCCGATGTTTAAAGAGGTGGAAGC 3'and reverse primer 5' CGGGATCCCG GTAA GTGTAAAATCCCCCC 3' for ΔNS2-4. These BamH I cut PCR products were then ligated into the Bam H I site of pTRE2-Hyg (Clonetech) and used to transfect BSR Tet-Off mammalian cells (Clonetech). Stable cell lines expressing desired protein were selected using 200 μg/ml hygromycin and subsequently maintained with 100 μg/ml hygromycin.
Labeling mammalian cells and immunoprecipitation
BSR cells expressing NS2 proteins in absence of doxycycline were incubated in medium lacking Methionine and Cysteine medium for 30 min and then pulsed with 100 μCi of 35S-Met/Cys for 2 h. The cells were harvested, washed and lysed with radio-immunoprecipitation (RIPA) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA), incubated in ice for 15 min and centrifuged at 13,000 × g. Anti-NS2 polyclonal antiserum bound to protein A agarose beads (Pierce) was used to immunoprecipitate the complex form cell lysates. For immunoprcepitation of BTV proteins in NS2 cell lines, the cells were first infected with BTV 10 (MOI 0.1) and then processed for radiolabeling. Both intracellular and extracellular viruses were collected and subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-BTV antibody. All the samples were washed with RIPA buffer, analyzed by SDS-PAGE and subjected to autoradiography. NS2 cell lines maintained in the presence of doxycycline and BSR cells were used as controls.
NS2 expressing and BTV infected cells were pelleted at 2000 rpm for 10 min and fixed in 2.25% (w/v) glutaraldehyde 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) at 4°C for 40 min. After rinsing the cells were post fixed in 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide, buffered in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2), washed in water, dehydrated in acetone and embedded in low viscosity resin. Sections were stained in 2% uranyl acetate. Stained sections were examined in a Hitachi H7000 electron microscope.
Immunostaining and IF microscopy
For immunolabeling experiments 1.5 × 105 cells were seeded the day before infection or transfection in six-well plates (9.6 cm2 per well) containing 18 mm round glass cover slips. Plasmids expressing VP2, VP3 or VP7 were transfected using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer's recommendations. The cells were then processed for immunostaining as described previously . For labeling VP2, the cells were incubated with anti-VP2 monoclonal antibody, while VP3, VP7 and NS2 were labeled with polyclonal antibodies followed by appropriate Alexa Fluor 488 (green)/FITC or Alexa Fluor 594 (red)/TRITC conjugated secondary antibodies. Immunostained cells were washed three times with PBS incubated with Hoechst 33342 for nuclear staining and mounted on slides with Vectashield (Vector laboratories). Immunolabeled samples were examined by Olympus inverted microscope with fluorescence optics. Images were collected digitally using IP lab software (Scananalytics, Fairfax, VA). Hoechst 33342, IgG conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 594 were obtained from Molecular probes. Anti-β tubulin was purchased from Sigma Chemical Company. Anti-vimentin monoclonal was purchased from Oncogene.
Detection of newly synthesized RNA in vivo by IF
BSR cells were infected with BTV at MOI of 1 for 14 h, followed by treatment with actinomycin D (10 μg/ml). After 1 h cells were transfected with 10 mM BrUTP (Sigma) using 5% FuGene transfection reagent (Roche). Cells were fixed 17 h pi and processed for IF analysis with mouse anti-bromodeoxyuridine BrdU monoclonal antisera (Sigma) followed by Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-mouse IgG as secondary antibody.
BTV infectivity assay
Induced NS2 cell lines were infected with BTV-10 at an MOI of 0.1 and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Cell supernatant and pellets were collected and the cells were subjected to three freeze/thaw cycles to disrupt cells and release virus. After all the samples were collected, the viral of each sample was determined by virus plaque assay in BSR cell monolayer cultures. Uninduced NS2 cell lines and BSR cells were infected and processed as described above.
We thank L Millican (UAB, USA) for her technical assistance in electron microscopy and C. Williams (LSHTM) for his artwork. We thank Dr. J Sahani and N Iwatani for their initial contributions tothe preparation ofthe cell lines. Wethank I.M. Jones (Reading, UK) for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grant (USA).
- Eichwald C, Vascotto F, Fabbretti E, Burrone OR: Rotavirus NSP5: mapping phosphorylation sites and kinase activation and viroplasm localization domains. J Virol. 2002, 76 (7): 3461-3470. 10.1128/JVI.76.7.3461-3470.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Touris-Otero F, Martinez-Costas J, Vakharia VN, Benavente J: Avian reovirus nonstructural protein microNS forms viroplasm-like inclusions and recruits protein sigmaNS to these structures. Virology. 2004, 319 (1): 94-106. 10.1016/j.virol.2003.10.034View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szajner P, Jaffe H, Weisberg AS, Moss B: Vaccinia virus G7L protein Interacts with the A30L protein and is required for association of viral membranes with dense viroplasm to form immature virions. J Virol. 2003, 77 (6): 3418-3429. 10.1128/JVI.77.6.3418-3429.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz M, Chen J, Janda M, Sullivan M, den Boon J, Ahlquist P: A positive-strand RNA virus replication complex parallels form and function of retrovirus capsids. Mol Cell. 2002, 9 (3): 505-514. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00474-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hyatt AD, Eaton BT: Ultrastructural distribution of the major capsid proteins within bluetongue virus and infected cells. J Gen Virol. 1988, 69 (Pt 4): 805-815.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sadasiv EC, Chang PW, Gulka G: Morphogenesis of canary poxvirus and its entrance into inclusion bodies. Am J Vet Res. 1985, 46 (2): 529-535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forzan M, Wirblich C, Roy P: A capsid protein of nonenveloped Bluetongue virus exhibits membrane fusion activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (7): 2100-2105. 10.1073/pnas.0306448101PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hassan SH, Roy P: Expression and functional characterization of bluetongue virus VP2 protein: Role in cell entry. J Virol. 1999, 73 (12): 9832-9842.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hassan SH, Wirblich C, Forzan M, Roy P: Expression and functional characterization of bluetongue virus VP5 protein: role in cellular permeabilization. J Virol. 2001, 75 (18): 8356-8367. 10.1128/JVI.75.18.8356-8367.2001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eaton BT, Hyatt AD, White JR: Localization of the nonstructural protein NS1 in bluetongue virus-infected cells and its presence in virus particles. Virology. 1988, 163 (2): 527-537. 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90293-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eaton BT, Gould AR: Isolation and characterization of orbivirus genotypic variants. Virus Res. 1987, 6 (4): 363-382. 10.1016/0168-1702(87)90067-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brookes SM, Hyatt AD, Eaton BT: Characterization of virus inclusion bodies in bluetongue virus infected cells. J Gen Virol. 1993, 74 (3): 525-530.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Owens R, Roy P: Role of an Arbovirus Nonstructural Protein in Cellular Pathogenesis and Virus Release. J Virol. 2004, 78 (12): 6649-6656. 10.1128/JVI.78.12.6649-6656.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beaton AR, Rodriguez J, Reddy YK, Roy P: The membrane trafficking protein calpactin forms a complex with bluetongue virus protein NS3 and mediates virus release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (20): 13154-13159. 10.1073/pnas.192432299PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huismans H, van Dijk AA, Bauskin AR: In vitro phosphorylation and purification of a nonstructural protein of bluetongue virus with affinity for single-stranded RNA. J Virol. 1987, 61 (11): 3589-3595.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Devaney MA, Kendall J, Grubman MJ: Characterization of a non-structural phosphoprotein of two orbiviruses. Virus Res. 1988, 11 (2): 151-164. 10.1016/0168-1702(88)90040-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas CP, Booth TF, Roy P: Synthesis of bluetongue virus-encoded phosphoprotein and formation of inclusion bodies by recombinant baculovirus in insect cells: it binds the single-stranded RNA species. J Gen Virol. 1990, 71 (Pt 9): 2073-2083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uitenweerde JM, Theron J, Stoltz MA, Huismans H: The multimeric nonstructural NS2 proteins of bluetongue virus, African horsesickness virus, and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus differ in their single-stranded RNA-binding ability. Virology. 1995, 209 (2): 624-632. 10.1006/viro.1995.1294View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Theron J, Nel LH: Stable protein-RNA interaction involves the terminal domains of bluetongue virus mRNA, but not the terminally conserved sequences. Virology. 1997, 229 (1): 134-142. 10.1006/viro.1996.8389View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lymperopoulos K, Wirblich C, Brierley I, Roy P: Sequence specificity in the interaction of Bluetongue virus non-structural protein 2 (NS2) with viral RNA. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (34): 31722-31730. 10.1074/jbc.M301072200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Markotter W, Theron J, Nel LH: Segment specific inverted repeat sequences in bluetongue virus mRNA are required for interaction with the virus non structural protein NS2. Virus Res. 2004, 105 (1): 1-9. 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.04.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Butan C, Van Der Zandt H, Tucker PA: Structure and assembly of the RNA binding domain of bluetongue virus non-structural protein 2. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (36): 37613-37621. 10.1074/jbc.M400502200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horscroft N, Roy P: NTP-binding and phosphohydrolase activity associated with purified bluetongue virus non-structural protein NS2. Journal of General Virology. 2000, 81: 1961-1965.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taraporewala Z, Chen D, Patton J: Multimers of the bluetongue virus nonstructural protein, NS2, possess nucleotidyl phosphatase activity:similarities between NS2 and rotavirus NSP2. Virology. 2001, 280 (2): 221-231. 10.1006/viro.2000.0764View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Modrof J, Lymperopoulos K, Roy P: Phosphorylation of Bluetongue Virus Nonstructural Protein 2 Is Essential for Formation of Viral Inclusion Bodies. J Virol. 2005, 79 (15): 10023-10031. 10.1128/JVI.79.15.10023-10031.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kar AK, Iwatani N, Roy P: Assembly and intracellular localization of the bluetongue virus core protein VP3. J Virol. 2005, 79 (17): 11487-11495. 10.1128/JVI.79.17.11487-11495.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eaton BT, Hyatt AD, White JR: Association of bluetongue virus with the cytoskeleton. Virology. 1987, 157 (1): 107-116. 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90319-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao Y, Thomas C, Bremer C, Roy P: Deletion and mutational analyses of bluetongue virus NS2 protein indicate that the amino but not the carboxy terminus of the protein is critical for RNA-protein interactions. J Virol. 1994, 68: 2179-2185.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fillmore GC, Lin H, Li JKK: Localization of the single-stranded RNA-binding domains of bluetongue virus nonstructural protein NS2. J Virol. 2002, 76 (2): 499-506. 10.1128/JVI.76.2.499-506.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharpe AH, Chen LB, Fields BN: The interaction of mammalian reoviruses with the cytoskeleton of monkey kidney CV-1 cells. Virology. 1982, 120 (2): 399-411. 10.1016/0042-6822(82)90040-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Broering TJ, Parker JS, Joyce PL, Kim J, Nibert ML: Mammalian reovirus nonstructural protein muNS forms large inclusions and colocalizes with reovirus microtubule-associated protein mu2 in transfected cells. J Virol. 2002, 76 (16): 8285-8297. 10.1128/JVI.76.16.8285-8297.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mohan KV, Muller J, Som I, Atreya CD: The N- and C-terminal regions of rotavirus NSP5 are the critical determinants for the formation of viroplasm-like structures independent of NSP2. J Virol. 2003, 77 (22): 12184-12192. 10.1128/JVI.77.22.12184-12192.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gillian A, Nibert M: Amino terminus of reovirus nonstructural protein sigma NS is important for ssRNA binding and nucleoprotein complex formation. Virology. 1998, 240 (1): 1-11. 10.1006/viro.1997.8905View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- French TJ, Roy P: Synthesis of bluetongue virus (BTV) corelike particles by a recombinant baculovirus expressing the two major structural core proteins of BTV. J Virol. 1990, 64 (4): 1530-1536.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- French TJ, Marshall JJ, Roy P: Assembly of double-shelled, virus-like particles of bluetongue virus by the simultaneous expression of four structural proteins. J Virol. 1990, 64 (12): 5695-5700.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adamson CS, Jones IM: The molecular basis of HIV capsid assembly--five years of progress. Rev Med Virol. 2004, 14 (2): 107-121. 10.1002/rmv.418View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Limn CK, Roy P: Intermolecular interactions in a two-layered viral capsid that requires a complex symmetry mismatch. J Virol. 2003, 77 (20): 11114-11124. 10.1128/JVI.77.20.11114-11124.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhattacharya B, Noad R, P. R: Interaction between Bluetongue virus outer capsid protein VP2 and vimentin is necessary for virus egress. Virology Journal. 2007, 4:7 (15 January 2007):Google Scholar
- Heath CM, Windsor M, Wileman T: Aggresomes resemble sites specialized for virus assembly. J Cell Biol. 2001, 153 (3): 449-455. 10.1083/jcb.153.3.449PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Risco C, Rodriguez JR, Lopez-Iglesias C, Carrascosa JL, Esteban M, Rodriguez D: Endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment membranes and vimentin filaments participate in vaccinia virus assembly. J Virol. 2002, 76 (4): 1839-1855. 10.1128/JVI.76.4.1839-1855.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greber UF, Way M: A superhighway to virus infection. Cell. 2006, 124 (4): 741-754. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.018View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mora M, Partin K, Bhatia M, Partin J, Carter C: Association of reovirus proteins with the structural matrix of infected cells. Virology. 1987, 159 (2): 265-277. 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90464-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mertens PP, Burroughs JN, Anderson J: Purification and properties of virus particles, infectious subviral particles, and cores of bluetongue virus serotypes 1 and 4. Virology. 1987, 157 (2): 375-386. 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90280-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2001, Cold Spring Harbor, New York , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, ThirdGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.