We want to know more about our readers. Tell us about yourself in
our short survey
for a chance to win a MacBook Air.
Research article
Open Access
Distinctive expression patterns of 185/333 genes in the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus: an unexpectedly diverse family of transcripts in response to LPS, β-1,3-glucan, and dsRNA
A diverse set of transcripts called 185/333 is strongly expressed in sea urchins responding to immune challenge. Optimal alignments of full-length 185/333 cDNAs requires the insertion of large gaps that define 25 blocks of sequence called elements. The presence or absence of individual elements also defines a specific element pattern for each message. Individual sea urchins were challenged with pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (lipopolysaccharide, β-1,3-glucan, or double stranded RNA), and changes in the 185/333 message repertoire were followed over time.
Results
Each animal expressed a diverse set of 185/333 messages prior to challenge and a 0.96 kb message was the predominant size after challenge. Sequence analysis of the cloned messages indicated that the major element pattern expressed in immunoquiescent sea urchins was either C1 or E2.1. In contrast, most animals responding to lipopolysaccharide, β-1,3-glucan or injury, predominantly expressed messages of the E2 pattern. In addition to the major patterns, extensive element pattern diversity was observed among the different animals before and after challenge. Nucleotide sequence diversity of the transcripts increased in response to β-1,3-glucan, double stranded RNA and injury, whereas diversity decreased in response to LPS.
Conclusion
These results illustrate that sea urchins appear to be able to differentiate among different PAMPs by inducing the transcription of different sets of 185/333 genes. Furthermore, animals may share a suite of 185/333 genes that are expressed in response to common pathogens, while also maintaining a large number of unique genes within the population.
Background
Recent advances in invertebrate immunology have led to a paradigm shift in our understanding of the ways in which animals respond to immunological challenges. Previously, it was assumed that invertebrate immune response proteins were germ-line encoded and were selected over evolutionary time scales for broad recognition of conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). This was originally based on the assumption that immune diversification only occurred in jawed vertebrates through somatic recombination of the immunoglobulin (Ig) gene family that employed recombination activating gene (RAG)-mediated rearrangements of gene segments. However, recent studies on invertebrates, jawless vertebrates and higher plants have suggested that diversification of immunological responses may occur in all organisms through a variety of mechanisms. Lampreys and hagfish monoallelically express somatically diversified variable lymphocyte receptors (VLRs) that contain different numbers and sequences of leucine rich repeats (LRRs) [1–3]. In shrimp, three classes of penaeidins show significant population diversity and have varying antimicrobial activities against fungi and Gram-positive bacteria based on substitutions and deletions within the proline-rich and cysteine-rich regions [4–6]. The Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (DSCAM) gene in Drosophila has 95 exons which undergo extensive mutually exclusive alternative mRNA splicing [7]. A DSCAM homologue has also been identified in the mosquito with 101 exons [8]. The DSCAM gene potentially produces ~18,000 or ~16,000 different transcripts in Drosophila or Anopheles hemocytes, respectively, that encode a diverse set of proteins putatively involved in phagocytosis [8, 9]. In the tunicate, Ciona intestinalis, and in amphioxus, Branchiostoma floridae, IgV-region containing chitin-binding proteins (VCBP) are encoded by polymorphic gene families and may have gut associated antimicrobial function [10–15]. The freshwater snail, Biomphalaria glabrata, has 13 families of fibrinogen-related protein (FREP) genes that are expressed in response to infection with trematode parasites, and diversify through gene conversion and alternative splicing [16–18]. Finally, plant disease resistance (R) genes encoding proteins with LRR domains, which function in pathogen detection, generate diversity through a variety of mechanisms including meiotic mispairing, gene duplication and gene conversion [19–21]. The immune response of the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, is likely mediated, in part, by a number of large gene families [22]. These include Toll-like receptors (TLRs), NACHT-domain containing NOD-like receptors (NLRs) [23–25] and scavenger receptor cysteine-rich repeat-containing proteins (SRCRs) [26] that have undergone expansion and diversification in the genome of this species [22]. Thus, a wide variety of organisms are able to generate a diverse immune response using a variety of molecular mechanisms [27, 28].
In addition to the large gene families in the S. purpuratus genome mentioned above, a highly variable family of transcripts has been identified called 185/333, which shows striking increases in response to bacteria and LPS [29, 30]. Optimal alignment of the 185/333 sequences requires the insertion of large gaps that define 25 blocks of sequence called elements [31]. Different subsets of elements are present in the mRNAs that are encoded by a single exon and do not result from alternative splicing. Elements range in size from 15 to 357 nucleotides and show sequence diversity based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and small insertions/deletions (indels). cDNAs that share the same set of elements (i.e., have identical element patterns) have been used to categorize sets of cDNAs. Based on the nucleotide diversity in each of the elements, sets of cDNAs are likely to be composed of members with unique nucleotide sequences. Analysis of 81 full-length cDNAs identified significant variability based on the element pattern and sequence diversity, in addition to the position and number of several different tandem and interspersed repeats [31]. Message variations were used to define 22 different element patterns, and the nucleotide diversity resulted in 67 unique mRNAs that encoded 64 different proteins. One of the 81 cDNAs had a frame shift that resulted in missense sequence and an early stop codon. The unexpected diversity of the 185/333 mRNAs, which are expressed in response to immune challenge, has made them an intriguing gene family for understanding innate immune diversity in an invertebrate.
The 185/333 messages were originally identified from a cDNA library constructed from coelomocyte mRNA pooled from five sea urchins responding to a large dose of a mixture of whole marine bacteria [26, 29, 32, 33]. In the current study, we have simplified this approach by analyzing coelomocyte mRNA from individual animals challenged with single PAMPs – either lipopolysaccharide (LPS), β-1,3-glucan (Laminarin; Lam), or double stranded RNA (dsRNA) – to identify differences in the 185/333 mRNA repertoire in response to different immunological challenges. We report that animals injected with LPS and Lam express messages with different element patterns before vs. after immune challenge, whereas a similar result was not identified for the dsRNA challenge. The sequence diversity of the transcripts decreased in response to LPS, suggesting that a specific subset of genes may be expressed in response to this molecular pattern. On the other hand, sequence diversity increased in response to dsRNA even though the major element pattern did not change, possibly suggesting that a greater number of genes with the same element pattern are expressed. The diversity of the response suggested that the innate immune system of the purple sea urchin may have evolved to detect and respond efficiently to microbial challenge with an array of 185/333 proteins.
Results
185/333 Expression
The outbred sea urchins used in this study were injected with three different PAMPs and coelomocyte mRNA was analyzed for 185/333 expression before challenge and at various times after challenge. Messages were amplified by RT-PCR using primers that annealed to the 5' and 3' UTRs (see Methods). Sea urchins that did not respond to the initial injection, as measured by expression of Sp056, a C-type lectin called SpEchinoidin [34–36], received a second injection. In total, nine animals were used in this study and eight were challenged with a single PAMP. To compensate for the large variations in the genetic make-up of individual sea urchins [37, 38], which may be reflected in variations in the immune response, animal 2 was injected with LPS, Lam and dsRNA, in separate experiments. For clarity, this animal has been identified as 2-LPS, 2-Lam or 2-dsRNA.
185/333 transcript sizes match cDNA insert sizes
The range of expressed sizes of the 185/333 messages varied among animals and was influenced by immune challenge (Figure 1). The amplified messages ranged in size from 0.16 kb to 1.5 kb, which was generally consistent with previous results [31]. Amplicons were cloned from nine animals for both pre and post challenge and 608 cDNAs were fully sequenced. From this set of cDNAs, 23 different element patterns were identified (Figure 2) of which nine had been reported previously [31]. The major band size observed for all animals on RT-PCR gels was approximately 0.96 kb (Figure 1), which corresponded in size to the major element patterns, E2 and E2.1 through E2.6 (511 clones; Figure 2), which were 960 nucleotides (nt) in length (Tables 1, 2). A second major band observed on gels was 1.2 kb (Figure 1), which corresponded in size with four types of element patterns: C1 and C1.1 through C1.4 (38 clones), C2.1 (1 clone), D1 and D1.2 (36 clones), and D2 (2 clones) (Figure 2; Table 1). The largest amplified fragment observed prior to challenge was approximately 1.5 kb (Figure 1) and corresponded in size with patterns A6 and G1 (1 clone each). The 0.85 kb amplicon corresponded with two element patterns,01 (17 clones) and E6.1 (2 clones). Thus, the observed major band sizes on gels corresponded to the major element patterns determined by sequencing the clones.
Figure 1
Expression of 185/333 in response to various antigens. Nine animals were injected with either (A) LPS (n = 3), (B) Lam (n = 3), (C) dsRNA (n = 3), or (D) aCF (n = 2). Whole coelomic fluid (wCF) samples were collected prior to injection (pre) and at various times after challenge. The expression of both 185/333 (upper gels) and Sp056 (lower gels) were analyzed by RT-PCR in separate reactions and the agarose gels are shown. The vertical arrows indicate the time points at which the animals received injection(s). All animals received at least one injection at 0 h. Based on immune activation responses, three animals received second injections; animal 2-LPS and animal 5 at 24 h, animal 6 at 72 h.
Figure 2
Element patterns identified from sequences of the185/333amplicons. The element patterns (defined in [31]) for all of the clones isolated from this study are represented in graphical form. Different elements are shown as differently colored circles and ovals. Gaps are shown as horizontal lines. Short vertical black lines indicate the position of a stop codon and cDNAs with an early stop codon are designated by a decimal point followed by an integer. Elements with a diamond indicate the locations of indels that lead to a frame shift and missense amino acid sequence (elements with horizontal stripes). The sequences located 3' of the stop codon are shown to indicate that the remainder of the transcript sequence is present even though it may not be translated (vertical stripes). The frequency with which each pattern was identified (#) and the antigen that induced the pattern (Antigen) are indicated; L: LPS; β: Lam; R: dsRNA; a: aCF; *: whole bacterial challenge as identified in [31].
Table 1
Element patterns of 185/333 cDNAs expressed before and after challenge
Challenge:
LPS
Laminarin
dsRNA
aCF
Total
Animal
1
2
3
2
6
7
2
8
9
4
5
Pattern
Size (kb)
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
Total
A6
1.50
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
0
·
·
·
·
1
0
1
B3
1.04
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
2
0
1
0
3
3
B5
1.07
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
2
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
2
2
C1
1.18
·
·
10
0
12
3
·
·
·
·
·
1
0
·
·
·
·
·
·
9
0
32
3
35
C1.1
1.18
·
·
·
·
1
0
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
0
1
C1.2
1.18
·
·
·
·
1
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
1
2
C1.3
1.18
·
·
·
·
1
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
1
2
C1.4
1.18
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
0
1
0
1
C2.1
1.15
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
0
1
1
D1
1.16
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
1
2
0
2
3
2
1
5
0
5
5
17
22
D1.2
1.16
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
D2
1.16
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
0
2
2
D2.1
1.16
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
D3
0.99
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
0
1
1
D4
1.09
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
2
2
D5
1.09
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
E2
0.96
4
28
0
5
0
8
6
33
33
7
7
9
12
2
8
9
9
1
19
0
5
38
167
205
E2.1
0.96
11
0
·
·
·
·
8
2
1
40
37
21
19
44
28
30
29
5
5
·
·
159
121
280
E2.2
0.96
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
E2.3
0.96
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
0
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
1
2
E2.4
0.96
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
E2.5
0.96
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
E2.6
0.96
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
E3
0.93
·
·
0
2
0
2
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
0
1
·
·
0
6
6
E4
0.95
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
E5
0.96
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
E6.1
0.87
0
2
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
2
2
F1
1.06
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
F1.1
1.06
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
1
G1
1.44
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
0
1
1
01
0.86
·
·
0
1
0
1
·
·
3
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
0
3
0
1
0
10
10
01.1
0.86
·
·
·
·
2
0
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
0
1
2
2
4
01.2
0.86
·
·
·
·
1
0
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
1
0
1
01.3
0.86
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
0
1
1
03.1
0.56
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
0
1
1
04
0.2
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
0
1
1
05
0.16
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
3
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
3
3
06
0.08
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
·
·
0
1
·
·
0
2
2
07
0.86
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
3
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
0
3
3
Total clones
15
31
10
12
18
18
15
36
42
42
44
32
44
46
41
43
40
7
43
10
14
243
365
608
Different patterns
2
3
1
7
6
8
3
3
7
7
2
4
10
2
6
4
3
3
14
2
6
12
35
39
-, pre challenge; +, post challenge
Table 2
Sequence diversity in cDNA sets#
Pre-injection
Post-injection
Total
Diversity Score
Challenge
Animal
cDNA Pattern
# of clones
unique clones
dn/ds
Div. score
# of clones
unique clones
dn/ds
Div. score
# of clones
unique clones
dn/ds
Div. score
Pre
Post
Total
LPS
1
E2
4
3
0.93
0.002
28
12
0.88
0.009
32
14
0.50
0.010
2
C1
10
9
1.87
0.012
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
3
E3
·
·
·
·
6
5
0.22
0.003
·
·
·
·
0.365
0.216
0.325
C1
12
8
0.36
0.005
·
·
·
+
15
10
0.63
0.007
E2
·
·
·
·
8
7
0.78
0.012
·
·
·
·
β-1,3-glucan (Lam)
2
E2
6
6
1.00
0.007
32
15
1.16
0.009
38
20
1.47
0.010
E2.1
8
3
0.54
0.005
·
·
·
+
10
4
0.72
0.007
6
1
·
·
·
·
3
3
0.46
0.003
·
·
·
·
E2
·
·
·
·
33
20
0.77
0.009
·
·
·
·
0.287
0.320
0.323
7
E2
7
4
0.72
0.007
7
7
0.49
0.008
14
9
0.55
0.009
E2.1
39
12
0.42
0.007
37
12
0.50
0.009
76
19
0.47
0.006
dsRNA
2
E2
9
8
0.73
0.011
12
8
0.91
0.014
21
14
0.88
0.017
E2.1
21
7
0.96
0.006
19
4
0.24
0.002
40
10
0.62
0.004
8
E2
2
2
·
+
8
6
0.97
0.008
10
7
0.82
0.008
E2.1
44
19
0.72
0.01
28
10
1.00
0.008
72
28
0.93
0.007
0.198
0.336
0.231
9
D1
3
3
0.15
0.002
·
·
·
+
5
5
0.49
0.003
E2
9
9
1.00
0.005
9
7
0.87
0.007
18
14
1.14
0.008
E2.1
30
8
0.79
0.007
29
8
1.00
0.007
59
15
1.03
0.009
aCF
4
D1
·
·
·
·
5
5
0.71
0.023
·
·
·
·
E2
·
·
·
+
19
16
1.16
0.014
20
17
1.00
0.015
E2.1
·
·
·
+
5
4
1.00
0.002
10
4
1.00
0.002
0.328
0.337
0.370
5
C1
9
8
1.70
0.006
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
D1
·
·
·
·
5
5
0.99
0.015
·
·
·
·
E2
·
·
·
·
5
4
1.00
0.004
·
·
·
·
# Modeled alignments have been used to understand diversity scores. A diversity score of 0.0954 represents an alignment in which 10% of the sequences have variations at 30% of nucleotide positions. A score of 0.0197 indicates that 1% of the sequences have a single change in 30% of the nucleotide positions [29].
+ Diversity scores were not determined because fewer than three unique sequences were identified. However, sequences were included for calculating total diversity scores.
Patterns 05 and 06, isolated from animal 2-dsRNA, were much shorter than the other clones from both this study and from previous work [31]. Pattern 06 (79 nt, 2 clones) only had a 5' UTR and element 25b with no other elements (Figure 2 and Additional File 1, see clone 2–2423). Pattern 05 (161 nt, 3 clones) had a 5'UTR followed by the leader and elements 1 and 2. The remainder of the elements were missing and no stop codon was identified (Figure 2). Pattern 05 was similar in size to the 0.2 kb fragment amplified by RT-PCR from animal 2-dsRNA (Figure 1C). Pattern 04 had a 5'UTR and leader followed by element 1 and part of element 25 (Figure 2). It was cloned from animal 4, although a fragment of 0.2 kb was not observed on the gel (Figure 1D).
LPS challenge
All animals injected with LPS (1, 2, and 3) showed similar expression patterns and changes in expression over time (Figure 1A). A C-type lectin called Sp056 was used to assess levels of immune activation [34–36]. It was expressed by animal 1 prior to challenge and increased expression by 24 hours (h) after challenge, whereas animal 2-LPS and animal 3 expressed Sp056 only after challenge. This indicated that these animals were either immunoquiescent (no expression of Sp056) or down-regulated (very low expression of Sp056) at the start of the experiment and that immune challenge with LPS activated their immune response. Prior to challenge, animal 1 expressed 185/333 transcripts ranging in size from 0.96 kb to 1.5 kb, and after challenge began to express a predominant 0.96 kb fragment at 3 h that became the only discernable band by 24 h. Sequence analysis showed that the most common element pattern identified prior to challenge for animal 1 was E2.1 (11 of 15 clones; Table 1, Figure 2). After injection with LPS, 185/333 expression changed such that E2.1 expression diminished and the predominant element pattern was E2 (28 of 31 clones). For a description of mRNAs with early stop codons (i.e., element pattern E2.1), see early stop codons below.
Animal 2-LPS expressed three message sizes prior to challenge but by 24 h after the first challenge, only two predominant message sizes were observed (Figure 1A). The 27 h sample from animal 2-LPS did not show any 185/333 fragments, although Sp056 expression was detected (data not shown). By 48 h, 24 h after the second challenge, the 0.96 kb fragment was present. The only pre-challenge element pattern identified from animal 2-LPS was C1 (10 clones), which was not found among the post-challenge clones (Table 1, Figure 2). After injection, an assortment of element patterns was identified from 12 clones.
Although animal 3 expressed four 185/333 sizes both before and after challenge with LPS, the major band size changed from 1.5 kb to 0.96 kb (Figure 1A). The set of clones collected prior to challenge was composed of six distinct element patterns, with the major pattern being C1 (12 of 18 clones). Seven different element patterns were isolated from animal 3 after injection (Table 1; Figure 2). Similar to animal 1, E2 (8 of 18 clones) was the predominant pattern expressed post-challenge (Table 1; Figure 2).
Analysis of 104 clones isolated from three animals challenged with LPS revealed that patterns C1 (22 clones) and E2.1 (11 clones) represented the majority of transcript types isolated prior to challenge (33 of 104 clones). In contrast, of the 61 clones analyzed from the 24 h sample, the predominant patterns were E2 (41 clones) or E3 (4 clones; Table 1; Figure 2). However, among the more rare element patterns (those isolated fewer than four times), there were differences in the types and numbers of patterns present among the three animals that had received LPS.
β-1,3-glucan challenge
The three animals (2, 6, and 7) injected with β-1,3-glucan (laminarin; Lam) expressed similarly sized 185/333 messages prior to and after challenge (Figure 1B). Animal 2-Lam did not show expression of either Sp056 or 185/333 prior to or at 3 h after challenge. However, by 24 h, Sp056 transcription was detected in addition to two sizes of 185/333 messages, the most prominent of which was 0.96 kb. Prior to injection, the major element patterns were E2 (6 of 15 clones) and E2.1 (8 of 15 clones). After injection, however, the E2 pattern (33 of 36 clones) was the principal pattern identified (Table 1; Figure 2).
Neither 185/333 nor Sp056 were expressed by animal 6 either prior to challenge or at 24 h. Consequently, a second injection of Lam was given 3 days (d) after the initial injection, and gene expression was measured on d 4. A single 185/333 fragment (0.96 kb) was observed in addition to Sp056 expression on d 4 (Figure 1B). Because animal 6 did not express detectable 185/333 transcripts prior to injection, the only sample used for sequencing was after the second injection (4 d). Of the 42 clones characterized, seven different patterns were identified (Table 1; Figure 2) of which the principal element pattern was E2 (33 clones).
Animal 7 expressed three sizes of 185/333 messages, the predominant being 0.96 kb, which was present both before and after challenge with Lam (Figure 1B). Lack of Sp056 expression indicated that the immune response of animal 7 was immunoquiescent prior to injection and at 3 h, but was activated by 24 h. Of the 91 clones that were sequenced from animal 7, E2.1 was the most common pattern both before (40 of 47 clones) and after challenge (37 of 44) (Table 2; Figure 2)
In general, animals challenged with Lam expressed a 0.96 kb fragment 24 h after injection, which was similar to the response observed for animals challenged with LPS. Two of the three sea urchins challenged with Lam expressed a diverse set of 185/333 transcripts including messages with rarely observed pattern types (Table 1). The predominant post challenge pattern was E2 for animal 2-Lam and animal 6, which was consistent with the response to LPS, and consistent with responses to injury (injections of artificial coelomic fluid [aCF], discussed below). This was in contrast to animal 7, which did not alter 185/333 expression in response to Lam, but continued to express E2.1 despite changes in Sp056 expression that indicated that the immune response had been activated.
dsRNA challenge
All three animals (2, 8, and 9) challenged with dsRNA expressed similarly sized 185/333 transcripts (Figure 1C). Prior to injection, all expressed the major 0.96 kb band, even though the absence of Sp056 expression suggested that all animals were immunoquiescent. Expression of Sp056 in these animals increased in response to challenge, indicating immune activation. After challenge, all three animals continued to express the 0.96 kb fragment, while animal 2-dsRNA and animal 9 expressed additional larger (>0.96 kb) transcripts. At 24 h, animal 2-dsRNA expressed an additional ~0.2 kb band, the only time a message of this size was observed on gels.
Most of the clones isolated and sequenced from animal 2-dsRNA both before (21 of 32 clones) and after (19 of 44 clones) challenge with dsRNA were the E2.1 pattern, although the E2 pattern was also isolated after challenge (12 of 44 clones) (Table 1). Similarly, animal 8 expressed the E2.1 pattern both before (44 of 46 clones) and after (28 of 41 clones) challenge. Only four 185/333 message patterns were obtained from animal 9, of which all were identified in animal 8 and/or animal 2-dsRNA. The major pattern expressed by animal 9 was E2.1 both before (30 of 43 clones) and after (29 of 40 clones) challenge. Among the three animals analyzed, the sizes (Figure 1C) and element patterns (Table 2) of the 185/333 transcripts appeared to be unaffected by dsRNA challenge, which was the only PAMP that did not induce obvious changes in the element patterns for the 185/333 messages.
Response to Injury
Because each PAMP was suspended in aCF, injections of aCF into two animals (animals 4 and 5) served as injury controls (Figure 1D). Animal 4 expressed a multitude of transcripts ranging in size from 0.96 kb to 1.5 kb before injury and at 3 h after injection. However, by 24 h, only the 0.96 kb fragment was observed. Expression of Sp056 was only observed at 24 h, indicating that animal 4 was immunoquiescent prior to injury. Sequences of clones from animal 4 before injury yielded three different element patterns with E2.1 as the major pattern (5 of 7 clones; Table 1). After injury, 14 element patterns were identified (Table 1), the majority of which were E2 (19 of 43 clones).
Animal 5 expressed three message sizes prior to injury and at 1 h after injection of aCF (Figure 1D). At 24 h post injury, Sp056 expression remained undetectable, suggesting that the immune response had not been activated. Therefore, a second injection of aCF was given at 24 h, and by 48 h (24 h after a second injection of aCF), expression of Sp056 indicated that the animal had activated its immune system. The 0.96 kb 185/333 transcript was first observed at 3 h and remained until 48 h post injury, becoming the predominant transcript at 24 h. The major element pattern expressed in animal 5 prior to injury was C1 (9 of 10 clones). After injection of aCF, six different element patterns were identified from 14 clones with D1 (5 clones) and E2 (5 clones) as the most common patterns. Overall, the animals responding to injury predominantly expressed element patterns C1 and/or E2.1 prior to injury and E2 after injury, although there were differences in the minor patterns expressed in each animal.
Animal 2
Analysis of 185/333 expression in a single sea urchin challenged with different PAMPs over time was valuable due to the 4.5% difference among genomes of individual sea urchins [37, 38]. We have assumed that this level of genetic variation among individuals would create differences in immune responses and make comparisons difficult. Therefore, we followed a single individual through the experimental protocol to eliminate the possibility that the observed differences in 185/333 expression were the result of individual variations rather than differential responses to the PAMPs. Animal 2 received separate injections of LPS, Lam, and dsRNA in that order during the study. The animal was rested for 17 months after the LPS challenge and 15 months after challenge with Lam and the entire experiment required over 4 years to complete, including 17 months that the animal was housed in our aquaria without manipulation before the initial injection of LPS. Because the life span estimate for S. purpuratus is about 50 years [38], an increase in age by four years for animal 2 was not expected to have an impact on immune responsiveness. The level of immune activation for animal 2 was monitored by the expression of Sp056 before and after each challenge. Sp056 was not expressed prior to challenge with LPS and Lam, indicating immunoquiescence, but was expressed at low levels prior to dsRNA challenge, suggesting only down-regulation of the immune response (Figure 1). Animal 2 expressed a set of 185/333 transcripts with a variety of element patterns in response to LPS, Lam and dsRNA. Prior to challenge with LPS, C1 was the only pattern identified (10 of 10 clones), whereas after challenge, E2 was the most common pattern (5 of 12 clones; Table 1). Upon return to immunoquiescence and prior to Lam challenge, animal 2 expressed both E2 and E2.1 (6 and 8 respectively of 15 clones). Following challenge with Lam, the animal again predominantly expressed E2 (33 of 36 clones). However, both before and after challenge with dsRNA, animal 2 primarily expressed element pattern E2.1 (21 of 32 clones pre-injection; 19 of 44 clones post-injection). Although the lack of Sp056 expression or its low expression prior to each of the three challenges suggested that animal 2 had returned to immunoquiescence, the animal expressed different 185/333 patterns before each challenge, which may suggest that it had retained a low response level to the previous challenge. Given that animal 2 did not appear to have responded to dsRNA by changing the expressed 185/333 element patterns, it is noteworthy that it switched from expressing pattern E2.1 to pattern E2 in response to LPS and Lam. Not only did animal 2 exhibit variation in the 185/333 responses to challenges, but also showed variations in the expressed element patterns between challenges.
Sequence Diversity
In addition to the variety of element patterns present in the 185/333 mRNAs, significant nucleotide sequence diversity was observed that resulted in different deduced amino acid sequences in the encoded proteins (see Additional file 1). The mRNA diversity was analyzed in two ways: 1) ratios of nonsynonymous vs. synonymous (dn/ds) nucleotide substitutions, and 2) entropy-based sequence diversity scores [31]. Dn/ds ratios of greater than 1.0 indicate that genes are under selective pressure for diversification [39]. Diversity scores are based on the frequency of different nucleotides present at each position within a given alignment and are influenced by any nucleotide change, regardless of whether or not that change alters the protein sequence [40].
Nonsynonymous/synonymous ratios
Dn/ds values were obtained from individual sea urchins for sets of cDNAs (transcripts with unique nucleotide sequences but with the same element pattern) that had three or more members (Table 2). The C1 element pattern from animal 2-LPS prior to challenge had a dn/ds ratio greater than 1, as did the E2 pattern from animal 2 after Lam challenge. For the two animals that served as the injury controls, element pattern C1 in animal 5 prior to challenge and pattern E2 in animal 4 after challenge also had elevated dn/ds ratios.
The dn/ds scores for 185/333 sequences had been calculated previously from cDNAs obtained from a library derived from coelomocytes pooled from five sea urchins [31]. In comparing the dn/ds scores of 185/333 sequences from individual animals, we found that they were lower than those from pooled mRNA. This difference may be due either to the genetic variation among animals [37] or to different complexities of immunogens that were used to challenge the animals. To test this, the dn/ds ratios were calculated for all E2 sequences isolated in this study (205 clones encoding 109 unique sequences obtained from nine animals) and were compared to the dn/ds ratio reported previously for E2 (24 clones with 15 unique sequences) from five animals used to construct the cDNA library [31]. Notably, the dn/ds ratio for the nine animals in this study was 0.7205, whereas that for the previous dataset was 1.267. The difference between these results was unlikely due to differences in methods used to generate the clones (clones from a conventional library vs. cloned RT-PCR amplicons, see methods). It was more likely that the set of 185/333 messages expressed by five animals responding to a complex mixture of marine bacteria [31] was more diverse than the messages expressed by nine animals responding to specific PAMPs.
Element diversity
In an effort to characterize the diversity among the elements and to identify possible hypervariable regions, diversity scores were calculated for specific elements before and after challenge. The diversity score of element 1 increased more than three fold after challenge with LPS and Lam, but did not change in response to dsRNA or injury (data not shown). Sequence diversity in the remaining elements expressed in response to LPS, Lam, dsRNA, or injury did not show discernable changes compared to pre-challenge diversity. Similar results were obtained from an analysis of elements in messages from animal 2 responding to all three PAMPs (data not shown). Therefore, despite changes in expressed element patterns in response to challenge, the sequence diversity of individual elements did not change (with the exception of element 1). Furthermore, the 185/333 sequences from individual sea urchins did not reveal elements or regions that were hypervariable, which was in agreement with the previous report [31].
Diversity of cDNA sets
Diversity scores were also calculated for sets of cDNAs (Table 2). For all animals in which E2 and E2.1 were expressed, diversity scores for E2 consistently increased after challenge, whereas changes in E2.1 diversity scores were variable (Table 2). When cDNA sets from individuals were combined for both pre- and post-challenge, diversity scored tended to be higher than when pre- and post-challenge sets were calculated independently (Table 2; columns labeled total). Although there were some exceptions to this result, it suggested that, although the same patterns were present both before and after challenge, different sequence variants of messages with the same element patterns were expressed at different times during an immune challenge.
Diversity scores were also calculated for sequences collected from all animals responding to the same PAMP (Table 2; last 3 columns). Comparisons showed that scores increased in response to Lam and dsRNA. On the other hand, scores decreased for animals injected with LPS, and scores for the injury controls remained about the same. This indicated that a set of 185/333 messages with increased diversity was expressed in response to Lam and dsRNA, whereas LPS and injury did not induce a similar response.
Because the E2 pattern was the only message type expressed by all animals, the diversity of this pattern type was calculated and compared to the E2 diversity scores from individuals. When all E2 sequences were analyzed, the diversity score was 0.0154, which was equal to or greater than the diversity scores obtained from each of the E2 sets from individual animals (Table 1). This suggested that although all animals expressed E2, the nucleotide diversity of this pattern was higher among the population than within individuals. However, because the dn/ds score for E2 was low, the variability in the nucleotide sequence inferred from the diversity scores indicated that the nucleotide changes did not have a greatly alter the amino acid sequence. Overall, diversity scores of cDNA sets from individual animals were lower than scores for sets of sequences from all nine animals. The implication was that sea urchins share 185/333 genes that have common element patterns, but that the common patterns do not share identical sequence.
Animal 2 injected with each PAMP
Diversity scores and dn/ds ratios of cDNAs collected from animal 2 were compared among the three challenges (Table 3). Element patterns E2 and E2.1 were expressed in animal 2 both pre- and post-challenge and were employed in an analysis of sequence variability. The dn/ds ratios for E2 and E2.1 increased in response to challenge while diversity scores remained about the same. This indicated that although the nucleotide diversity did not change in response to immune challenge, the sequence variation present after challenge (dn/ds ratios) likely led to changes in the amino acid sequence.
Table 3
Sequence diversity of cDNA sets from animal 2
Pre-injection
Post-injection
Total
cDNA Pattern
# of clones
unique clones
dn/ds
Diversity score
# of clones
unique clones
dn/ds
Diversity score
# of clones
unique clones
dn/ds
Diversity Score
E2.1
29
9
0.61
0.003
21
5
0.99
0.002
50
13
0.68
0.003
E2
15
14
1.02
0.011
45
22
1.22
0.010
60
33
1.27
0.012
Early stop codons
In addition to introducing changes in the deduced amino acid sequence, sequence diversity also introduced frame shifts and altered the positions of stop codons. Previous analysis had established the locations of three possible stop codons associated with element 25 [31]. Sequence analysis showed that in addition to the stop codons in element 25, 50% of the cDNAs had an early stop in a different element. Of the eight general pattern types (A to 0, Table 1; Figure 2) that were identified in this study, five (C to F and 0; Table 1) had members with a stop codon positioned 5' of element 25 (i.e., E2.1, E2.2, etc; see Figure 2). Four of the patterns with an early stop codon (E2.1, E2.6, E2.5, and 01.3; Figure 2 and Additional file 2) had a SNP that changed a translated codon to a stop codon. The remaining patterns had small indels which introduced frame shifts (Figure 2, designated by a diamond in the element) that led to missense sequence and an early stop codon. If translated, these variations in the mRNAs would result in truncated proteins.
Discussion
Previous reports analyzed cDNAs from coelomocytes pooled from five animals challenged with a mixture of marine bacteria [30, 32, 33]. This led to the identification of the 185/333 transcripts, a diverse family of messages expressed in response to immune challenge [29, 31]. The current study presents a simplified approach for investigating the expression patterns of 185/333 genes by challenging individual animals with small amounts of single PAMPs. The substantial diversity evident in the 185/333 sequences is illustrated by the identification of 23 different element patterns in this study (excluding variants with early stop codons) plus 21 element patterns described previously [31]. From these two sources of cDNAs, nine element patterns are shared for a total of 35 different patterns identified from 14 sea urchins. When the nucleotide sequences were compared for these two data sets, 62% of the messages were unique and the C1 element patterns (13 of 42 clones) were shared between the sets [this study; [31]].
Changes in Element Patterns
The sea urchins employed in this study expressed different 185/333 genes in response to various PAMPs. Changes in the expression of messages with different element patterns were identified by sequencing cDNA clones isolated from nine animals. The general trend in 185/333 expression in response to each PAMP indicated a shift from primarily C1 and E2.1 expression in immunoquiescent coelomocytes to E2 as the predominant element pattern after challenge (Table 4). The shift from C1 to E2 was a significant change in the message and the encoded protein, implying a change in gene expression after immune challenge. The shift from E2.1 to E2 was significant as well, because the presence of a SNP that changed the position of the first stop codon caused a major change in the putative translated protein. This trend was not observed for animals responding to dsRNA, which maintained expression of the E2.1 pattern after challenge. It has been noted previously that the 185/333 response to injury progresses more slowly than responses to bacteria [30]. Unlike the response to LPS and Lam, the animals responding to injury tended to express patterns E2 and D1 patterns (Table 4). Although there were differences in element patterns expressed in different animals, animal 2 demonstrated that individual sea urchins most likely expressed different patterns over time and in response to different challenges.
Table 4
Summary of responses to PAMPs
PAMP
Major Pattern
# of Different Minor Patterns§
Diversity Change
Pre
Post
Pre
Post
LPS
E2.1, C1
E2
6
13
decrease
Lam*
E2.1
E2
3
8
increase
dsRNA
E2.1
E2.1
3
12
increase
injury
E2.1, C1
E2, D1
3
13
no change
*No pre-injection data were collected for animal 6.
§Number of different minor patterns combined from the three animals responding to a single PAMP.
In addition to the expression of major element patterns, each animal expressed an array of mRNAs with rarely observed element patterns that were generally not shared among individuals. In response to immune challenge, the number of different rare element patterns expressed in individual sea urchins increased in seven of 10 animals (animal 2 was used three times and animal 6 did not have pre-injection data; see bottom of Table 1, Figure 2). The number of rare element patterns increased in all groups of animals responding to all PAMPs (Table 4) and 27 of 35 rare patterns were present only after challenge (including rare patterns with altered stop codon positions, and excluding all major patterns; E2, E2.1, C1, D1; Table 1). The rare patterns constituted an interesting aspect of the diversity in 185/333 expression after challenge. These results suggested that there may be a suite of genes found in all sea urchins that encode the most common or major element patterns and that there may be a much larger number of genes encoding rare or minor element patterns that are present in low frequencies within the population.
185/333 Sequence Diversity
Extensive nucleotide diversity was present in the 185/333 cDNA sequences such that 60% of sequences were unique (using leader through element 25, excluding flanking sequence) and 50% of the cDNAs had a premature stop codon. Many of the clones with early stop codons were found only once, but others (E2.1, E2.3, E6.1, and 01.1; Figure 2) were identified multiple times with identical element patterns and early stop codons in identical positions. One obvious source of the observed message diversity would be sequence diversity within the 185/333 gene family. However, preliminary sequence analysis of more than 180 unique 185/333 genes shows that, except for one pseudogene with an unusual deletion, there were no early stop codons or frame shifts within the two exons (Buckley and Smith, unpublished). This implies that post-transcriptional processing of an unknown nature may be altering mRNA sequences.
The deduced proteins have an N-terminal glycine-rich region and a C-terminal histidine-rich region [29, 31]. Messages with early stop codons would putatively encode truncated 185/333 proteins that include only portions of these two regions. The most common 185/333 patterns, C1 and E2, had stop codons at expected positions in element 25 and encoded proteins with 382 and 292 amino acids, respectively. However, E2.1 had an early stop in element 12 such that the E2.1 protein would only have 142 amino acids consisting of the glycine-rich region and missing most of the C-terminal histidine-rich region. Although the functionality of the proteins encoded by these abbreviated transcripts is unknown, it is an intriguing possibility that the glycine-rich region of the 185/333 proteins may have functions that can be altered by the absence of the histidine-rich region. Functional truncated proteins are unusual, but some have been demonstrated in other systems [41, 42]. Preliminary analysis of 185/333 protein sizes indicates that not only do these proteins appear to multimerize, but they reveal intermediate sizes not predicted by a single full-length cDNA (Brockton et al, unpublished data). Consequently, the transcripts with early stop codons may be translated and perhaps some of the truncated proteins have a role in 185/333 activity.
Gene Expression
Message diversity appeared to be influenced by both the type of challenge and the individual responding to the challenge. Previous work indicates that large doses of marine bacteria induce the 185/333 response within 6 h [33], while small doses of LPS and other PAMPs induce response more slowly. Animals responding to LPS showed decreases in sequence diversity after challenge in addition to changes in element patterns. This may indicate that the LPS-induced response selectively alters transcription to a smaller set of 185/333 genes that would putatively encode proteins that may have some association with LPS. On the other hand, animals injected with dsRNA did not show a change in the element patterns of the 185/333 messages even though nucleotide sequence diversity of those messages increased after challenge. Consequently, it was difficult to determine whether sea urchins respond to viral molecular signatures. Because nothing is known about sea urchin-specific viruses, it is not clear whether polyGC is recognized as a threat, and it is also not clear whether the antiviral response involves 185/333 proteins. Recent studies in shrimp show that dsRNA of low complexity may not induce responses to the same degree as highly complex dsRNA [43]. Alternatively, the rate of the sea urchin response to dsRNA may be slower than that observed for LPS and Lam, and the lack of obvious changes in element patterns may be the result of terminating the experiment too early. The beginnings of responses to dsRNA may have been present because both animal 2-dsRNA and animal 8 showed post-challenge increases in messages of the E2 pattern, and all of the animals showed elevated sequence diversity.
The response to Lam was not striking. Two of the three animals responding to Lam showed the switch to E2 expression after challenge, but there was only a small increase in sequence diversity. β-1,3-glucan is isolated from giant kelp, Laminaria, and because kelp is a favored food of the purple sea urchin, this molecular pattern may not be recognized as a strong immunogen. On the other hand, the 185/333 proteins may not interact with fungal immunogens. Injury did not induce a change in sequence diversity of the messages, which was unlike responses to PAMPs.
Changes in message prevalence are typically attributed to changes in transcriptional activity of the genes or to decreases in the rate of message degradation. Yet it is feasible that changes in the messages could also be the result of changes in subpopulations of coelomocytes responding to immune challenge. Preliminary results indicate that the 185/333 proteins are expressed in two subpopulations of phagocytes, of which one increases in numbers in response to LPS (Brockton et al., unpublished; Majeske and Smith, unpublished). However, for a change in coelomocyte populations to alter the types and prevalence of specific 185/333 mRNA, there must be a restricted expression of 185/333 genes in specific coelomocytes. Restricted gene expression has been noted for VLR genes in lamprey lymphocytes [1, 44], has been proposed as a theory for sea urchin TLRs [22] (see below), and is theoretically feasible for 185/333-positive coelomocytes. However, verification of this notion will require analysis of 185/333 expression in single coelomocytes.
Because the sequence diversity and element patterns changed during the 185/333 response to different PAMPs in individuals, this implies that sea urchins may have mechanisms to differentiate between the foreign molecular patterns that may dictate the regulation of 185/333 gene expression. The purple sea urchin has a large family of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) that are expressed on coelomocytes [22, 38]. Speculation on function of TLRs suggests that they may be restricted in expression to a few per coelomocyte and that possible combinatorial interactions on coelomocyte cell surfaces may result in diverse yet highly specific pathogen recognition capabilities [28]. Although the analysis of the 185/333 gene promoters is underway, it is not currently known whether the TLR detection system is involved in the regulation of this gene family. However, the estimated size of the 185/333 gene family and the diversity of the 185/333 response appears to fit with the complexity of the TLR genes.
Large Gene Families
Immune systems typically have large gene families, as exemplified by the Ig family, which includes the novel immune-type receptor (NITR) genes in fish [45] and the FREP genes in snails [16, 18]. Often, immune genes are closely linked, which is a locus structure that appears to promote gene duplication and sequence diversification, and is an organization that has been noted for FREP genes [18]. Large families of linked genes in the sea urchin are also putatively associated with immune function including TLRs and NLRs [22, 28, 38]. Many of the sea urchin TLR genes are closely linked and show sequence diversity in the LRR domains, a result that is reminiscent of LRR domain diversity in the plant R genes, which are also closely linked [19–21, 46, 47]. Similarly, the 185/333 genes are present in the genome as a large family of very closely linked genes ([31], Buckley and Smith, unpublished) and this may promote sequence diversification for this family as well. Although RAG homologues have been identified in the sea urchin genome [22, 48], it is not known whether the echinoderm recombinases are involved in immune diversification. Consequently, for organisms lacking higher vertebrate mechanisms for somatic diversification of immune genes, a number of alternative mechanisms are expected to exist to maintain an edge in the arms race with the pathogens.
Conclusion
There are several conclusions that can be drawn from the data presented here. Changes in element patterns and sequence diversity of the 185/333 mRNAs occurred in response to immune challenge and the encoded proteins may be directed towards specific PAMPs. However, changes in element patterns did not always correlate with changes in sequence diversity of mRNAs (Table 4). The predominantly expressed element patterns changed in response to LPS, Lam and injury, but not in response to dsRNA. Sequence diversity increased for Lam and dsRNA, decreased for LPS, and did not change in response to injury. Although challenge with either Lam or dsRNA caused an increase in nucleotide diversity, decreased sequence diversity was observed after LPS challenge, possibly indicating transcription of a smaller set of genes. Due to the minimal changes in element patterns following challenge, it was possible that sea urchins may not have recognized polyGC as pathogenic. Differential responses to the PAMPs indicated that sea urchins could differentiate among the molecular patterns and mount different responses to those challenges.
The striking diversity of the sequences among the small sample of animals reported here and previously [31] implies that the variety of the 185/333 sequences within the population is large. There may be a core set of genes that are shared among all purple sea urchins that are augmented by a large number of genes that are more rare in the population. Preliminary work on the structure of the 185/333 gene locus suggests that the number and orientation of 185/333 genes may promote diversification as has been shown for R genes in plants [46]. Future work in the area of innate immune diversification is expected to reveal a multitude of mechanisms to accomplish this end in a variety of organisms.
Methods
Animals
This study followed previously published protocols for generating and using immunoquiescent sea urchins [36, 49–51]. Sea urchins were maintained in marine aquaria without manipulation for at least 17 months prior to the current study.
Animal Challenge and Tissue Collection
Sea urchins were challenged with LPS in a manner similar to that described previously and was based on the estimated volume of the coelomic fluid (CF) from each animal [36, 49, 51]. Sea urchins were injected with 2 μg of LPS per 1 ml CF (n = 3 animals), or 4 μg of either laminarin (Lam; n = 3 animals; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or polyGC (dsRNA; n = 3 animals; Sigma Aldrich) per 1 ml CF to simulate an infection with gram-negative bacteria, fungi, or virus, respectively. Each antigen was suspended in aCF (10 mM CaCl2, 14 mM KCl, 50 mM MgCl2, 398 mM NaCl, 1.7 mM Na2HCO3, 25 mM Na2SO4) and injected through the peristomial membrane directly into the coelomic cavity of the sea urchin. Samples of whole coelomic fluid (wCF; fluid plus cells) were taken 15 min before challenge and 24 h after challenge. Two animals were used as injury controls and received injections of aCF using the same timing and volumes as the PAMP challenges. Animal 2-LPS and animal 5 were injected a second time at 24 h and samples were taken at 48 h. Animal 6 received a second injection of Lam at 3 days. Expression of Sp056 (GenBank Acc. # AY336600) was were used to assess immune activation [34, 36]. Amplification of SpL8 (a homologue of ribosomal L8) and actin were used as controls for gel loading and cDNA integrity (data not shown). These controls indicated that the absence of amplicons for 185/333 and Sp056 was due to expression that was below the detection sensitivity of the gel imaging system rather than a protocol failure.
Samples of wCF were collected into anti-coagulant buffer (aCF with 50 mM imidazole pH 7.4, 30 mM EDTA), centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C and the pelleted coelomocytes were lysed and stored in RNA later (Ambion Diagnostics, Austin, TX). Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) per the manufacturer. Total RNA samples were treated with DNase using the DNA-free kit per the manufacturer (Ambion, Austin, TX).
RT-PCR
Reverse transcription (RT) was performed on 1 μg of total RNA as previously described [36]. A pair of primers (5'UTR forward: TAG CAT CGG AGA GAC CT; 3'UTR reverse: AAA TTC TAC ACC TCG GCG AC) specific for 185/333 were designed to anneal in the untranslated regions (UTRs) of the known 185/333 transcripts and amplified the entire coding region [29, 31]. Expression of Sp056 (GenBank Acc. # AY336600, [35]) was analyzed with Sp056F (GCA CAG CCA GCA ACC AGC ACT ACA AT) and Sp056R (ACG CCG ATG GGT TCT ACA GTG AAG GT) primers, which amplified a 640 bp fragment of the message. Amplification of different transcripts was always done in separate reactions. Each PCR reaction of 20 μl had 1 μM forward primer, 1 μM reverse primer, 0.5 μM of each deoxynucleotide, 2 mM MgCl2, 1× company supplied buffer, 0.5 U of ExTaq polymerase (Takara Bio, Otsu, Shiga, Japan), plus 1 μl of the RT reaction, which served as the cDNA template. Reactions were performed with a Mastercycler Gradient thermocycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) using the following program: 94°C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 55°C (185/ 333) or 68°C (Sp056) for 30 s, 72°C for 2 min with a final hold at 4°C. Images of the agarose gels were obtained with a DC120 digital camera (Eastman Kodak Co. New Haven, CT) with Digital Science1D software ver. 3.0.0 (Eastman Kodak Co.).
Cloning and Sequencing
Cloning into pCR4-TOPO vector was performed with 1 μl of the PCR reaction using the TOPO-TA Cloning kit for Sequencing (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) per the manufacturer. The cDNA clones were grown overnight and plasmids were isolated using Wizard Plus SV Minipreps DNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen).
Plasmids were sequenced directly using universal T7 and T3 primers with 2× to 9× coverage. Sequencing was completed using either the DTCS Quick Start Kit for Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and analyzed on a CEQ8000 DNA sequencer (Beckman Coulter) or plasmids were sent to SeqWright DNA Technology Services (Houston, TX). Sequences have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers EF065719 through EF066327.
The fidelity of the Taq polymerase used in this study was tested to ensure that sequence diversity observed was not a byproduct of Taq-induced errors. One clone (Sp0228, GenBank Acc. # DQ183174; see Table S1 in [31]) with an insert of 1519 nt was amplified by PCR and re-cloned as described above. Subclones (n = 24) were sequenced and alignments were used to identify and quantify the number of nucleotide errors. An error rate of 1/18,228 nt was calculated (2 errors in 36,456 bases {24 clones multiplied by 1,519 nt}), which equates to one Taq-induced error in about 18 clones (608 cDNA clones yielded 602,635 nt).
Bioinformatics
Sequence alignments were performed with BioEdit [52]. WinClada ver. 1.00.08 [53] was used to identify identical sequences from the nucleotide alignments. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees were created in MEGA3 [54] and employed in Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML) [55] using three dn/ds models (M1, M2 and M20) to identify statistically significant non-synonymous and synonymous (dn/ds) ratios. Diversity scores were acquired using an in-house Perl script implementing an entropy equation [40] as previously described [31].
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Drs. David Raftos and Paul S. Gross and three anonymous reviewers for very helpful improvements to the manuscript. Dr. Sheri Church provided valuable advice for the dn/ds analysis and Pat Riordan assisted with sequencing. Heather Del Valle provided valuable assistance with bioinformatics. The research was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (MCB-0424235) to LCS.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University
(2)
DPT, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University
(3)
NJR, Butler University
References
Adler NM, Rogozin IB, Iyer LM, Glazko GV, Cooper MD, Pancer Z: Diversity and function of adaptive immune receptors in a jawless vertebrate. Science. 2005, 310: 1970-1973. 10.1126/science.310.5746.199cView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Pancer Z, Amemiya CT, Ehrhardt GR, Ceitlin J, Gartland GL, Cooper MD: Somatic diversification of variable lymphocyte receptors in the agnathan sea lamprey. Nature. 2004, 430 (6996): 174-180. 10.1038/nature02740View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Pancer Z, Saha NR, Kasamatsu J, Suzuki T, Amemiya CT, Kasahara M, Cooper MD: Variable lymphocyte receptors in hagfish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102 (26): 9224-9229. 10.1073/pnas.0503792102PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Cuthbertson BJ, Bullesbach EE, Fievet J, Bachere E, Gross PS: A new class (penaeidin class 4) of antimicrobial peptides from the Atlantic white shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus) exhibits target specificity and an independent proline-rich-domain function. Biochem J. 2004, 381 (Pt 1): 79-86.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Cuthbertson BJ, Shepard EF, Chapman RW, Gross PS: Diversity of the penaeidin antimicrobial peptides in two shrimp species. Immunogenetics. 2002, 54 (6): 442-445. 10.1007/s00251-002-0487-zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Cuthbertson BJ, Yang Y, Bachere E, Bullesbach EE, Gross PS, Aumelas A: Solution structure of synthetic penaeidin-4 with structural and functional comparisons with penaeidin-3. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (16): 16009-16018. 10.1074/jbc.M412420200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Schmucker D, Clemens JC, Shu H, Worby CA, Xiao J, Muda M, Dixon JE, Zipursky SL: Drosophila Dscam is an axon guidance receptor exhibiting extraordinary molecular diversity. Cell. 2000, 101 (6): 671-684. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80878-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Dong Y, Taylor HE, Dimopoulos G: AgDscam, a hypervariable immunoglobulin domain-containing receptor of the Anopheles gambiae innate immune system. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4 (7): e229- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040229PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Watson FL, Puttmann-Holgado R, Thomas F, Lamar DL, Hughes M, Kondo M, Rebel VI, Schmucker D: Extensive diversity of Ig-superfamily proteins in the immune system of insects. Science. 2005, 309 (5742): 1874-1878. 10.1126/science.1116887View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Azumi K, De Santis R, De Tomaso A, Rigoutsos I, Yoshizaki F, Pinto MR, Marino R, Shida K, Ikeda M, Ikeda M, Arai M, Inoue Y, Shimizu T, Satoh N, Rokhsar DS, Du Pasquier L, Kasahara M, Satake M, Nonaka M: Genomic analysis of immunity in a Urochordate and the emergence of the vertebrate immune system: "waiting for Godot". Immunogenetics. 2003, 55 (8): 570-581. 10.1007/s00251-003-0606-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Cannon JP, Haire RN, Litman GW: Identification of diversified genes that contain immunoglobulin-like variable regions in a protochordate. Nat Immunol. 2002, 3 (12): 1200-1207. 10.1038/ni849View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Cannon JP, Haire RN, Rast JP, Litman GW: The phylogenetic origins of the antigen-binding receptors and somatic diversification mechanisms. Immunol Rev. 2004, 200: 12-22. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00166.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Litman GW, Cannon JP, Rast JP: New insights into alternative mechanisms of immune receptor diversification. Adv Immunol. 2005, 87: 209-236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Loker ES, Adema CM, Zhang SM, Kepler TB: Invertebrate immune systems--not homogeneous, not simple, not well understood. Immunol Rev. 2004, 198: 10-24. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0117.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Zhang SM, Adema CM, Kepler TB, Loker ES: Diversification of Ig superfamily genes in an invertebrate. Science. 2004, 305 (5681): 251-254. 10.1126/science.1088069View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hulbert SH, Webb CA, Smith SM, Sun Q: Resistance gene complexes: evolution and utilization. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2001, 39: 285-312. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.285View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Parniske M, Hammond-Kosack KE, Golstein C, Thomas CM, Jones DA, Harrison K, Wulff BB, Jones JD: Novel disease resistance specificities result from sequence exchange between tandemly repeated genes at the Cf-4/9 locus of tomato. Cell. 1997, 91 (6): 821-832. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80470-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Parniske M, Jones JD: Recombination between diverged clusters of the tomato Cf-9 plant disease resistance gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96 (10): 5850-5855. 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5850PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hibino T, Loza-Coll M, Messier C, Majeske AJ, Cohen AH, Terwilliger DP, Buckley KM, Brockton V, Nair SV, Berney K, Fugmann SD, Anderson MK, Pancer Z, Cameron RA, Smith LC, Rast JP: The immune gene repertoire encoded in the purple sea urchin genome. Dev Biol. 2006, 300 (1): 349-365. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.065View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Inohara N, Chamaillard M, McDonald C, Nunez G: NOD-LRR proteins: role in host-microbial interactions and inflammatory disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005, 74: 355-383. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133347View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kufer TA, Fritz JH, Philpott DJ: NACHT-LRR proteins (NLRs) in bacterial infection and immunity. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13 (8): 381-388. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.06.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Pancer Z: Dynamic expression of multiple scavenger receptor cysteine-rich genes in coelomocytes of the purple sea urchin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97 (24): 13156-13161. 10.1073/pnas.230096397PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Flajnik MF, Du Pasquier L: Evolution of innate and adaptive immunity: can we draw a line?. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25 (12): 640-644. 10.1016/j.it.2004.10.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rast JP, Smith LC, Loza-Coll M, Hibino T, Litman GW: Genomic insights into the immune system of the sea urchin. Science. 2006, 314 (5801): 952-956. 10.1126/science.1134301PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Nair SV, Del Valle H, Gross PS, Terwilliger DP, Smith LC: Macroarray analysis of coelomocyte gene expression in response to LPS in the sea urchin. Identification of unexpected immune diversity in an invertebrate. Physiol Genomics. 2005, 22 (1): 33-47. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00052.2005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rast JP, Pancer Z, Davidson EH: New approaches towards an understanding of deuterostome immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2000, 248: 3-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Terwilliger DP, Buckley KM, Mehta D, Moorjani PG, Smith LC: Unexpected diversity displayed in cDNAs expressed by the immune cells of the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Physiological Genomics. 2006, 26 (2): 134-144. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00011.2006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Cameron RA, Mahairas G, Rast JP, Martinez P, Biondi TR, Swartzell S, Wallace JC, Poustka AJ, Livingston BT, Wray GA, Ettensohn CA, Lehrach H, Britten RJ, Davidson EH, Hood L: A sea urchin genome project: sequence scan, virtual map, and additional resources. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97 (17): 9514-9518. 10.1073/pnas.160261897PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Pancer Z, Rast JP, Davidson EH: Origins of immunity: transcription factors and homologues of effector genes of the vertebrate immune system expressed in sea urchin coelomocytes. Immunogenetics. 1999, 49 (9): 773-786. 10.1007/s002510050551View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Multerer KA, Smith LC: Two cDNAs from the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, encoding mosaic proteins with domains found in factor H, factor I, and complement components C6 and C7. Immunogenetics. 2004, 56 (2): 89-106. 10.1007/s00251-004-0665-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Smith LC, Chang L, Britten RJ, Davidson EH: Sea urchin genes expressed in activated coelomocytes are identified by expressed sequence tags. Complement homologues and other putative immune response genes suggest immune system homology within the deuterostomes. J Immunol. 1996, 156 (2): 593-602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Terwilliger DP, Clow LA, Gross PS, Smith LC: Constitutive expression and alternative splicing of the exons encoding SCRs in Sp152, the sea urchin homologue of complement factor B. Implications on the evolution of the Bf/C2 gene family. Immunogenetics. 2004, 56 (7): 531-543. 10.1007/s00251-004-0711-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Britten RJ, Cetta A, Davidson EH: The single-copy DNA sequence polymorphism of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Cell. 1978, 15 (4): 1175-1186. 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90044-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Davidson EH, Cameron RA, Gibbs RA, Angerer RC, Angerer LM, Arnone MI, Burgess DR, Burke RD, Coffman JA, Dean M, Elphick MR, Ettensohn CA, Foltz KR, Hamdoun A, Hynes RO, Klein WH, Marzluff W, McClay DR, Morris RL, Mushegian A, Rast JP, Smith LC, Thorndyke MC, Vacquier VD, Wessel GM, Wray G, Zhang L, Elsik CG, Ermolaeva O, Hlavina W, Hofmann G, Kitts P, Landrum MJ, Mackey AJ, Maglott D, Panopoulou G, Poustka AJ, Pruitt K, Sapojnikov V, Song X, Souvorov A, Solovyev V, Wei Z, Whittaker CA, Worley K, Durbin KJ, Shen Y, Fedrigo O, Garfield D, Haygood R, Primus A, Satija R, Severson T, Gonzalez-Garay ML, Jackson AR, Milosavljevic A, Tong M, Killian CE, Livingston BT, Wilt FH, Adams N, Belle R, Carbonneau S, Cheung R, Cormier P, Cosson B, Croce J, Fernandez-Guerra A, Geneviere AM, Goel M, Kelkar H, Morales J, Mulner-Lorillon O, Robertson AJ, Goldstone JV, Cole B, Epel D, Gold B, Hahn ME, Howard-Ashby M, Scally M, Stegeman JJ, Allgood EL, Cool J, Judkins KM, McCafferty SS, Musante AM, Obar RA, Rawson AP, Rossetti BJ, Gibbons IR, Hoffman MP, Leone A, Istrail S, Materna SC, Samanta MP, Stolc V, Tongprasit W, Tu Q, Bergeron KF, Brandhorst BP, Whittle J, Berney K, Bottjer DJ, Calestani C, Peterson K, Chow E, Yuan QA, Elhaik E, Graur D, Reese JT, Bosdet I, Heesun S, Marra MA, Schein J, Anderson MK, Brockton V, Buckley KM, Cohen AH, Fugmann SD, Hibino T, Loza-Coll M, Majeske AJ, Messier C, Nair SV, Pancer Z, Terwilliger DP, Agca C, Arboleda E, Chen N, Churcher AM, Hallbook F, Humphrey GW, Idris MM, Kiyama T, Liang S, Mellott D, Mu X, Murray G, Olinski RP, Raible F, Rowe M, Taylor JS, Tessmar-Raible K, Wang D, Wilson KH, Yaguchi S, Gaasterland T, Galindo BE, Gunaratne HJ, Juliano C, Kinukawa M, Moy GW, Neill AT, Nomura M, Raisch M, Reade A, Roux MM, Song JL, Su YH, Townley IK, Voronina E, Wong JL, Amore G, Branno M, Brown ER, Cavalieri V, Duboc V, Duloquin L, Flytzanis C, Gache C, Lapraz F, Lepage T, Locascio A, Martinez P, Matassi G, Matranga V, Range R, Rizzo F, Rottinger E, Beane W, Bradham C, Byrum C, Glenn T, Hussain S, Manning G, Miranda E, Thomason R, Walton K, Wikramanayke A, Wu SY, Xu R, Brown CT, Chen L, Gray RF, Lee PY, Nam J, Oliveri P, Smith J, Muzny D, Bell S, Chacko J, Cree A, Curry S, Davis C, Dinh H, Dugan-Rocha S, Fowler J, Gill R, Hamilton C, Hernandez J, Hines S, Hume J, Jackson L, Jolivet A, Kovar C, Lee S, Lewis L, Miner G, Morgan M, Nazareth LV, Okwuonu G, Parker D, Pu LL, Thorn R, Wright R: The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Science. 2006, 314 (5801): 941-952. 10.1126/science.1133609View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Nei M, Gojobori T: Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 1986, 3 (5): 418-426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Durbin R, Eddy S, Krogh A, Mitchison G: Biological sequence analysis, probability models of proteins and nucleic acids. 1998, Cambridge, UK , Cambridge University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Park IH, Yeon SI, Youn JH, Choi JE, Sasaki N, Choi IH, Shin JS: Expression of a novel secreted splice variant of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) in human brain astrocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Mol Immunol. 2004, 40 (16): 1203-1211. 10.1016/j.molimm.2003.11.027View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Zhao FQ, Zheng Y, Dong B, Oka T: Cloning, genomic organization, expression, and effect on beta-casein promoter activity of a novel isoform of the mouse Oct-1 transcription factor. Gene. 2004, 326: 175-187. 10.1016/j.gene.2003.10.023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Robalino J, Payne C, Parnell P, Shepard E, Grimes AC, Metz A, Prior S, Witteveldt J, Vlak JM, Gross PS, Warr G, Browdy CL: Inactivation of White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) by normal rabbit serum: implications for the role of the envelope protein VP28 in WSSV infection of shrimp. Virus Res. 2006, 118 (1-2): 55-61. 10.1016/j.virusres.2005.11.011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Nagawa F, Kishishita N, Shimizu K, Hirose S, Miyoshi M, Nezu J, Nishimura T, Nishizumi H, Takahashi Y, Hashimoto S, Takeuchi M, Miyajima A, Takemori T, Otsuka AJ, Sakano H: Antigen-receptor genes of the agnathan lamprey are assembled by a process involving copy choice. Nat Immunol. 2007, 8 (2): 206-213. 10.1038/ni1419View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Yoder JA, Litman RT, Mueller MG, Desai S, Dobrinski KP, Montgomery JS, Buzzeo MP, Ota T, Amemiya CT, Trede NS, Wei S, Djeu JY, Humphray S, Jekosch K, Hernandez Prada JA, Ostrov DA, Litman GW: Resolution of the novel immune-type receptor gene cluster in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101 (44): 15706-15711. 10.1073/pnas.0405242101PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Fugmann SD, Messier C, Novack LA, Cameron RA, Rast JP: An ancient evolutionary origin of the Rag1/2 gene locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (10): 3728-3733. 10.1073/pnas.0509720103PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Clow LA, Gross PS, Shih CS, Smith LC: Expression of SpC3, the sea urchin complement component, in response to lipopolysaccharide. Immunogenetics. 2000, 51 (12). 10.1-1033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Shah M, Brown KM, Smith LC: The gene encoding the sea urchin complement protein, SpC3, is expressed in embryos and can be upregulated by bacteria. Dev Comp Immunol. 2003, 27 (6-7): 529-538. 10.1016/S0145-305X(03)00030-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Smith LC, Britten RJ, Davidson EH: Lipopolysaccharide activates the sea urchin immune system. Dev Comp Immunol. 1995, 19 (3): 217-224. 10.1016/0145-305X(95)00009-IView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hall TA: 1999, 41: 95-98. BioEdit: a user friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
