The ICP22 protein selectively modifies the transcription of different kinetic classes of pseudorabies virus genes
© Takács et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 23 June 2012
Accepted: 24 January 2013
Published: 29 January 2013
Pseudorabies virus (PRV), an alpha-herpesvirus of swine, is a widely used model organism in investigations of the molecular pathomechanisms of the herpesviruses. This work is the continuation of our earlier studies, in which we investigated the effect of the abrogation of gene function on the viral transcriptome by knocking out PRV genes playing roles in the coordination of global gene expression of the virus. In this study, we deleted the us1 gene encoding the ICP22, an important viral regulatory protein, and analyzed the changes in the expression of other PRV genes.
A multi-timepoint real-time RT-PCR technique was applied to evaluate the impact of deletion of the PRV us1 gene on the overall transcription kinetics of viral genes. The mutation proved to exert a differential effect on the distinct kinetic classes of PRV genes at the various stages of lytic infection. In the us1 gene-deleted virus, all the kinetic classes of the genes were significantly down-regulated in the first hour of infection. After 2 to 6 h of infection, the late genes were severely suppressed, whereas the early genes were unaffected. In the late stage of infection, the early genes were selectively up-regulated. In the mutant virus, the transcription of the ie180 gene, the major coordinator of PRV gene expression, correlated closely with the transcription of other viral genes, a situation which was not found in the wild-type (wt) virus. A 4-h delay was observed in the commencement of DNA replication in the mutant virus as compared with the wt virus. The rate of transcription from a gene normalized to the relative copy number of the viral genome was observed to decline drastically following the initiation of DNA replication in both the wt and mutant backgrounds. Finally, the switch between the expressions of the early and late genes was demonstrated not to be controlled by DNA replication, as is widely believed, since the switch preceded the DNA replication.
Our results show a strong dependence of PRV gene expression on the presence of functional us1 gene. ICP22 is shown to exert a differential effect on the distinct kinetic classes of PRV genes and to disrupt the close correlation between the transcription kinetics of ie180 and other PRV transcripts. Furthermore, DNA replication exerts a severe constraint on the viral transcription.
The pseudorabies virus (PRV), an alpha-herpesvirus, is the etiological cause of Aujeszky’s disease of swine. PRV is related to the human pathogen varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and -2), and the animal herpesvirus bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV-1). PRV is widely used as a model organism in investigations of the molecular pathomechanisms of the herpesviruses, and is a useful tool for the mapping of neural circuits[3, 4]. Attempts have additionally been made to utilize this virus as a gene delivery vector[5, 6] and an oncolytic agent. Besides the lytic phase, alpha-herpesviruses can enter a latent state, where they transcribe a limited set of cis-antisense RNAs. Traditionally, the lytic herpesvirus genes are classified into three kinetic categories: immediate-early (IE) genes, early (E) genes and late (L) genes. On a finer scale, an intermediate category, the early/late (E/L = delayed early) genes can also be distinguished. PRV encodes a single IE gene, the ie180 gene. The IE180 protein, a transactivator, is the principal coordinator of the overall gene expression of the virus. E genes encode proteins required for the nucleotide metabolism and DNA replication. Other E genes such, as the early protein 0 (ep0) and ul54 genes, encode transcriptional regulators. Most of the L genes code for structural elements of the virus. ICP22 is one of the five IE proteins of HSV-1, which is encoded by the us1 gene. Intriguingly, a large part of the HSV us1 gene is located in the unique US region, whereas its promoter and a short 5’ portion of the transcribed region are in the inverted repeat (IR) segment. In PRV, however, the entire us1 gene (earlier called the rsp40 gene) resides in the IR region; this gene is therefore represented in two copies in the PRV genome. There is no consensus as to whether the PRV us1 gene is expressed in IE or E kinetics. We demonstrated in an earlier analysis that this gene is expressed in atypical kinetics, and that it is obviously not an IE gene. The function of the ICP22 polypeptide has primarily been analyzed in HSV-1. The investigations have revealed that ICP22 is a multifunctional protein that plays roles in various aspects of HSV pathogenesis. It has not yet clearly established whether ICP22 acts to repress E genes or to enhance the transcription of L genes. It has been shown that not all L genes require this transactivator for their expressions. The BICP22 protein of BHV-1, a homologue of ICP22, has been demonstrated to exert a general repressive effect on each kinetic class. Rice and coworkers reported that ICP22 acts at the level of transcriptional regulation. However, the level of ICP0 mRNA was also reduced in the us1 knockout (KO) HSV, which raises the question of whether the direct cause of the reduced transcription is the lack of us1 gene activity or the low ICP0 mRNA level. ICP22 has to be phosphorylated by the viral UL13 protein kinase in order to accomplish the transcriptional activation of L genes. An additional function of the ICP22 polypeptide is associated with the alteration of the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase cdc2, a regulator of the cell cycle, which results in a selective up-regulation of HSV L genes during lytic infection. Furthermore, HSV ICP22 also acts to modify the phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II), which carries out the transcription of viral genes. One of the major control regions of RNAP II is its carboxy terminal domain (CTD), residing on the large subunit of the molecule. The CTD, containing multiple repeats of a heptapeptide sequence, serves as a binding site for various cellular proteins involved in the regulation of transcription. ICP22 is presumed to trigger the loss of Ser-2 phosphorylation on the CTD, and thereby modify the activity of RNAP II. A novel function of ICP22 was recently identified, involving alteration of the chaperon localization of the host cells. It has been shown that ORF63, the ICP22 homolog of VZV, does not alter RNAP II phosphorylation and the host chaperon machinery, which might indicate that ICP22 acts in a species- or genus-specific manner. In the present study, we have investigated the effects of us1 gene deletion on the overall transcription of PRV genes.
Results and discussion
An insertion mutant PRV strain was constructed which contains the mutation in both copies of the us1 gene. Mutation of a DNA sequence in the internal repeat region is copied to the terminal repeat by a mechanism called equalization. From among the 70 PRV genes, 32 were selected for the transcription analysis, which reside at the upstream position of the tandem gene clusters and which represent each kinetic class of PRV genes. The reason for this choice was to exclude the distorting effect of the transcriptional read-through exerted by the upstream genes on the downstream genes. Furthermore, the genes selected for analysis play important roles in the regulation of the overall gene expression of the virus, including the ie180, the ep0 (and their antisense transcripts, the LAT and the AST, respectively), the virion host shut-off (vhs), and the ul54 genes. For each viral gene, a minimum of 3 parallel replicates were performed in order to achieve statistical reliability. Immortalized PK-15 cells were infected with either the wild-type (wt) or us1 gene-deleted (us1-KO) PRV, using a high multiplicity of infection [MOI; 10 plaque-forming units (pfu)/cell]. The low-dose infections produce a much finer resolution of the cycle threshold (Ct) values for the transcripts than in the case of high-dose infections; however, in the former case a large proportion of the cells remain uninfected, which allows the initiation of an additional infection cycle after 6 h post-infection (pi) by the newly generated virions, which would confuse the interpretation of the expression data obtained. The transcription of PRV genes was monitored at 9 different time points: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 24 h pi (multi-timepoint analysis). Strand-specific primers were used for the reverse transcription reaction so as to exclude the distorting effects of the potential cis-antisense transcripts that might be produced from the complementary DNA strands, which cannot be avoided on the use of other methods, such as oligo-dT- or random priming-based reverse transcription. On the other hand, we found that the specificity of strand-specific primer-based RT is much higher than that of other methods. In our work, we applied a modified version of the mathematical model described by Soong and colleagues for the relative quantification. Specifically, we used the average of the 6-h ECt-sample values of the wt PRV for each gene in both the wt and the mutant backgrounds, as controls, which were normalized to the average of the corresponding 28S values (ECt-reference). The 28S RNA gene was used as a reference gene since the ribosomal RNAs are not substrates of VHS ribonuclease. We used a selected Ct value (at 6 h in our system) as control for the comparability of the relative copy numbers of a transcript at different time points. The relative amounts of the transcripts of different genes cannot be compared directly due to the variation in the primer efficiencies in both RT and PCR. However, the use of multi-timepoint qPCR analysis allows a comparison of the transcription kinetics of different viral genes throughout the whole period of infection. Furthermore, this method allows a comparison of the same genes in the two genetic backgrounds (Rr = Rus1KO),/Rwt), and of the mRNAs and the complementary antisense transcripts in the case of the ep0/LAT and ie180/AST pairs. A high Rr value indicates an inhibitory effect of the ICP22 protein on the transcript level of a particular gene in the wt virus. Conversely, a low Rr value indicates a stimulatory effect on the gene expression. We applied the same logic for the interpretation of the data obtained as is used in other knockout organisms, i.e. the normal role of the us1 gene is considered to be the opposite of that of the phenotype caused by the mutation of this gene. In other words, an elevated expression of a gene in the us1-null mutant is indicative of a suppressive effect of the ICP22 protein on the expression of this gene.
Confirmation of the mutant genotype
The mutation in the us1 gene was confirmed by PCR amplification of the DNA sequences containing the mutation, followed by pyrosequencing. The mutation of the us1 gene was rescued, and this was followed by growth analysis in order to confirm that the altered kinetic properties can be solely explained by the abrogation of the us1 function (data not shown). Besides these analyses, we also carried out more precise techniques for this purpose. Thus, we compared the rates of increase of viral DNA during the first twelve hours of viral infection. We observed similar dynamics in the growth rates of the DNA of the wild-type and rescued viruses, while both differed significantly from those of the us1-mutant virus (Additional file1). In addition, we compared the transcription kinetics of the two most important transactivator genes, the ie180 and ep0 genes of pseudorabies virus. This revealed that the kinetics of the rescued virus resembled that of the wild-type virus, but differed significantly from that of the mutant virus (Additional file2 and Additional file3).
Transcription of the us1 gene in the wild-type PRV
The impact of the us1 gene mutation on the viral transcriptome
Comparison of the effects on gene expression in three mutant PRV strains
The expression of the ie180 gene is correlated with the expressions of the PRV genes in the us1-KO virus
We previously reported that the expression of the ie180 gene, the major transactivator of the wt virus, was uncorrelated with the expressions of the remaining genes. When we investigated this relationship in the us1-KO virus by using Pearson correlation analysis, very high correlations emerged between the ie180 transcripts and the transcripts produced by all three kinetic classes of the PRV genes (Additional file5A). The correlation was especially high between the ie180 and the E transcripts. Interestingly, we observed a similar effect in the vhs-null mutant as concerns of the correlation between the ie180 and the other viral genes.
The initiation of DNA replication is delayed in the us1-KO as compared with the wt virus
Investigation of the expression kinetics of PRV genes in the mutant and wt viruses through the use of R values normalized to the relative copy numbers of the DNA
Normalization of the R values to the relative DNA copy number leads to the ie180 gene correlating with the other viral genes in the wt background
Normalization of the R values of the cDNAs to the copy number of the viral DNAs leads to a very strong correlation between the ie180 and the other genes in both genetic backgrounds (Additional file5B). It is noteworthy that the strength of the correlation between the ie180 and the different kinetic classes of genes is the opposite that in the non-normalized case. These data suggest that the synchronism in the transcription between the IE180 transactivator and the other genes is indicative of a real correlation. However, since the DNA replication imposes a severe constraint on the transcription of each gene, including the ie180 gene, the high correlation between the normalized data could possibly be merely a statistical curiosity without any functional significance. Additional file6 shows the R values of ie180, the average total viral genes and the average of various kinetic classes of genes normalized to the DNA copy number at different time points of infection.
Our kinetic data show that the abrogation of the us1 function leads to a significant reduction of transcription in every kinetic class of genes in the first hour pi. In the period 1 to 6 h pi, the L genes are selectively down-regulated, and the E genes are later up-regulated in the us1-KO background relative to the wt virus. The questions as to whether the ICP22 protein exerts a direct effect upon the gene expression and, if so, at what levels remains to be answered. It is noteworthy that deletion of the vhs gene resulted in a similar overall expression pattern as that observed in the us1-KO virus, and in an expression profile complementary to those in the ep0-KO virus. Interestingly, ep0 was the gene that was most affected in both the us1 and vhs knockout viruses (highly elevated expressions), which might imply that EP0 could be a common link in the determination of the overall gene expression profile. We observed a strong inhibition of transcription during DNA replication. The question arises of whether the process of DNA replication itself could exert this inhibitory effect. In the mutant virus, the main inhibition in gene expression occurs between 4 and 6 h pi, while DNA synthesis exhibits the highest rate 2 h later. This suggests that the decrease in gene expression is not, or not only, a result of the potential collision of the transcription and DNA replication machineries. We have earlier shown that disruption of the function of the vhs gene of the virus results in synchronization of the gene expression profile of the ie180 and the remaining PRV genes. We obtained very similar results with the us1 gene-deleted PRV: the expression of the ie180 gene correlated with those of the other PRV genes in the mutant virus, which was not the case for the wt virus. The question may be posed of whether this correlation is directly associated with the disruption of the us1 gene function, or is rather caused by the delay of DNA replication.
Cells and viruses
Monolayer cultures of porcine kidney epithelial cells (PK-15) were used for the propagation of the pseudorabies virus. Cells were grown in DMEM (Sigma Aldrich), supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 80 μg of gentamicin per ml (Invitrogen) at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2. The Kaplan wt strain of PRV was used as the parental strain for the generation of the us1-null mutant virus (us1-KO).
Construction of the us1 gene knockout virus
The Ka-us1-KO (us1-KO, in short) virus was generated as follows. As a first step the Bam HI-10 fragment of PRV was isolated from the gel, and was then subcloned to pRL525, resulting in the generation of pRL525-B10. This plasmid was used as a template for the PCR amplification of the two arms of the flanking sequences providing homology with the target viral genomic region. A green-fluorescent protein (GFP) gene expression cassette (Clontech) was inserted into the unique Ecl136 II site of the targeting sequence, resulting in pUS1-gfp, which was used as the transfer plasmid for the generation of the knockout virus. The linearized transfer plasmid was transfected along with the purified wt viral DNA into PK-15 cells. The recombinant virus was generated by homologous recombination, then isolated and plaque-purified on the basis of the fluorescence. Rescued viruses were generated by using pUS1 as a transfer plasmid, which was co-transfected with the purified DNA of us1-KO to PK-15 cells. The revertant viruses were selected on the basis of the non-fluorescent plaque phenotype. Both mutant and rescued viruses were checked with DNA sequencing.
The virus stock used for the experiments was prepared by infecting PK-15 cells with low-dose viruses, followed by incubation of the cells until a complete cytopathic effect was observed. To assess the effect of the us1 gene deletion on the transcription kinetics of PRV, rapidly-growing semi-confluent PK-15 cells were infected with the wt or us1-KO virus at a high multiplicity of infection [MOI; 10 plaque forming units (pfu)/cell], and incubated for 1 h, which was followed by removal of the virus suspension and washing of the cells with PBS. Subsequently, fresh culture medium was added to the cells, which were further cultivated for an additional 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 or 24 h.
Isolation of RNAs
Infected or non-infected PK-15 cells were washed with PBS and harvested for RNA purification. Total RNA was isolated by using the NucleoSpin RNA II Kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH and Co. KG) as recommended by the supplier. Briefly, harvested cells were collected by low-speed centrifugation, and lysed in the buffer included in the kit. Samples were treated with RNase-free rDNase solution (included in the Kit) to remove potential genomic DNA contamination. As the next step, the potential residual DNA contamination was removed by using Turbo DNase (Ambion Inc.). Subsequently, RNA samples were eluted in RNase-free water (supplied with the kit), resulting in a total volume of 60 μl of RNA solution. RNA concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically in a BioPhotometer Plus (Eppendorf). The RNA solution was stored at −80°C until use.
Total RNA samples were reverse-transcribed by using gene-specific primers, and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) as described in our earlier reports[9, 34]. Briefly, RT mixtures containing total RNA, primer, SuperScript III enzyme, buffer, dNTP mix and RNase inhibitor (RNAsin, Promega) were incubated at 55°C for 1 h. The amplification of the first-strand cDNA synthesis was terminated by keeping the samples at 70°C for 15 min. The cDNAs were diluted 10-fold with nuclease-free water (Promega Corp.) and the solutions were stored at −80°C until use.
SYBR Green-based (Absolute QPCR SYBR Green Mix, Thermo Scientific) quantitative real-time PCRs were performed on the first-strand cDNAs in a real-time PCR cycler (Rotor-Gene 6000, Corbett Life Sciences), as described in our previous studies[9, 30]. The specificity of the reverse transcription and the PCR reactions was ensured by using no-RT, no-primer, and no-template controls. The accuracy of sampling was guaranteed by using 28S rRNA of swine as loading control. The specificity of the PCR products was confirmed by melting point analysis, PAGE and/or DNA sequencing.
We used pyrosequencing with a Pyromark Q24 pyrosequencer (Qiagen) to validate the mutation of the us1 gene and the specificity of the PCR products obtained in the kinetic experiments in the event of doubt.
The cDNAs were all normalized to the cDNAs of the 28S rRNAs of swine by using the Comparative Quantitation module of the Rotor-Gene 6000 software (Version 1.7.28, Corbett Research), which automatically sets the thresholds and calculates the efficiency of PCR reactions. We used the average 6-h ECt values of the “samples”, with those of the “references” as controls, as in our earlier works[9, 30, 34]. The R values of the viral DNAs were calculated similarly; the 6-h ECt values were taken as the control, and porcine 28S rRNA gene was used as the reference. The effect of deletion of the us1 gene on the global gene expression was calculated by using Rr, the ratio of the R values of the us1 mutant and the wt viruses (Rr = Rus1KO/Rwt), where Rus1KO and Rwt are the R values of a particular gene at a given time point in the us1-KO and wt genetic background, respectively. All data were analyzed by using the average and the standard deviance functions of Microsoft Excel. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated for the analysis of the correlation between the expression kinetics of the genes, using the following formula:
. The normalized R values were calculated by dividing the appropriate R value of the cDNA by the R value of the viral DNA measured at the same time for the same sample. The Pearson correlation coefficient is a number between −1 and +1 that measures the linear relationship between two variables, denoted here as X and Y, which are the R values of two different genes or the average R values of genes belonging in the same kinetic class in the same time interval. X and Y are the average values, n is the sample number, and SX and SY are the standard errors of the mean values for X and Y, respectively. A positive value for the correlation indicates a positive association, while a negative value indicates an inverse association.
We would like to thank Katalin Révész, Csilla Papdi and Margit Kisapáti for the technical assistance. This study was supported by grant TÁMOP-4.2.1.B-09/1//KONV, TÁMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0012, and Swiss-Hungarian Cooperation Programme grant SH/7/2/8 to ZB.
- Aujeszky A: A contagious disease, not readily distinguishable from rabies, with unknown origin. Veterinarius. 1902, 12: 387-396.Google Scholar
- Pomeranz L, Reynolds A, Hengartner C: Molecular biololgy of pseudorabies virus: Impact on neurovirology and veterinary medicine. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2005, 69 (3): 462- 10.1128/MMBR.69.3.462-500.2005View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boldogkoi Z, Balint K, Awatramani GB, Balya D, Busskamp V, Viney TJ, Lagali PS, Duebel J, Pasti E, Tombacz D, Toth JS, Takacs IF, Scherf BG, Roska B: Genetically timed, activity-sensor and rainbow transsynaptic viral tools. Nature Methods. 2009, 6 (2): 127-130. 10.1038/nmeth.1292View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enquist LW: Five Questions about Viral Trafficking in Neurons. Plos Pathogens. 2012, 8 (2): e1002472- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002472View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boldogkoi Z, Nogradi A: Gene and cancer therapy–pseudorabies virus: a novel research and therapeutic tool?. Curr Gene Ther. 2003, 3 (2): 155-182. 10.2174/1566523034578393View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prorok J, Kovacs PP, Kristof AA, Nagy N, Tombacz D, Toth JS, Ordog B, Jost N, Virag L, Papp JG, Varro A, Toth A, Boldogkoi Z: Herpesvirus-mediated delivery of a genetically encoded fluorescent Ca(2+) sensor to canine cardiomyocytes. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009, 2009: 361795-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boldogkoi Z, Bratincsak A, Fodor I: Evaluation of pseudorabies virus as a gene transfer vector and an oncolytic agent for human tumor cells. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22 (4): 2153-2159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spivack J, Fraser N: Detection of Herpes-Simplex Virus Type-1 Transcripts during Latent Infection in Mice. J Virol. 1987, 61 (12): 3841-3847.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tombacz D, Toth JS, Petrovszki P, Boldogkoi Z: Whole-genome analysis of pseudorabies virus gene expression by real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 491- 10.1186/1471-2164-10-491View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boldogkoi Z, Braun A, Fodor I: Replication and virulence of early protein 0 and long latency transcript deficient mutants of the Aujeszky's disease (pseudorabies) virus. Microb Infect. 2000, 2 (11): 1321-1328. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01285-5. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01285-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz J, Brittle E, Reynolds A, Enquist L, Silverstein S: UL54-null pseudorabies virus is attenuated in mice but productively infects cells in culture. J Virol. 2006, 80 (2): 769-784. 10.1128/JVI.80.2.769-784.2006View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fuchs W, Ehrlich C, Klupp B, Mettenleiter T: Characterization of the replication origin (Ori(S)) and adjoining parts of the inverted repeat sequences of the pseudorabies virus genome. J Gen Virol. 2000, 81: 1539-1543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang G, Leader D: The Structure of the Pseudorabies Virus Genome at the End of the Inverted Repeat Sequences Proximal to the Junction with the Short Unique Region. J Gen Virol. 1990, 71: 2433-2441. 10.1099/0022-1317-71-10-2433View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowman JJ, Orlando JS, Davido DJ, Kushnir AS, Schaffer PA: Transient Expression of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 ICP22 Represses Viral Promoter Activity and Complements the Replication of an ICP22 Null Virus. J Virol. 2009, 83 (17): 8733-8743. 10.1128/JVI.00810-09View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Poffenberger K, Raichlen P, Herman R: In-Vitro Characterization of a Herpes-Simplex Virus Type-1 Icp22 Deletion Mutant. Virus Genes. 1993, 7 (2): 171-186. 10.1007/BF01702397View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Purves F, Ogle W, Roizman B: Processing of the Herpes-Simplex Virus Regulatory Protein Alpha-22 Mediated by the U(l)13 Protein-Kinase Determines the Accumulation of a Subset of Alpha-Messenger Rnas and Gamma-Messenger Rnas and Proteins in Infected-Cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90 (14): 6701-6705. 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6701View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Koppel R, Vogt B, Schwyzer M: Immediate-early protein BICP22 of bovine herpesvirus 1 trans-represses viral promoters of different kinetic classes and is itself regulated by BICP0 at transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. Arch Virol. 1997, 142 (12): 2447-2464. 10.1007/s007050050254View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rice S, Long M, Lam V, Schaffer P, Spencer C: Herpes-Simplex Virus Immediate-Early Protein Icp22 is Required for Viral Modification of Host Rna-Polymerase-Ii and Establishment of the Normal Viral Transcription Program. J Virol. 1995, 69 (9): 5550-5559.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Long M, Leong V, Schaffer P, Spencer C, Rice S: ICP22 and the UL13 protein kinase are both required for herpes simplex virus-induced modification of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II. J Virol. 1999, 73 (7): 5593-5604.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Advani S, Weichselbaum R, Roizman B: Herpes simplex virus 1 activates cdc2 to recruit topoisomerase II alpha for post-DNA synthesis expression of late genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100 (8): 4825-4830. 10.1073/pnas.0730735100View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rice S, Long M, Lam V, Spencer C: Rna-Polymerase-Ii is Aberrantly Phosphorylated and Localized to Viral Replication Compartments Following Herpes-Simplex Virus-Infection. J Virol. 1994, 68 (2): 988-1001.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fraser KA, Rice SA: Herpes simplex virus immediate-early protein ICP22 triggers loss of serine 2-phosphorylated RNA polymerase II. J Virol. 2007, 81 (10): 5091-5101. 10.1128/JVI.00184-07View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bastian TW, Livingston CM, Weller SK, Rice SA: Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Immediate-Early Protein ICP22 Is Required for VICE Domain Formation during Productive Viral Infection. J Virol. 2010, 84 (5): 2384-2394. 10.1128/JVI.01686-09View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boldogkoi Z, Braun A, Medveczky I, Glavits R, Gyuro B, Fodor I: Analysis of the equalization of inverted repeats and neurovirulence using a pseudorabies virus mutant strain altered at the Ul/Ir junction. Virus Genes. 1998, 17 (1): 89-98. 10.1023/A:1008061220442View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boldogkoi Z: Transcriptional interference networks coordinate the expression of functionally-related genes clustered in the same genomic loci. Frontiers in Genetics. 2012, 3: 00122-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soong R, Tabiti K: Detection of colorectal micrometastasis by quantitative RT-PCR of cytokeratin 20 mRNA. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2000, 41: 391-XP002149389,Google Scholar
- Chambers J, Angulo A, Amaratunga D, Guo H, Jiang Y, Wan J, Bittner A, Frueh K, Jackson M, Peterson P, Erlander M, Ghazal P: DNA microarrays of the complex human cytomegalovirus genome: Profiling kinetic class with drug sensitivity of viral gene expression. J Virol. 1999, 73 (7): 5757-5766.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tombacz D, Toth JS, Boldogkoi Z: Effects of deletion of the early protein 0 gene of pseudorabies virus on the overall viral gene expression. Gene. 2012, 493 (2): 235-242. 10.1016/j.gene.2011.11.049View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kramer T, Greco TM, Enquist LW, Cristea IM: Proteomic Characterization of Pseudorabies Virus Extracellular Virions. J Virol. 2011, 85 (13): 6427-6441. 10.1128/JVI.02253-10View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tombacz D, Toth JS, Boldogkoi Z: Deletion of the virion host shut-off gene of pseudorabies virus results in selective upregulation of the expression of early viral genes in the late stage of infection. Genomics. 2011, 98 (1): 15-25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huvet M, Nicolay S, Touchon M, Audit B, D'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Arneodo A, Thermes C: Human gene organization driven by the coordination of replication and transcription. Genome Res. 2007, 17 (9): 1278-1285. 10.1101/gr.6533407View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Necsulea A, Guillet C, Cadoret J, Prioleau M, Duret L: The Relationship between DNA Replication and Human Genome Organization. Mol Biol Evol. 2009, 26 (4): 729-741. 10.1093/molbev/msn303View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elhai J, Wolk C: A Versatile Class of Positive-Selection Vectors Based on the Nonviability of Palindrome-Containing Plasmids that Allows Cloning into Long Polylinkers. Gene. 1988, 68 (1): 119-138. 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90605-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toth JS, Tombacz D, Takacs IF, Boldogkoi Z: The effects of viral load on pseudorabies virus gene expression. Bmc Microbiology. 2010, 10: 311. 10.1186/1471-2180-10-311View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Campbell AM, Heyer LJ: Basic research with DNA microarray. Discovering Genomics Proteomics and Bioinformatics. Edited by: Anonymous. 2007, 238-241. San Francisco: CSHL Press, 2,Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.