- Research article
- Open Access
Expression and functional analysis of TaASY1 during meiosis of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum)
© Boden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 24 January 2007
Accepted: 04 August 2007
Published: 04 August 2007
Pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosomes is required for normal chromosome segregation and the exchange of genetic material via recombination during meiosis. Synapsis is complete at pachytene following the formation of a tri-partite proteinaceous structure known as the synaptonemal complex (SC). In yeast, HOP1 is essential for formation of the SC, and localises along chromosome axes during prophase I. Homologues in Arabidopsis (AtASY1), Brassica (BoASY1) and rice (OsPAIR2) have been isolated through analysis of mutants that display decreased fertility due to severely reduced synapsis of homologous chromosomes. Analysis of these genes has indicated that they play a similar role to HOP1 in pairing and formation of the SC through localisation to axial/lateral elements of the SC.
The full length wheat cDNA and genomic clone, TaASY1, has been isolated, sequenced and characterised. TaASY1 is located on chromosome Group 5 and the open reading frame displays significant nucleotide sequence identity to OsPAIR2 (84%) and AtASY1 (63%). Transcript and protein analysis showed that expression is largely restricted to meiotic tissue, with elevated levels during the stages of prophase I when pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosomes occur. Immunolocalisation using transmission electron microscopy showed Ta ASY1 interacts with chromatin that is associated with both axial elements before SC formation as well as lateral elements of formed SCs.
TaASY1 is a homologue of ScHOP1, AtASY1 and OsPAIR2 and is the first gene to be isolated from bread wheat that is involved in pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosomes.
Meiosis is obligatory for sexual reproduction and is comprised of one round of DNA replication followed by two rounds of cell division. There are three key processes that occur during early meiosis which are responsible for the juxtaposition of homologous chromosomes required for successful production of haploid gametes, namely chromosome pairing, recombination and chromosome synapsis. Studies investigating the molecular nature of homologous chromosome pairing have revealed a complex relationship between these three processes.
Complexity is particularly pronounced in polyploid organisms such as the allohexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Bread wheat contains seven groups of chromosomes which are derived from three diploid progenitor species (AABBDD; 2n = 6× = 42). Despite the genome complexity of this important crop, each chromosome will pair only with its homologue, despite the potential for pairing with an equivalent chromosome from one of the other two related or homoeologous genomes. Extensive cytological analysis of chromosome dynamics during early meiosis in normal bread wheat and mutants such as Ph1 and Ph2 (p airing h omoeologous), which display reduced specificity of chromosome pairing to homologues, have provided valuable information on the control of chromosome pairing in this organism [1–7]. However, to date there are no individual proteins that have been identified and characterised from bread wheat that have been shown to have a role in homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis.
Pairing of homologous chromosomes is closely followed by synapsis through the formation of a proteinaceous structure referred to as the synaptonemal complex (SC) [8–10]. The evolutionary conservation of the SC within sexually reproducing organisms and its demonstrated association with recombination indicates a fundamental and critical role during meiosis I (for comprehensive reviews on the biology of the SC refer to [11–13]). The SC is composed of three components: the axial/lateral elements, transverse filaments and a dense central element. While several genes encoding SC and SC-associated proteins including ZIP1  and SCP1  have been isolated and characterised in both yeast and mammals since the discovery of this structure 50 years ago, it has only been recently that the first SC plant specific protein was reported , even though this structure has been comprehensively dissected cytologically. The slow progress in plants is mainly due to limited sequence conservation of SC proteins from various eukaryotic species, as reflected in a study of ZYP1 from Arabidopsis thaliana, which shares only 18 and 20% sequence identity to ZIP1 and SCP1 from yeast and mouse respectively . This problem is being overcome through two approaches. Reverse genetics is being used in Arabidopsis and rice to identify genes involved in chromosome synapsis by analysing mutants that display an abnormal synaptic phenotype during early meiosis, and additionally, an in silico screening of databases is used to identify proteins that contain secondary structures that are conserved amongst known SC proteins [16, 17].
One class of meiotic mutants used to identify genes that code for components of the SC in plants are termed asynaptic. These mutants are typically characterised as being defective in homologous chromosome synapsis, from which other defects follow, including dramatically increased frequency of univalents at pachytene and reduced fertility [18–21]. Several such genes have been reported in the literature including HOP1 from yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) [22, 23], ASY1 from Arabidopsis and Brassica oleracea [19, 24] and PAIR2 from rice (Oryza sativa) [20, 25]. In addition, the location and activity of ASY1 orthologues during meiosis in maize and rye has been investigated using the At ASY1 antibody in studies of mutants displaying abnormal chromosomal morphology during prophase I, which also supports results obtained from Arabidopsis and rice [26, 27]. A common feature of the three characterised asynaptic genes is the presence of a HORMA domain (Ho p1, R ev7, MA D2)  which appears to facilitate direct interaction of proteins containing this domain with chromatin during mitosis and meiosis, including chromatin associated with DNA adducts and DNA double stranded breaks [23, 24, 28, 29].
In an attempt to further understand the mechanism of pairing/synapsis of homologous chromosomes during meiosis in bread wheat, we have characterised the expression and protein localisation of the wheat orthologue of ASY1 of Arabidopsis, TaASY1. This gene shares significant sequence identity and similar features (including the presence of a HORMA domain) to previously characterised asynaptic genes including the Arabidopsis, Brassica and rice orthologues and is likely to play a pivotal role during meiosis in bread wheat.
TaASY1 is a wheat orthologue of AtASY1, BoASY1 and rice PAIR2 and is located on wheat chromosome group 5
We further localised TaASY1 using a PCR-based approach with primers specific for the A genome and multiple bread wheat deletion lines. Genome specificity of the primers was confirmed with amplification of a 446 bp fragment using template from the three nullisomic-tetrasomic lines of chromosome Group 5 and wild-type Chinese Spring (Figure 3B). Bread wheat deletion lines that contained varying distal deletions of 5A long arm (5AL) were then screened using these primers (courtesy of Professor Takashi Endo, National Bioresource Project, Kyoto University, Japan). The fragment specific for the A genome was amplified in a deletion line that contained 0.35 fraction length (FL – see Methods; DNA isolation, Southern blot and PCR analysis) of the 5AL (5AL 19-5, Professor Takashi Endo, personal communication), but not in a line that contained 0.32 FL of 5AL (5AL 12-1, NBRP, Kyoto University, Japan) (Figure 3C). This suggests that TaASY1 is located in a region between 0.32 and 0.35 FL on 5AL when measured from the centromere.
TaASY1 is highly expressed in anthers at prophase I of meiosis
To complement and confirm the accuracy of the microarray results, Q-PCR was also performed to investigate the transcript expression levels of TaASY1 across a range of tissues. While low levels of expression were evident in leaf and root tips which were not detected in the tissue series northern, the results revealed significant levels of expression in anthers during the early stages of meiosis (Figure 4D), confirming the results obtained from the other two techniques used. In parallel, the microarray and Q-PCR platforms exhibited a correlation value of 0.98 between each other thus suggesting that the results were highly reproducible .
These assays all used RNA isolated from whole wheat anthers and contained many tissues in addition to the meiocytes; including tapetum, epidermis, endothecium and segments of the filament. Demonstration of meiocyte expression and a role for the Ta ASY1 protein in pairing required sub-cellular localisation of the gene product.
Protein analysis validates TaASY1 expression in meiotic tissue and location adjacent to the axial elements of chromosomes at early prophase I
Primarily, chromosome pairing and synapsis in bread wheat has been extensively analysed using mutants, such as ph1b and ph2a, which display reduced restriction of chromosome pairing to homologues (reviewed in [31, 32]). The major loci (Ph1 and Ph2) responsible for this phenotype have been mapped to 5BL and 3DS, respectively. Since their discovery many cytological studies have been conducted to investigate the diploid behaviour of chromosome pairing during meiosis in bread wheat [1, 2, 7, 33–40]. More recently, significant work on chromosome pairing dynamics has led to theoretical models which help explain how this complex organism maintains its diploid behaviour during meiosis [1, 6, 7, 32]. Coupled with the cytological studies have been the extensive mapping strategies of Griffiths and colleagues  to identify the gene(s) responsible for the Ph1 phenotype, culminating in the identification of four cdc2-related genes and a sub-telomeric heterochromatic region that translocated from chromosome 3AL, as candidates for the Ph1 effect. Theses approaches have been built around the use of the genetic information to track down genes that control pairing. There have been few reports of studies aimed at deciphering components of the wheat meiotic machinery based on candidates identified in other systems. The characterisation of TaASY1 described here suggests that knowledge from other systems can be applied to bread wheat and can help build a molecular view of pairing and recombination.
While the presence of TaASY1 on chromosome Group 5 implies that it does not represent Ph2, its location and putative role, based on the asynaptic phenotype of Arabidopsis and rice mutants, suggests it may still be involved with either the product of the Ph1 and/or Ph2 loci; albeit indirectly. Based on the findings of Griffiths et al. , and Southern analysis that we have conducted using the Ph1 mutant, ph1b (data not shown), TaASY1 does not represent Ph1. Given its location on the long arm of chromosome 5A, it is possible that TaASY1 represents one of the previously reported minor chromosome pairing promoters on 5AL and/or 5DL [36, 42, 43]. However, further experimentation will be required to determine if any of these loci represent TaASY1. This work is likely to involve precise location of the gene relative to various bread wheat deletion lines that have previously been reported [36, 42–44].
TaASY1, ASY1 from Arabidopsis and Brassica, and PAIR2 from rice represent the only HORMA domain containing proteins identified in plants [19, 20, 24]. The amino acid sequences of the ASY1 and PAIR2 proteins display significant sequence similarity to Ta ASY1. When comparing only the HORMA domain of all known asynaptic proteins reported, sequence identity increased significantly suggesting that the HORMA domain is essential for the function of Ta ASY1 and its orthologues. However, this is not always the case when comparing sequences of meiotic proteins across various organisms, with sequence identities varying widely for proteins involved in the evolutionarily conserved process of chromosome pairing and synapsis [12, 14–16, 45, 46]. This is highlighted by the difficulty to predict meiotic activity of Os PAIR2 based around the extensive knowledge of Sc HOP1 [25, 45, 47–53].
The TaASY1 gene structure is very similar to the reported structures of AtASY1 and OsPAIR2, with all three genes having 22 exons and 21 introns. The similarity in gene structure of TaASY1 and OsPAIR2 is also reflected in the location of the two genes, with chromosome Group 5 of bread wheat displaying high levels of gene order conservation with rice Chromosome 9, on which OsPAIR2 resides .
The three transcript analysis procedures used in this study clearly indicated significant expression of TaASY1 in meiotic tissue, with highest expression predominantly confined to pre-meiosis and leptotene to pachytene. The leptotene to pachytene result was expected based on these stages being when synapsis occurs, which is also reflected by the phenotypes of asy1 and pair2 mutants where chromosomes fail to synapse [18, 20].
The Q-PCR data indicated that transcript levels of TaASY1 remained elevated from diplotene through to the completion of telophase II. This may be due to minor asynchrony between the collection of anthers that were selected for staging and subsequent RNA isolation. In addition, as wheat meiosis takes only 24 hours to complete it is possible that the elevated expression seen later in meiosis represents the mRNA that remained in the cells as they rapidly progressed through the meiotic cycle, after the relatively lengthy prophase I period of 17 hours . Although the TaASY1 transcript was not detected in vegetative tissues using northern analysis, Q-PCR and microarray analysis suggested that there were very low levels of expression (up to approximately 40,000 fold less). Both these technology platforms are extremely sensitive to very low transcript levels.
The elevated transcript expression in meiotic tissue correlates with the detection of protein seen in the western analysis. The very low level of protein in the leaf and root tissues contrasts to results from Arabidopsis and rice [24, 25]. However, the differences detected between the reports could be attributed to alternative experimental procedures used, including the protein extraction procedure and the higher concentration of primary antibody used in this study.
While it was not possible to define whether Ta ASY1 associated directly with axial elements, immunolocalisation using TEM revealed that Ta ASY1 associates with chromatin regions of axial elements prior to formation of the SC, as well as chromatin of lateral elements within a formed SC. These results are consistent with the previous data in Arabidopsis and rice where ASY1/PAIR2 are shown to have a role in pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosomes. Although Ta ASY1 is located adjacent to axial elements prior to SC formation, it is unlikely to have a role in initiation of axial element formation since dense axial elements still formed in the rice pair2 mutants. In addition, as the axial elements that formed in the pair2 mutant were comparable in size to those in the wild-type plant, especially when compared to the differences in axial element size and distribution of ASY1 in the maize mutant afd1, it is unlikely that the labelling of Ta ASY1 to axial elements in wheat is due to a role in axial element elongation [25, 26].
Localisation of Ta ASY1 to components of the SC both before and after SC formation indicates a role for this protein in synapsis and/or pairing of homologous chromosomes. A role for Ta ASY1 in synapsis is supported by results of Mikhailova et al. . Using a rye mutant that failed to correctly synapse homologous chromosomes, Mikhailova et al.  demonstrated that ASY1 and ZYP1 (a known SC component) still load correctly onto chromosome axes without formation of the tripartite SC. It is plausible therefore that the localisation of Ta ASY1 to axial elements prior to synapsis may represent a role in recruiting components of the SC, such as ZYP1, to the axial elements in preparation for SC formation.
While support for a role in chromosome pairing is less obvious, it has been shown that the Arabidopsis asy1 mutant exhibits near normal centromere and telomere pairing behaviour during interphase and leptotene but subsequent stages are atypical, with non-recognisable pairing and synapsis of homologues . This indicates that ASY1 is active between the time point where telomeres and centromeres first associate and homologues correctly synapse. Therefore, in bread wheat TaASY1 represents an interesting candidate for further research into how homologues are resolved from their homoeologues, since the seven homoeologous centromere clusters form prior to the resolution of 21 homologous chromosome pairs .
A long term objective of this research is to pursue an efficient methodology for the induction of pairing control and recombination in bread wheat. Significant progress was recently made towards this goal with the molecular characterisation of the Ph1 locus by Griffiths et al. . However, to understand the mechanism of action of cdc2-kinases found at the Ph1 locus, it may be necessary to characterise down stream proteins involved in chromosome synapsis, such as Ta ASY1. To this end we have begun investigating what proteins interact with Ta ASY1 and where these proteins are located within the bread wheat genome.
We have isolated and characterised the wheat homologue of ScHOP1, AtASY1 and OsPAIR2; called TaASY1. This study has enhanced our understanding of proteins that are responsible for the correct pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosomes in bread wheat. TaASY1 is located on Chromosome group 5, with a copy on each of the three genomes; A, B and D. Transcript and protein expression analyses indicate a role for this protein during the early stages of meiosis, specifically during prophase I. This was confirmed by immunolocalisation using TEM, which showed that Ta ASY1 interacts with chromatin of SC associated structures during zygotene and pachytene, before being removed or degraded during later stages.
Hexaploid wheat plants including wild-type (Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring), nullisomic-tetrasomic (NT) derivatives, and mutants of wild-type Chinese Spring (ph2a, ph2b, ph1b) and a series of 5AL deletion lines (courtesy of Professor Takashi Endo, NBRP, Kyoto University, Japan) were grown under a 14 hour photoperiod in a temperature controlled glasshouse ranging from 15°C to 23°C.
DNA isolation, Southern blot and PCR analysis
Plant genomic DNA extraction and Southern blot analysis was conducted according to . The TaASY1 full-length ORF cDNA was amplified and used as a probe, from the cultivar Chinese Spring using primers TaASY1 F1 (5' ATGGTGATGGCTCAGAAGACG) and TaASY1 R1 (5' TGAACTAGGACTTCTGGCGC).
The probe was labelled using α-32P dCTP and hybridised to membranes according to . PCR analysis of Chinese Spring mutants containing varying deletions of chromosome 5AL was performed to identify the location of TaASY1. Genome specific primers were designed for the A genome based on genomic DNA sequence comparisons of TaASY1 amplified from the three nullisomic-tetrasomic lines of chromosome group 5 (TGS1AS; 5' CCACGCTCATCTTGTCATCATCA 3', TGS2S; 5' GTTATCGACAGCTGCCATCCTAGA 3'). The eight mutants analysed were: n5AL.4-1, n5AL.12-1, n5AL14-1, n5AL14-3, n5AL14-4, n5AL14-5 and n5AL.19-5. Each mutant contained varying deletions (fraction length – FL) of 5AL, as detailed on the National BioResources Project database (courtesy of Professor Takashi Endo, Kyoto University) .
Meiotic staged tissue and whole plant tissue collections
Meiotic tissue from the plant material listed was harvested early in the morning. With the complete inflorescence having been dissected from the sheath, individual florets from the central region of the spike were prepared for anther squashes. Using aceto-orcein to stain the meiocytes, compound light microscopy was used in order to determine the stage of meiosis. Upon determining the stage, the remaining anthers from the corresponding floret were placed in a microfuge tube in liquid nitrogen. This process was repeated for florets up and down the length of several wheat inflorescences, with anthers from identical stages being pooled.
Anthers from the following stages were collected: pre-meiosis, leptotene to pachytene, diplotene to anaphase I, telophase I to telophase II, tetrads, immature pollen and mature pollen. In addition to the meiosis specific sub-staged tissue collection, complete immature inflorescences, mature leaf, young leaf, roots and seedlings were also collected. This process was conducted twice; once for the northern analysis and the second time for both microarray and Q-PCR analysis.
RNA isolation and northern blot analysis
RNA was extracted from the following: whole seedling (14 days), young leaf (21 days), mature leaf (56 days), root tissues (14 days) and immature inflorescence material. In addition, staged meiotic anthers were also collected for RNA extraction from pre-meiosis, leptotene to pachytene, diplotene to anaphase I, telophase I to telophase II, tetrads and immature pollen. RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Gibco BRL, Australia) according to manufacturer's instructions.
For northern analysis, 5 μg of total RNA for each sample was separated on a 1% denaturing agarose gel and subsequently transferred to Hybond N+ membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Australia). RNA loading equivalents were visualised prior to membrane transfer, using the GeneFlash gel documentation system (Syngene BioImaging, USA). Hybridisation was conducted in formamide solution at 42°C . Membranes were washed and film developed as in Sutton et al. .
Prior to cDNA synthesis, the total RNA samples were first treated with DNase I using the TURBO-DNA free kit, according to manufacturer's instructions (Ambion, Australia). Synthesis of cDNA was performed using SuperScript III (Invitrogen, Australia), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Isolation of TaASY1 using inverse PCR
An EST sequence (Accession Number: CA599825) that was identified as having significant similarity to AtASY1 (Accession Number: AF157556) was used as the basis for TaASY1 isolation. To isolate the full length TaASY1 cDNA, an inverse PCR method was utilised. Total RNA was extracted from immature inflorescences using Trizol reagent (Gibco BRL, Australia) according to manufacturer's instructions. 5 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using oligo dT(12–18) and the Superscript III kit (Invitrogen, Australia) as per manufacturer's instructions. Following phenol chloroform purification of first strand cDNA, the 3' ends were tailed with dATP using terminal transferase (Invitrogen, Australia) as per manufacturer's instructions. The poly A capped single stranded cDNA was ethanol precipitated and half the volume was used for second strand cDNA synthesis (50°C, 2 minutes; 72°C, 20 minutes; 30 cycles of 94°C, 1 minute; 50°C, 2 minutes; 72°C, 10 minutes; with a final elongation at 72°C for 10 minutes) using primer B26 5' GACTCGAGTCGACATCGAdT(17) and Q Taq (QIAGEN, Australia).
The double stranded cDNA was ethanol precipitated and 100 ng was used in a 150 μL ligation reaction using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Australia) as per manufacturer's instructions. Circularised double stranded cDNA was then heat denatured, phenol chloroform purified and resuspended in 10 μL of water. Primers Asyrev2 (5' TCATCTGGTCAGGAGTGACTTCTGCTG) and Asyfwd1 (5' GCAAAGGTCAGAGTGGTACAAACTC) were used to amplify the full length TaASY1 clone from 1 μL of the circularised double stranded cDNA using High Fidelity Taq Polymerase (Roche, Australia) as per manufacturer's instructions with the following cycling parameters: 94°C, 1 minute; 35 cycles of 94°C, 30 seconds; 55°C, 30 seconds; 68°C, 3 minutes; with a final extension of 68°C for 10 minutes. The TaASY1 product was cloned into pGEM T-easy (Promega, Australia) and sequenced as described below. The final cDNA clone obtained was 2145 bp.
Genomic clone isolation and sequencing
Primer sets used to determine the gene structure of TaASY1
Exon 10-Intron 14
Exon 16-Intron 20
Affymetrix wheat GeneChip® microarray hybridisation and expression analysis
For experimental procedures regarding the microarray hybridisation and expression analysis, refer to Crismani et al. .
Q-PCR expression analysis
Nucleotide sequencing was conducted using the BigDye™ Terminator Sequencing v3.1 Ready Reaction Kit (Perkin Elmer, USA). Sequence PCR products were cleaned for analysis using 75% isopropanol, prior to sequencing using an ABI Prism 3700 DNA Analyser (Applied Biosystems) at the Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science (IMVS, Adelaide, Australia). Sequence data was analysed using VNTI Suite Version 8.0 software (Informax Inc., MD, USA). To assign putative functions to sequenced products, BLASTn, tBLASTn, tBLASTx, BLASTp searches of the GenBank non-redundant databases were conducted.
A peptide spanning residues 486 to 499 (DRRDHQTADQEMKDC) of the Ta ASY1 amino acid sequence was synthesized (AusPep, Australia). Selection of the peptide was based on its low hydro-phobicity, uniqueness of sequence when used in a BLAST search against known translated sequences and protein sequences (tBLASTn and BLASTp), and its predicted structure compared to protein structures with sequence similarity to Ta ASY1. The peptide was initially dissolved in 200 μL of 1× PBS (10 μg μL-1) and conjugated with an equal volume of the carrier molecule KLH (Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin, Pierce, Australia) dissolved in double autoclaved milli-Q water (10 μg μL-1). For the first mouse immunization, 50 μL ofKLH-conjugated antigen was added to 50 μL of 1× PBS, and subsequently added to an equal volume of Freund's complete adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) prior to subcutaneous injection. For the following immunisations, which were administered at three weekly intervals, the 100 μL ofKLH-conjugated antigen in 1× PBS was added to Freund's incomplete adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) prior to subcutaneous injection. Immune sera were extracted 68 days after the first injection.
To generate recombinant Ta ASY1 protein, the full length TaASY1 ORF was inserted into pCR8/GW/TOPO (Invitrogen, Australia). The full length clone was inserted into the pDEST17 vector containing a 6× histidine (6× His) repeat at the 5' end of the entry site using Gateway technology, according to manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Australia). Protein production in BL21-A1 cells (Invitrogen, Australia) was induced by adding L-arabinose (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) to a final concentration of 0.2% in LB liquid culture. The recombinant protein was then extracted and purified using Ni-NTA agarose under denaturing conditions according to manufacturer's instructions (QIAGEN, Australia). Trypsin digestion mediated mass spectrometry using a QTOF2 mass spectrometer confirmed that the recombinant protein expressed was Ta ASY1 [see Additional file 2]. The resulting MSMS were analysed using the ProteinLynx Global Server to search against the NCBI non-redundant database for peptide tag matches. This was also combined with de novo sequencing and BLAST analysis.
Western blot analysis
Proteins were extracted from plant tissue using a phenol extraction and methanol ammonium acetate precipitation method . Protein samples were quantified using the Bradford method , and equal amounts of protein (10 μg) from each tissue sample were loaded on a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel for separation by SDS-PAGE. Protein samples were then electroblotted onto a Hybond-P polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Australia).
Western blots were incubated with anti-Ta ASY1 antiserum diluted 1/1500 followed by incubation with anti-mouse IgG antibodies conjugated to biotin (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) diluted 1/1000. Streptavidin conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) was then added at a dilution of 1/1000 followed by addition of BCIP/NBT Purple Liquid Substrate System (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) for protein detection.
Chinese Spring anthers were collected, stained and prepared as described earlier to determine their meiosis stage. Partner anthers of those determined via staining to be of the prophase I sub-stages leptotene through to pachytene were incubated in fixative solution (0.25% gluteraldehyde, 3% paraformaldehye, 4% sucrose in 1× PBS) overnight at 4°C. Fixed anthers were then washed three times with 1× PBS for 8 hours each, before being dehydrated in an ethanol series of 70%, 90%, 95% and 100% consecutively, with three lots of 20 minute incubations in each solution. Anthers were then incubated in a 50:50 mixture of 100% ethanol and LR white resin for 8 hours, before being incubated three times in pure LR white resin for 8 hours each. Anthers were then embedded into LR White Resin by incubation at 60°C for 60 hours. Standard procedures using an ultramicrotome were then used to produce tissue sections for TEM, which were affixed to nickel mesh grids.
Sectioned grids were then prepared for immunolocalisation by incubating with 0.05 M glycine for 20 minutes, followed by 2 incubations with incubation buffer (1 × PBS/0.15% AURION BSA-c™). Sections were then incubated for 90 minutes with anti-Ta ASY1 mouse polyclonal antiserum diluted 1/400 in incubation buffer. The sections were then washed 3 times with incubation buffer, before being incubated with a gold conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG serum (Aurion, Wageningen, The Netherlands) diluted 1/30 with incubation buffer. This was followed with three washes using both incubation buffer and 1 × PBS, with fixation of sections using 2% glutaraldehyde in PBS. Samples were then washed two times in both PBS and distilled water. Prior to visualisation, the grids were counter-stained with uranyl acetate (10 minutes) and lead citrate (5 minutes), with three 1 minute washes in distilled water after each stain. Stained and labelled sections were visualised using a Philips 100 transmission electron microscope, with images recorded using a SIS Megaview II CCD camera and AnalySIS software (Soft Imaging Systems) at Adelaide Microscopy (Adelaide, Australia).
The TaASY1 sequence (accession: EF446137) has been deposited with NCBI.
This research was supported through the Molecular Plant Breeding Cooperative Research Centre, the Grains Research Development Corporation (GRDC) and the Endeavour Cheung Kong Award (DEST). The authors would like to thank Marilyn Henderson for TEM technical assistance, Tim Sutton for the initial EST, Wayne Crismani for the microarray data relating to TaASY1 temporal expression, Margaret Pallotta for supplying the wheat aneuploid Southern membranes and Professor Takashi Endo (Kyoto University) for supplying 5AL bread wheat deletion derivatives.
- Martinez-Perez E, Shaw P, Reader S, Aragon-Alcaide L, Miller T, Moore G: Homologous chromosome pairing in wheat. J Cell Sci 1999, 112: 1761-1769.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roberts M, Reader S, Dalgliesh C, Miller T, Foote T, Fish L, Snape J, Moore G: Induction and characterisation of Ph1 wheat mutants. Genetics 1999, 153: 1909-1918.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez – Perez E, Shaw P, Moore G: Polyploidy induces centromere association. J Cell Biol 2000, 148: 233-238. 10.1083/jcb.148.2.233PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez – Perez E, Shaw P, Moore G: The Ph1 locus is needed to ensure specific somatic and meiotic centromere pairing. Nature 2001, 411: 204-208. 10.1038/35075597View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez M, Cuñado N, Carcelén N, Romero C: The Ph1 and Ph2 loci play different roles in the synaptic behaviour of hexaploid wheat Triticum aestivum . Theor Appl Genet 2001, 103: 398-405. 10.1007/s00122-001-0543-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maestra B, de Jong J, Shepherd K, Naranjo T: Chromosome arrangement and behaviour of the two rye homologous telosomes at the onset of meiosis in disomic wheat 5RL addition lines with and without the Ph1 locus. Chromosome Res 2002, 10: 655-667. 10.1023/A:1021564327226View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez – Perez E, Shaw P, Aragon – Alcaide L, Moore G: Chromosomes form into 7 groups in hexaploid and tetraploid wheat as a prelude to meiosis. Plant Cell 2003, 36: 21-29.Google Scholar
- Moses M: Chromosomal structures in crayfish spermatocytes. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1956, 2: 215-218.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fawcett D: The fine structure of chromosomes in the meiotic prophase of vertebrate spermatocytes. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1956, 2: 403-406.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Wettstein D, Rasmussen S, Holm P: The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Annu Rev Genet 1984, 18: 331-413.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Page S, Hawley R: The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2004, 20: 525-558. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.155141View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heyting C: Synaptonemal complexes: structure and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1996, 8: 389-396. 10.1016/S0955-0674(96)80015-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zickler D, Kleckner N: Meiotic chromosomes: intergrating structure and function. Annu Rev Genet 1999, 33: 603-754. 10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.603View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sym M, Engebrecht J, Roeder G: ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 1993, 72: 365-378. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90114-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meuwissen R, Meerts I, Hoovers J, Leschot N, Heyting C: Human synaptonemal complex protein 1 (SCP1): Isolation and characterization of the cDNA and chromosomal localization of the gene. Genomics 1992, 39: 377-384. 10.1006/geno.1996.4373View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Higgins J, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong S, Jones G, Franklin F: The Arabidopsis synaptonemal complex protein ZYP1 is required for chromosome synapsis and normal fidelity of crossing over. Genes and Dev 2005, 19: 2488-2500. 10.1101/gad.354705PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bogdanov Y, Dadashev S, Grishaeva T: In silico search for functionally similar proteins involved in meiosis and recombination in evolutionary distant organisms. In Silico Biol 2003, 3: 173-185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ross K, Fransz P, Armstrong S, Vizir I, Mulligan B, Franklin F, Jones G: Cytological characterisation of four meiotic mutants of Arabidopsis isolated from T-DNA transformed lines. Chromosome Res 1997, 5: 551-559. 10.1023/A:1018497804129View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caryl A, Armstrong S, Jones G, Franklin F: A homologue of the yeast HOP1 gene is inactivated in the Arabidopsis meiotic mutant asy1 . Chromosoma 2000, 159: 62-71. 10.1007/s004120050413View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nonomura K, Nakano M, Murata K, Miyoshi K, Eiguchi M, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Kurata N: An insertional mutation in the rice PAIR2 gene, the orthologue of Arabidopsis ASY1 , results in a defect in homologous chromosome pairing during meiosis. Mol Genet Genomics 2004, 271: 121-129. 10.1007/s00438-003-0934-zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sosnikhina S, Mikhailova E, Tikholiz O, Priyatkina S, Smirnov V, Dadashev S, Kolomiets O, Bogdanov Y: Meiotic mutations in rye Secale cereale L. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005, 109: 215-220. 10.1159/000082403View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hollingsworth N, Byers B: HOP1: A yeast meiotic pairing gene. Genetics 1989, 121: 445-462.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hollingsworth N, Goetsch L, Byers B: The HOP1 gene encodes a meiosis-specific component of yeast chromosomes. Cell 1990, 61: 73-84. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90216-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong S, Caryl A, Jones G, Franklin F: Asy1, a protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis, localizes to axis-associated chromatin in Arabidopsis and Brassica . J Cell Sci 2002, 115: 3645-3655. 10.1242/jcs.00048View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nonomura K, Nakano M, Eiguchi M, Suzuki T, Kurata N: PAIR2 is essential for homologous chromosome synapsis in rice meiosis I. J Cell Sci 2006, 119: 217-225. 10.1242/jcs.02736View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Golubovskaya I, Hamant O, Timofejeva L, Wang C, Braun D, Meeley R, Cande W: Alleles of afd1 dissect REC8 functions during meiotic prophase I. J Cell Sci 2006, 119: 3306-3315. 10.1242/jcs.03054View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mikhailova E, Phillips D, Sosnikhina S, Lovtsyus A, Jones R, Jenkins G: Molecular assembly of meiotic proteins Asy1 and Zyp1 and pairing promiscuity in rye (Secale cereale L.) and its synaptic mutant sy10. Genetics 2006. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.064105Google Scholar
- Aravind L, Koonin E: The HORMA domain: a common structural denominator in mitotic checkpoints, chromosome synapsis and DNA repair. Trends Biochem Sci 1998, 23: 284-286. 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01257-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zetka M, Kaawasaki I, Strome S, Muller F: Synapsis and chiasma formation in Caenorhabditis elegans require HIM-3, a meiotic chromosome core component that functions in chromosome segregation. Genes and Dev 1999, 13: 2258-2270. 10.1101/gad.13.17.2258PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crismani W, Baumann U, Sutton T, Shirley N, Webster T, Spangenberg G, Langridge P, Able J: Microarray expression analysis of meiosis and microsporogenesis in hexaploid bread wheat. BMC Genomics 2006., 7:Google Scholar
- Sears E: Genetic control of chromosome pairing in wheat. Annu Rev Genet 1976, 10: 31-51. 10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.000335View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore G: Meiosis in allopolyploids – the importance of 'Teflon' chromosomes. Trends Genet 2002, 18: 456-463. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02730-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okamoto M: Asynaptic effect of chromosome V. Wheat Inf Serv 1957, 5: 6.Google Scholar
- Riley R, Chapman V: Genetic control of the cytologically diploid behaviour of hexaploid wheat. Nature 1958, 182: 713-715. 10.1038/182713a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riley R: The diploidisation of polyploid wheat. Heredity 1960, 15: 407-409.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feldman M: The effect of chromosome 5A, 5B and 5D on chromosome pairing in Triticum aestivum . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1966, 55: 1447-1453. 10.1073/pnas.55.6.1447PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riley R: The basic and applied genetics of chromosome pairing. Proc 3rd Int Wheat Genet Symp: 1968; Canberra: Aust. Acad. Sci 1968, 185-195.Google Scholar
- Wall A, Riley R, Chapman V: Wheat mutants permitting homoeologous meiotic chromosome pairing. Genet Res 1971, 18: 311-328.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bennett M, Dover G, Riley R: Meiotic duration in wheat genotypes with and without homoeologous meiotic chromosomes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1974,187(1087):191-207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sears E: An induced mutant with homeologous pairing in common wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 1977, 19: 585-593.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths S, Sharp R, Foote T, Bertin I, Wanous M, Reader S, Colas I, Moore G: Molecular characterisation as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat. Nature 2006, 439: 749-752. 10.1038/nature04434View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riley R, Chapman V, Young R, Belfield A: Control of meiotic chromosome pairing by the chromosomes of homoeologous group 5 of Triticum aestivum . Nature 1966, 212: 1475-1477. 10.1038/2121475a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mello-Sampayo T: Compensated monosomic 5B-trisomic 5A plants in tetraploid wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 1972, 14: 463-475.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feldman M, Mello-Sampayo T: Suppression of homoeologous pairing in hybrids of polyploid wheats x Triticum speltoides . Can J Genet Cytol 1967, 9: 307-313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hamant O, Ma H, Cande W: Genetics of meiotic prophase I in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2006, 57: 267-302. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105255View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Page S, Hawley R: c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein. Genes and Dev 2001, 15: 3130-3143. 10.1101/gad.935001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith A, Roeder G: The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol 1997, 136: 957-967. 10.1083/jcb.136.5.957PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hollingsworth N, Ponte L: Genetic interaction between HOP1 , RED1 and MEK1 suggest that MEK1 regulates assembly of axial element components during meiosis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Genetics 1997, 147: 33-42.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kironmai K, Muniyappa K, Friedman D, Hollingsworth N, Byers B: DNA-binding activities of Hop1 protein, a synaptonemal complex component from Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Mol Cell Biol 1998, 18: 1424-1435.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de los Santos T, Hollingsworth N: Red1p: a MEK1 dependent phosphoprotein that physically interacts with Hop1p during meiosis in yeast. J Cell Biol 1999,274(3):1783-1790.Google Scholar
- Woltering D, Baumgartner B, Bagchi S, Larkin B, Loidl J, de los Santos T, Hollingsworth N: Meiotic segregation, synapsis and recombination checkpoint functions require physical interaction between chromosomal proteins Red1p and Hop1p. Mol Cell Biol 2000, 20: 6646-6658. 10.1128/MCB.20.18.6646-6658.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wan L, de los Santos T, Zhang C, Shokat K, Hollingsworth N: Mek1 kinase activity functions downstream of RED1 in the regulation of meiotic double strand break repair in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2004, 15: 11-23. 10.1091/mbc.E03-07-0499PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niu H, Wan L, Baumgartner B, Schaefer D, Loidl J, Hollingsworth N: Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol Biol Cell 2005, 16: 5804-5818. 10.1091/mbc.E05-05-0465PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bennett M, Smith J: The effects of polyploidy on meiotic duration and pollen development in cereal anthers. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 1972, 181: 81-107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong S, Franklin F, Jones G: Nucleolus-associated telomere clustering and pairing precede meiotic chromosome synapsis in Arabidopsis thaliana . J Cell Sci 2001, 114: 4207-4217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pallotta M, Graham R, Langridge P, Sparrow D, Barker S: RFLP mapping of manganese efficiency in barley. Theor Appl Genet 2000, 101: 1100-1108. 10.1007/s001220051585View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sutton T, Whitford R, Baumann U, Dong C, Able J, Langridge P: The Ph2 pairing homoeologous locus of wheat ( Triticum aestivum ): identification of candidate meiotic genes using a comparative genomics approach. Plant J 2003, 36: 443-456. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01891.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Endo T, Gill B: The deletion stocks of common wheat. J Hered 1996, 87: 295-307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook F, Fritsch E, Maniatis F: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbour: Cold Spring Habour Laboratory Press; 1989.Google Scholar
- Burton R, Shirley N, King B, Harvey A, Fincher G: The CesA gene family of barley. Quantitative analysis of transcripts reveals two groups of co-expressed genes. Plant Physiol 2004, 134: 224-236. 10.1104/pp.103.032904PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carpentier S, Witters E, Laukens K, Deckers P, Sweenen R, Panis B: Preparation of protein extracts from recalcitrant plant tissues: an evaluation of different methods for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis. Proteomics 2005, 5: 2497-2507. 10.1002/pmic.200401222View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bradford M: A rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye-binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72: 248-254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.