Skip to main content

Differential regulation of NAB corepressor genes in Schwann cells



Myelination of peripheral nerves by Schwann cells requires not only the Egr2/Krox-20 transactivator, but also the NGFI-A/Egr-binding (NAB) corepressors, which modulate activity of Egr2. Previous work has shown that axon-dependent expression of Egr2 is mediated by neuregulin stimulation, and NAB corepressors are co-regulated with Egr2 expression in peripheral nerve development. NAB corepressors have also been implicated in macrophage development, cardiac hypertrophy, prostate carcinogenesis, and feedback regulation involved in hindbrain development.


To test the mechanism of NAB regulation in Schwann cells, transfection assays revealed that both Nab1 and Nab2 promoters are activated by Egr2 expression. Furthermore, direct binding of Egr2 at these promoters was demonstrated in vivo by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of myelinating sciatic nerve, and binding of Egr2 to the Nab2 promoter was stimulated by neuregulin in primary Schwann cells. Although Egr2 expression activates the Nab2 promoter more highly than Nab1, we surprisingly found that only Nab1 – but not Nab2 – expression levels were reduced in sciatic nerve from Egr2 null mice. Analysis of the Nab2 promoter showed that it is also activated by ETS proteins (Ets2 and Etv1/ER81) and is bound by Ets2 in vivo.


Overall, these results indicate that induction of Nab2 expression in Schwann cells involves not only Egr2, but also ETS proteins that are activated by neuregulin stimulation. Although Nab1 and Nab2 play partially redundant roles, regulation of Nab2 expression by ETS factors explains several observations regarding regulation of NAB genes. Finally, these data suggest that NAB proteins are not only feedback inhibitors of Egr2, but rather that co-induction of Egr2 and NAB genes is involved in forming an Egr2/NAB complex that is crucial for regulation of gene expression.


Members of the EGR (early growth response) family of transactivators fulfill critical roles in diverse systems, including nervous system development, bone formation, and fertility. Transcriptional activity of three EGR family members (Egr1/NGFI-A, Egr2/Krox20, and Egr3) is regulated by interaction with the NAB (NGFI-A/EGR binding) family of transcriptional corepressors. The Nab1 protein was first identified by screening a yeast two-hybrid library for proteins that interact with a repressive domain within Egr1[1], and Nab2 was subsequently found to share similar properties [2]. Both Nab1 and Nab2 can bind to a conserved domain in Egr1, Egr2 and Egr3. NAB proteins repress activation of several EGR target promoters [35], and the repression mechanism involves interaction with the CHD4 subunit of the Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase (NuRD) complex [6].

The most severe phenotypes caused by loss of EGR function have been found in mice lacking the Egr2/Krox20 gene (hereafter referred to as Egr2). Characterization of these mice revealed three principal defects: 1) defective hindbrain segmentation with the loss of rhombomeres r3 and r5 [7, 8], 2) defective bone formation [9], and 3) failure of Schwann cells to myelinate peripheral nerves [1012]. Target genes regulated by Egr2 in Schwann cells include myelin genes such as Myelin Protein Zero and Myelin-associated glycoprotein [1015]. As a consequence, most mice with a homozygous Egr2 disruption die shortly after birth, although mice that are homozygous for a hypomorphic Egr2 allele survive somewhat longer [11].

Because of the myelination defect in peripheral nerves of Egr2 knockout mice, several groups have screened human patients with peripheral neuropathies for mutations in the EGR2 gene. Mutations in EGR2 have been identified in several patients with myelin disorders, such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease, Dejerine-Sottas Syndrome, and Congenital Hypomyelinating Neuropathy [1620]. Most of the neuropathy-associated mutations occur within the zinc fingers of EGR2 and prevent DNA-binding [21]. However, one of the EGR2 mutations associated with a very severe congenital hypomyelinating neuropathy [I268N, [16]] prevents binding of EGR2 to NAB corepressors [21]. The importance of NAB corepressors to the regulation of peripheral nerve myelination by Egr2 was recently confirmed by the demonstration that a double knockout of the Nab1/Nab2 genes results in a phenotype very similar to that of the Egr2 knockout: early lethality and peripheral neuropathy resulting from arrested myelination [22]. Moreover, NAB genes have been implicated in several other physiological processes, including macrophage development, cardiac hypertrophy, prostate carcinogenesis, and feedback regulation involved in hindbrain development [2326].

As critical regulators of peripheral myelination, it is important to probe the mechanism of NAB regulation. Recent work has shown that Nab1 and Nab2 are induced by neuregulin signaling [22]. Neuregulin signaling plays an extremely important role in axon-derived signals for Schwann cell myelination [2735]. Moreover, Egr2 and NAB expression appear to be closely linked, as Nab1 and Nab2 are co-regulated with Egr2 after nerve crush injury, and both corepressors are induced by ectopic Egr2 expression in cultured Schwann cells [22, 36, 37]. However, direct regulation of Nab1 and Nab2 by Egr2 has not been demonstrated in vivo. The following data demonstrate direct regulation of NAB expression by Egr2 in myelinating sciatic nerve, and indicate that other neuregulin-regulated pathways are specifically involved in inducing Nab2 expression.


Induction of Nab promoters by Egr2

Sequence analysis of the Nab1 and Nab2 promoters identified several conserved motifs that resemble Egr2 binding sites [22]. To test whether these sites bind Egr2, the mouse Nab1 and Nab2 promoters were analyzed by DNase I footprinting. In the presence of recombinant Egr2, there were strongly protected regions encompassing three previously identified sites in the Nab2 promoter, as well as some weaker protections (Figure 1A). Interestingly, previous analysis of Egr2 site specificity indicated a strong preference for T in the 4th position of the consensus sequence [GCGTGGGCG, [38]], and each of the three strongly protected sites have a T in the 4th base. A similar analysis of the mouse Nab1 promoter (Figure 1B) confirmed binding of Egr2 to the conserved binding sites identified previously [22]. The strong binding site at the 3' end of the mouse Nab2 promoter corresponds to a site of phorbol ester-induced Egr1 binding in a recent analysis of the human NAB2 promoter using electrophoretic mobility shift assays [39].

Figure 1

Egr2 activates the Nab1 and Nab2 promoters. A) The plot shows percent identity of the human and mouse Nab2 loci upstream of the first exon. DNase I footprinting analysis of a 1000 bp fragment of the mouse Nab2 promoter in the presence of recombinant Egr2 protein revealed two footprinted regions (solid line) with some weaker protections (dotted lines). The footprinted regions correspond to three of the four previously identified conserved sites [filled circles, 22] that conform to the Egr2 consensus binding site. There was no apparent footprint over putative site #4 identified in previous sequence analysis of the Nab2 promoter [22] M = marker lane. B) A similar analysis of the mouse Nab1 promoter confirmed binding of Egr2 to the six previously identified conserved binding sites in the mouse Nab1 promoter [filled circles, 22]. C) JEG-3 cells were transfected with a luciferase reporter plasmid containing either the Nab1 or Nab2 promoter, and the indicated amounts of an Egr2 expression construct. The mutant Nab2 promoter contains mutations in the two upstream Egr2 binding sites. Egr2 binding sites are indicated by filled circles. The y-axis shows the fold activation normalized to the activity of the reporter alone. Means and standard deviations of three separate transfections are shown. Activation of both Nab1 and Nab2 promoters by 25 ng Egr2 (compared to control) was statistically significant (P =< 0.002).

To test the function of the Egr2 binding sites, fragments encompassing the conserved regions of the Nab1 and Nab2 promoters were fused to a luciferase reporter gene and transfected into JEG-3 cells, which exhibit a low level of expression of EGR proteins [40]. As shown in Figure 1C, expression of Egr2 activated the Nab1 promoter up to 15-fold, and the Nab2 reporter was increased 25-fold. Two of the Egr2 binding sites in the Nab2 promoter were mutated to determine how that would affect activation by Egr2. As shown in Figure 1, we still observed some residual activation of the promoter, but the induction was much less than observed with the wild type promoter. Previous work had indicated that Nab2 is more inducible by serum and neuregulin than Nab1 [2, 22]. Moreover, the Nab2 promoter was more highly induced by Egr2 in the transfection experiments. However, this disparity is somewhat surprising, given that the Nab1 promoter contains more Egr2 binding sites than does Nab2.

Neuregulin stimulation increases Egr2 occupancy of the Nab1 and Nab2 promoters

In rat Schwann cells treated with neuregulin, there is a large induction of Egr2 (within 1 hour), followed by a delayed induction of Nab1 and Nab2, which peaks at two hours after neuregulin addition [22], with Nab2 being more highly induced than Nab1. To test if neuregulin stimulates direct binding of Egr2 to the NAB promoters, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were used, in which formaldehyde is used to covalently crosslink DNA with any associated proteins and the proteins of interest are subsequently immunoprecipitated [14, 41]. Primary rat Schwann cells were treated for 2 hours with neuregulin and then cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde. Sonicated chromatin was then immunoprecipitated with an Egr2 antibody or control IgG. An untreated culture of Schwann cells was also cross-linked and immunoprecipitated similarly. After crosslinks were reversed, purified DNA was analyzed by quantitative PCR using primer sets proximal to the Egr2 binding sites in the Nab1 and Nab2 promoters. As shown in Figure 2, binding of Egr2 to the Nab1 and Nab2 promoters was significantly stimulated upon treatment with neuregulin. Egr2 binding was not detected at an immunoglobulin promoter [IMG2A, which lacks Egr2 binding sites and is transcriptionally silent in Schwann cells, [14, 41]] in either sample. Evidence for the specificity of the antibody used for ChIP analysis includes induction of Egr2 binding by neuregulin (Figure 2), and immunoblot analysis using this antibody reveals a band of the correct size (Figure 3). In addition, this antibody has been extensively tested with multiple negative control sites [6, 14, 41], and expression of dominant negative Egr2 (consisting of the DNA-binding domain of Egr2) reduces Egr2 binding in this assay (unpublished data). In parallel cultures, Nab2 mRNA was induced 11-fold upon treatment with neuregulin for 2 hours, consistent with previously published results [22].

Figure 2

Neuregulin stimulates Egr2 binding to the Nab2 promoter in primary Schwann cells. Primary rat Schwann cells, untreated or exposed to neuregulin for 2 h, were analyzed by ChIP assay. Formaldehyde-crosslinked chromatin from the two cultures were immunoprecipitated with an antibody for Egr2 (filled bars) or purified control IgG (open bars). Percentage recovery relative to input was determined using quantitative PCR with primers designed for the Nab1, Nab2 and Immunoglobin 2A (IMG2A) promoters. The horizontal lines above the promoter diagrams indicate the positions of the amplicons derived from the primer sets used for ChIP analysis. Means and standard deviations were calculated for duplicate measurements from two independent experiments.

Figure 3

Egr2 binds NAB promoters in myelinating sciatic nerve. Formaldehyde-crosslinked chromatin from sciatic nerves of rats at P10 was immunoprecipitated with an antibody for Egr2 (filled bars) or purified control IgG (open bars). Percentage recovery relative to input DNA was determined by quantitative PCR with the same primers used in Figure 2. The horizontal lines above the promoter diagrams indicate the positions of the amplicons derived from the primer sets used for ChIP analysis. Binding at the transcriptionally silent IMG2A locus was analyzed as a negative control. The data are representative of at least two independent experiments; average fold enrichment for Egr2 binding (relative to control IgG immunoprecipitation) to the Nab2 promoter in four independent experiments was 51-fold (P = 0.016). Inset: Immunoblot analysis with the same antibody used in the ChIP assay was used to detect Egr2 (~70 kD) in rat sciatic nerve lysates at P5 and P15. Three amounts of the P15 lysate (in increasing 2-fold amounts in lanes 2–4) were loaded to facilitate comparison with the expression level at P5. The blot was reprobed with a β-actin antibody as a normalization control (bottom panel).

Egr2 binds to the Nab1 and Nab2 promoters in myelinating sciatic nerve

We have recently employed ChIP analysis of myelinating sciatic nerve to test whether Egr2 directly regulates specific elements in vivo [6, 14, 41]. Egr2 expression increases concurrently with initiation of myelination in rat sciatic nerve within two weeks after birth [42], which is also observed in immunoblot analysis of Egr2 expression in P5 and P15 rat sciatic nerve (Figure 3). Therefore, freshly dissected sciatic nerves from rat pups at P10 (from pools of 5–13 pups) were minced in 1% formaldehyde after dissection. After immunoprecipitation of sonicated chromatin, quantitation of the ChIP assays demonstrated significant enrichment of Egr2 at both Nab1 and Nab2 promoters in rat sciatic nerve (Figure 3).

Nab expression levels in peripheral nerve of Egr2-deficient mice

To independently test the regulation of NAB genes by Egr2 in vivo, we examined NAB expression levels in the Egr2/Krox20 knockout (Figure 4). In these mice, Schwann cells develop normally and associate with axons, but fail to initiate myelination of peripheral nerves [10]. The sciatic nerves of seventeen wild type and knockout animals at P7 were pooled, and the levels of Nab1 and Nab2 were determined by quantitative PCR. Previous analysis of these samples had indicated that expression of many myelin-associated Egr2 target genes are significantly reduced in the knockout nerves [14, 41, 43]. Consistent with the data from the transfection and ChIP assays, we observed a significant decrease in the expression of Nab1. A similar reduction in Nab1 expression was reported in mice with a hypomorphic allele of Egr2 [22]. In contrast, the expression level of Nab2 was not significantly different in mice containing the null allele of Egr2/Krox20.

Figure 4

Expression levels of Nab genes in Egr2 null mice. Sciatic nerves were isolated from Egr2 wild type (+/+) and knockout (-/-) mice. The relative levels of the Nab1 and Nab2 genes are indicated relative to the wild type sample, which was set as 1. Each level was determined from >10 pooled mice of the same genotype and normalized to the level of 18S rRNA. Quantitative PCR assays were performed in duplicate, and the standard deviation is indicated. Further analysis of nerves from individual mice at P7 (3 of each genotype) confirmed reduction of Nab1 (expression level of 0.58 for Egr2 -/- relative to 1 for wild type, P = 0.04). Expression level of Nab2 in the same samples was 0.95 relative to wild type.

Regulation of the Nab2 promoter by ETS proteins

Given the unexpected finding that the expression level of Nab2 was not lower in the absence of Egr2, the Nab2 promoter was screened for other transcription factor binding sites that could contribute to Nab2 expression, thereby compensating for the loss of Egr2 activation. Analysis of the Nab2 promoter revealed several putative binding sites for ETS transcription factors (diagrammed in Figure 6B). Interestingly, ETS proteins are regulated by neuregulin signaling [4446]. In addition, previous studies have identified ETS transcription factors as playing an important role in autocrine and neuregulin-mediated survival of Schwann cells, and showed that several ETS genes, including Net/Elk3, Ets2, GABPα and Etv1/ER81, are expressed in E12 and newborn mouse peripheral nerve [47]. Ets2 and Etv1/ER81 (hereafter referred to as Etv1) were selected for further analysis as they were highly expressed in microarray analyses of mouse sciatic nerve [see 94246, 92927 probe sets in supplementary data of [48, 49]]. Quantitative PCR analysis confirmed significant levels of Ets2 and Etv1 in mouse and rat sciatic nerves during peripheral nerve myelination (data not shown), and Western analysis (Figure 5A) showed that both Ets2 and Etv1 are developmentally increased in rat sciatic nerve at P15, compared to the P5 (early myelination) timepoint. Since Nab2 expression was unaffected in the Egr2 knockout, we assessed the expression levels of Ets2, Etv1, and Elk3 in Egr2 knockout nerves from P7 mice. Interestingly, Ets1 expression was previously shown to be elevated in sciatic nerve of Egr2-deficient mice [11], and Etv1 expression was somewhat higher in the Egr2 null mice as compared to wild-type mice (Figure 5B). The presence of Ets2 and Etv1 in mouse and rat sciatic nerve during myelination [4749], as well as in Egr2 null mice, suggest that ETS transcription factors could compensate in the absence of Egr2 to maintain Nab2 expression levels.

Figure 5

ETS expression in peripheral nerve. A) Immunoblot analysis was used to determine protein levels of Etv1 and Ets2 in rat sciatic nerve at P5 and P15. Three amounts of the P15 lysate (in increasing 2-fold amounts) were loaded to facilitate comparison with the expression level at P5. For each antibody, the blot was reprobed with a β-actin antibody as a normalization control. B) Expression levels of Ets2, Etv1, and Elk3, in wild-type (+/+) and homozygous null (-/-) Egr2 mice at P7, were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The relative levels of each gene were normalized to 18S rRNA and fold induction was determined as compared to wild-type sample, which was set as 1.

Figure 6

ETS activation of NAB promoters. A) Lysates of the JEG3 and S16Y (Schwann cell) lines were probed with the antibodies directed against Etv1 and Ets2, and respective blots were re-probed with β-actin antibody as a loading control. B) JEG3 cells were transfected with either the pGL3-Nab2 or pGL3-Nab1 reporter. Ets2 (25 ng), Etv1 (50 ng), or Egr2 (25 ng) expression plasmids were co-transfected as indicated in each panel. The y-axis shows the fold activation normalized to the activity of the reporter alone. Means and standard deviations of three separate transfections are shown. Average fold induction of the NAB2 promoter by Ets2 and Etv1 in 8 independent transfections was 19.5- and 7.3-fold, respectively (P =< 10-6 for both). C) Similar transfections were performed to compare ETS activation of the pGL3-Nab2 (wild type) promoter with the mutant Nab2 reporter construct in which two Egr2 binding sites are mutated (used in Figure 1c). The diagram indicates potential ETS binding sites identified by sequence analysis relative to the footprinted Egr2 binding sites in the Nab2 promoter.

ETS proteins activate the Nab2 promoter

To test whether ETS proteins activate the Nab1 and Nab2 promoters, JEG3 cells were transfected with the Nab1 or Nab2 reporters described above, along with expression vectors for Ets2 and Etv1. Western analysis revealed that Ets2 and Etv1 expression in JEG3 cells is much lower than found in the S16Y Schwann cell line (Figure 6A). The Nab2 promoter was significantly induced by Ets2 and Etv1 expression, and this induction was further potentiated by coexpression of Egr2 (Figure 6B). A dominant-negative ETS construct [consisting of the DNA-binding domain of Ets1, as used previously, [47]] specifically interfered with ETS-mediated induction of the promoter and had no effect on activation by Egr2 (data not shown). In contrast, the Nab1 promoter was activated to a lower extent by Ets2 and Etv1, and the ETS factors did not appear to augment activation of the Nab1 promoter by Egr2.

We tested the ability of Ets2 and Etv1 to induce a mutated version of the Nab2 promoter construct containing mutations in two of the Egr2 binding sites (Figure 6C). As observed previously, the mutant promoter is only weakly induced by Egr2. However, Ets2 and Etv1 were nonetheless able to induce this mutant reporter in the absence of Egr2, although the synergistic activation observed with Egr2 was clearly diminished in the mutant promoter.

Ets2 binds to the Nab2 promoter in S16Y Schwann cells

In order to test if ETS factors directly regulate Nab2 in Schwann cells, we carried out ChIP assays in the S16Y Schwann cell line [50], which expresses significant levels of Nab1, Nab2 (data not shown) and ETS factors (Figure 5A). S16Y cells were crosslinked in 1% formaldehyde and sonicated chromatin was immunoprecipitated with either an affinity purified Ets2 antibody (used previously for ChIP analysis, [51]) or an IgG control antibody. Quantitative PCR was carried out on purified DNA with primer sets in the Nab1 and Nab2 promoters, and the IMG2A locus as a negative control. As shown in Figure 7, we observed significant enrichment of Ets2 using two primer sets in the Nab2 promoter, whereas binding of Ets2 was not detected at either the Nab1 promoter or the IMG2A negative control locus. A similar trend in Ets2 occupancy was observed in the S16 Schwann cell line ([50], data not shown).

Figure 7

Ets2 binds to the endogenous Nab2 promoter. Cross-linked chromatin from the S16Y Schwann cell line was immunoprecipitated with Ets2 antibody (filled bars) or purified control IgG (open bars). Percentage recovery relative to input DNA was determined for IMG2A, Nab1, and several Nab2 primer sets as indicated in the diagram. Potential ETS binding sites identified by sequence analysis are shown as filled rectangles. Primer set 3 was used in previous figures to detect Egr2 binding.

One limitation of the ChIP assay is that it cannot be used to precisely localize binding of transcription factors. However, the analysis suggests that Ets2 binding is separable from Egr2, because Ets2 binding was not detected using the primer set (#3) that was used previously to detect binding of Egr2 within the Nab2 promoter (Figures 2 and 3). In addition, the relatively simple recognition site of ETS factors (GGAA or GGAT) does not make sequence analysis necessarily predictive, since the upstream cluster of putative ETS binding sites (spanned by primer set 1) does not appear to bind Ets2. Accordingly, deletion of the upstream cluster of putative ETS binding sites does not affect activation of the Nab2 promoter in transfection assays (data not shown). Ets2 binding appears to occur in two separable regions of the Nab2 promoter, as detected by primer sets 2 and 4. Interestingly, primer set 4 overlaps with the corresponding segment of the human NAB2 promoter that was recently shown to be inducible by phorbol ester [39], which also activates ETS proteins. Overall, these data are consistent with regulation of the Nab2 promoter by ETS transactivators in vivo.


Recent studies have shown that NAB proteins are required for peripheral nerve myelination by Schwann cells, as mice lacking Nab1/Nab2 displayed a severe congenital hypomyelinating phenotype similar to Egr2 knockout mice [22]. The molecular roles of Egr2 and NAB proteins appear to be closely intertwined at several levels, including both physical interaction and coregulation [2, 2124]. Several previous studies have suggested that EGR factors regulate the expression of Nab1 and Nab2 corepressors. First, Nab2 and, to a lesser extent, Nab1 are activated in a delayed early fashion by a variety of stimuli that induce expression of EGR family members [2, 23, 39, 52, 53]. For example, neuregulin treatment of Schwann cells stimulates Egr2 and activates Nab1 and Nab2 expression in a slightly delayed manner [22]. Second, the Nab2 promoter can be activated by EGR factors in transient transfection studies [[39], Figure 1, [54]], and ectopic expression of Egr1 and Egr2 stimulates expression of endogenous Nab1 and Nab2 in a variety of cell lines, including Schwann cells [22, 36, 37, 55, 56].

These earlier studies, however, did not test direct regulation of NAB corepressors by Egr2. Our data provide several lines of evidence to establish Nab2 regulation by Egr2 in vivo. First, DNAse footprinting analysis identified several Egr2 protected sites in both Nab1 and Nab2 promoters. Second, activation of Nab2 by Egr2 in transient transfection assays was severely compromised when Egr2 binding sites were mutated (Figure 1). Finally, ChIP assays demonstrated direct binding of Egr2 to both promoters in cultured Schwann cells as well as myelinating sciatic nerve (Figures 2 and 3). Several studies have implicated neuregulin signaling as a critical factor in Schwann cell survival and stimulation of myelination [2734]. Egr2 occupancy at both Nab1 and Nab2 was significantly enhanced upon neuregulin stimulation of Schwann cells. Our results provide the first demonstration of neuregulin-induced binding of a transcription factor to a specific promoter in Schwann cells.

Several groups have shown that Type III neuregulin (membrane-bound) plays a central role in regulating myelination in vivo [29, 30, 35]. Therefore, addition of soluble neuregulin (as in Figure 2) does not act as a mimic of myelination. Nonetheless, Egr2 is regulated by both soluble neuregulin and interaction with Type III neuregulin [22, 57, 58], and therefore soluble neuregulin probably induces some of the early pathways relating to Egr2 induction in vivo. Since Egr2 expression is regulated by Type III neuregulin signaling in vivo [58], our ChIP data in myelinating rat sciatic nerve presumably reflect type III neuregulin-dependent binding of Egr2 to the NAB promoters.

Previous work showed that expression of Nab1 and Nab2 in zebrafish hindbrain is dependent on Egr2 expression [26]. Therefore, it was surprising that Nab2 levels were not affected in Egr2 knockout mice. In contrast, Nab1 levels were significantly lower in the absence of Egr2, even though the Nab1 promoter is less effectively activated by neuregulin and Egr2 expression (Figure 1, [22]). These data suggested that Nab2 might be coregulated by other factors that compensate for loss of Egr2, and promoter analysis revealed several conserved binding sites for ETS transcription factors. ETS family members are activated by neuregulin signaling [4547]. Since Nab2 is more highly induced by neuregulin stimulation [22], we tested whether ETS proteins are involved in regulation of Nab2.

Both Ets2 and Etv1 activated the Nab2 promoter in transfection assays, and we observed a cooperative effect on the Nab2 promoter when Egr2 was co-expressed together with Ets2 or Etv1. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis with an Ets2 antibody detected binding in the Nab2 promoter, but not in the Nab1 promoter. Unfortunately, we have been unable to find an Etv1 antibody that is suitable for ChIP analysis, but recent immunohistochemical studies indicate that Etv1/ER81 is expressed in Schwann cells [59]. Based on our data, we propose that the higher induction of Nab2 by neuregulin, compared to Nab1 [22], is due to synergistic activation of the Nab2 promoter by Egr2 and ETS factors. Consequently, the maintained expression of Nab2 levels in the knockout could be mediated by elevated levels of Etv1 (Figure 5), Ets1 [11], or other ETS factors that may be revealed by a more comprehensive analysis of family member expression. In addition, although Ets2 mRNA is not induced in the Egr2 knockout, its activity (as well as that of other ETS factors) could be elevated post-transcriptionally (e.g. phosphorylation).

In contrast, the Nab1 promoter was more modestly activated by ETS proteins, suggesting that Nab1 is more exclusively dependent on EGR factors and consequently is more reduced in the absence of Egr2. However, the modest induction of the Nab1 promoter by ETS factors in transfection assays could reflect some level of regulation of Nab1 expression by ETS proteins in Schwann cells, particularly if there are other ETS binding sites that lie outside of the Nab1 promoter regions we have analyzed. A limitation of these studies is that the importance of the NAB promoters relative to more remote enhancer elements has not been established. The mechanism of Nab2 activation by ETS remains to be determined, since only potential ETS binding sites in the Nab2 promoter have been identified. Despite the commonality of the core ETS motif (GGAa/t), individual ETS factors have distinct binding site preferences. Therefore, future studies will focus on identifying the relevant ETS factor(s) using RNAi approaches and/or knockout mice in order to facilitate such a mechanistic analysis.

Given the in vivo evidence that ETS proteins regulate expression of Egr1 and Egr2 [23, 6062], it seems likely that co-induction of Egr2 and Nab2 by ETS transcription factor activation may have evolved to ensure formation of sufficient Egr2/NAB complexes that are required for specific gene regulation events in Schwann cell differentiation. This may also prevent inappropriate activation of some target genes if Nab2 was not immediately present at the onset of Egr2 induction. Alternatively, it is possible that Nab2 modulates other transcription factors, so that its induction should not exclusively depend on Egr2.

Several groups have proposed that the induction of Nab2 constitutes a negative feedback loop in which EGR activators induce expression of their own corepressor [2, 26, 39, 53]. Our studies refine this model by showing that other neuregulin-regulated pathways direct Nab2 expression. In addition, recent publications have shown that Egr2 is required for certain gene repression mechanisms during myelination [11, 12]. Therefore, we suggest that the induction of NAB proteins does not merely constitute a negative feedback loop, but rather, that co-induction of Egr2 and NAB proteins by axon-dependent signals (e.g. neuregulin/erbB) is required to form an Egr2/NAB complex that actively represses transcription of specific genes during peripheral nerve myelination (Figure 8). These results are consistent with our demonstration of direct repression of the Rad gene by an Egr2/NAB complex in Schwann cells [6, 22], as well as recent publications implicating repression by the Egr2/NAB complex in macrophages and cardiomyocytes [23, 63].

Figure 8

Model for regulation of NAB expression. The figure indicates a model for regulation of NAB proteins during myelination, based on the requirement of NAB proteins for peripheral nerve myelination. In the first model (A), neuregulin/erbB signaling (and/or other axon-dependent signals) trigger expression of Egr2/Krox20 in myelinating Schwann cells, and the induction of NAB proteins by binding of Egr2/Krox20 acts as a negative feedback control to limit activation of specific target genes that are important for myelination. B) The second model suggests that co-induction of Egr2 and NAB proteins is mediated by neuregulin-activated expression of ETS factors. Activation of ETS factors induces sufficient amounts of NAB proteins so that an Egr2/NAB complex can actively repress specific target genes. It is noted that these two models are not necessarily mutually exclusive and could apply to different target genes in different tissues.

Our studies do not rule out the possibility that other EGR family members and/or other zinc finger proteins may partially compensate in maintaining Nab2 levels in the absence of Egr2. Indeed, previous work has shown that Egr1 and Egr2/Krox20 are coexpressed in Schwann cells at the onset of myelination (P1). In contrast by one month of age, Egr2 is exclusively expressed in myelinating Schwann cells, whereas Egr1 is confined to nonmyelinating Schwann cells [64]. Egr1 is induced ~2-fold in sciatic nerve of mice homozygous for a hypomorphic Egr2 allele [11], and our analysis indicates that Egr1 mRNA is induced about 1.5-fold in the complete absence of Egr2 (data not shown). Importantly, compensation by other Egr family members is not sufficient to maintain Nab1 levels despite the presence of several Egr1 binding sites, and fails to maintain expression of other Egr2 target genes like myelin protein zero, which is reduced up to 50-fold in the Krox20/Egr2 knockout [1014], suggesting that non-EGR factors contribute significantly to regulation of Nab2 expression. Interestingly, regulation of NAB expression by Egr2 is consistent with previous observations that Nab1 and Nab2 are co-regulated with Egr2 after nerve crush injury [22, 36]. However, the decrease in Nab2 expression following nerve injury would be consistent not only with regulation by Egr2, but also by loss of neuregulin-dependent (i.e. axon-dependent) induction of ETS factors, analogous to regulation of ETS factors by neuregulin signaling observed in other systems [4446].

The involvement of ETS transcription factors in Nab2 regulation resolves several puzzling observations regarding Nab1 and Nab2 activation. First, Nab2 expression is more responsive than Nab1 to several stimuli including serum, neuregulin and NGF [2, 22], even though the Nab1 promoter contains more EGR binding sites than Nab2. Second, Nab2 expression is already fairly elevated by E17 in profiling studies of peripheral nerve myelination, even though Egr2 levels do not peak until P10 [49]. Finally, a recent analysis of hematopoietic development showed that expression of the ETS factor, PU.1, induced expression of both Egr2 and Nab2, and the induction of Nab2 was shown to be Egr2-independent [23]. Our analysis of the Nab2 promoter provides a mechanism for Egr2-independent activation of Nab2 by ETS proteins.


Our results demonstrate that Egr2 is directly involved in regulation of both NAB1 and NAB2 corepressors, indicating that axon-dependent induction of NAB expression is partially dependent on Egr2. However, the maintained expression of Nab2 in Egr2 deficient mice suggested that other factors could compensate for lack of Egr2. Transfection experiments and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated that Ets2 and Etv1 specifically activate the Nab2 promoter, but not Nab1, which provides an explanation for the differential regulation of NAB corepressors in several developmental systems. Finally, these results suggest that NAB corepressors are not simply feedback inhibitors, but that co-induction of Egr2 with NAB corepressors is critically involved in forming a transcriptional complex required for gene regulation events.


Promoter Analysis

Putative Egr2 binding sites were identified by comparison to the previously defined consensus Egr2 binding site [38], and sequence analysis for potential binding sites was performed using the rVISTA program [65]. Footprinting was carried out by incubating 200 ng of purified, FAM-labeled promoter fragments in the presence or absence of recombinant Egr2 protein, and 500 ng of a non-specific 20 bp oligonucleotide in binding buffer (20% glycerol, 20 mM Tris 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.01 mM ZnCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 0.2 mM PMSF) in a volume of 10 μl. One microliter of 1000 U/ml DNAse I (Promega) was added for 1 min at room temperature before adding 90 μl of 0.5% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, and 10 mM EDTA. The resulting fragments were resolved on an ABI Prism 377 Sequencer. Recombinant Egr2 was made by fusing the mouse Egr2 sequence with the 6 × His tag in pET30a (Novagen), and purifying the protein from bacteria using Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol.


A 370 bp NotI/PvuII fragment of the mouse Nab1 promoter (-250 to +120 relative to the transcription start site) and a 1000 bp KpnI/SmaI fragment of the mouse Nab2 promoter (-850 to +150) were fused to the luciferase gene in the pGL3 vector (Promega). The two upstream Egr2 binding sites in the Nab2 promoter were destroyed by replacing C residues at positions 2 and 8 with G. The Etv1 (ER81) expression plasmid was provided by Ralf Janknecht. The expression construct for Egr2 has been previously described [4]. A mouse Ets2 expression plasmid was provided by Barbara Graves [66].

Cell culture conditions and transfection assays

JEG3 cells (a trophoblast-derived cell line) were transfected as described [43, 54]. The average luciferase activity of each sample was normalized to the β-galactosidase activity from the transfected lacZ reporter. Unless otherwise indicated, means and standard deviations of two separate transfections are shown. The S16Y rat Schwann cell line [50] was maintained in DMEM (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium) supplemented with 10% bovine growth serum (Hyclone). Primary rat Schwann cells were cultured as described [43].

Expression analysis

Sciatic nerve cDNA from pooled (or individual) Egr2 wild type, heterozygous and homozygous littermates at day P7 was provided by Lawrence Wrabetz and analyzed as described [14, 41, 43]. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed by monitoring in real-time the increase in fluorescence of the SYBR-GREEN dye [67] using the TaqMan 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Relative amounts of each gene between samples were determined using the Comparative Ct method [68] and normalized to the relative levels of 18S rRNA.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays

All experiments were performed in strict accordance with experimental protocols approved by the University of Wisconsin, School of Veterinary Medicine. ChIP analysis of myelinating rat sciatic nerve at postnatal day 10 was performed as described [14, 41], by mincing pooled sciatic nerves from 8–13 rat pups in 1% formaldehyde for 25 min. For neuregulin stimulation, primary rat Schwann cells were washed once in serum-free media and cultured in N2 medium for 24 hours [36]. The cells were treated with 20 ng/ml neuregulin-1 β isoform (heregulin-β 1, R&D Systems) for 2 h prior to cross-linking cells with 1% formaldehyde. Cross-linked cells were sonicated in a Biorupter sonicator (Diagenode) for 20 minutes.

For each immunoprecipitation, 300 μg of sonicated chromatin (as determined by Bio-Rad protein assay) from either nerves or cells was combined with Egr2 antibody (Covance) or rabbit IgG control antibody (Upstate) overnight at 4°C. 10% of this amount was saved as input. Chromatin-antibody complexes were collected with 30 μl protein G sepharose (pre-blocked with herring sperm DNA and Bovine serum albumin) for 1 hour at 4°C. Beads were washed with low salt, high salt and lithium chloride buffers as described [14, 41]. Crosslinks were reversed for 5 h at 65°C in buffer containing 1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO3 and 200 mM NaCl and DNA was purified using QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). Quantitative PCR was carried out on the purified samples in duplicate with primers specific to regions of interest. Percentage recovery relative to input DNA was determined using the Comparative Ct method [68]. ChIP analysis in the S16Y Schwann cell line [50] was performed similarly with an affinity purified Ets2 antibody [51].

Primer sets used for ChIP analysis were as follows: IMG2a [41],


Rat Nab2 promoter #3 (used in Figures 2, 3, and 6): F) ATAGCTCGGCCTCGGTCAC

  1. R)

    GGGACTCAAGAATCGGGCTC, and the following primer sets used in Figure 6




Immunoblotting analysis

Sciatic nerves were dissected from Sprague-Dawley rat pups at postnatal day 5 (P5) and day 15 (P15) and homogenized in buffer containing 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 1 μg/mL of pepstatinA, 1 μg/mL Leupeptin and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The lysates were then analyzed by immunoblotting with Ets2 [51], Egr2 (Covance) or ETV1/ER81 (Santa Cruz, CA) antibody as indicated in figures. The membranes were reprobed with β-Actin (JLA-20, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank at University of Iowa) for loading control. The membranes were probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibody (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Luminescence was detected with West pico or west dura chemiluminescence detection system (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).


EGR (early growth response) ChIP (chromatin immunoprecipitation):

IMG2a (immunoglobulin G 2a), CMT (Charot-Marie Tooth)


  1. 1.

    Russo MW, Sevetson BR, Milbrandt J: Identification of NAB1, a repressor of NGFI-A- and Krox20-mediated transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995,92(15):6873-6877. 10.1073/pnas.92.15.6873

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Svaren J, Sevetson BR, Apel ED, Zimonjic DB, Popescu NC, Milbrandt J: NAB2, a corepressor of NGFI-A (Egr-1) and Krox20, is induced by proliferative and differentiative stimuli. Mol Cell Biol 1996,16(7):3545-3553.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Svaren J, Sevetson BR, Golda T, Stanton JJ, Swirnoff AH, Milbrandt J: Novel mutants of NAB corepressors enhance activation by Egr transactivators. EMBO J 1998,17(20):6010-6019. 10.1093/emboj/17.20.6010

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sevetson BR, Svaren J, Milbrandt J: A novel activation function for NAB proteins in EGR-dependent transcription of the luteinizing hormone beta gene. J Biol Chem 2000,275(13):9749-9757. 10.1074/jbc.275.13.9749

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Abdulkadir SA, Qu Z, Garabedian E, Song SK, Peters TJ, Svaren J, Carbone JM, Naughton CK, Catalona WJ, Ackerman JJ, Gordon JI, Humphrey PA, Milbrandt J: Impaired prostate tumorigenesis in Egr1-deficient mice. Nat Med 2001,7(1):101-107. 10.1038/83231

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Srinivasan R, Mager GM, Ward RM, Mayer J, Svaren J: NAB2 represses transcription by interacting with the CHD4 subunit of the NuRD complex. J Biol Chem 2006, 281: 15129-15137. 10.1074/jbc.M600775200

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schneider-Maunoury S, Topilko P, Seitanidou T, Levi G, Cohen-Tannoudji M, Pournin S, Babinet C, Charnay P: Disruption of Krox-20 results in alteration of rhombomeres 3 and 5 in the developing hindbrain. Cell 1993, 75: 1199-1214. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90329-O

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Swiatek PJ, Gridley T: Perinatal lethality and defects in hindbrain development in mice homozygous for a targeted mutation of the zinc finger gene Krox20. Genes and Development 1993, 7: 2071-2084. 10.1101/gad.7.11.2071

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Levi G, Topilko P, Schneider-Maunoury S, Lasagna M, Mantero S, Cancedda R, Charnay P: Defective bone formation in Krox-20 mutant mice. Development 1996, 122: 113-120.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Topilko P, Schneider-Maunoury S, Levi G, Baron-Van Evercooren A, Chennoufi AB, Seitanidou T, Babinet C, Charnay P: Krox-20 controls myelination in the peripheral nervous system. Nature 1994, 371: 796-799. 10.1038/371796a0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Le N, Nagarajan R, Wang JY, Araki T, Schmidt RE, Milbrandt J: Analysis of congenital hypomyelinating Egr2Lo/Lo nerves identifies Sox2 as an inhibitor of Schwann cell differentiation and myelination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005,102(7):2596-2601. 10.1073/pnas.0407836102

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Decker L, Desmarquet-Trin-Dinh C, Taillebourg E, Ghislain J, Vallat JM, Charnay P: Peripheral myelin maintenance is a dynamic process requiring constant Krox20 expression. J Neurosci 2006,26(38):9771-9779. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0716-06.2006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zorick TS, Syroid DE, Brown A, Gridley T, Lemke G: Krox-20 controls SCIP expression, cell cycle exit and susceptibility to apoptosis in developing myelinating Schwann cells. Development 1999,126(7):1397-1406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    LeBlanc SE, Jang SW, Ward RM, Wrabetz L, Svaren J: Direct Regulation of Myelin Protein Zero Expression by the Egr2 Transactivator. J Biol Chem 2006, 281: 5453-5460. 10.1074/jbc.M512159200

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    LeBlanc SE, Ward RM, Svaren J: Neuropathy-associated Egr2 mutants disrupt cooperative activation of myelin protein zero by Egr2 and Sox10. Mol Cell Biol 2007,27(9):3521-3529. 10.1128/MCB.01689-06

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Warner LE, Mancias P, Butler IJ, McDonald CM, Keppen L, Koob KG, Lupski JR: Mutations in the early growth response 2 (EGR2) gene are associated with hereditary myelinopathies. Nat Genet 1998,18(4):382-384. 10.1038/ng0498-382

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Timmerman V, De Jonghe P, Ceuterick C, De Vriendt E, Lofgren A, Nelis E, Warner LE, Lupski JR, Martin JJ, Van Broeckhoven C: Novel missense mutation in the early growth response 2 gene associated with Dejerine-Sottas syndrome phenotype. Neurology 1999,52(9):1827-1832.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bellone E, Di Maria E, Soriani S, Varese A, Doria LL, Ajmar F, Mandich P: A novel mutation (D305V) in the early growth response 2 gene is associated with severe Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1 disease. Hum Mutat 1999,14(4):353-354. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(199910)14:4<353::AID-HUMU17>3.0.CO;2-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pareyson D, Taroni F, Botti S, Morbin M, Baratta S, Lauria G, Ciano C, Sghirlanzoni A: Cranial nerve involvement in CMT disease type 1 due to early growth response 2 gene mutation. Neurology 2000,54(8):1696-1698.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mikesova E, Huhne K, Rautenstrauss B, Mazanec R, Barankova L, Vyhnalek M, Horacek O, Seeman P: Novel EGR2 mutation R359Q is associated with CMT type 1 and progressive scoliosis. Neuromuscul Disord 2005,15(11):764-767. 10.1016/j.nmd.2005.08.001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Warner LE, Svaren J, Milbrandt J, Lupski JR: Functional consequences of mutations in the early growth response 2 gene (EGR2) correlate with severity of human myelinopathies. Hum Mol Genet 1999,8(7):1245-1251. 10.1093/hmg/8.7.1245

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Le N, Nagarajan R, Wang JY, Svaren J, LaPash C, Araki T, Schmidt RE, Milbrandt J: Nab proteins are essential for peripheral nervous system myelination. Nat Neurosci 2005,8(7):932-940.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Laslo P, Spooner CJ, Warmflash A, Lancki DW, Lee HJ, Sciammas R, Gantner BN, Dinner AR, Singh H: Multilineage transcriptional priming and determination of alternate hematopoietic cell fates. Cell 2006,126(4):755-766. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.052

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Buitrago M, Lorenz K, Maass AH, Oberdorf-Maass S, Keller U, Schmitteckert EM, Ivashchenko Y, Lohse MJ, Engelhardt S: The transcriptional repressor Nab1 is a specific regulator of pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Nat Med 2005,11(8):837-844. 10.1038/nm1272

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Abdulkadir SA, Carbone JM, Naughton CK, Humphrey PA, Catalona WJ, Milbrandt J: Frequent and early loss of the EGR1 corepressor NAB2 in human prostate carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2001,32(9):935-939. 10.1053/hupa.2001.27102

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mechta-Grigoriou F, Garel S, Charnay P: Nab proteins mediate a negative feedback loop controlling Krox-20 activity in the developing hindbrain. Development 2000, 127: 119-128.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Riethmacher D, Sonnenberg-Riethmacher E, Brinkmann V, Yamaai T, Lewin GR, Birchmeier C: Severe neuropathies in mice with targeted mutations in the ErbB3 receptor. Nature 1997,389(6652):725-730. 10.1038/39593

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Garratt AN, Voiculescu O, Topilko P, Charnay P, Birchmeier C: A dual role of erbB2 in myelination and in expansion of the schwann cell precursor pool. J Cell Biol 2000,148(5):1035-1046. 10.1083/jcb.148.5.1035

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Michailov GV, Sereda MW, Brinkmann BG, Fischer TM, Haug B, Birchmeier C, Role L, Lai C, Schwab MH, Nave KA: Axonal neuregulin-1 regulates myelin sheath thickness. Science 2004,304(5671):700-703. 10.1126/science.1095862

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Taveggia C, Zanazzi G, Petrylak A, Yano H, Rosenbluth J, Einheber S, Xu X, Esper RM, Loeb JA, Shrager P, Chao MV, Falls DL, Role L, Salzer JL: Neuregulin-1 type III determines the ensheathment fate of axons. Neuron 2005,47(5):681-694. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.017

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Maurel P, Salzer JL: Axonal regulation of Schwann cell proliferation and survival and the initial events of myelination requires PI 3-kinase activity. J Neurosci 2000,20(12):4635-4645.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Li Y, Tennekoon GI, Birnbaum M, Marchionni MA, Rutkowski JL: Neuregulin signaling through a PI3K/Akt/Bad pathway in Schwann cell survival. Mol Cell Neurosci 2001,17(4):761-767. 10.1006/mcne.2000.0967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ogata T, Iijima S, Hoshikawa S, Miura T, Yamamoto S, Oda H, Nakamura K, Tanaka S: Opposing extracellular signal-regulated kinase and Akt pathways control Schwann cell myelination. J Neurosci 2004,24(30):6724-6732. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5520-03.2004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chen S, Velardez MO, Warot X, Yu ZX, Miller SJ, Cros D, Corfas G: Neuregulin 1-erbB signaling is necessary for normal myelination and sensory function. J Neurosci 2006,26(12):3079-3086. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3785-05.2006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Nave KA, Salzer JL: Axonal regulation of myelination by neuregulin 1. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006,16(5):492-500. 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.008

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nagarajan R, Svaren J, Le N, Araki T, Watson M, Milbrandt J: EGR2 mutations in inherited neuropathies dominant-negatively inhibit myelin gene expression. Neuron 2001,30(2):355-368. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00282-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Arthur-Farraj P, Mirsky R, Parkinson DB, Jessen KR: A double point mutation in the DNA-binding region of Egr2 switches its function from inhibition to induction of proliferation: A potential contribution to the development of congenital hypomyelinating neuropathy. Neurobiol Dis 2006, 24: 159-169. 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.06.006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Swirnoff AH, Milbrandt J: DNA-binding specificity of NGFI-A and related zinc finger transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol 1995,15(4):2275-2287.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kumbrink J, Gerlinger M, Johnson JP: Egr-1 induces the expression of its corepressor nab2 by activation of the nab2 promoter thereby establishing a negative feedback loop. J Biol Chem 2005,280(52):42785-42793. 10.1074/jbc.M511079200

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Dorn C, Ou Q, Svaren J, Crawford PA, Sadovsky Y: Activation of luteinizing hormone-beta gene by gonadotropin releasing hormone requires the synergy of early growth response-1 and steroidogenic factor-1. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1999, 274: 13870-13876. 10.1074/jbc.274.20.13870

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jang SW, LeBlanc SE, Roopra A, Wrabetz L, Svaren J: In vivo detection of Egr2 binding to target genes during peripheral nerve myelination. Journal of Neurochemistry 2006, 98: 1678-1687. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04069.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zorick TS, Syroid DE, Arroyo E, Scherer SS, Lemke G: The Transcription Factors SCIP and Krox-20 Mark Distinct Stages and Cell Fates in Schwann Cell Differentiation. Mol Cell Neurosci 1996,8(2/3):129-145. 10.1006/mcne.1996.0052

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    LeBlanc SE, Srinivasan R, Ferri C, Mager GM, Gillian-Daniel AL, Wrabetz L, Svaren J: Regulation of cholesterol/lipid biosynthetic genes by Egr2/Krox20 during peripheral nerve myelination. J Neurochem 2005,93(3):737-748. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03056.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hagedorn L, Paratore C, Brugnoli G, Baert JL, Mercader N, Suter U, Sommer L: The Ets domain transcription factor Erm distinguishes rat satellite glia from Schwann cells and is regulated in satellite cells by neuregulin signaling. Dev Biol 2000,219(1):44-58. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9595

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sapru MK: Neuregulin-1 regulates expression of the Ets-2 transcription factor. Life Sci 2001,69(22):2663-2674. 10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01343-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bosc DG, Goueli BS, Janknecht R: HER2/Neu-mediated activation of the ETS transcription factor ER81 and its target gene MMP-1. Oncogene 2001,20(43):6215-6224. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204820

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Parkinson DB, Langner K, Namini SS, Jessen KR, Mirsky R: beta-Neuregulin and autocrine mediated survival of Schwann cells requires activity of Ets family transcription factors. Mol Cell Neurosci 2002,20(1):154-167. 10.1006/mcne.2002.1109

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Nagarajan R, Le N, Mahoney H, Araki T, Milbrandt J: Deciphering peripheral nerve myelination by using Schwann cell expression profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002,99(13):8998-9003. 10.1073/pnas.132080999

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Verheijen MH, Chrast R, Burrola P, Lemke G: Local regulation of fat metabolism in peripheral nerves. Genes Dev 2003,17(19):2450-2464. 10.1101/gad.1116203

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Toda K, Small JA, Goda S, Quarles RH: Biochemical and cellular properties of three immortalized Schwann cell lines expressing different levels of the myelin-associated glycoprotein. J Neurochem 1994,63(5):1646-1657.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ghosh D, Sachdev S, Hannink M, Roberts RM: Coordinate regulation of basal and cyclic 5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-activated expression of human chorionic gonadotropin-alpha by Ets-2 and cAMP-responsive element binding protein. Mol Endocrinol 2005,19(4):1049-1066. 10.1210/me.2004-0320

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kirsch KH, Korradi Y, Johnson JP: Mader: a novel nuclear protein over expressed in human melanomas. Oncogene 1996,12(5):963-971.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Silverman ES, Khachigian LM, Santiago FS, Williams AJ, Lindner V, Collins T: Vascular smooth muscle cells express the transcriptional corepressor NAB2 in response to injury. Am J Pathol 1999,155(4):1311-1317.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gillian AL, Svaren J: The Ddx20/DP103 dead box protein represses transcriptional activation by Egr2/Krox-20. J Biol Chem 2004,279(10):9056-9063. 10.1074/jbc.M309308200

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ehrengruber MU, Muhlebach SG, Sohrman S, Leutenegger CM, Lester HA, Davidson N: Modulation of early growth response (EGR) transcription factor-dependent gene expression by using recombinant adenovirus. Gene 2000,258(1-2):63-69. 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00445-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Fu M, Zhu X, Zhang J, Liang J, Lin Y, Zhao L, Ehrengruber MU, Chen YE: Egr-1 target genes in human endothelial cells identified by microarray analysis. Gene 2003, 315: 33-41. 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00730-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Murphy P, Topilko P, Schneider-Maunoury S, Seitanidou T, Baron-Van Evercooren A, Charnay P: The regulation of Krox-20 expression reveals important steps in the control of peripheral glial cell development. Development 1996,122(9):2847-2857.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Taveggia C, Pizzagalli A, Fagiani E, Messing A, Feltri ML, Wrabetz L: Characterization of a Schwann cell enhancer in the myelin basic protein gene. J Neurochem 2004,91(4):813-824. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02745.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sedy J, Tseng S, Walro JM, Grim M, Kucera J: ETS transcription factor ER81 is required for the Pacinian corpuscle development. Dev Dyn 2006,235(4):1081-1089. 10.1002/dvdy.20710

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Robinson L, Panayiotakis A, Papas TS, Kola I, Seth A: ETS target genes: identification of egr1 as a target by RNA differential display and whole genome PCR techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997,94(14):7170-7175. 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7170

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ayadi A, Zheng H, Sobieszczuk P, Buchwalter G, Moerman P, Alitalo K, Wasylyk B: Net-targeted mutant mice develop a vascular phenotype and up-regulate egr-1. Embo J 2001,20(18):5139-5152. 10.1093/emboj/20.18.5139

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Krysinska H, Hoogenkamp M, Ingram R, Wilson N, Tagoh H, Laslo P, Singh H, Bonifer C: A two-step, PU.1-dependent mechanism for developmentally regulated chromatin remodeling and transcription of the c-fms gene. Mol Cell Biol 2007,27(3):878-887. 10.1128/MCB.01915-06

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Wang C, Dostanic S, Servant N, Chalifour LE: Egr-1 negatively regulates expression of the sodium-calcium exchanger-1 in cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo. Cardiovasc Res 2005,65(1):187-194. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.09.026

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Topilko P, Levi G, Merlo G, Mantero S, Desmarquet C, Mancardi G, Charnay P: Differential regulation of the zinc finger genes Krox-20 and Krox-24 (Egr-1) suggests antagonistic roles in Schwann cells. J Neurosci Res 1997,50(5):702-712. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19971201)50:5<702::AID-JNR7>3.0.CO;2-L

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Loots GG, Ovcharenko I, Pachter L, Dubchak I, Rubin EM: rVista for comparative sequence-based discovery of functional transcription factor binding sites. Genome Res 2002,12(5):832-839. 10.1101/gr.225502. Article published online before print in April 2002

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Seidel JJ, Graves BJ: An ERK2 docking site in the Pointed domain distinguishes a subset of ETS transcription factors. Genes Dev 2002,16(1):127-137. 10.1101/gad.950902

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Morrison TB, Weis JJ, Wittwer CT: Quantification of low-copy transcripts by continuous SYBR Green I monitoring during amplification. Biotechniques 1998,24(6):954-962.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001,25(4):402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Lawrence Wrabetz for generously providing sciatic nerve RNA from Krox20 null animals and Richard Quarles for providing the S16Y cell line. We would also like to thank Ralf Janknecht and Barbara Graves for providing the Etv1 and Ets2 expression plasmids, respectively, David Jarrard and Vivian Fu for assistance with footprinting, and Heather Stephany for technical assistance. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (HD41590) to JS, and a core grant to the Waisman Center from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30 HD03352).

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rajini Srinivasan or Sung-Wook Jang or Rebecca M Ward or Shrikesh Sachdev or Toshihiko Ezashi or John Svaren.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

RS performed transfections, immunoblotting and ChIP experiments and helped write the manuscript. SJ assisted in development of in vivo ChIP assays and contributed preliminary data. RW performed DNase I footprinting. SS and TE produced and purified anti-Ets2 sera for ChIP analysis. JS was responsible for experimental design and analysis and drafted this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, R., Jang, SW., Ward, R.M. et al. Differential regulation of NAB corepressor genes in Schwann cells. BMC Molecular Biol 8, 117 (2007).

Download citation


  • Sciatic Nerve
  • Schwann Cell
  • JEG3 Cell
  • Egr2 Expression
  • Myelin Protein Zero