- Research article
- Open Access
Mutational analysis of an archaeal minichromosome maintenance protein exterior hairpin reveals critical residues for helicase activity and DNA binding
© Brewster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 13 April 2010
Accepted: 18 August 2010
Published: 18 August 2010
The mini-chromosome maintenance protein (MCM) complex is an essential replicative helicase for DNA replication in Archaea and Eukaryotes. While the eukaryotic complex consists of six homologous proteins (MCM2-7), the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus has only one MCM protein (ssoMCM), six subunits of which form a homohexamer. We have recently reported a 4.35Å crystal structure of the near full-length ssoMCM. The structure reveals a total of four β-hairpins per subunit, three of which are located within the main channel or side channels of the ssoMCM hexamer model generated based on the symmetry of the N-terminal Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus (mtMCM) structure. The fourth β-hairpin, however, is located on the exterior of the hexamer, near the exit of the putative side channels and next to the ATP binding pocket.
In order to better understand this hairpin's role in DNA binding and helicase activity, we performed a detailed mutational and biochemical analysis of nine residues on this exterior β-hairpin (EXT-hp). We examined the activities of the mutants related to their helicase function, including hexamerization, ATPase, DNA binding and helicase activities. The assays showed that some of the residues on this EXT-hp play a role for DNA binding as well as for helicase activity.
These results implicate several current theories regarding helicase activity by this critical hexameric enzyme. As the data suggest that EXT-hp is involved in DNA binding, the results reported here imply that the EXT-hp located near the exterior exit of the side channels may play a role in contacting DNA substrate in a manner that affects DNA unwinding.
DNA replication is a tightly regulated and efficient process. Central to this process is the coordinated unwinding of double stranded DNA by the AAA+ family member MCM (Minichromosome Maintenance) protein [1–3]. As the replicative helicase, MCM is required for cellular viability, and is regulated through controlled assembly at the origin in combination with ORC and Cdc6 among others, and through phosphorylation by various replication checkpoint proteins such as CDK and DDK [4–6].
In eukaryotes, MCM is composed of a heterohexamer formed from the gene products of 6 homologs (MCM2-7), all necessary for cell survival [5, 7]. Archaeal MCM serves as a model system for studying MCM function as many strains only have one MCM gene whose product oligomerizes as a homohexamer or even as a double hexamer [8–10]. Several structures have been recently made available that have helped understanding of the biochemistry involved in DNA unwinding (reviewed in [11–13]. Specifically, the poorly-conserved N-terminal portion was solved in a double hexameric configuration from Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus (N-mtMCM) , and as single hexamers from Sulfolobus solfataricus (N-ssoMCM) . The near full length MCM monomer from Sulfolobus solfataricus (ssoMCM) was also recently solved . Finally, the structure of an inactive MCM homolog with natural internal deletions from Methanopyrus kandleri (mkaMCM2) was also published .
The crystal structure of ssoMCM reveals an elongated fold for the monomer with two large domains. The first is a large N-terminal domain with its sequence, but not structure, poorly conserved. The second is a highly conserved C-terminal helicase domain that contains what is known as the MCM box . The hexamer structures, and hexamer models of the near-full length structures, reveal a large central channel, through which DNA is postulated to be threaded.
One of the major structural features of the subunit structure of ssoMCM is the four obvious β-hairpins projecting radially away from the monomeric ssoMCM. One, located in the N-terminal domain (NT-hairpin), projects into the central channel and has been implicated in DNA binding [10, 17]. The other three β-hairpins are located in the C-terminal AAA+ domain: the pre-sensor 1 hairpin (PS1-hp), the helix 2 insertion hairpin (H2I-hp), and the external hairpin (EXT-hp) .
Residues on the PS1-hp and H2I-hp play a role for helicase activity, are involved in DNA binding and project into or near the central channel [17, 18]. The EXT-hp, however, is located on the exterior side of the hexamer, near the side channels in the C-terminal domain . The unusual location of this EXT-hp raises interesting questions regarding its functional role. However, unlike the other β-hairpins, no detailed mutational and functional analysis of the EXT-hp has been performed, and its role in DNA binding, ATPase, and helicase activity is not understood. In this work we present a granular examination of this important structural feature, including a thorough examination of the hairpin's role in DNA binding, ATP hydrolysis and helicase activity.
Mutational analysis of the exterior hairpin
Mutant M1 modifies a highly conserved lysine to alanine on the exterior side of the hairpin, close to the hairpin base. Mutants M2-M7 are located in the VLED sequence that wraps around the tip of the hairpin and consist of single or double mutations. We previously postulated that these residues could function to repel DNA, similar to the acidic pin in RuvA [15, 19]. M2-M4 change the properties of the hydrophobic residues, VL. Of the two, the leucine is more conserved but neither are strongly conserved in eukaryotes or archaea. M5-M8 mutate the acidic ED region. Of note, the aspartate is highly conserved in archaea, but in eukaryotes its conservation varies by homolog. For example, in MCM5 it remains an aspartate, but in MCM3 it is consistently changed to asparagine. M8 changes a well conserved arginine in archaea that only remains consistently basic in MCM7, and mostly so in MCM2. M9, changing an absolutely conserved arginine at the base of the hairpin, had been assayed previously for ATPase and helicase activity , and was included as an additional control. We further assayed it for DNA binding differentials. Finally, M10, the Walker A mutant, changes the conserved lysine vital for ATP hydrolysis . The Walker A motif is not conserved in the inactive MCM homolog from Methanopyrus kandleri , nor is the EXT-hp present in that homolog.
Oligomerization as assayed by size-exclusion chromatography
Kinetic parameters of EXT-hp mutants
ATpase + Y-DNA
3.1 ± 0.1
170 ± 20
3.8 ± 0.1
190 ± 20
240 ± 0.5
8.8 ± 0.5
224 ± 7.3
5.8 ± 1.3
1.8 ± 0.1
140 ± 30
3.7 ± 0.5
440 ± 150
317 ± 5.8
4.4 ± 0.3
398 ± 4.0
13.2 ± 1.3
2.4 ± 0.1
120 ± 20
3.6 ± 0.1
160 ± 20
209 ± 5.8
4.7 ± 0.5
230 ± 7.2
10.1 ± 3.3
4.7 ± 0.3
270 ± 40
5.2 ± 0.2
260 ± 30
169 ± 1.3
5.6 ± 0.1
186 ± 6.4
7.9 ± 1.1
3.9 ± 0.1
230 ± 10
5.3 ± 0.2
260 ± 30
165 ± 10.0
13.4 ± 4.3
178 ± 1.5
7.7 ± 0.5
2.9 ± 0.2
60 ± 40
3.7 ± 0.2
180 ± 30
185 ± 0.3
12.1 ± 0.3
224 ± 0.9
11.6 ± 0.4
2.3 ± 0.1
100 ± 20
2.6 ± 0.2
130 ± 30
283 ± 78.7
15.6 ± 20.1
400 ± 6.5
5.6 ± 0.4
2.0 ± 0.1
90 ± 10
2.2 ± 0.1
90 ± 20
444 ± 1.0
10.6 ± 0.5
404 ± 2.6
8.8 ± 0.4
1.8 ± 0.1
170 ± 40
1.7 ± 0.1
170 ± 30
380 ± 1.8
8.0 ± 0.3
483 ± 0.4
9.0 ± 0.03
325 ± 8.3
6.2 ± 0.8
428 ± 2.0
12.9 ± 0.5
267 ± 7.0
4.5 ± 0.5
339 ± 2.6
11.4 ± 2.0
In this report, we conduct a systematic mutational and functional study in order to understand how this externally located β-hairpin immediately next to the exit of the side channels is involved in helicase function. We do this by assessing specific oligomerization, DNA binding, ATPase, and DNA unwinding functionality of the mutants compared with wild type MCM.
Summary of biochemical assays of the mutants
Mutants M5-M7 contain mutations of acidic residues (Table 2). M5 showed a slight increase in ssDNA binding, but no change from WT in all other aspects. M6, the more highly conserved of the acidic residues, revealed weaker ATPase activity, Y-DNA binding and helicase activity. It is interesting that the loss of the aspartate decreased DNA binding. The puzzling data in this set, however, is the double mutant, M7. Despite the weaker ATPase activity and DNA binding, it showed near wild-type helicase activity.
Mutants involving basic residues (M1, M8-M9) have the most profound effect in all the activities assayed. Reduced ATPase activity, DNA binding and helicase activity are observed across the board. Notably, R331 (M9), which had been assayed for ATPase and helicase activity previously , now is revealed to have compromised DNA binding as well.
Our single and double mutant EMSA assays from the current round of experiments reveal decreases in DNA binding on the order of 1.5 to 2 fold increases in Kd. Mutations in the PS1-hairpin resulted in a similar change in DNA binding (2× fold increase in Kd) . Therefore, the EXT-hp appears to be involved in interactions with DNA, as shown for the three other β-hairpin structural elements in the MCM structure.
Some of the specific changes in DNA binding caused by mutations appear to be counter intuitive. For example M6 and M7, which are both mutations eliminating negative charges, have a lowered affinity for DNA. Also, the increase in binding from hydrophobic mutations is interesting. Similarly, how two basic amino acids on opposite sides of the hairpin (K323 (M1) and R329 (M8)) could impact DNA binding in similar ways is unclear. Regardless of the individual peculiarities of the mutants, there seems to be a general trend when looking at the data as a whole. With the exception of mutant M1, the functional role of the residues generally increases in importance from the base of the hairpin to the tip, with the residues located in the internal β-strand of the EXT-hairpin being the most important for ATPase activity, DNA binding and helicase activity.
The proximity of R329 (M8) (decreased DNA binding, decreased helicase activity) to the putative side-channel could implicate the hairpin in pulling ssDNA through the channel in a side channel extrusion model (see ). However, additional explanations are feasible. One possibility is, as proposed by Rothenberg et. al. in a DNA exclusion model , that one ssDNA strand may be on the exterior of the hexamer interacting with the EXT-hp while the other ssDNA is translocated through the central channel.
However, it is important to note that decreases in DNA binding were often correlated with decreases in ATPase activity. Defects in ATP binding could prevent conformational changes necessary for DNA binding. Thus these DNA binding defects could be secondary effects. Alternatively, DNA binding stimulates ATPase activity, so mutations with DNA binding phenotypes could also result in slowing the rate of ATP hydrolysis as a secondary effect. This is at least partially borne out by the fact that the km 's for ATPase activity do not seem unduly affected by the mutations, with the exceptions of M9 and M10 (Table 1). Thus, the enzyme may be still binding ATP with wild-type affinity, but hydrolyzes ATP slower due to problems with DNA binding.
Finally, R331 (M9) is a residue of particular interest since we first examined the ssoMCM structure and compared it to known mutations [20, 22]. As part of an examination of sequence alignments and structure alignments of ssoMCM with viral hexameric helicase LargeT antigen (LTag), we discovered that R331 aligns well with LTag K418 that serves as a "lysine finger" and, in combination with LTag's arginine finger, coordinates the ATP gamma phosphate in the ATP binding and hydrolysis [22–24]. K418 is vital for LTag ATPase and helicase activity , which mimics the phenotype we see here. Thus, the base of the EXT-hp seems directly involved in ATP hydrolysis.
We have presented for the first time the systematic mutational and biochemical analysis of the residues on the EXT-hp to understand their functional roles in MCM helicase activity. The study suggests that key residues on the EXT-hp affect helicase activity through their DNA binding activity. Determining how this EXT-hp interacts with DNA through these residues and how such interactions are related to unwinding activity will require further structural and functional analysis.
Cloning, purification and size-exclusion analysis
WT Sulfolobus solfataricus MCM and mutations were cloned and purified in wash buffer (WB: 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 250 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT), as described previously  with the following changes: prior to size-exclusion chromatography, the protein was first purified on a 6 mL Resource Q anion exchange column. Protein concentration was assayed by nano-drop and SDS-PAGE analysis. The protein was then diluted to 10 uM in helicase buffer (HB, 30 mM Tris acetate (pH 8), 75 mM NaCl, 50 mM potassium acetate, 10 mM magnesium acetate), aliquoted, and frozen at -80°C. ~0.5 mg of protein was taken separately to analyze on size-exclusion chromatography.
Helicase assays were performed exactly as described previously on radio-labeled Y-shaped DNA substrate . The substrate was created from annealing two complementary strands. The sequences are: (dT)44 GCTCGTGCAGACGTCGAGGTGAGGACGAGCTCCTCGTGACCACG (strand Y1) and CGTGGTCACGAGGAGCTCGTCCTCACCTCGACGTCTGCACGAGC (dT)44 (strand Y2). Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays
DNA binding constants were determined using electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs). ssDNA (strand Y2) or Y-shaped DNA from above was radio labeled and desalted using a Micro Bio-Spin 6 Column (BIO-RAD). Increasing amounts of protein were incubated with 1.4 nM DNA in DNA binding buffer (DB, 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM magnesium chloride) for 30 minutes at 65°C, then ran on a 5% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× Tris/borate/EDTA buffer for 90 minutes at 100 V. DNA bands were detected by autoradiography and quantified. % DNA bound was determined vs. protein concentration and Kd was calculated as described in . Experiments were performed in duplicate.
ATPase assays were performed as described previously . Experiments were performed in triplicate.
This work is supported by NIH grant GM080338.
- Lee JK, Hurwitz J: Processive DNA helicase activity of the minichromosome maintenance proteins 4, 6, and 7 complex requires forked DNA structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98 (1): 54-59. 10.1073/pnas.98.1.54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ishimi Y: A DNA helicase activity is associated with an MCM4, -6, and -7 protein complex. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272 (39): 24508-24513. 10.1074/jbc.272.39.24508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- You Z, Komamura Y, Ishimi Y: Biochemical analysis of the intrinsic Mcm4-Mcm6-mcm7 DNA helicase activity. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19 (12): 8003-8015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mendez J, Stillman B: Perpetuating the double helix: molecular machines at eukaryotic DNA replication origins. Bioessays. 2003, 25 (12): 1158-1167. 10.1002/bies.10370.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bell SP, Dutta A: DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002, 71: 333-374. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135425.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowers JL, Randell JC, Chen S, Bell SP: ATP hydrolysis by ORC catalyzes reiterative Mcm2-7 assembly at a defined origin of replication. Mol Cell. 2004, 16 (6): 967-978. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tye BK: MCM proteins in DNA replication. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999, 68: 649-686. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kelman Z, Lee JK, Hurwitz J: The single minichromosome maintenance protein of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum DeltaH contains DNA helicase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96 (26): 14783-14788. 10.1073/pnas.96.26.14783.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chong JP, Hayashi MK, Simon MN, Xu RM, Stillman B: A double-hexamer archaeal minichromosome maintenance protein is an ATP-dependent DNA helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (4): 1530-1535. 10.1073/pnas.030539597.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fletcher RJ, Bishop BE, Leon RP, Sclafani RA, Ogata CM, Chen XS: The structure and function of MCM from archaeal M. Thermoautotrophicum. Nat Struct Biol. 2003, 10 (3): 160-167. 10.1038/nsb893.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakakibara N, Kelman LM, Kelman Z: Unwinding the structure and function of the archaeal MCM helicase. Mol Microbiol. 2009, 72 (2): 286-296. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06663.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bochman ML, Schwacha A: The mcm complex: unwinding the mechanism of a replicative helicase. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009, 73 (4): 652-683. 10.1128/MMBR.00019-09.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Costa A, Onesti S: Structural biology of MCM helicases. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2009, 44 (5): 326-342. 10.1080/10409230903186012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu W, Pucci B, Rossi M, Pisani FM, Ladenstein R: Structural analysis of the Sulfolobus solfataricus MCM protein N-terminal domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (10): 3235-3243. 10.1093/nar/gkn183.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brewster AS, Wang G, Yu X, Greenleaf WB, Carazo JM, Tjajadia M, Klein MG, Chen XS: Crystal structure of a near-full-length archaeal MCM: functional insights for an AAA+ hexameric helicase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105 (51): 20191-20196. 10.1073/pnas.0808037105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bae B, Chen YH, Costa A, Onesti S, Brunzelle JS, Lin Y, Cann IK, Nair SK: Insights into the architecture of the replicative helicase from the structure of an archaeal MCM homolog. Structure. 2009, 17 (2): 211-222. 10.1016/j.str.2008.11.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGeoch AT, Trakselis MA, Laskey RA, Bell SD: Organization of the archaeal MCM complex on DNA and implications for the helicase mechanism. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005, 12 (9): 756-762. 10.1038/nsmb974.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jenkinson ER, Chong JPJ: Minichromosome maintenance helicase activity is controlled by N- and C-terminal motifs and requires the ATPase domain helix-2 insert. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103 (20): 7613-7618. 10.1073/pnas.0509297103.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ingleston SM, Sharples GJ, Lloyd RG: The acidic pin of RuvA modulates Holliday junction binding and processing by the RuvABC resolvasome. EMBO J. 2000, 19 (22): 6266-6274. 10.1093/emboj/19.22.6266.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Moreau MJ, McGeoch AT, Lowe AR, Itzhaki LS, Bell SD: ATPase site architecture and helicase mechanism of an archaeal MCM. Mol Cell. 2007, 28 (2): 304-314. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rothenberg E, Trakselis MA, Bell SD, Ha T: MCM forked substrate specificity involves dynamic interaction with the 5'-tail. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (47): 34229-34234. 10.1074/jbc.M706300200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brewster AS, Chen XS: Insights into the MCM functional mechanism: lessons learned from the archaeal MCM complex. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2010, 45 (3): 243-256. 10.3109/10409238.2010.484836.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Li D, Zhao R, Lilyestrom W, Gai D, Zhang R, DeCaprio JA, Fanning E, Jochimiak A, Szakonyi G, Chen XS: Structure of the replicative helicase of the oncoprotein SV40 large tumour antigen. Nature. 2003, 423 (6939): 512-518. 10.1038/nature01691.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gai D, Zhao R, Li D, Finkielstein CV, Chen XS: Mechanisms of conformational change for a replicative hexameric helicase of SV40 large tumor antigen. Cell. 2004, 119 (1): 47-60. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenleaf WB, Shen J, Gai D, Chen XS: Systematic study of the functions for the residues around the nucleotide pocket in simian virus 40 AAA+ hexameric helicase. J Virol. 2008, 82 (12): 6017-6023. 10.1128/JVI.00387-08.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.