- Research article
- Open Access
A trypsin-like protease with apparent dual function in early Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer) development
© Skern-Mauritzen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 19 December 2008
- Accepted: 13 May 2009
- Published: 13 May 2009
Trypsin-like serine proteases are involved in a large number of processes including digestive degradation, regulation of developmental processes, yolk degradation and yolk degradome activation. Trypsin like peptidases considered to be involved in digestion have been characterized in Lepeophtheirus salmonis. During these studies a trypsin-like peptidase which differed in a number of traits were identified.
An intronless trypsin-like serine peptidase (LsTryp10) from L., salmonis was identified and characterized. LsTryp10 mRNA is evenly distributed in the ovaries and oocytes, but is located along the ova periphery. LsTryp10 protein is deposited in the oocytes and all embryonic cells. LsTryp10 mRNA translation and concurrent degradation after fertilization was found in the embryos demonstrating that LsTryp10 protein is produced both by the embryo and maternally. The results furthermore indicate that LsTryp10 protein of maternal origin has a distribution pattern different to that of embryonic origin.
Based on present data and previous studies of peptidases in oocytes and embryos, we hypothesize that maternally deposited LsTryp10 protein is involved in regulation of the yolk degradome. The function of LsTryp10 produced by the embryonic cells remains unknown. To our knowledge a similar expression pattern has not previously been reported for any protease.
- Embryonic Cell
- Yolk Granule
- Maternal mRNA
- Salmon Louse
- Genital Segment
Trypsin-like serine peptidases of the S1A subfamily (hereafter referred to as S1A peptidases) are found in all metazoan groups and are involved in a variety of biological processes [1, 2]. They are synthesized as inactive zymogens which are activated by proteolytic cleavage at a defined site N-terminal to the proteolytic domain. They may consist of the proteolytic domain only (referred to as single domain peptidases) or may contain one or more additional domains, generally N-terminal to the proteolytic domain (referred to as multi domain peptidases). S1A peptidases are generally extracellular peptidases although some have intracellular functions [2, 3]. S1A peptidases involved in digestion commonly consist of a proteolytic domain only, but single domain S1A peptidases may exhibit strict specificity and serve regulatory roles [4–6]. However, regulatory S1A peptidases generally include one or more additional domains [2, 5, 7]. Trypsins are S1A peptidases with a specific architecture that cleave substrates after Arg and Lys . They are common digestive enzymes in metazoans and their zymogens are activated by trypsins or enteropeptidases . Once activated, the digestive trypsins contribute to the proteolysis of ingested proteins and also activate other digestive zymogens such as chymotrypsinogens and proelastases .
S1A peptidases also play important roles during fertilization and early development; at fertilization S1A peptidases are necessary to prevent polyspermy by catalyzing formation of a fertilization envelope [8, 9] and in the early embryo, S1A peptidases participate in developmental control [10, 11] and cell migration [12, 13]. Egg yolk degradation has been reported to be catalyzed both by aspartic and cysteine cathepsins and serine peptidases, including S1A peptidases [14–20]. S1A peptidases involved in egg yolk degradationare suggested mainly to serve in degradome activation [14, 17, 21], but it should be noted that the main mechanism controlling activation of yolk degrading proteases appears to be decreasing yolk granule pH [14, 15, 22].
Proteins needed before the midblastula transition are supplied maternally or encoded by maternal mRNA. S1A peptidases exerting their role in the embryos prior to the midblastula transition appear to be transcribed and translated either maternally  or by germ line cells other than the oocyte . Proteases involved in, or putatively involved in, yolk degradation generally appear to be translated before fertilization [24–26] although embryonic transcription and translation of a vitellogenin degrading S1A peptidase has been reported in Bombyx mori . However, the exact spatiotemporal patterns of transcription and translation are unknown for many peptidases active during early development. Maternal transcripts have been reported to comprise transcripts from more than 50% of the protein encoding genes in an organism [27, 28]. However, detailed studies of maternally encoded S1A peptidases have not been reported previously.
Salmon lice (L. salmonis) are obligate ectoparasites on salmonid fishes and a major pest in salmon aquaculture. Adult female salmon lice are fertilized by males that deposit spematophores at the genital segment . At regular temperature dependent intervals (approximately 10 days at 10°C (personal observations)) they produce a pair of eggstrings (containing ≤ 1500 eggs) that are fertilized when they are extruded . During characterization of trypsins and trypsin-like peptidases in L. salmonis [30–33] we identified an intronless single domain trypsin that was transcribed by adult female L. salmonis (LsTryp10, accession# EF490878). In the present study LsTryp10 is characterized and functional implications are discussed.
EST sequencing led to identification of a 1052 b.p. transcript encoding a serine proteinase named LsTryp10. The transcript consist of a 810 b.p. ORF, a 37 b.p. 5' untranslated region (UTR) and a 205 b.p. 3' UTR. Alignment of genomic and corresponding cDNA sequences revealed that LsTryp10 is devoid of introns. The protein was predicted to be secreted from the cell using the analytical strategy recommended by Emanuelsson et al. . The encoded 270 amino acid (a.a.) protein with a predicted weight of 30 kDa consist of a putative 17 a.a. signal peptide, a 10 a.a. activation peptide and a 243 a.a. proteolytic domain. The proteolytic domain in the predicted protein includes the catalytic triad His57, Asp102 and Ser195 in a sequence context typical for proteinases of the S1A subfamily in addition to residues characteristic for S1A peptidases with trypsin specificity, including Tyr172, Asp189, Gln192, Gly216 and Gly226 (chymotrypsinogen numbering ). The encoded trypsinogen appear to contain the 3 cysteine bridges conserved in S1A peptidases  and an additional cysteine bridge between Cys106 and Cys129. However, LsTryp10 do not contain the disulphide bridge (Cys59 to Cys104) conserved in previously described single domain trypsins from L. salmonis . The overall identity to previously published trypsins from L. salmonis [30, 31, 37] was ≤ 33%.
Stage specific LsTryp10 transcription and size confirmation
Localization of LsTryp10 mRNA
Yolk lumen acidification, LsTryp10 protein localization, translation and mRNA degradation
The results show that LsTryp10 encodes a peptidase that includes the catalytic triad residues (His, Asp and Ser) in a context typical for serine peptidases of the S1A clan in addition to the specificity determinants for trypsin . Transcript length and presence was confirmed by northern blot analysis (Fig. 2). Interestingly, LsTryp10 is devoid of introns, which is a feature also reported for functional digestive trypsins in Anopheles gambiae . The phylogenetic analysis do not indicate a reliable phylogenetic position for LsTryp10, which appears no closer related to other single domain trypsins from L. salmonis [30, 31, 33, 37] than to bacterial trypsin or the clip domain containing LsCSP1 . CGSP1, which is thought to activate the fertilization envelope and prevent polyspermy in sea urchins , appears to be closer related to acrosins than to the other serine peptidases included in the analysis. Since this may give the impression that S1A peptidases related to fertilization form a monophyletic assemblage it should be noted that mouse TESP4 which is suggested to have a fertilization related function , resides on a well supported branch with pancreatic trypsin from cow and chicken (Fig. 1).
Background LsTryp10 transcription is detected in all investigated L. salmonis stages except adult females where it is upregulated more than 2000-fold relative to the level in nauplius II larvae (Fig. 3). In situ hybridization results show that LsTryp10 mRNA is transcribed in the ovary. LsTryp10 transcripts are evenly distributed in the immature oocytes in the anterior oviduct in cephalothorax (Fig. 4H, J), but are located along the periphery of the ova in the genital segment (Fig. 4F). The change in distribution of LsTryp10 mRNA indicates that the transcripts are actively localized in the egg, as are the transcription factor bicoid mRNA in Drosophila melanogaster and the transforming growth factor Vg1 mRNA in Xenopus laevis [41, 42]. The 3' UTR in LsTryp10 mRNA is substantially longer (205 b.p.) than the 3'-UTRs (44–104 b.p.) in previously characterized L. salmonis S1A peptidases [30, 31, 33, 37]. Considering that localization of many transcripts, including bicoid mRNA and Vg1 mRNA, depends on elements in their 3' UTRs [41–45] the relatively long LsTryp10 mRNA 3' UTR may contain elements involved in control of mRNA localization and translation.
The distribution of LsTryp10 mRNA suggests that it is a maternal transcript. This notion appears to be supported by the simultaneous LsTryp10 mRNA translation and degradation after fertilization (Fig. 6). However, immunohistochemical studies demonstrate this perception to be incorrect as LsTryp10 protein is found in oocytes inside the female's genital segment as well as in most embryonic cells (Fig. 5). The question then arises: Is the embryonic LsTryp10 protein encoded by maternal mRNA? The first cleavage in order Siphonostomatoida (which includes L. salmonis) is holoblastic but strongly unequal with the smaller cell giving rise to the embryonic cells and the larger cell containing most of the yolk [46–48]. A similar development in L. salmonis must be expected which implies that only a small fraction of the deposited maternal mRNA is present in the embryonic cells. The stable level of LsTryp10 mRNA in developing eggs (Fig. 6) may thus be the product of a simultaneous degradation of maternal LsTryp10 mRNA in the large yolk containing cell and zygotic transcription of LsTryp10 mRNA in the developing embryonic cells [47–49]. The very low expected levels of maternal LsTryp10 encoding transcripts inside the embryonic cells thus strongly indicates that LsTryp10 protein translated after fertilization is encoded by zygotically transcribed LsTryp10 mRNA. It is plausible that the maternal and zygotic LsTryp10 mRNAs are encoded by paralog genes.
In the oocytes, maternally deposited LsTryp10 protein (mLsTryp10) was found along the periphery and in patches associated with vitellogenin granules inside the yolk compartment (Fig 5). This yolk associated localization resembles the reported distribution of an Artemia trypsin-like peptidase with a putative degradome activating function  as well as other peptidases putatively involved in yolk degradation or degradome activation [17, 51, 52]. Earlier reports suggest, that serine peptidases are not directly responsible for yolk degradation but activate a second set of peptidases (generally cathepsins) that perform the degradation of the yolk [14, 17, 21]. A similar function for mLsTryp10 protein is likely. Yolk degradation appear to be initiated by yolk granule acidification in many invertebrate species [15, 22, 52, 53]. This may also be the case in L. salmonis as we observed acidic conditions in the yolk compartment in 5 days old embryos. It is possible that acidification leads to autoactivation of mLsTryp10 protein that in turn activates the general yolk degradome. The LsTryp10 protein translated by the embryo (eLsTryp10) is found in all embryonic cells, including cells in the antennae (Fig. 5D) which indicate that eLsTryp10 has a function not related to egg yolk degradation. Based on the ubiquitous distribution of eLsTryp10 it is likely to be involved in general developmental processes such as modification of the cell-matrix e.g. associated with cell movement [12, 13]
In conclusion, LsTryp10 is a trypsin which is both deposited in the oocytes and translated after fertilization. Maternally deposited and embryonic LsTryp10 seems to be translated from different pools of mRNA; one maternally transcribed and one transcribed after fertilization. The deposited LsTryp10 is likely to be involved in egg yolk degradation whereas embryonic LsTryp10 appears to serve a different purpose, e.g. cell matrix modification. LsTryp10 is the first arthropod peptidase reported to be both maternally deposited and translated in developing embryos.
An intronless trypsin-like serine peptidase, LsTryp10, was characterized in L. salmonis. LsTryp10 mRNA was significantly upregulated in adult females relative to all other investigated stages. LsTryp10 mRNA was found in the ovaries, oviducts, ova and developing embryos. The encoded protein was found in ova as well as in developing embryos where it was also shown to be translated. Considering the pattern of the first cell divisions in L. salmonis, the present results indicate that LsTryp10 proteins in the embryos stem from two distinct lines of synthesis. First maternally transcribed and translated LsTryp10 protein is deposited in the oocytes and second embryonically transcribed LsTryp10 mRNA is translated in all embryonic cells. The maternally produced LsTryp10 protein is likely to be involved in yolk degradation or yolk degradation control, whereas the function of embryonically produced LsTryp10 protein is unknown.
Handling and sampling of fishes and parasites
L. salmonis were cultured on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar (Linnaeus)) as described previously . L. salmonis for quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) analysis were sampled as nauplius I larvae (n≈10000), nauplius II larvae (n≈10000), infectious copepodids (n≈5000), chalimus III (n = 35), preadult I&II males mixed (n = 10), preadult I females (n = 10), adult males (n = 16) and adult females (n = 10). L. salmonis for Q-PCR and cDNA sequencing were stored in RNA later (Ambion, Huntingdon, UK), for 24 hours at 4°C and then at minus 20°C. Adult females used for isolation of genomic DNA were stored in 70% ethanol. Eggstrings for transcript quantification were sampled from fertilized females and unfertilized females. These were obtained by incubating preadult II females on salmon (not previously infected) with and without adult L. salmonis males. The copulative statuses for the groups were confirmed by visual examination for spermatophores. The eggstrings were sampled at 1 hour (± 30 minutes), 24 hours (± 4 hours), 60 and 108 hours (both ± 8 hours) after fertilization and stored at -80°C. Eggstrings for protein analysis were sampled after 1 hour (± 30 minutes) and 48, 72, and 96 hours (all ± 8 hours).
Sequencing of gDNA and full-length cDNA
Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) from L. salmonis were obtained as described previously  and are described in Eichner et al. . The trypsin encoding EST clone with the longest insert was selected and completely sequenced on both strands using primer walking. Additional 5' sequence was obtained as described previously . Based on the obtained cDNA sequences, primer pairs for genomic PCRs were constructed and the resulting PCR products were cloned and more than 30 clones were completely sequenced on both strands using primer walking. Additional genomic sequence was obtained using the GenomeWalker kit in accordance with the manufacturers instructions (Clonetech, Mountain view, California, USA).
Northern blot hybridization analyses
Total RNA was purified from unfertilized eggstrings, an adult male and an adult female L. salmonis using TRIZOL® following the manufacturers recommendations (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA). Northern blotting was performed using approximately 4.5 μg RNA per well and sequence specific [32P] labeled DNA probes against the LsTryp10 ORF and the homogeneously transcribed eEF1α . Membranes were prehybridized 30–60 min. at 68°C in PerfectHyb solution (Sigma-Aldrich Norway, Oslo, Norway). Denatured probes were added and incubation was continued over night. After washing twice for 10 min. at 68°C in 0.1× SSC/0.1× SDS, signals from the membrane were detected using Kodak BioMax MS X-Ray film (Kodak, Rochester, New York, USA).
Sequence handling and editing was done using Vector NTI 9.1.0 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, and USA.) and GeneDoc http://www.psc.edu/biomed/genedoc. For analysis of a plausible protein location the translated LsTryp10 sequence was analyzed by submission to TargetP 1.1 , SignalP 3.0 , TMHMM 2.0 , TMBETA-NET  and big-PI  according to the suggestion by Emanuelsson et al. . Phylogenetic analyses of selected amino acid sequences corresponding to the mature peptidases were performed using the Phylip package  and Tree-Puzzle v. 5.2 . Mutation rate heterogeneities were calculated in Tree-Puzzle using the JTT model and 8 rate heterogeneities. The distribution coefficient α was 0.93. A maximum likelihood tree was generated by Proml in the Phylip package (jumbling 10 times) and support was calculated by bootstrapping (100 replicates in Phylip) and puzzling (10000 times in Tree-Puzzle).
Relative quantification of LsTryp10 mRNA levels
The transcript levels during the L. salmonis life cycle and in eggstrings at different ages after fertilization were determined by Q-PCR using ABI 7900 HT (eggs and embryos) and ABI 7700 (adults and larval stages) PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) at standard settings. The real-time primers and probe were: Forward primer: TTG CAA GAC CGG AAC AAG AAC. Reverse primer: CAA ATC TGA GTA CAC CCC AAC CT. Probe: 6FAM-CAA CTA CAA GAG GTG TCC CAT CCG GG-TAMRA. The real time assays were performed as previously described  with the modification that additional TurboDNase (Ambion, Huntingdon, UK) treatments were performed on the RNA from nauplius I and II, chalimus III and preadult males and females. The results were analyzed by the ΔCT approach  as described previously . The 95% c.i. values at each developmental stage presented in Fig. 3 were calculated from the average ΔΔCT values for each dilution, except for nauplius II (which was used as calibrator thereby defining the average ΔΔCT values as 0 for this stage). For nauplius II the 95% c.i. shown in Fig. 3 was calculated from the average ΔCT at each dilution. The results were confirmed by analysis using a kinetic approach  as earlier suggested .
Where CT mean*dilution is the mean of the CT values of all samples at a given dilution and CT sample*dilution is the mean CT value of the sample parallels at a given dilution. The relative transcript levels (RTL) presented in Fig. 5 are calculated as . The c.i. is calculated from the ΔCT values from the five dilutions. The results were confirmed by analysis using a kinetic approach .
Identification of LsTryp10 mRNA localization
The localization of LsTryp10 mRNA in adult female L. salmonis was determined by in situ hybridization as described previously  using a cDNA clone covering 669 base pairs (b.p.) of the open reading frame (ORF) as template for RNA probe synthesis. Hybridizations were performed with antisense probes to show localization of transcripts and with sense probes as negative controls. Labeled probes were visualized using anti-DIG alkaline phosphatase FAB fragment (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and a chromogen substrate containing Levamisol (Sigma-Aldrich Norway, Oslo, Norway), NTB and BCIP (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).
Histological analysis of L. salmonis
Adult female L. salmonis were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, dehydrated in ethanol (70%, 80%, 90% and 95%) and subsequently embedded in Technovit 7100 following the manufacturers recommendations (Heraeus, Hanau, Germany). Sections (2 μm) were produced using a microtome, stained with metachromatic toluidin and examined using a Leica DMRBE light microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
Relative quantification of LsTryp10 protein levels in fertilized eggs
Where Abscorr*sample is the Abscorr for a protein sample at a given dilution and Abscorr*dilution mean*dilution is the mean Abscorr for all samples at that dilution. The c.i. was calculated from four parallel RPL values for each of the four dilutions. Pilot studies using the above design and the described peptide antiserum as well as five additional peptide antisera at various dilutions were conducted in advance to enable selection of the best serum and appropriate dilutions.
Identification of LsTryp10 protein localization
Developing embryos from eggstrings 5 days post fertilization were dissected and incubated in 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 hours. Embryos were washed in PBS-AT (PBS, 1% albumin, 0.5% Triton-X) followed by blocking for 2 hours in 3% albumin, PBS, 0.5% Triton-X. The embryos were subsequently incubated with the antiserum used for ELISA (as described above) diluted 1:100 for 20 hours and washed in PBS-AT for 2 hours followed by incubation with Alexa Flour 594 conjugated goat-anti rabbit antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA.) diluted 1:200 over night. Samples were mounted using ProLong Gold with DAPI (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA.) Paraffin sections (3 μm) were processed according to standard protocols. Slides were blocked with 3% albumin and incubated for 16 hours with the above mentioned antiserum. Alexa Flour 594 conjugated goat-anti rabbit antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA.) diluted 1:200 was used as a secondary antibody. Samples were mounted using ProLong Gold(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA.). Confocal imaging was performed with a Leica TCS SP2 AOBS microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at the Molecular Imaging Center (FUGE, Norwegian Research Council, University of Bergen). Parallel negative controls were performed without primary antibody. At similar confocal settings no signals were detected from negative controls (except for signal from DAPI where present).
Embryonic LysoTracker assays
Developing embryos were obtained as described in the previous section. The dissected eggs were immediately incubated in filtered sea water with 50 nM LysoTracker (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA.) for 30 minutes. Embryos were then briefly washed in seawater and visualized as described above.
We would like to thank Morten Arnesen, Per Gunnar Espedal, Ingrid Uglenes Fiksdal, Heidi Kongshaug and Dr. Ketil Malde for technical assistance and Dr. Christiane Eichner for fruitful discussions. This work has been financially supported by the Norwegian Research Council.
- Krem MM, Di Cera E: Evolution of Enzyme Cascades From Embryonic Development to Blood Coagulation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2002, 27: 67-74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrett AJ, Rawlings ND, Woessner JF: Handbook of proteolytic enzymes. 1998, San Diego: Academic press,Google Scholar
- Korkmaz B, Moreau T, Gauthier F: Neutrophil elastase, proteinase 3 and cathepsin G: Physicochemical properties, activity and physiopathological functions. Biochimie. 2008, 90: 227-242.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hedstrom L: Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chem Rev. 2002, 102: 4501-4524.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Volanakis JE, Narayana SV: Complement factor D, a novel serine protease. Protein Sci. 1996, 5: 553-564.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adham IM, Klemm U, Maier WM, Hoyer-Fender S, Tsaousidou S, Engel W: Molecular cloning of preproacrosin and analysis of its expression pattern in spermatogenesis. Eur J Biochem. 1989, 182: 563-568.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krem MM, Rose T, Di Cera E: Sequence Determinants of Function and Evolution in Serine Proteases. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2000, 10: 171-176.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haley SA, Wessel GM: Regulated proteolysis by cortical granule serine protease 1 at fertilization. Mol Biol Cell. 2004, 15: 2084-2092.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haley SA, Wessel GM: Proteolytic cleavage of the cell surface protein p160 is required for detachment of the fertilization envelope in the sea urchin. Dev Biol. 2004, 272: 191-202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ye Y, Fortini ME: Proteolysis and developmental signal transduction. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2000, 11: 211-221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- LeMosy EK, Tan YQ, Hashimoto C: Activation of a protease cascade involved in patterning the Drosophila embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 5055-5060.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Terada T, Okada Y, Nakanuma Y: Expression of matrix proteinases during human intrahepatic bile duct development. A possible role in biliary cell migration. Am J Pathol. 1995, 147: 1207-1213.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drapkin PT, Monard D, Silverman AJ: The role of serine proteases and serine protease inhibitors in the migration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. BMC Dev Biol. 2002, 2: 1-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giorgi F, Bradley JT, Nordin JH: Differential vitellin polypeptide processing in insect embryos. Micron. 1999, 30: 579-596.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abreu LA, Valle D, Manso PP, Facanha AR, Pelajo-Machado M, Masuda H, Masuda A, Vaz I, Lenzi H, Oliveira PL, Logullo C: Proteolytic activity of Boophilus microplus Yolk pro-Cathepsin D (BYC) is coincident with cortical acidification during embryogenesis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004, 34: 443-449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Indrasith LS, Sasaki T, Yamashita O: A unique protease responsible for selective degradation of a yolk protein in Bombyx mori. Purification, characterization, and cleavage profile. J Biol Chem. 1988, 263: 1045-1051.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medina M, Vallejo CG: A Serine Proteinase in Drosophila Embryos – Yolk Localization and Developmental Activation. Insect Biochemistry. 1989, 19: 687-691.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ikeda M, Yaginuma T, Kobayashi M, Yamashita O: Cdna Cloning, Sequencing and Temporal Expression of the Protease Responsible for Vitellin Degradation in the Silkworm, Bombyx-Mori. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B-Biochemistry & Molecular Biology. 1991, 99: 405-411.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ikeda M, Sasaki T, Yamashita O: Purification and Characterization of Proteases Responsible for Vitellin Degradation of the Silkworm, Bombyx-Mori. Insect Biochemistry. 1990, 20: 725-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Estrela A, Seixas A, Termignoni C: A cysteine endopeptidase from tick (Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus) larvae with vitellin digestion activity. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B-Biochemistry & Molecular Biology. 2007, 148: 410-416.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Medina M, Leon P, Vallejo CG: Drosophila cathepsin B-like proteinase: a suggested role in yolk degradation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1988, 263: 355-363.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fagotto F: Regulation of yolk degradation, or how to make sleepy lysosomes. J Cell Sci. 1995, 108 (Pt 12): 3645-3647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- LeMosy EK, Kemler D, Hashimoto C: Role of Nudel protease activation in triggering dorsoventral polarization of the Drosophila embryo. Development. 1998, 125: 4045-4053.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonnier P, Baert JL: Identification of Cathepsin L-Like Proteinase and Aminopeptidase in Yolk Granules of the Sand Worm, Nereis-Diversicolor. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B-Biochemistry & Molecular Biology. 1992, 103: 425-430.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cho WL, Deitsch KW, Raikhel AS: An extraovarian protein accumulated in mosquito oocytes is a carboxypeptidase activated in embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 10821-10824.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribolla PEM, Debianchi AG: Processing of Procathepsin from Musca-Domestica Eggs. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1995, 25: 1011-1017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tadros W, Goldman AL, Babak T, Menzies F, Vardy L, Orr-Weaver T, Hughes TR, Westwood JT, Smibert CA, Lipshitz HD: SMAUG is a major regulator of maternal mRNA destabilization in Drosophila and its translation is activated by the PAN GU kinase. Dev Cell. 2007, 12: 143-155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Renzis S, Elemento O, Tavazoie S, Wieschaus E: Unmasking activation of the zygotic genome using chromosomal deletions in the drosophila embryo (vol 5, art. no. e117, 2007). Plos Biology. 2007, 5: 1631-1631.Google Scholar
- Pike AW, Wadsworth SL: Sealice on Salmonids: Their Biology and Control. Adv Parasitol. 1999, 44: 233-337.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kvamme BO, Frost P, Nilsen F: The cloning and characterisation of full-length trypsins from the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004, 136: 303-307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kvamme BO, Skern R, Frost P, Nilsen F: Molecular characterisation of five trypsin-like peptidase transcripts from the salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) intestine. Int J Parasitol. 2004, 34: 823-832.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kvamme BO, Kongshaug H, Nilsen F: Organisation of trypsin genes in the salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis, Crustacea, copepoda) genome. Gene. 2005, 352: 63-74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Skern-Mauritzen R, Frost P, Hamre LA, Kongshaug H, Nilsen F: Molecular characterization and classification of a clip domain containing peptidase from the ectoparasite Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda, Crustacea). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B-Biochemistry & Molecular Biology. 2007, 146: 289-298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H: Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat Protoc. 2007, 2: 953-971.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartley BS: Amino-Acid Sequence of Bovine Chymotrypsinogen-A. Nature. 1964, 201: 1284-1287.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lesk AM, Fordham WD: Conservation and variability in the structures of serine proteinases of the chymotrypsin family. J Mol Biol. 1996, 258: 501-537.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson SC, Ewart KV, Osborne JA, Delage D, Ross NW, Murray HM: Molecular cloning of trypsin cDNAs and trypsin gene expression in the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda: Caligidae). Parasitol Res. 2002, 88: 789-796.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eichner C, Frost P, Dysvik B, Jonassen I, Kristiansen B, Nilsen F: Salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) transcriptomes during post molting maturation and egg production, revealed using EST-sequencing and microarray analysis. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 126-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muller HM, Crampton JM, della Torre A, Sinden R, Crisanti A: Members of a trypsin gene family in Anopheles gambiae are induced in the gut by blood meal. EMBO J. 1993, 12: 2891-2900.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohmura K, Kohno N, Kobayashi Y, Yamagata K, Sato S, Kashiwabara S, Baba T: A homologue of pancreatic trypsin is localized in the acrosome of mammalian sperm and is released during acrosome reaction. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 29426-29432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brunel C, Ehresmann C: Secondary structure of the 3' UTR of bicoid mRNA. Biochimie. 2004, 86: 91-104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewis RA, Kress TL, Cote CA, Gautreau D, Rokop ME, Mowry KL: Conserved and clustered RNA recognition sequences are a critical feature of signals directing RNA localization in Xenopus oocytes. Mech Dev. 2004, 121: 101-109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lie YS, Macdonald PM: Apontic binds the translational repressor Bruno and is implicated in regulation of oskar mRNA translation. Development. 1999, 126: 1129-1138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bullock SL, Zicha D, Ish-Horowicz D: The Drosophila hairy RNA localization signal modulates the kinetics of cytoplasmic mRNA transport. EMBO J. 2003, 22: 2484-2494.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bashirullah A, Cooperstock RL, Lipshitz HD: Spatial and temporal control of RNA stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 7025-7028.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson CB: North American Parasitic Copepods belonging to the Family Caligidae. Part I – The Caliginae. Proceedings of the US National Museum. 1905, 28: 479-672.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McClendon JF: On the development of parasitic copepods – Part II. Biol Bull. 1907, 12: 53-88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McClendon JF: On the development of parasitic copepods – Part I. Biol Bull. 1906, 12: 37-52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Renzis S, Elemento O, Tavazoie S, Wieschaus EF: Unmasking activation of the zygotic genome using chromosomal deletions in the Drosophila embryo. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5: e117-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ezquieta B, Vallejo CG: The Trypsin-Like Proteinase of Artemia – Yolk Localization and Developmental Activation. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B-Biochemistry & Molecular Biology. 1985, 82: 731-736.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Medina M, Vallejo CG: The Maternal Origin of Acid-Hydrolases in Drosophila and Their Relation with Yolk Degradation. Development Growth & Differentiation. 1989, 31: 241-247.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ribolla PEM, Bijovsky AT, de Bianchi AG: Procathepsin and acid phosphatase are stored in Musca domestica yolk spheres. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2001, 47: 225-232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fausto AM, Gambellini G, Mazzini M, Cecchettini A, Masetti M, Giorgi F: Yolk granules are differentially acidified during embryo development in the stick insect Carausius morosus. Cell Tissue Res. 2001, 305: 433-443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frost P, Nilsen F: Validation of Reference Genes for Transcription Profiling in the Salmon Louse, Lepeophtheirus Salmonis, by Quantitative Real-Time Pcr. Veterinary Parasitology. 2003, 118: 169-174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G: Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J Mol Biol. 2000, 300: 1005-1016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S: Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004, 340: 783-795.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL: Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001, 305: 567-580.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gromiha MM, Ahmad S, Suwa M: Neural network-based prediction of transmembrane beta-strand segments in outer membrane proteins. J Comput Chem. 2004, 25: 762-767.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eisenhaber B, Bork P, Eisenhaber F: Prediction of potential GPI-modification sites in proprotein sequences. J Mol Biol. 1999, 292: 741-758.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Felsenstein J: PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. 2004,Google Scholar
- Strimmer K, vonHaeseler A: Quartet puzzling: A quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol Biol Evol. 1996, 13: 964-969.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peirson SN, Butler JN, Foster RG: Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 1-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skern R, Frost P, Nilsen F: Relative transcript quantification by Quantitative PCR: Roughly right or precisely wrong?. Bmc Molecular Biology. 2005, 6: 10-DOI 10.1186/1471-2199-6-10,PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sommerset I, Skern R, Biering E, Bleie H, Fiksdal IU, Grove S, Nerland AH: Protection against Atlantic halibut nodavirus in turbot is induced by recombinant capsid protein vaccination but not following DNA vaccination. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2005, 18: 13-29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.