Skip to content


  • Methodology article
  • Open Access

From Gateway to MultiSite Gateway in one recombination event

BMC Molecular Biology20067:46

  • Received: 30 September 2006
  • Accepted: 06 December 2006
  • Published:

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.



Invitrogen Gateway technology exploits the integrase/att site-specific recombination system for directional cloning of PCR products and the subsequent subcloning into destination vectors. One or three DNA segments can be cloned using Gateway or MultiSite Gateway respectively. A vast number of single-site Gateway destination vectors have been created while MultiSite Gateway is limited to few destination vectors and therefore to few applications. The aim of this work was to make the MultiSite Gateway technology available for multiple biological purposes.


We created a construct, pDONR-R4-R3, to easily convert any available Gateway destination vector to a MultiSite Gateway vector in a single recombination reaction. In addition, we designed pDONR-R4-R3 so that DNA fragments already cloned upstream or downstream of the Gateway cassette in the original destination vectors can still be utilized for promoter-gene or translational fusions after the conversion.


Our tool makes MultiSite Gateway a more widely accessible technology and expands its applications by exploiting all the features of the Gateway vectors already available.


  • Resultant Vector
  • Destination Vector
  • Translational Fusion
  • Donor Vector
  • Entry Clone


Recombinase-based cloning technologies are becoming increasingly popular because of their easy use and high efficiency. These tools exploit bacterial or viral site-specific recombinases like the bacteriophage P1 Cre, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae FLP or the bacteriophage lambda integrase [13]. These enzymes catalyze a reciprocal double-stranded DNA exchange between two specific DNA sites [4].

Gateway (Invitrogen) is one of the most popular recombination cloning technologies [3]. It is based on the Escherichia coli bacteriophage lambda integrase/att system [5]. Two sets of reactions are employed in this technology: LR and BP recombinations (Fig 1). The BP reaction is catalyzed by the BP Clonase enzyme mix (Invitrogen), which recombines att B sites with att P sites. The LR Clonase mix (Invitrogen) is responsible for recombination of att L sites with att R sites. Any DNA fragment of interest can be PCR amplified with primers containing att B sites and cloned into a donor vector carrying att P sites in the presence of the BP Clonase mix. The recombination of att B with att P sites leads to the formation of att L and att R sites. The reaction creates an entry clone bearing the insert of interest flanked by att L sites and a byproduct flanked by att R sites (Fig 1A). The insert can then be mobilized into any destination vector having att R sites via an LR reaction (Fig 1B). The resulting construct can be easily selected using a combination of a positive (antibiotic resistance) and a negative (the cytotoxic ccdB gene) selection which does not allow the growth of E. coli transformed with either the initial vectors or the by-product [3, 6]. The vast number of Gateway destination vectors designed for many different biological analyses and the large collections of entry clones carrying entire genome open reading frames make this technology highly attractive.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Gateway BP and LR reactions. (A) BP recombination of a PCR product "X" flanked by att B sites with a Gateway donor vector [3]. (B) LR recombination of an entry clone bearing a DNA fragment "X" with a Gateway destination vector [3].

A variant of Gateway, named MultiSite Gateway (Invitrogen), has been developed to facilitate the cloning of multiple DNA fragments [7]. By using four different att B sites (att B1, att B2, att B3, and att B4), three PCR products flanked by specific att B sites can be cloned into three donor vectors bearing the corresponding att P sites (Fig 2A). The LR Clonase Plus mix (Invitrogen) specifically recombines all att L sites with their corresponding att R sites. A single LR Plus reaction with the three entry clones and the pDEST-R4-R3 destination vector (Invitrogen) creates a construct with the three inserts in a defined and oriented order (Fig 2B). Any Gateway entry clone can be mobilized into a MultiSite Gateway destination vector. Compared to Gateway, MultiSite Gateway is limited by the availability of a small number of destination vectors which prevents this powerful technology from being used for multiple biological purposes.
Figure 2
Figure 2

MultiSite Gateway. (A) BP recombinations of three PCR products "A", "B" and "C" flanked by att B sites with three Gateway donor vectors [7]. (B) LR plus recombination of three entry clones bearing the DNA fragments "A", "B" and "C" with the MultiSite Gateway destination vector pDEST-R4-R3 (Invitrogen) [7].

Here we present a method to convert any Gateway vector to a MultiSite Gateway vector via a single recombination event.

Results and discussion

We decided to take advantage of the large number of Gateway single-site destination vectors and developed a new method to easily convert them to MultiSite Gateway. The functional part of MultiSite Gateway destination vectors is the att R4-att R3 cassette which can recombine with three Gateway donor vectors carrying the appropriate att L sites (Fig 2B) [7]. We constructed a vector, pDONR-R4-R3, to mobilize the att R4-att R3 cassette into any Gateway Destination vector. To create pDONR-R4-R3, we cloned a Gateway cassette inside another Gateway cassette by choosing a combination of att sites that cannot recombine with one another. We exploited the ability of the BP Clonase enzyme mix to recombine att B sites with att P sites while leaving att R sites untouched [3]. The att R4-att R3 cassette was amplified using att B primers and cloned into pDONR221 (Invitrogen), a vector carrying an att P1-att P2 cassette. The BP recombination created the pDONR-R4-R3 vector that contains the att R4-att R3 cassette flanked by att L1-att L2 sites (Fig 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3

pDONR-R4-R3. BP recombination of the att R4-att R3 Gateway cassette flanked by att B1 and att B2 sites with a linear Gateway donor vector pDONR221 (Invitrogen) which leads to the creation of the vector pDONR-R4-R3 and a cytotoxic by-product.

In order to use pDONR-R4-R3 to deliver the att R4-att R3 cassette into any Gateway destination vector in a single LR reaction, we took advantage of the fact that att R4 and att R3 sites cannot recombine with the flanking att L1 and att L2 sites (Fig 2B) [7]. To test it, we performed LR reactions with pDONR-R4-R3 and three different Gateway vectors: pDEST32 (Invitrogen), pDEST22 (Invitrogen) and pMDC163 [8]. These specific destination vectors were chosen to demonstrate the feasibility of the experiment. The linearization of pDEST32 and pDEST22 inside the Gateway cassette and their antibiotic resistance allowed us to specifically select for and recover the entry clones pDEST32-R4-R3 and pDEST22-R4-R3 bearing the att R4-att R3 cassette flanked by att B1-att B2 sites (Fig 4A). Some destination vectors, like pMDC163, carry the Kanamycin resistance gene in discordance with the Invitrogen recommendations. In this case, the linearization of the entry clone efficiently works as a negative selector against the non-recombined entry clone. The linearization of pDONR-R4-R3 in the vector backbone and pMDC163 inside the Gateway cassette allowed us to specifically recover pMDC163-R4-R3 (data not shown). The large number of Gateway vectors already available for various biological experiments can be easily converted to MultiSite Gateway vectors after an LR recombination with pDONR-R4-R3.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Conversion of any Gateway destination vector to a MultiSite Gateway destination vector. (A) LR recombination of the pDONR-R4-R3 vector with a linear Gateway destination vector. We tested this reaction using pDEST32 (Invitrogen) and pDEST22 (Invitrogen) destination vectors. (B) LR Plus recombination of three entry clones bearing the DNA fragments "A", "B" and "C" with a converted MultiSite Gateway destination vector. We tested this reaction by recombining three entry clones carrying a 3434 bp, 3116 bp and 561 bp DNA fragment with pDEST32-R4-R3 and pDEST22-R4-R3. (C) DNA and amino acid sequence of the external borders of the expression clone.

Last, we performed an LR Plus reaction with pDEST22-R4-R3 and pDEST32-R4-R3 to test the functionality of the att R4-att R3 cassette flanked by att B1-att B2 sites (Fig 4B). We used three entry clones bearing a 3434 bp, 3116 bp and 561 bp DNA fragment cloned into pDONR-P4-P1R (Invitrogen), pDONR221 and pDONR-P2R-P3 (Invitrogen) respectively [7]. Two LR Plus reactions were performed with the entry clones and either pDEST22-R4-R3 or pDEST32-R4-R3. Both reactions led to the creation of pDEST22 and pDEST32 expression clones containing the inserts in the expected order (Fig 4B). Correct functioning of the technology was further tested by cloning a different set of three entry clones into pDEST22-R4-R3 (data not shown). When the converted MultiSite Gateway destination vector bears a kanamycin resistance gene, like pMDC163-R4-R3, the entry clones need to be linearized in order to specifically recover the expression clone.

Figure 4C shows the external att B1-att B4 and att B3-att B2 sites of a converted MultiSite Gateway expression clone which maintain the Gateway frame and lack start and stop codons to allow promoter-gene or translational fusions. Thus, converted MultiSite Gateway vectors can take advantage of all reporter genes, tags or promoter sequences already present in the original Gateway destination vectors.


We have developed a new method to convert virtually all Gateway vectors to MultiSite Gateway. A careful combination of compatible att sites allowed us to use the Gateway recombination technology to deliver a MultiSite Gateway cassette. This strategy opens a new way of thinking about recombination sites as cloning and clonable elements at the same time and could apply to other recombination cassettes. Our method makes the Invitrogen technology available to many biological systems for translational fusion of different proteins or tags, expression of genes or reporter genes under the control of specific promoters and 3'-UTRs, and combinatorial analysis of promoters, genes or other DNA fragments. Our improvement also expands the potential use of this recombination system by utilizing all the features of the large number of Gateway vectors already created.


Construction of pDONR-R4-R3

We PCR amplified the att R4-att R3 cassette from the pDEST-R4-R3 vector (Invitrogen) using the primers att B1-att R4-F (5'GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTCAACTTTGTATAGAAAAGTTGAAC3') and att B2-att R3-R (5'GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCAACTATGTATAATAAAGTTGAAC3'). We digested the pDONR221 vector (Invitrogen) with EcoRI and used it in a BP recombination reaction (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer with the att R4-att R3 cassette PCR fragment. We used the reaction to transform DB3.1 E. coli cells (Invitrogen) and selected them for kanamycin resistance. We named the resultant vector pDONR-R4-R3.

Construction of pDEST22-R4-R3, pDEST32-R4-R3 and pMDC163-R4-R3

We digested the pDEST22 (Invitrogen), pDEST32 (Invitrogen) and pMDC163 [8] vectors with EcoRI, XbaI and NcoI respectively. We conducted two independent LR reactions (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer combining pDONR-R4-R3 with digested pDEST22 and pDEST32. An additional LR reaction was performed combining EcoNI linearized pDONR-R4-R3 with digested pMDC163. We used the three reactions to transform DB3.1 E. coli cells (Invitrogen) and selected them for ampicillin (pDEST22/pDONR-R4-R3 reaction), gentamicin (pDEST32/pDONR-R4-R3 reaction) or kanamycin (pMDC163/pDONR-R4-R3 reaction) resistance. We named the resultant vectors pDEST22-R4-R3, pDEST32-R4-R3 and pMDC163-R4-R3 respectively.

Construction of pDONR-P4-P1R-pPNY, pDONR221-PNY and pDONR-P2R-P3-YC

We PCR amplified 3434 bp upstream the start codon of the Arabidopsis thaliana PENNYWISE (PNY) gene [9] using pny-att B4F (GGGGACAACTTTGTATAGAAAAGTTGTTGGCACGATTCTGAAACACG) and pny-att B1R (GGGGACTGCTTTTTTGTACAAACTTGGGGAAAGGATGATGTCGATGAG) primers, the PNY gene (3116 bp) using pny-att B1F (GGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTGATGGCTGATGCATACGAGCC) and pny-att B2R (GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTAACCTACAAAATCATGTAGAA) primers and a 561 bp fragment of the pUC-SPYCE vector [10] using att B2-SPYCE-F (GGGGACAGCTTTCTTGTACAAAGTGGGGATGTACCCATACGATGTTCCA) and att B3-SPY-R (GGGGACAACTTTGTATAATAAAGTTGGAATTCCCGATCTAGTAACATAGATG) primers. The PNY promoter region, the PNY gene and pUC-SPYCE PCR fragments were cloned into the pDONR-P4-P1R (Invitrogen), pDONR221 and pDONR-P2R-P3 (Invitrogen) vectors respectively via three independent BP reactions according to the manufacturer. We used the reactions to transform TOP10 E. coli cells (Invitrogen) and selected them for kanamycin resistance. We named the resultant vectors pDONR-P4-P1R-pPNY, pDONR221-PNY and pDONR-P2R-P3-YC respectively.

Construction of pDEST22-pPNY-PNY-YC and pDEST32-pPNY-PNY-YC

We performed an LR Plus reaction (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer combining pDONR-P4-P1R-pPNY, pDONR221-PNY, pDONR-P2R-P3-YC, and pDEST22-R4-R3. We used the reaction to transform TOP10 E. coli cells and selected for ampicillin resistance. We named the resultant vectors pDEST22-pPNY-PNY-YC. We performed another LR Plus reaction according to the manufacturer combining pDONR-P4-P1R-pPNY, pDONR221-PNY, pDONR-P2R-P3-YC, and pDEST32-R4-R3. We used the reaction to transform TOP10 E. coli cells and selected for gentamicin resistance. We named the resultant vectors pDEST32-pPNY-PNY-YC.

List of abbreviations


ampicillin resistance.


chloramphenicol resistance.


kanamycin resistance.



We thank Hector Candela, Elisa Fiume, Jennifer Fletcher, Elise Kikis, China Lunde, and Peter Quail for critically reading the article. EM and LB were supported by NRI 04-03387.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
Plant Gene Expression Center, United States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service, Albany, California 94710, USA


  1. Liu Q, Li MZ, Leibham D, Cortez D, Elledge SJ: The univector plasmid-fusion system, a method for rapid construction of recombinant DNA without restriction enzymes. Curr Biol. 1998, 8: 1300-1309. 10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00560-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sadowski PD: The Flp double cross system a simple efficient procedure for cloning DNA fragments. BMC Biotechnol. 2003, 3: 9- 10.1186/1472-6750-3-9PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hartley JL, Temple GF, Brasch MA: DNA cloning using in vitro site-specific recombination. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 1788-1795. 10.1101/gr.143000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stark WM, Boocock MR, Sherratt DJ: Catalysis by site-specific recombinases. Trends Genet. 1992, 8: 432-439.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Landy A: Dynamic, structural, and regulatory aspects of lambda site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem. 1989, 58: 913-949.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernard P, Couturier M: Cell killing by the F plasmid CcdB protein involves poisoning of DNA-topoisomerase II complexes. J Mol Biol. 1992, 226: 735-745. 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90629-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheo DL, Titus SA, Byrd DR, Hartley JL, Temple GF, Brasch MA: Concerted assembly and cloning of multiple DNA segments using in vitro site-specific recombination: functional analysis of multi-segment expression clones. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 2111-2120. 10.1101/gr.2512204PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Curtis MD, Grossniklaus U: A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133: 462-469. 10.1104/pp.103.027979PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith HM, Hake S: The interaction of two homeobox genes, BREVIPEDICELLUS and PENNYWISE, regulates internode patterning in the Arabidopsis inflorescence. Plant Cell. 2003, 15: 1717-1727. 10.1105/tpc.012856PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Walter M, Chaban C, Schutze K, Batistic O, Weckermann K, Nake C, Blazevic D, Grefen C, Schumacher K, Oecking C, Harter K, Kudla J: Visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Plant J. 2004, 40: 428-438. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02219.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Magnani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.