Skip to main content

Phylogeny and expression of carbonic anhydrase-related proteins



Carbonic anhydrases (CAs) are found in many organisms, in which they contribute to several important biological processes. The vertebrate α-CA family consists of 16 subfamilies, three of which (VIII, X and XI) consist of acatalytic proteins. These are named carbonic anhydrase related proteins (CARPs), and their inactivity is due to absence of one or more Zn-binding histidine residues. In this study, we analyzed and evaluated the distribution of genes encoding CARPs in different organisms using bioinformatic methods, and studied their expression in mouse tissues using immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR.


We collected 84 sequences, of which 22 came from novel or improved gene models which we created from genome data. The distribution of CARP VIII covers vertebrates and deuterostomes, and CARP X appears to be universal in the animal kingdom. CA10-like genes have had a separate history of duplications in the tetrapod and fish lineages. Our phylogenetic analysis showed that duplication of CA10 into CA11 has occurred only in tetrapods (found in mammals, frogs, and lizards), whereas an independent duplication of CA10 was found in fishes. We suggest the name CA10b for the second fish isoform. Immunohistochemical analysis showed a high expression level of CARP VIII in the mouse cerebellum, cerebrum, and also moderate expression in the lung, liver, salivary gland, and stomach. These results also demonstrated low expression in the colon, kidney, and Langerhans islets. CARP X was moderately expressed in the cerebral capillaries and the lung and very weakly in the stomach and heart. Positive signals for CARP XI were observed in the cerebellum, cerebrum, liver, stomach, small intestine, colon, kidney, and testis. In addition, the results of real-time quantitative PCR confirmed a wide distribution for the Car8 and Car11 mRNAs, whereas the expression of the Car10 mRNA was restricted to the frontal cortex, parietal cortex, cerebellum, midbrain, and eye.


CARP sequences have been strongly conserved between different species, and all three CARPs show high expression in the mouse brain and CARP VIII is also expressed in several other tissues. These findings suggest an important functional role for these proteins in mammals.


Carbonic anhydrases (CAs), EC, are metal-containing enzymes that occur abundantly in nature and are found in almost all organisms that have been studied [1]. CAs are fundamental to many biological processes, such as photosynthesis, respiration, renal tubular acidification, and bone resorption [25]. These enzymes are encoded by five distinct and evolutionarily unrelated gene families known as α, β, γ, δ, and ζ CAs [6]. Interestingly, there is no sequence similarity between these different families. Thus, the CA families are excellent examples of the convergent evolution of catalytic function. The animal kingdom CAs belong to a single gene family known as α-CAs that contain zinc as a metal ion in the active site. The main chemical reaction catalyzed by CAs involves the reversible hydration of CO2 (CO2+H2O (HCO3-+H+).

In mammals, α-CAs are characterized by 16 different isoforms, 13 of which (CA I, II, III, IV, VA, VB, VI, VII, IX, XII, XIII, XIV, and XV) are enzymatically active, whereas the other 3, namely, the CA-related proteins (CARPs) VIII, X, and XI, appear to lack CA activity because of substitutions to 1 or more of the 3 functionally important histidine residues [3, 7, 8]. In addition, the receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatases β and γ (RPTP β, RPTP γ) also contain 'CA-like' domains [3, 9]. The 13 active CA isozymes differ in their subcellular localizations such that CAs I, II, III, VII, and XIII are all cytosolic enzymes, CAs IV, IX, XII, XIV, and XV are all membrane-associated enzymes, CAs VA and VB are mitochondrial, and CA VI is a secreted protein.

Previous studies on the distribution of CARPs using either western blot analysis or RT-PCR methods have shown a wide expression profile in all parts of the brain in both humans and mice [1013]. Notably, immunohistochemical studies on CARPs have been mainly focused on brain tissues. The results have shown predominant expression of CARP VIII in the mouse and human cerebellum, especially in the Purkinje cells. Studies on CARP X and XI have revealed a lower level of expression in the cerebellum [1416]. Previous investigations using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), northern blot analysis, western blot assays or dot blots have reported restricted expression of all CARPs in some mouse and human tissues including the brain [13, 17]. The presence of CARPs in the human and mouse brain has suggested important roles for these proteins in the brain development and/or neural functions [12, 16]. Interestingly, CARP VIII and XI may also be involved in cancer development in the gastrointestinal tract and lungs [13, 1821].

The pivotal physiological function of CARP VIII became clearly evident in recently published reports on CARP VIII mutations in both human and mouse. A study of waddle mice characterized by a spontaneous mutation in the Car8 gene showed ataxia and a distinctive lifelong gait disorder [22]. Another recent study described mild mental retardation, quadrupedal gait and ataxia in members of an Iraqi family who each possessed a defect in the CA8 gene [23]. These studies clearly indicated that CARP VIII plays an important role in motor coordination.

The three-dimensional structure of CARP VIII has been recently solved [24], as the only protein in the CARP subfamily. The structural basis of catalytic inactivity is confirmed in this study, but currently there is no interpretation to correlate the structure to any function.

The CARP sequences are well conserved throughout all vertebrates, suggesting that CARPs may play biologically important roles in higher organisms. The number of members in the CARP families has increased with the completion of vertebrate genome sequencing projects, but many sequences have been annotated in incomplete or even partly incorrect forms. To date there are no systematic studies on the distribution and phylogenetic analysis of CARP genes across species nor does there exist any parallel study on the distribution of all three CARP proteins and their mRNA levels in mouse tissues. Therefore, we first used bioinformatic methods to identify and evaluate the distribution of CARP genes across different species. We subsequently performed sequence and phylogenetic analysis of CARPs VIII, X, and XI, focusing on vertebrates, and studied the distribution of the three CARP mRNAs using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and the corresponding proteins using immunohistochemistry in different mouse tissues.


Bioinformatic survey and comparison of CARP sequences

Detailed information and database sources from which sequences were obtained are shown in Table 1. In total, 84 full-length sequences were obtained from 38 organisms (3 invertebrates and 35 vertebrates). Thirty-three gene sequences encoding for CARP VIII were identified, of which 3 sequences were from deuterostome invertebrates, namely, Branchiostoma floridae, Trichoplax adhaerens, and Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, and 30 were from vertebrates. We identified 31 sequences of CARP X and 19 sequences of CARP XI in these vertebrates, which included a single CARP X gene from a chordate (Branchiostoma floridae). CARP X-like sequences in invertebrates were discovered in both protostomes and deuterostomes. A detailed analysis of invertebrate CARP X homologs will be reported elsewhere. Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) of the CARP VIII, X, and XI protein sequences are presented in Figures 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Table 1 Details of the carbonic anhydrase-related protein (CARP) sequences used in this study
Figure 1
figure 1

Multiple sequence alignment of CARP VIII sequences. Comparison of 33 CARP VIII sequences by multiple sequence alignment. Short names (first letter of the genus and first three letters of the species) are provided on the left side and residue numbers are provided on the right side of the figure. Details of the sequences and full species names are provided in Table 1. The sequences of CAH8_Rnor and CAH8_Spur are trimmed in the end by 21 and 89 residues, respectively.

Figure 2
figure 2

Multiple sequence alignment of CARP X sequences. Comparison of 32 CARP X sequences by multiple sequence alignment. Short names (first letter of the genus and first three letters of the species) are provided on the left side and residue numbers are provided on the right. Details of the sequences and full species names are provided in Table 1.

Figure 3
figure 3

Multiple sequence alignment of CARP XI sequences. Comparison of 19 CARP XI sequences by multiple sequence alignment. Short names (first letter of the genus and first three letters of the species) are provided on the left side and residue numbers are provided on the right. Details of the sequences and full species names are provided in Table 1.

Among vertebrate sequences, the protein sequence identities ranged from 67% to 100% for CARP VIII, from 70% to 100% for CARP X and from 70% to 100% for CARP XI. The 100% values were observed between primate sequences. However, even between humans and mice, identities of CARP orthologs were 98%, 100%, and 96% for CARP VIII, X, and XI, respectively. When the invertebrate CARP VIII and CARP X sequences used in this study were compared to their vertebrate orthologs, the sequence identities were only 40% to 45%. For comparison, in case of enzymatically active CAs, protein sequence identity between human and mouse are 94%, 93%, 92%, and 91% for CAs VII, Vb, III, and XIII, respectively, and 50% to 83% for other pairs of isozymes. Thus, sequence conservation was found to be higher in all CARPs than in any of the active CAs.

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic tree of the CARP protein sequences is shown in Figure 4. The full MSA from which the tree was calculated is provided as Additional file 1. The tree shows two distinct sequence pools, including one pool for CARP VIII and the other pool for CARPs X and XI. The CARP VIII pool subscribes to the expected animal taxonomy, except for mammals, which are not resolved due to sequence identities near 100%. The second sequence pool is comprised of the CARP X and CARP XI sequences. CARP X forms three subgroups, including the large subgroup consisting of sequences from mammals, frogs, and lizards, and two smaller groups containing sequences from fishes (Figure 4). The CARP XI group contains a major branch, consisting of mammalian sequences, while the sequences from lizard and frog form an outgroup. The tree indicates that there has been an independent duplication of the ancestral vertebrate CA10 gene in the fish lineage, whereas we conclude that the CA11 gene has emerged from another gene duplication after the separation of the fish and tetrapod lineages.

Figure 4
figure 4

Evolutionary relationships of CARP sequences. The phylogenetic tree of 84 CARP sequences used in the study was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated sequences clustered together in the bootstrap test is shown above the branches.

Quantitative analysis of Car 8, Car10, Car11 mRNA expression in mouse tissues

We studied the expression of all three CARP mRNAs in 20 different mouse tissues. The expression patterns of each mRNA are shown in Figures 5 through 7. As predicted based on previous studies [15], Car8 mRNA expression was found to be highest in the cerebellum, and high levels were also detected in the liver and the lung (Figure 5). Low expression was observed in the stomach, duodenum, ileum, jejunum, colon, spleen, kidney, heart, frontal cortex, parietal cortex, midbrain, and eye, while extremely low expression was observed in the ovary, skeletal muscle, and testis.

Figure 5
figure 5

Expression pattern of Car8 mRNA in different murine tissues.

Figure 6
figure 6

Expression profile of Car10 mRNA in murine tissues.

Figure 7
figure 7

Distribution of Car11 mRNA in murine tissues.

The expression profile for Car10 mRNA is presented in Figure 6. The Car10 mRNA levels were high in the cerebellum, frontal cortex, and parietal cortex, low in the midbrain, and extremely low in the eye. The distribution of Car11 mRNA expression was broad, and the highest signals were observed in the cerebellum and cerebral cortex (Figure 7) while the midbrain showed moderate levels of expression. In addition to the brain, low expression was detected in the colon, kidney, ovary, heart, and lung. Moreover, barely detectable expression was observed in the liver, stomach, duodenum, ileum, jejunum, spleen, and eye.

Distribution of CARP VIII, X, and XI proteins in mouse tissues

We studied the expression of CARP VIII, X, and XI proteins in mouse tissues using immunohistochemistry as shown in Figures 8 through 11 and in Table 2. CARP VIII was expressed in most of the tissues analyzed, indicating a wider distribution profile compared to CARP X and CARP XI expression. Strong expression for CARP VIII was observed in the cerebellum and cerebrum while weaker expression was observed in several other tissues including the liver, pancreatic Langerhans islets, submandibular gland, stomach, colon, kidney, and lung (Figures 8 and 9). In the cerebellum, the highest staining intensity was present in the Purkinje cells and a slightly lower staining intensity was associated with the molecular layer. The cerebrum showed an intense and punctate staining pattern, indicating the strongest expression in the axons and dendrites. In the kidney, very weak positive staining was observed in a few epithelial cells of the renal tubules. The liver showed moderate immunostaining in the hepatocytes. In the lung, staining was observed in both the respiratory epithelium and the rounded alveolar cells, most likely representing the type II pneumocytes. The submandibular gland showed strong immunoreactions in both the acinar and ductal epithelial cells. The gastric and colonic glands were also positively stained for CARP VIII.

Figure 8
figure 8

Immunohistochemical staining of CARP VIII, CARP X, and CARP XI proteins in mouse cerebellum (A, C, E) and cerebrum (B, D, F). Arrows indicate the location of the Purkinje cells, which are strongly positive for CARP VIII and moderately positive for CARP XI. The molecular layer (m) of the cerebellum is also intensely labeled with CARP VIII, whereas the granular cell layer is negative (g). Panel B shows strong punctuate immunostaining for CARP VIII in the cerebrum. The arrowheads in panel D indicate CARP X-positive microcapillaries in the cerebrum. Immunostaining reactions for CARP XI remained very weak in the cerebrum (F). Original magnifications are at × 20.

Figure 9
figure 9

Immunohistochemical staining of CARP VIII proteins in mouse tissues. CARP VIII was observed moderately in the liver hepatocytes (A), ducts (*) and acini (arrows) of the submandibular gland (C), gastric glands (arrows in D), respiratory epithelium (arrowhead), and rounded alveolar cells (arrows) of the lung (G). Extremely low expression was observed in the pancreatic Langerhans islets (*in B), colonic glands (arrows in E), and occasionally in the tubule cells of the kidney (arrow in F indicates positive macula densa cells). No staining was present in the skeletal muscle (H) and testis (I). Original magnifications are at × 20.

Table 2 Expression profile of CARP VIII, X, and XI in mouse tissues using immunohistochemistry

A significant amount of CARP X expression was observed only in the lung where the staining was localized to the respiratory epithelium. In addition, positive signals were occasionally detected in the cerebral capillaries and the stomach (Figures 8 and 10 and Table 2). Barely detectable staining was occasionally observed in the heart muscle cells.

Figure 10
figure 10

Immunohistochemical staining of CARP X protein in mouse tissues. Moderate CARP X expression was observed in the respiratory epithelium (arrowhead) of the lung (G). Moderate expression was also present in the gastric glands (arrows in panel D). The heart muscle cells occasionally showed extremely weak signals (I). The other tissues including the liver (A), pancreas (B), submandibular gland (C), colon (E), small intestine (F), skeletal muscle (H) remained negative. Original magnifications are at × 20.

CARP XI showed a broader expression profile than CARP X. Its overall distribution was fairly similar to that for CARP VIII, although the staining intensity was clearly less intense. Positive signal for CARP XI was observed in the cerebellum, cerebrum, liver, stomach, small intestine, colon, kidney, and testis (Figures 8 and 11 and Table 2). In the cerebellum, the most prominent signal was located in the Purkinje cells.

Figure 11
figure 11

Immunohistochemical staining of CARP XI protein in mouse tissues. Weak immunoreactions for CARP XI were observed in the crypts of Lieberkuhn (arrows in D), gastric glands (arrows in C), and renal tubule cells (F). Extremely weak signals can also be observed in the liver (A), colon (E), and testis (I). The pancreas (B), lung (G), and skeletal muscle (H) were all negative. Original magnifications are at × 20.


Previous bioinformatic investigations have described individual CARP sequences only for human, mouse, and other mammals [10, 11, 25, 26]. Using a variety of bioinformatic tools we identified 84 full-length sequences from genome and sequence databases, including 22 coming from novel or improved gene models and combining mRNA data to genome data. Of these 22 sequences, 8 are novel and previously unannotated, and 14 comprise extended and/or partially corrected sequences. Sequences encoding CARP VIII and CARP X were identified in all available vertebrate genomes, even if many sequences were present only as gene fragments. In contrast, CARP XI was found only in mammals, frogs (X. tropicalis), and lizards (A. carolinensis). Our results indicate that the CA11 gene emerged through a process of gene duplication from CA10 after the divergence of the fish and tetrapod lineages. In addition, we failed to identify any CARP XI sequences from birds, but since there are only two genomes available, the CA11 gene may have been either missed as a consequence of the incomplete genome coverage or alternatively the gene may have been lost in the bird lineage.

The fish CARP X-like sequences form two distinct subgroups, both of which are more closely related to CARP X than CARP XI. This indicates that these sequences have arisen by gene duplication from the CA10 gene in the fish lineage. We suggest names CA10a and CA10b for these genes and CARP Xa and CARP Xb for the proteins to distinguish them from CA11/CARP XI, which is specific to tetrapods.

Sequences found in three deuterostomes (B. floridae, T. adhaerens, and S. purpuratus) that were similar to CARP VIII, with sequence similarities between 40% and 45% when compared to vertebrate CARP VIII sequences, were novel and unexpected discoveries. No CARP VIII orthologs were likewise discovered in protostomes. According to these findings, the origin of CARP VIII would have occurred sometime after the separation of the Protostomia and Deuterostomia lineages. In contrast, CARP X-like sequences are widely found in invertebrates, including all available insect and nematode genomes. Further analysis of the invertebrate CARP X homologs will be presented elsewhere.

Earlier studies reported the expression of human or mouse CARP mRNAs and their corresponding proteins using immunohistochemistry, western blot analysis, northern blot assays, dot blots, and RT-PCR mostly in the brain and in a few cases in other tissues, often with slightly conflicting results [12, 13, 16, 22, 2730]. However, a comprehensive distribution of all CARPs and their corresponding mRNAs has yet to be completely elucidated. In fact, the present study revealed for the first time the distribution of all CARP proteins and their mRNAs in a wide variety of adult mouse tissues using immunohistochemistry and real-time qPCR.

The expression of Car8 mRNA has been previously studied in some other tissues besides from the brain using RT-PCR and dot blot analysis. Multiple transcripts were reported to be expressed in the brain, lung, and liver, and a single transcript was found in the heart, skeletal muscle, and kidney, though to a lesser extent [11]. In the present study, we observed high expression of Car8 mRNA in the cerebellum, liver, and lung. Low expression of Car8 mRNA was observed in all other tissues except for the pancreas and uterus. In brief, the expression pattern we observed by RT-qPCR was similar to the earlier results [11]. The immunohistochemical findings show high levels of CARP VIII expression in the cerebellum and cerebrum. In previous studies, immunohistochemical staining, northern blot studies, and RT-PCR analyses have shown abundant expression of CARP VIII in the human and mouse brain, and immunohistochemical studies have further defined its expression especially in the cerebellar Purkinje cells [12, 13, 16, 22, 2730], all of which are in agreement with the results of our study. Lower CARP VIII expression has been reported in other murine tissues including the lung, liver, and stomach using western blot analysis [30]. Our study confirmed the expression using immunohistochemical staining in these organs. High level expression of Car8 mRNA and CARP VIII protein in the brain and in a wide variety of other tissues suggests important roles for this protein in normal physiology. Indeed the role of CARP VIII is evident from the recently published reports showing ataxia and gait disorders in both mice and humans due to mutations in the CA8 gene [22, 23].

RT-PCR analyses have previously shown the expression of Car10 mRNA in the human brain, testis, salivary glands, and kidney, while lower expression levels were reported in the pancreas, liver, and testis [11]. Using northern blot analysis, the expression was observed in the kidney and the brain [11]. Incidentally, there have been only a few previous reports in the literature regarding the expression of the CARP X protein in the human and mouse brain. The expression was shown to be weak in the cerebellar Purkinje cells [14, 16]. Herein we report strong positive signal intensities only in the cerebellum followed by the parietal cortex and the frontal cortex, low expression in the midbrain, and extremely low expression in the eye. Using immunohistochemical studies, we observed clearly localized signal only in the respiratory epithelium of the lung, and weak signals in the stomach and cerebral capillaries. Our real-time qPCR results do not agree with previous results on human tissues (except for the brain) nor do they agree with the present immunohistochemical findings. The discrepancies between immununohistochemistry and RT-qPCR may be due to (i) a low amount of mRNA that is translated into protein; (ii) rapid degradation of the protein; (iii) the low signal from immunochemical staining, which could be due to the loss of antigenicity in some tissues during the processing and storage of slides; (iv) differences in the species or strains used. Further immunohistochemical studies using new antibodies along with analysis of mRNA transcripts will be important for understanding the discrepancies observed.

In a previous paper, Okamoto et al. [11] reported that the Car10 sequence contains seven CCG repeats in the 5'-untranslated region followed by two CCG repeats located 16 bp downstream from the aforementioned repeats. These repeats have been associated with various neurological disorders [31]. The presence of the CCG repeats in the Car10 gene makes it a potential candidate gene that might contribute to the development of neurodegenerative disorders. Therefore, it will be of interest to explore the expansion mutations of Car10 gene in patients with neurological symptoms [8].

Our study revealed widespread expression of CARP XI in most of the tissues studied by using both immunohistochemistry and real-time qPCR. Compared to CARP VIII, the intensity of CARP XI immunostaining was clearly weaker. In a previous study, immunochemical staining of the human brain indicated that the signal for CARP XI was lower compared to CARP VIII but higher than CARP X [16]. Thus, our findings were in agreement with these aforementioned results. The present real-time qPCR analysis, surprisingly, showed very high expression of the Car11 mRNA in all of the brain segments analyzed, especially in the frontal cortex followed by the parietal cortex, cerebellum, and midbrain. These results were in agreement with an earlier report showing Car11 mRNA expression in all parts of the human brain [10]. The same study demonstrated Car11 mRNA expression in the kidney, liver, and salivary glands, and low expression levels in the lung, skeletal muscle, kidney, pancreas, and liver [10]. In our study, low levels of Car11 mRNA were observed in the colon, kidney, ovary, heart, and lung. The presence of CARP XI in several regions of the brain suggests an important, yet undefined role for CARP XI in the central nervous system.


The present investigation describes a comprehensive bioinformatic study of CARP gene sequences and also elucidates the distribution of three CARPs in mouse tissues using real-time qPCR and immunohistochemistry. We have observed a very high conservation of all the three CARP sequences across the species. In the cases of CARP VIII and CARP X, we found unusually high similarity between vertebrate and invertebrate sequences. Based on our results, the duplication history of the CA10 gene has followed different paths in the fish and tetrapod lineages. Our results contribute to a deeper understanding of CARP evolution across species.

The expression of CARP VIII was found to be widespread in the tissues analyzed, and the highest mRNA signals were detected in the cerebellum, lung, and liver. Both CARP X and XI showed the strongest mRNA expression in the nervous tissues. The distribution patterns suggest that CARPs may contribute to the development of the nervous system, motor coordination functions, and yet unknown physiological roles in other tissues. It will be of interest to determine the specific function of all CARPs by producing and analyzing suitable single, double, and triple knockout animal models and also by screening neurological patients for trinucleotide repeats or other mutations in CARP genes.


Sequence retrieval

The available CARP protein sequences were obtained from Ensembl [32], UniProt [33], and RefSeq [34] and further sequences were searched using BLAST from NCBI protein databases [35] and via BLAT searches from complete genomes [36] using human and mouse CARPs as initial query sequences, and zebrafish, lancelet and sea urchin CARPs later as they were discovered and confirmed. Duplicate sequences were rejected, after which the remaining sequences were taken through iterated cycles of multiple sequence alignment [37], evaluation, and revision. For revision, sequences with poorly matching or missing regions were subjected to gene model generation with GeneWise [38] taking the genomic sequences from the UCSC Genome Browser [36]. EST and mRNA sequence data were used to confirm gene models, to bridge gaps or fill ends in the genomic sequences, and to discover and assemble CARPs from less than genome-wide sequenced organisms. Finally, incomplete sequences were rejected, with the exception of marginally shortened ends, which were allowed.

Multiple sequence alignment

Individual multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) were calculated for CARP VIII, CARP X, and CARP XI using ClustalW [39] and visualized using GeneDoc software [40]. Furthermore, all of the 84 CARP protein sequences were aligned together for the phylogenetic tree.

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic tree of all CARP protein sequences was constructed from the MSA of 84 sequences using the MEGA software, version 4.1 [41]. Evolutionary relationships were inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method. A bootstrap test was performed using 1000 replicates and evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method with the complete deletion option.


The tissue specimens from the normal mice were fixed in 4% neutral-buffered formaldehyde at +4°C for 8 to 27 days. The samples were then dehydrated in an alcohol series, treated with xylene, embedded in paraffin wax, and 4 μm sections were cut and placed on Superfrost microscope slides. After removal of the paraffin with xylene, the rehydrated sections were boiled in sodium citrate (0.01 M, pH 6.0) for 20 min and cooled down. The sections were immunohistochemically stained according to the following procedure: (i) incubating the sample in methanol + 3% H2O2 for 5 min; (ii) rinsing with 1 × Tris-buffered saline (TBS), pH 8.0, containing 0.05% Tween; (iii) blocking with Rodent Block M™(Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) for 30 min; (iv) incubating with primary rabbit anti-human CARP VIII, CARP X, and CARP XI antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Bergheimer Heidelberg, Germany) raised against amino acids 1 to 100 (CARP VIII), 1 to 50 (CARP X) and 279 to 328 (CARP XI) diluted 1:350 in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 hour at room temperature and rinsing with TBS containing 0.05% Tween. Notably, rabbit IgG was used as a control instead of the primary antibodies; (v) incubation with Rabbit HRP-Polymer + XM Factor™(Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) (2.5 ml HRP-Polymer + 1 to 2 drops XM Factor) for 30 min prior to rinsing with 1 × TBS containing 0.05% Tween; (vi) treatment with 1 × 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) solution for 5 min prior to rinsing with distilled water; (vii) counterstaining of the slides with Mayer's Hematoxylin for 1 to 3 sec and rinsing under tap water for 10 min. After dehydration, the slides were mounted with Entellan Neu™ (Merck; Darmstadt, Germany), examined and photographed using Nikon Microphot microscope (Nikon Microphot-FXA, Japan). All of the procedures were carried out at room temperature.

RNA Extraction

Specimens from 20 tissue samples were collected from six normal NMRI mice. The tissue samples used for mRNA isolation were stabilized in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) immediately after collection, and the total RNA was isolated from 30 mg of tissue samples using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) by following the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration and purity of RNA was determined using a spectrophotometric method at 260 and 280 nm.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Reverse transcriptase PCR was performed using 50 μg of total RNA to synthesize the first strand of cDNA using First Strand cDNA Synthesis kits (High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kits, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with random primers and MultiScribe™ Reverse Transcriptase according to the protocol recommended by the manufacturer.

Real-time qPCR primers were designed based on the complete cDNA sequences deposited in the GenBank (RefSeq accession numbers: Car8 [NCBI: NM_007592], Car10 [NCBI: NM_028296], and Car11 [NCBI: NM_009800]). Primer sequences for Car8 included the Forward primer (5'-3') cgggattactgggtctatgaagg and the Reverse primer (5'-3') ggctgggtaggtcggaaattgtc, while the primer sequences for Car10 included the Forward primer (5'-3') gagagcaagagcccagaactc and the Reverse primer (5'-3') ctcaccagtggcagaaatggc. In addition, the Car11 primer sequences were (5'-3') gccggctctgaacaccagatc (for the Forward primer) and (5'-3') gaggaggcgactgaggaatgg (for the Reverse primer).

Real-time qPCR was performed using the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix Kit in an ABI PRISM 7000 Detection System™ according to the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems). The PCR conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec (denaturation) and 60°C for 1 min (elongation). The data were analyzed using the ABI PRISM 7000 SDS™ software (Applied Biosystems). Every PCR was performed in a total reaction volume of 15 μl containing 2 μl of first strand cDNA (20 ng cDNA), 1 × Power SYBR green PCR Master Mix™ (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA 94404, USA), and 0.5 μM of each primer. The final results, expressed as the N-fold relative difference (ratio) in gene expression between the studied samples, were calculated according to the Pfaffl's equation with appropriate modification [42].


  1. Henry RP: Multiple roles of carbonic anhydrase in cellular transport and metabolism. Annu Rev Physiol. 1996, 58: 523-538. 10.1146/

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Supuran CT: Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008, 7 (2): 168-181. 10.1038/nrd2467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sly WS, Hu PY: Human carbonic anhydrases and carbonic anhydrase deficiencies. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995, 64: 375-401. 10.1146/

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tashian RE: The carbonic anhydrases: widening perspectives on their evolution, expression and function. Bioessays. 1989, 10 (6): 186-192. 10.1002/bies.950100603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tashian RE: Genetics of the mammalian carbonic anhydrases. Adv Genet. 1992, 30: 321-356. full_text

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertucci A, Innocenti A, Zoccola D, Scozzafava A, Tambutte S, Supuran CT: Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Inhibition studies of a coral secretory isoform by sulfonamides. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009, 17 (14): 5054-5058. 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.05.063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tashian REH-ED, Carter ND, Bergenhem NCH, : Carbonic anhydrase (CA)-related proteins (CA-RPs), and trans-membrane proteins with CA or CA RP membrane proteins with CA or CA RP domains. 2000, Basel: New Horizons, Birkhauser 17 (14)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nishimori I: Acatalytic CAs: Carbonic anhydrase-related proteins. Carbonic anhydrases: Its inhibitors and activators. CRC enzyme inhibitor series. Edited by: Supuran CT, Scozzfava A, Conway J. 2004, 25-43. full_text. CRC press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnea G, Silvennoinen O, Shaanan B, Honegger AM, Canoll PD, D'Eustachio P, Morse B, Levy JB, Laforgia S, Huebner K, et al: Identification of a carbonic anhydrase-like domain in the extracellular region of RPTP gamma defines a new subfamily of receptor tyrosine phosphatases. Mol Cell Biol. 1993, 13 (3): 1497-1506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujikawa-Adachi K, Nishimori I, Taguchi T, Yuri K, Onishi S: cDNA sequence, mRNA expression, and chromosomal localization of human carbonic anhydrase-related protein, CA-RP XI. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999, 1431 (2): 518-524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Okamoto N, Fujikawa-Adachi K, Nishimori I, Taniuchi K, Onishi S: cDNA sequence of human carbonic anhydrase-related protein, CA-RP X: mRNA expressions of CA-RP X and XI in human brain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001, 1518 (3): 311-316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taniuchi K, Nishimori I, Takeuchi T, Fujikawa-Adachi K, Ohtsuki Y, Onishi S: Developmental expression of carbonic anhydrase-related proteins VIII, X, and XI in the human brain. Neuroscience. 2002, 112 (1): 93-99. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00066-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Akisawa Y, Nishimori I, Taniuchi K, Okamoto N, Takeuchi T, Sonobe H, Ohtsuki Y, Onishi S: Expression of carbonic anhydrase-related protein CA-RP VIII in non-small cell lung cancer. Virchows Arch. 2003, 442 (1): 66-70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nishimori I, Takeuchi H, Morimoto K, Taniuchi K, Okamoto N, Onishi S, Ohtsuki Y: Expression of carbonic anhydrase-related protein VIII, X and XI in the enteric autonomic nervous system. Biomed Res. 2003, 14 (1): 69-73.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taniuchi K, Nishimori I, Takeuchi T, Ohtsuki Y, Onishi S: cDNA cloning and developmental expression of murine carbonic anhydrase-related proteins VIII, X, and XI. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2002, 109 (1-2): 207-215. 10.1016/S0169-328X(02)00563-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. K Taniuchi IN, Takeuchi T, Fujikawa-Adachi K, Ohtsuki Y, Onishi S: Developmental expression of carbonic anhydrase-related proteins VIII, X, and XI in the human brain. Neuroscience. 2002, 112: 93-99. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00066-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miyaji E, Nishimori I, Taniuchi K, Takeuchi T, Ohtsuki Y, Onishi S: Overexpression of carbonic anhydrase-related protein VIII in human colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 2003, 201 (1): 37-45. 10.1002/path.1404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morimoto K, Nishimori I, Takeuchi T, Kohsaki T, Okamoto N, Taguchi T, Yunoki S, Watanabe R, Ohtsuki Y, Onishi S: Overexpression of carbonic anhydrase-related protein XI promotes proliferation and invasion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Virchows Arch. 2005, 447 (1): 66-73. 10.1007/s00428-005-1225-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu SH, Takeuchi T, Fujita J, Ishida T, Akisawa Y, Nishimori I, Kohsaki T, Onishi S, Sonobe H, Ohtsuki Y: Effect of carbonic anhydrase-related protein VIII expression on lung adenocarcinoma cell growth. Lung Cancer. 2004, 44 (3): 273-280. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2003.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ishihara T, Takeuchi T, Nishimori I, Adachi Y, Minakuchi T, Fujita J, Sonobe H, Ohtsuki Y, Onishi S: Carbonic anhydrase-related protein VIII increases invasiveness of non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2006, 448 (6): 830-837. 10.1007/s00428-006-0199-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nishikata M, Nishimori I, Taniuchi K, Takeuchi T, Minakuchi T, Kohsaki T, Adachi Y, Ohtsuki Y, Onishi S: Carbonic anhydrase-related protein VIII promotes colon cancer cell growth. Mol Carcinog. 2007, 46 (3): 208-214. 10.1002/mc.20264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiao Y, Yan J, Zhao Y, Donahue LR, Beamer WG, Li X, Roe BA, Ledoux MS, Gu W: Carbonic anhydrase-related protein VIII deficiency is associated with a distinctive lifelong gait disorder in waddles mice. Genetics. 2005, 171 (3): 1239-1246. 10.1534/genetics.105.044487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Turkmen S, Guo G, Garshasbi M, Hoffmann K, Alshalah AJ, Mischung C, Kuss A, Humphrey N, Mundlos S, Robinson PN: CA8 mutations cause a novel syndrome characterized by ataxia and mild mental retardation with predisposition to quadrupedal gait. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5 (5): e1000487- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000487

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Picaud SS, Muniz JR, Kramm A, Pilka ES, Kochan G, Oppermann U, Yue WW: Crystal structure of human carbonic anhydrase-related protein VIII reveals the basis for catalytic silencing. Proteins. 2009, 76 (2): 507-511. 10.1002/prot.22411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kato K: Sequence of a novel carbonic anhydrase-related polypeptide and its exclusive presence in Purkinje cells. FEBS Lett. 1990, 271 (1-2): 137-140. 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80390-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bellingham J, Gregory-Evans K, Gregory-Evans CY: Sequence and tissue expression of a novel human carbonic anhydrase-related protein, CARP-2, mapping to chromosome 19q13.3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 253 (2): 364-367. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hirasawa M, Xu X, Trask RB, Maddatu TP, Johnson BA, Naggert JK, Nishina PM, Ikeda A: Carbonic anhydrase related protein 8 mutation results in aberrant synaptic morphology and excitatory synaptic function in the cerebellum. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2007, 35 (1): 161-170. 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.02.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Antal Nógrádi NJ, Richard Walker, Keith Caddy, Nick Carter, Christiane Kelly: Carbonic anhydrase II and carbonic anhydrase-related protein in the cerebellar cortex of normal and lurcher mice. Developmental Brain Research. 1997, 98: 91-101. 10.1016/S0165-3806(96)00177-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lakkis MM, O'Shea KS, Tashian RE: Differential expression of the carbonic anhydrase genes for CA VII (Car7) and CA-RP VIII (Car8) in mouse brain. J Histochem Cytochem. 1997, 45 (5): 657-662.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Junji Hirota HA, Kozo Hamada, Katsuhiko Mikoshiba: Carbonic anhydrase-related protein is a novel binding protein for inositol 1, 4, 5-trisphosphate receptor type 1. Biochem J. 2003, 372: 435-441. 10.1042/BJ20030110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kleiderlein JJ, Nisson PE, Jessee J, Li WB, Becker KG, Derby ML, Ross CA, Margolis RL: CCG repeats in cDNAs from human brain. Hum Genet. 1998, 103 (6): 666-673. 10.1007/s004390050889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ensembl genome database.

  33. Universal Protein Resource.

  34. Non-redundant database of DNA, RNA, and protein sequences.

  35. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215 (3): 403-410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. UCSC Genome Browser.

  37. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, et al: Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23 (21): 2947-2948. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R: GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (5): 988-995. 10.1101/gr.1865504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Align Sequences using Clustal W2 EBI.

  40. Nicholas KB, Nicholas HB, Deerfield DW: GeneDoc: Analysis and Visualization of Genetic Variation. EMBNEWNEWS. 1997, 4: 14-

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (9): e45- 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Marianne Kuuslahti and Aulikki Lehmus for their skilful technical assistance with the experiments and Csaba Ortutay for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Competitive Research Funding of the Tampere University Hospital (Grant 9L071) and a grant from Academy of Finland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok Aspatwar.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

All authors participated in the design of the study. AA is the corresponding author who performed the experimental work and drafted the first version of the manuscript. AA and MT jointly performed the bioinformatic analyses, under supervision of MT. In addition, AA and SP performed essential microscopic analyses. All authors contributed to the writing of the document and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1:Multiple sequence alignment of CARP VIII, X, and XI sequences. Multiple sequence alignment of the 84 CARP protein sequences analyzed in the study which was used for the construction of the phylogenetic tree. (PDF 76 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aspatwar, A., Tolvanen, M.E. & Parkkila, S. Phylogeny and expression of carbonic anhydrase-related proteins. BMC Molecular Biol 11, 25 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis
  • CA10 Gene
  • Branchiostoma Floridae
  • Tetrapod Lineage