Open Access

Sp1/3 and NF-1 mediate basal transcription of the human P2X1 gene in megakaryoblastic MEG-01 cells

BMC Molecular Biology20067:10

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-7-10

Received: 28 October 2005

Accepted: 10 March 2006

Published: 10 March 2006

Abstract

Background

P2X1 receptors play an important role in platelet function as they can induce shape change, granule centralization and are also involved in thrombus formation. As platelets have no nuclei, the level of P2X1 expression depends on transcriptional regulation in megakaryocytes, the platelet precursor cell. Since nothing is known about the molecular mechanisms regulating megakaryocytic P2X1 expression, this study aimed to identify and functionally characterize the P2X1 core promoter utilized in the human megakaryoblastic cell line MEG-01.

Results

In order to identify cis-acting elements involved in the transcriptional regulation of P2X1 expression, the ability of 4.7 kb P2X1 upstream sequence to drive luciferase reporter gene expression was tested. Low promoter activity was detected in proliferating MEG-01 cells. This activity increased 20-fold after phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) induced differentiation. A transcription start site was detected 365 bp upstream of the start codon by primer extension. Deletion analysis of reporter constructs indicated a core promoter located within the region -68 to +149 bp that contained two Sp1 sites (named Sp1a and Sp1b) and an NF-1 site. Individual mutations of Sp1b or NF-1 binding sites severely reduced promoter activity whereas triple mutation of Sp1a, Sp1b and NF-1 sites completely abolished promoter activity in both untreated and PMA treated cells. Sp1/3 and NF-1 proteins were shown to bind their respective sites by EMSA and interaction of Sp1/3, NF-1 and TFIIB with the endogenous P2X1 core promoter in MEG-01 cells was demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Alignment of P2X1 genes from human, chimp, rat, mouse and dog revealed consensus Sp1a, Sp1b and NF-1 binding sites in equivalent positions thereby demonstrating evolutionary conservation of these functionally important sites.

Conclusion

This study has identified and characterized the P2X1 promoter utilized in MEG-01 cells and shown that binding of Sp1/3 and NF-1 to elements in the direct vicinity of the transcription start site is essential for basal transcription. Targeting the function of these transcription factors in megakaryocytes may therefore provide a basis for the future therapeutic manipulation of platelet P2X1 function.

Background

P2X receptors comprise a family of membrane cation channels gated by extracellular ATP. Seven subtypes (P2X1–7), each encoded for by a separate gene, are present in mammalian species (reviewed by [1]) and these combine to form either homo or hetero trimeric channels [2, 3] exhibiting different expression profiles and functional properties. P2X1, the first subtype to be isolated, was cloned over a decade ago [4] and the physiological roles of this channel in the regulation of arterial tone [5] and in the neuronal control of smooth muscle contraction [6, 7] are well established. The presence of P2X1 receptors in platelets was discovered shortly after its cloning [8, 9], however, it has not been until more recent times that the physiological importance of P2X1 in platelet function has started to fully emerge (for review see [10]). Activation of platelet P2X1 receptors by extracellular ATP results in a rapid Ca2+ influx which activates cytoskeletal events to induce a transient but substantial shape change and granule centralization [11, 12], both important early events in platelet activation. P2X1 receptors can also synergize with P2Y, collagen, adrenaline and thrombopoietin receptor mediated responses [10] to enhance platelet function. Furthermore, over expression of P2X1 in the platelets of transgenic mice results in a prothrombotic phenotype [13] whereas an absence of the receptor in P2X1 knockout mice leads to a reduced risk of thrombosis [14] suggesting that the level of P2X1 receptor expression in platelets is of physiological and clinical significance.

Although the physiological roles and consequences of altered expression levels of platelet P2X1 receptors are becoming increasingly apparent, the mechanisms that regulate P2X1 expression in platelets are poorly understood. Since platelets are cell fragments devoid of any nuclei the complement of channels and receptors present on their surface must ultimately rely on the regulation of gene transcription in the megakaryocyte, the platelet precursor cell. bHLH factors and E proteins are thought to be involved in smooth muscle specific P2X1 transcription [15]. Nothing however is known about transcriptional regulation of P2X1 in megakaryoblastic cells. In order to initiate studies on the transcriptional mechanisms involved in determining P2X1 expression levels in platelets, we have identified and characterized the P2X1 promoter in the megakaryoblastic cell line MEG-01 [16]. We show that Sp1 and NF-1 regulatory elements located in the direct vicinity of the transcriptional start site are essential for basal transcription of P2X1 in MEG-01 cells.

Results

Cloning and analysis of the P2X 1 gene 5' upstream sequence

The human genomic BAC clone RP11-167N20 was found to contain all 12 exons of the human P2X1 gene and 64 kb 5' upstream sequence. The 4.772 kb upstream of the ATG start codon was cloned into the pGL-3 Basic luciferase reporter plasmid to generate the plasmid p-4407/+365 and the sequence analyzed by the Proscan computer program [17]. A potential core promoter was predicted at -151 to +99 bp with a promoter score of 70.32.

The P2X1 transcription start site is located 365 bp upstream of the start codon

To map the location of the P2X1 transcription initiation site in MEG-01 cells, four anti-sense oligonucleotides Pet1, Pet2, Pet3 and Pet4 (Figure 3) were used for primer extension. As positive control we utilized a previously published primer sequence pTXRHR-100 which has been used to map the transcription start site of the thromboxane receptor gene in MEG-01 cells [18]. Similar to previous studies, this control primer yielded a single extension product of ~110 bp (Figure 1A lane 1). A single extension product of ~210 bp was generated by Pet1 (Figure 1A lane 3), two distinct extension products of ~150 bp and ~249 bp, were generated by Pet3 (Figure 1A lane 5), a doublet band of ~66 bp was generated by Pet4 (Figure 1A lane 6) and no extension products were observed from Pet2 (Figure 1A lane 4). Extension products of 66 bp (Pet4), 150 bp (Pet3) and 210 bp (Pet1) correspond to a transcription start site located ~365 bp upstream of the ATG start codon. The Pet2 sequence is very close to this site (Figure 3) and so would not be expected to produce an extension product. An additional extension product of 249 bp produced by the Pet3 primer (Figure 1A, lane 5) indicated the possibility of an additional transcription start site located ~465 bp upstream of start codon. However, no bands corresponding to such a start site were observed with the Pet1, Pet2 or Pet4 primers. Furthermore, subsequent analysis of promoter activity in constructs where this potential site had been removed (p-111/+149 compared to p-68/+149 (Figure 2B)) did not indicate the presence of a functional transcription start site in this region. We therefore attributed the 249 bp band produced by the Pet3 primer as a non-specific extension product. To precisely map the start site, sequencing reactions primed with the same Pet primer used for primer extension were run in parallel to extension reactions (Figure 1B). The 150 bp Pet3 extension product (Figure 1B lane 6) corresponds to a transcription start site located at a "T" residue 365 bp upstream of the ATG start codon. This site is 78 bp downstream of the start site previously described for P2X1 in smooth muscle [15] but matches closely to the EST clone BX644575 which was isolated from human bone marrow, a tissue rich in megakaryocytes.
Figure 1

The P2X 1 transcription start site is located 365 bp upstream of the start codon. A) 32P-labelled primers Pet1, Pet2, Pet3 and Pet4 and Con (control primer pTXRHR-100) were annealed to poly(A) RNA from PMA-treated MEG-01 cells and extended with reverse transcriptase. Extension products for Pet1, Pet3 and Pet4 that equate to the same transcription start site are indicated with arrows. (M), molecular mass marker. B) Pet3 extension reaction (lane 6) run in parallel with a sequencing ladder. The location of primers is depicted in Figure 3.

Figure 2

Activity of P2X 1 promoter constructs in transient transfection assays. A) Promoter activity of p-4407/+365 was determined both with (+) and without (-) the prior treatment of cells with 10 nM PMA. Data are means of absolute firefly luciferase activity of three independent transfections. B) Luciferase activity of P2X1 deletion constructs in PMA treated MEG-01 cells. TSS, transcription start site. PT depicts a polypyrimidine tract located from -1801 to -1405 bp. Values are presented as means of at least three experiments and normalized against the construct p-4407/+365. Names of plasmid constructs correspond to the 5' and 3' ends of the insert relative to the transcription start site e.g. construct p-4407/+365 extends from 4407 bp 5' to 365 bp 3' of the transcription start site.

Figure 3

Sequence of the P2X 1 proximal promoter region. Potential transcription factor binding sites are underlined and in bold. Oligonucleotide sequences used for primer extension analysis (Pet1-4) are indicated by horizontal arrows. End points of plasmid deletion constructs in this region are indicated by "p" and number above the sequence. Sequence numbering is relative to the transcription start site indicated as +1. The translation initiation ATG is boxed. The EMBL/Genbank accession number of this sequence is AJ971536.

PMA induced differentiation results in a 20-fold increase in P2X1 reporter gene activity

In initial studies, we tested the p-4407/+365 construct for promoter activity in three cell lines previously reported to show endogenous P2X1 expression, MEG-01 [9, 19], HL-60 [20] and Jurkat [21]. The human kidney proximal tubular epithelial cell line HK2 was used as negative control. Cells were assayed both with and without prior treatment with PMA, a phorbol ester previously reported to increase P2X1 mediated currents in MEG-01 [9, 19] and HL-60 [20] cells. Low promoter activity was detected in untreated MEG-01, HL-60 and Jurkat cells but not in HK2 cells (Figure 2A). Treatment of MEG-01 cells with 10 nM PMA caused cells to differentiate to a non-proliferating adherent phenotype and resulted in a ~20 fold increase in promoter activity of p-4407/+365. This PMA-induced increase was also apparent in Jurkat and HL-60 cells but not in HK2 cells (Figure 2A). Comparisons of promoter activity between different constructs in untreated MEG-01 cells proved problematic since promoter activities were not sufficiently above background to allow accurate quantification. PMA-differentiated MEG-01 cells were therefore utilized for subsequent analysis since these cells represent a well characterized model of megakaryocyte maturation [22] and the higher P2X1 promoter activity aided quantification of differences between constructs.

Deletion analysis of luciferase reporter gene constructs

To define the mechanisms controlling transcriptional regulation of P2X1 in MEG-01 cells, a series of deletion constructs were generated. Gradual deletion of 5' sequence from -4407 to -2235 resulted in no significant change in luciferase activity (Figure 2B) suggesting that no important regulatory elements reside in this ~2 kb region. Removal of sequence between -2235 and -1398 in construct p-1398/+365 however resulted in a 88 ± 14% increase (p < 0.01) in promoter activity indicating the presence of a repressive element. Sequence analysis of this region revealed a 396 bp polypyrimidine tract located -1801 to -1405 bp which contains 15 copies of the sequence motif 5'-TCCCTCCCTCCC-3'. Interestingly, this same sequence motif is present in the mouse c-Ki-ras promoter where it plays a role in transcriptional regulation [23]. Within this polypyrimidine tract region are clustered multiple potential Sp1, Ets-2 and MAZ transcription factor binding sites. The increase in promoter activity was maintained throughout deletions from 1398 to 190 in the constructs p-805/365, p-454/+365, p-330/+365, and p-190/+365 (p < 0.01 for each construct) (Figure 2B). The difference in promoter activity between constructs p-1398/+365 through to p-190/+365 was not significant. Removal of 3' sequence from +365 to +149 bp (p-190/+149) decreased promoter activity back to the level of the p-4407/+365 construct. Deletion of 5' sequence from -190 to -111 bp (p-111/+149) resulted in a 63 ± 5% decrease (p < 0.01) in promoter activity. Further deletion of 43 bp 5' sequence in construct p-68/+149 produced no significant change in activity from p-111/+149. Removal of 3' sequence however from +149 to +17 bp in construct p-190/+17 completely abolished promoter activity.

Thus, to summarize the deletion analysis performed on the P2X1 upstream region, promoter activity was stable or increased in 5' deletions from -4407 through to position -190. Deletions past -190 up to position -68 significantly reduced promoter activity whereas removal of 132 bp from +149 to +17 bp abolished promoter function demonstrating that this region contains regulatory elements essential for transcription.

In vitro binding of Sp1/3 and NF-1 to the P2X1 promoter

Results from the above deletion analysis suggested that the region -190 to +149 bp plays an important role in the transcriptional regulation of the P2X1 gene (Figure 3). Analysis of this region using the programmes TESS [24] and PROSCAN [17] did not reveal putative TATA or CCAAT boxes, but detected several potential transcription factor binding sites including NF-κB, YY-1, GATA-1, NF-1, and multiple Sp1 sites. To begin to understand which specific transcription factors are involved in regulating P2X 1 gene transcription we initially performed EMSAs on nuclear extracts from PMA-treated MEG-01 cells using oligonucleotides corresponding to a potential NF-1 site and two Sp1 sites (named Sp1a and Sp1b) located in the immediate vicinity of the transcription start site. The radiolabelled probe O-NF1 containing a potential NF-1 binding site produced a major retarded band (Figure 4A lanes 1 and 3), the formation of which was prevented by an excess of unlabelled O-NF1 itself (Figure 4A lane 4) but not by the mutated O-NF1-mut probe (Figure 4A lane 5). In the presence of an anti-NF-1 antibody, the DNA-protein complexes were either supershifted or remained in the well (Figure 4A lane 2). Similar results for NF-1 supershift complexes have also been reported in previous studies [25, 26], we therefore concluded that NF-1 can bind to the P2X1 proximal promoter.
Figure 4

EMSA assays on NF-1 and Sp1/Sp3 binding sites. A) Competition experiments were performed in the presence of excess unlabelled O-NF1 (lane 4) and unlabelled mutated O-NF1-mut (lane 5). Complexes supershifted by pre-incubation with an NF-1 antibody (NF-1Ab, lane 2) are marked "SS". "NS" indicates non specific binding complexes, the level of which varied between individual nuclear extractions (lanes 1 and 3). "F" indicates free probe. B) Supershift assays using Sp1 (lanes 2 and 5) and Sp3 (lanes 3 and 6) specific antibodies. C) Competition experiments in the absence (lanes 1 and 5) or presence of excess of unlabelled competitors: Lanes 2 and 6, an excess of unlabelled O-Sp1a or O-Sp1b probe respectively. Lanes 3 and 7, an excess of unlabelled mutated oligonucleotide O-Sp1a-mut and O-Sp1b-mut respectively. Lanes 4 and 8, an excess of a consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide (Promega, E323A).

The probes O-Sp1a and O-Sp1b corresponding to the Sp1a and Sp1b binding sites respectively, gave rise to three major DNA-protein complexes, the larger two of which appear as a doublet band (Figure 4B lanes 1 and 4). To identify specific transcription factor binding, supershift assays with Sp1 and Sp3 antibodies were performed. The Sp3 antibody produced a supershift ("ss" Figure 4B lanes 3 and 6). Sp1 antibodies caused a decrease in intensity of the doublet band but produced no visible supershifted products (Figure 4B lanes 2 and 5). To further clarify the molecular basis of Sp1/Sp3 interactions with the oligonucleotide probes, competition experiments were performed (Figure 4C). Addition of unlabelled O-Sp1a or O-Sp1b prevented binding of Sp1/Sp3 to labelled probe (Figure 4C lanes 2 and 6). Similarly, addition of an unlabelled commercial consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide (Figure 4C lanes 4 and 8) also prevented Sp1/Sp3 binding to O-Sp1a and O-Sp1b. In contrast O-Sp1a-mut and O-Sp1b-mut did not prevent protein binding (Figure 4C lanes 3 and 7) demonstrating that a 2 bp mutation (Table 1) disrupted Sp1/3 binding.
Table 1

Oligonucleotides used for EMSA. Primer sequences are 5' to 3'. Bold lowercase bases represent mutations with respect to the wild type sequence. Underlined sequences represent consensus binding sites for respective transcription factor.

Name

Position

Sequence

O-NFκB

-168/-144

GAGTCGCGGGGAGTCCCC TAATCTG

O-NFκB-mut

 

GAGTCGCGGcc AGTCCCCTAATCTG

O-NF1

-29/-5

CCTGTGG TTTCCTGCCAAC AACTCC

O-NF1-mut

 

CCTGTGGTTTCCTtaa AACAACTCC

O-Sp1a

+33/+60

GGAGGGGCAGTGGGGCTGGG CCTGGGTG

O-Sp1a-mut

 

GGAGGGGCAGTGGtt CTGGGCCTGGGTG

O-Sp1b

+63/+90

CCCACCAGCCCCGCCCC ATCTATCTTTG

O-Sp1b-mut

 

CCCACCAGCCCCGaa CCATCTATCTTTG

Table 2

Binding site mutants. Positions of mutations in mutant constructs. Schematic illustration of the P2X1 core promoter mutation constructs. "." indicates positions same as wild type. "~" indicates where sequence has been omitted for clarity.

 

NF-κB

NF-1

Sp1a

Sp1b

Wild type

GGGGAGTCCCC~~~TGGTTTCCTGCCAAC~~~GGGGCTGGG~~~CCCCGCCCC

mNFkB

..CC.......~~~...............~~~.........~~~.........

mNF-1

...........~~~.........TAA...~~~.........~~~.........

mSp1a

...........~~~...............~~~..TT.....~~~.........

mSp1b

...........~~~...............~~~.........~~~.....AA..

mut1

..CC.......~~~.........TAA...~~~.........~~~.........

mut2

...........~~~...............~~~..TT.....~~~.....AA..

mut3

...........~~~.........TAA...~~~.........~~~.....AA..

mut4

...........~~~.........TAA...~~~..TT.....~~~.....AA..

Table 3

Oligonucleotides used for ChIP analysis. Primer sequences are 5' to 3'. At the end of oligonucleotide names, f: indicates a sense primer, r: indicates an antisense primer.

Name

Sequence

Product size

P2X1f

CGCACGCGTTCTCATTTTGGCAGTGGAGGGGAG

360 bp

P2X1r

GGTGATCAGAGCAAAGCTTGGCCCCTGG

 

Hsp70f

CCTCCAGTGAATCCCAGAAGACTCT

282 bp

Hsp70r

TGGGACAACGGGAGTCACTCTC

 

H4f

GAGAGGGCGGGGACAATTGA

362 bp

H4r

TTGGCGTGCTCGGTGTAGGT

 

GAPDHf

TGAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGT

983 bp

GAPDHr

CATGTGGGCCATGAGGTCCACCAC

 

An oligonucleotide probe corresponding to the potential NF-κB binding site (O-NFκB) did not produce super-shifted products after addition of an NF-κB antibody (data not shown). In summary EMSAs demonstrated that Sp1, Sp3 and NF-1 transcription factors can bind regulatory elements in the P2X1 proximal promoter implying that these factors are involved in the regulation of P2X1 gene transcription.

Sp1 and NF-1 sites are essential for basal transcription of the P2X1 gene

We next conducted site-directed mutagenesis to disrupt the Sp1/3, NF-1 and NF-κB binding sites in selected P2X1 promoter constructs. Promoter activity of mutated constructs was determined in PMA treated MEG-01 cells and expressed relative to that of the wild type p-190/+149 construct (Figure 5). Single mutation of the NF-κB (construct mNF-κB) and Sp1a (construct mSp1a) sites produced no significant change in promoter activity (Figure 5A). Single mutation of the NF-1 site (construct mNF-1) or Sp1b site (construct mSp1b) however resulted in 76 ± 5% (p < 0.01) and 76 ± 2% (P < 0.01) reductions respectively. A double mutation ablating both NF-1 and NF-κB sites simultaneously (construct mut1) reduced promoter activity by 80 ± 2% (p < 0.01), whereas double mutation of Sp1a and Sp1b sites (construct mut2) reduced activity by 92% ± 1 (p < 0.01). Simultaneous mutation of NF-1 and Sp1b sites (construct mut3), the NF-1 site together with Sp1a and Sp1b sites (construct mut4), or deletion of the fragment from +18 to +149 bp which removes both Sp1a and Sp1b sites (construct p-190/+17) effectively abolished promoter activity (Figure 5A).
Figure 5

Mutation analysis of transcription factor binding sites. A series of luciferase reporter constructs harbouring site-directed mutations in the NF-κB, NF-1 and Sp1 binding sites of the P2X1 proximal promoter region were assayed for promoter activity in PMA-treated MEG-01 cells (sequences of mutations are shown in Table 2). Shaded symbols represent mutated binding sites. Values are presented as means ± S.E of at least three independent experiments and are normalized against the wild type p-190/+149 construct for panels A to C and the wild type construct p-4407/+365 in panel D. A) Effects of mutations in the construct p-190/+149. B) Effect of mutation after removal of the potential NF-κB binding site. C) Effect of mutation after removal of the transcription start site that is utilized by smooth muscle cells [15]. Dotted vertical arrow (TSS) represents the transcription start site determined in this study. D) The Sp1a, Sp1b and NF-1 sites were mutated in the original full length 4.7 kb reporter construct p-4407/+365 to generate the triple mutated construct p-4407/+365(mut4). Promoter activities were determined in MEG-01 cells either treated (+) or untreated (-) with PMA.

In order to confirm the apparent redundancy of the potential NF-κB site, we generated a further set of mutations in the plasmid p-111/+149, a construct where the potential NF-κB site has been removed (Figure 5B). Whilst removal of 79 bp from -190 to -111 resulted in a ~50% decrease in promoter activity, the overall pattern of promoter activity resulting from Sp1 and NF-1 binding site mutations was very similar to that observed in the p-190/+149 mutations (Figure 5A).

A P2X1 transcription start site 78 bp upstream from site identified in this current study has been reported in human smooth muscle cells [15]. If this same site is utilized in MEG-01 cells then its removal in deletion constructs would be expected to abolish promoter activity. To test this hypothesis and to further delineate a functional core promoter, the construct p-68/+149 was generated. p-68/+149 displayed a promoter activity 32 ± 3% that of the p-190/+149 construct. Single and double site-directed mutations of Sp1 and NF-1 binding sites in this p-68/+149 construct again showed a similar pattern of promoter activity to that observed in the p-190/+149 construct (Figure 5C).

From the above mutation and previous deletion analysis, we defined the region spanning -68 to +149 as the P2X1 core promoter composing of a single NF-1 binding site and two Sp1-binding sites. To prove the importance of these sites in controlling basal transcription, the Sp1a, Sp1b and NF-1 sites were mutated in the original 4.7 kb reporter construct p-4407/+365 to generate the construct p-4407/+365(mut4). Promoter activity from this triple mutated construct was abolished in both untreated and PMA-treated MEG-01 cells (Figure 5D) confirming the essential roles of Sp1 and NF-1 in P2X1 basal transcription.

Direct binding of Sp1/3 and NF-1 to the endogenous P2X1 core promoter

Having identified Sp1, Sp3 and NF-1 sites essential for P2X1 reporter gene function, we next utilized ChIP to determine whether the corresponding transcription factors are physically recruited to the endogenous P2X1 core promoter in vivo (Figure 6). Primers for the Hsp70 and histone H4 promoters were used as positive controls as Sp1 and Sp3 have previously been detected at these promoters by ChIP assay [27, 28]. As a negative control, parallel experiments using primers for the coding region of the GAPDH gene were performed. Antibodies for Sp1, Sp3, NF-1 and TFIIB in ChIP assays using chromatin isolated from PMA-treated MEG-01 cells resulted in enrichment of the DNA genomic segment harboring the region -197/+166 of the P2X1 gene thus confirming the in vivo recruitment of these factors to the core promoter.
Figure 6

Transcription factors bind the endogenous P2X 1 promoter. Formaldehyde cross-linked chromatin was prepared from PMA-treated MEG-01 cells and immunoprecipitated with antibodies to Sp1 (lane 4), Sp3 (lane 5), NF-1 (lane 6), TFIIB (lane 7), or in the absence of antibody (lane 3). PCR was performed with specific primers for the P2X1, H4 and Hsp70 promoter and for the GAPDH coding region as a negative control. A sample representative of the total input chromatin (input DNA lane 1) was included in the PCR analysis. Lane 2 shows the supernatant of the 'unbound' sample. PCR products were between 282 and 983 bp in length. PCR cycle numbers were 31 for the P2X1, H4 and Hsp70 promoter and 36 for the GAPDH coding region. Primer sequences are given in Table 3.

Discussion

Regulation of P2X1 transcription in megakaryocytic cells is of physiological and clinical importance as ultimately this will influence the level of P2X1 receptor present on platelets, excessive activation of which can lead to thrombosis, cardiovascular disease and stroke. As a first step towards understanding the transcriptional mechanisms regulating P2X1 expression in megakaryocytic cells, we have analyzed the P2X1 promoter in MEG-01 cells. We identified a transcription start site 365 bp upstream of the start codon and defined a core promoter located within the region -68 to +149 bp. Two Sp1 sites and an NF-1 site in the core promoter were shown to be critical for basal transcription.

The P2X1 core promoter was found not to possess "TATA" or "CCAAT" elements but contained Sp1 and NF-1 sites critical for basal transcription. Mammalian promoters lacking a TATA box often contain Sp1 elements and rely on Sp1 to recruit TATA-binding protein and guide RNA polymerase II to the initiator site [2931]. Sp1 and Sp3 are members of a large family of transcription factors that regulate transcription through interactions with GC-boxes. They are both zinc finger proteins that bind the same DNA recognition sequences with similar affinity [32]. Despite ubiquitous expression, tissue-specific gene activation by Sp1 and Sp3 may be achieved by a variety of mechanisms including variability in the concentration of Sp1 and Sp3 [32], interactions of Sp1 with tissue specific transcription factors [33] and tissue specific post-translational modification of Sp1 and Sp3 [32]. Sp1/3 can regulate gene transcription through a variety of mechanisms, functioning as either a basal promoter element or an upstream activator, depending on promoter [34, 35]. Two Sp1/3 sites were identified in the P2X1 promoter and mutation of the Sp1b (+71 to +79) site most markedly reduced promoter activity. Single mutation of the Sp1a (+44 to +52) site did not significantly reduce transcription. However, simultaneous mutation of both Sp1a and Sp1b together entirely abolished transcriptional activity. Thus, the Sp1b site can completely compensate for the loss of the Sp1a site but Sp1a can only partially compensate for the loss of Sp1b suggesting that whilst both sites may be utilized in basal transcription, the Sp1b site plays a more prominent role.

An NF-1 site in the P2X1 core promoter was also found to be important for transcription. NF-1 proteins are recruited to promoters in a cell type specific manner and can associate with different regulators to either activate or repress transcription depending on the promoter and cellular context [36, 37]. Site-directed mutagenesis of the NF-1 site in the P2X1 core promoter significantly reduced transcriptional activity by ~80% (Figure 5). Simultaneous mutation of both NF-1 and Sp1b sites completely abolished promoter activity suggesting that NF-1 and Sp1/3 may act synergistically to recruit the initiation complex to the P2X1 core promoter.

The human P2X1 promoter identified in this study shows characteristics typical of those normally associated with housekeeping genes: lack of classical TATA or CCAAT boxes, an increased GC content and critical Sp1 and NF-1 elements [38]. This would appear ideally suited for P2X1 expression in megakaryocytes since constant synthesis is required for platelet production. Constitutive expression of P2X1 however does not occur in all hematic cell types and their progenitors as neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes show no significant expression of P2X1 [39, 40]. This suggests that tight repression of the P2X1 promoter occurs and that release from this repression may be an important feature of P2X1 transcriptional regulation. Deletion analysis performed in this study identified a repressive element in an upstream region containing a 396 bp polypyrimidine tract located -1801 to -1405. Removal of this tract in deletion constructs p-1398/+365 through to p-190/+365 resulted in a ~90–100% increase in promoter activity (Figure 2B). Polypyrimidine tracts can harbor multiple binding sites for Sp1 and Sp3 [41, 42] and play important roles in the regulation of gene transcription [43, 44]. A possible mechanism for the repressive effect of the P2X1 polypyrimidine tract could be that this region facilitates a local sequestration of Sp1/3 factors hindering their binding to the Sp1a and Sp1b sites further downstream in the core promoter.

Important transcriptional regulatory elements often show conservation between species [45]. We therefore investigated whether the NF-1, Sp1a and Sp1b binding sites identified in the human promoter are also present in the upstream sequence of P2X1 genes from other species. Using BLAST searches of genomic sequence data we identified P2X1 genes from mouse, chimp, dog and rat. Similar to human, the upstream regions of these genes were also GC-rich and contained no "TATA" or "CCAAT" elements. Sequence alignment revealed NF-1, Sp1a and Sp1b sites in identical positions across all species examined (Figure 7). These results demonstrate a conserved core promoter structure in mammalian P2X1 genes and suggest that the involvement of Sp1/3 and NF-1 in the regulation of P2X1 transcription has been conserved during evolution.
Figure 7

Cross species conservation of the P2X 1 core promoter. P2X1 upstream sequence from chimp (chromosome 19 position 4051445–4051944), dog (chromosome 9 position 40295005–40295504), rat (chromosome 10 position 59889637–59890136) and mouse (chromosome 11 position 72611373–72611872) was obtained by BLAST searching of genomic databases via the ENSEMBL genome browser http://www.ensembl.org. The 500 bp upstream of the ATG start codon of each gene was aligned using CLUSTAL. Alignment equivalent to -68/+149 of the human P2X1 core promoter is shown. Sequence identity to the human P2X1 sequence over this region was 99.1%, 83.4%, 76.8%, and 75.9% for chimp, dog, mouse and rat respectively. "." indicates nucleotides identical to the human P2X1 sequence. Dashes indicate positions where gaps have been inserted in order to maintain the alignment. The transcription start site of the human P2X1 gene determined in this study is indicated as +1. Potential transcription start sites predicted by PROSCAN [17] are indicated as arrows. In each species, potential NF-1, Sp1a and Sp1b binding sites (indicated by boxes) are present in equivalent positions to the human P2X1 core promoter.

PMA-induced differentiation of MEG-01 cells is widely used as a model of megakaryocytic maturation and is known to increase the expression of megakaryocytic lineage specific antigens, such as integrin αIIbβ3 [22, 46]. PMA activates signaling cascades via activation of PKC and other C1 domain containing receptors resulting in a wide range of cellular effects [47]. PMA can enhance P2X1 mediated responses in MEG-01 [19], THP1 [39], and HL-60 [20] cells and is also thought to have more acute effects by increasing phosphorylation of a putative P2X1 accessory protein [48]. In this study, we found that P2X1 promoter activity increased ~20-fold in PMA-differentiated MEG-01 cells compared to untreated cells. Several studies have shown Sp1 DNA-binding activity and expression level to increase upon treatment of cells with PMA [4953]. Similarly, PMA induction has been shown to increase the formation of NF-1 DNA complexes [54, 55]. We therefore speculate that PMA enhances P2X1 ion channel function through the actions of Sp1 and NF-1 at the P2X1 core promoter resulting in an increase in gene transcription and the synthesis of new P2X1 protein. The signaling pathways that link PMA stimulation with P2X1 gene activation and whether these result in alterations in the levels of Sp1 and NF-1 or in protein modifications such as phosphorylation altering the affinity of factors for their respective binding sites remain to be determined.

Conclusion

The in vivo control of P2X 1 transcription in megakaryocytes is undoubtedly a complex combinatorial process involving the integration of a large number of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions that mediate cell type specific expression during megakaryocyte differentiation and the ability respond to regulatory inputs. This study provides the first steps towards unraveling the complexities of this control by providing the fundamental information of P2X 1 core promoter location and composition in a megakaryocytic cell line. We demonstrate that Sp1 and NF-1 are critical for P2X 1 core promoter function in both proliferating and PMA-differentiated MEG-01 cells. The targeting of signaling pathways that influence the function of these transcription factors in megakaryocytes may therefore provide the basis for the future therapeutic manipulation of platelet P2X1 function.

Methods

Reporter constructs

The human genomic BAC clone (RP11-167N20) containing the human P2X1 gene was obtained from the Sanger Institute. 4.772 kb upstream of the start codon was amplified by PCR using Pfu polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) and cloned into pGL3-Basic (Promega). A series of 5' deletion constructs were created either by restriction enzyme digestion with Mlu I/Hind III or via a PCR based approach to introduce Mlu I/Hind III sites via primers.

Cell culture

MEG-01, HL-60 and Jurkat cells were purchased from the German National Resource Centre for Biological Material (DSMZ) and maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. HK2 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium-Ham's F12 mix supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM L-glutamine.

Site-directed mutagenesis

Point mutations were introduced into potential Sp1 and/or NF-1 binding sites by a two step cloning strategy. A 339 bp fragment (spanning from -190 to +149 bp) was cut from the P2X1 pGL3-Basic plasmid, cloned into the Mlu I/Hind III sites of pCR-Script™ and used as template for mutagenesis using the QuikChange™ system (Stratagene, La, Jolla CA). Mutated fragments were then re-cloned into the Mlu I/Hind III sites of the corresponding pGL3-Basic vectors. Double (mut1, mut2 and mut3) and triple-site (mut4) mutation constructs were generated by consecutive rounds of mutagenesis. The triple mutation construct p-4407(mut4) was generated by replacing a Sal I/Hind III fragment with the equivalent mutated Sal I/Hind III fragment from the plasmid mut4.

Mapping the P2X1 transcription start site

Poly(A) RNA was isolated from PMA (10 nM) treated MEG-01 cells using RNAWIZ™ total RNA and Poly(A) Purist™ mRNA purification kits (Ambion, Austin, TX). Extension of [γ-32P]ATP labeled primers (Figure 1) was performed using the Promega Primer Extension System (Promega, E3030). Size of extension products was determined by resolution on denaturing 8% polyacrylamide gels. Locations of the primers used are depicted in Figure 3.

Transient transfection and luciferase assays

For transient transfections 5 × 104 cells were plated in 96-well plates and incubated with 80 ng of P2X1 reporter plasmid, 20 ng of pRL-SV40 and 0.3 μl of transfection reagent (GeneJuice™, Novagen Madison, WI). The Renilla luciferase plasmid pRL-SV40 (Promega) was used as internal control for transfection efficiency. Following transfection, cells were cultured in the absence or presence of 10 nM PMA. The Dual-Glo™ Luciferase Assay (Promega) was used to determine firefly and renilla luciferase activity 48 hours after transfection in 96-well plates. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla activity in each transfection. All plasmids were purified using Qiagen columns (Qiagen, Valencia CA) and at least two preparations per plasmid were tested. Transfections were done in triplicate in each experiment and at least 3 experiments were performed for each construct. Data are presented as means of experiments ± Standard error. Differences between means of control and experimental constructs were assessed by Dunnett's test. Differences between experimental constructs within a dataset were assessed using Tukey's multiple comparison test.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays

Nuclear proteins were isolated from PMA-treated (10 nM, 48 hours) MEG-01 cells essentially as described by Hurst [56]. EMSAs were performed using the Promega EMSA kit on at least three different preparations of nuclear extract for each experiment. Bands that could not be competed by cold unlabelled oligonucleotide, consensus oligonucleotide or the non-specific competitor Poly dI-dC were classed as non-specific binding complexes. Nuclear protein (5.0 μg) was incubated with or without a 100-fold molar excess of unlabelled competitor DNA in 4% glycerol, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 and 2.0 μg poly (dI-dC) on ice for 15 minutes, followed by addition of the radiolabelled probe. For supershift assays, antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Santa Cruz, CA) were added to the reaction mixture 25 minutes prior to the probe. DNA-protein complexes were resolved by electrophoresis on 6% polyacrylamide gels. Commercial double-stranded oligonucleotides used were as follows: Sp1, 5'-ATTCGATCGGGGCGGGGCGAGC-3', (Promega); NF-1, 5'-TTTTGGATTGAAGCCAATATGATAA-3' (Santa Cruz). Other oligonucleotide sequences are shown in Table 1.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

Formaldehyde cross-linking and chromatin immunoprecipitation were performed as described by Okada and co-workers [57]. After PMA treatment for 48 hours, 2 × 106 cells were treated with formaldehyde for 10 minutes followed by the addition of 0.125 M glycine. Cells were washed twice in PBS and re-suspended in lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM HEPES, 10 μl/ml Protease inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma) adjusted to pH 7.9 with KOH). After sonication to an average fragment size of 500 bp, protein-DNA cross-linked products were enriched by immunoprecipitation. Samples without antibody were included as negative controls. After reversal of cross links and DNA purification, the extent of enrichment was monitored by PCR using primers to P2X1, H4, and Hsp70 promoter fragments and to the coding region of GAPDH as negative control. The input sample was processed with the rest of the samples from the point at which the cross links were reversed.

Abbreviations

EMSA: 

electrophoretic mobility shift assay

PMA: 

phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate

S.E: 

standard error

ChIP: 

chromatin immunoprecipitation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Gary Willars for advice on statistical analysis and Dr Tania Webb for critical review of the manuscript. This work was funded by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Cell Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Leicester

References

  1. North RA: Molecular physiology of P2X receptors. Physiol Rev. 2002, 82: 1013-1067.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrera NP, Ormond SJ, Henderson RM, Murrell-Lagnado RD, Edwardson JM: Atomic force microscopy imaging demonstrates that P2X2 receptors are trimers but that P2X6 receptor subunits do not oligomerize. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 10759-10765. 10.1074/jbc.M412265200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nicke A, Baumert HG, Rettinger J, Eichele A, Lambrecht G, Mutschler E, Schmalzing G: P2X1 and P2X3 receptors form stable trimers: a novel structural motif of ligand-gated ion channels. Embo J. 1998, 17: 3016-3028. 10.1093/emboj/17.11.3016PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Valera S, Hussy N, Evans RJ, Adami N, North RA, Surprenant A, Buell G: A new class of ligand-gated ion channel defined by P2x receptor for extracellular ATP. Nature. 1994, 371: 516-519. 10.1038/371516a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Vial C, Evans RJ: P2X(1) receptor-deficient mice establish the native P2X receptor and a P2Y6-like receptor in arteries. Mol Pharmacol. 2002, 62: 1438-1445. 10.1124/mol.62.6.1438View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mulryan K, Gitterman DP, Lewis CJ, Vial C, Leckie BJ, Cobb AL, Brown JE, Conley EC, Buell G, Pritchard CA, Evans RJ: Reduced vas deferens contraction and male infertility in mice lacking P2X1 receptors. Nature. 2000, 403: 86-89. 10.1038/47495View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Vial C, Evans RJ: P2X receptor expression in mouse urinary bladder and the requirement of P2X(1) receptors for functional P2X receptor responses in the mouse urinary bladder smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol. 2000, 131: 1489-1495. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703720PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. MacKenzie AB, Mahaut-Smith MP, Sage SO: Activation of receptor-operated cation channels via P2X1 not P2T purinoceptors in human platelets. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 2879-2881. 10.1074/jbc.271.8.4086View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Vial C, Hechler B, Leon C, Cazenave JP, Gachet C: Presence of P2X1 purinoceptors in human platelets and megakaryoblastic cell lines. Thromb Haemost. 1997, 78: 1500-1504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mahaut-Smith MP, Tolhurst G, Evans RJ: Emerging roles for P2X1 receptors in platelet activation. Platelets. 2004, 15: 131-144. 10.1080/09537100410001682788View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Erhardt JA, Pillarisetti K, Toomey JR: Potentiation of platelet activation through the stimulation of P2X1 receptors. J Thromb Haemost. 2003, 1: 2626-2635. 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00453.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rolf MG, Brearley CA, Mahaut-Smith MP: Platelet shape change evoked by selective activation of P2X1 purinoceptors with alpha, beta-methylene ATP. Thromb Haemost. 2001, 85: 303-308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Oury C, Kuijpers MJ, Toth-Zsamboki E, Bonnefoy A, Danloy S, Vreys I, Feijge MA, De Vos R, Vermylen J, Heemskerk JW, Hoylaerts MF: Overexpression of the platelet P2X1 ion channel in transgenic mice generates a novel prothrombotic phenotype. Blood. 2003, 101: 3969-3976. 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3215View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hechler B, Lenain N, Marchese P, Vial C, Heim V, Freund M, Cazenave JP, Cattaneo M, Ruggeri ZM, Evans R, Gachet C: A role of the fast ATP-gated P2X1 cation channel in thrombosis of small arteries in vivo. J Exp Med. 2003, 198: 661-667. 10.1084/jem.20030144PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhulipala PD, Lianos EA, Kotlikoff MI: Regulation of human P2X1 promoter activity by beta helix-loop-helix factors in smooth muscle cells. Gene. 2001, 269: 167-175. 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00442-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ogura M, Morishima Y, Ohno R, Kato Y, Hirabayashi N, Nagura H, Saito H: Establishment of a novel human megakaryoblastic leukemia cell line, MEG-01, with positive Philadelphia chromosome. Blood. 1985, 66: 1384-1392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Prestridge DS: Predicting Pol II promoter sequences using transcription factor binding sites. J Mol Biol. 1995, 249: 923-932. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0349View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Saffak T, Nusing RM: The 5' region of the human thromboxane A(2) receptor gene. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2002, 67: 25-31. 10.1054/plef.2002.0377View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kawa K: Thrombopoietin enhances rapid current responses mediated by P2X1 receptors on megakaryocytic cells in culture. Jpn J Physiol. 2003, 53: 287-299. 10.2170/jjphysiol.53.287View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Buell G, Michel AD, Lewis C, Collo G, Humphrey PP, Surprenant A: P2X1 receptor activation in HL60 cells. Blood. 1996, 87: 2659-2664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Budagian V, Bulanova E, Brovko L, Orinska Z, Fayad R, Paus R, Bulfone-Paus S: Signaling through P2X7 receptor in human T cells involves p56lck, MAP kinases, and transcription factors AP-1 and NF-kappa B. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 1549-1560. 10.1074/jbc.M206383200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Baatout S: Phorbol esters: useful tools to study megakaryocyte differentiation. Hematol Cell Ther. 1998, 40: 33-39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoffman EK, Trusko SP, Murphy M, George DL: An S1 nuclease-sensitive homopurine/homopyrimidine domain in the c-Ki-ras promoter interacts with a nuclear factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990, 87: 2705-2709.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schug J: Using TESS to Predict Transcription Factor Binding Sites in DNA Sequence. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. Edited by: Baxevanis AD, Davison DB, Page RDM, Petsko GA, Stein LD and Stormo GD. 2003, Chapter 5-, John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  25. Mori D, Okuro N, Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Sogawa K: Gene structure and promoter analysis of the rat BTEB2 gene. Gene. 2003, 304: 163-170. 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)01203-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin CJ, Martens JW, Miller WL: NF-1C, Sp1, and Sp3 are essential for transcription of the human gene for P450c17 (steroid 17alpha-hydroxylase/17, 20 lyase) in human adrenal NCI-H295A cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2001, 15: 1277-1293. 10.1210/me.15.8.1277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao J, Bilsland A, Hoare SF, Keith WN: Involvement of NF-Y and Sp1 binding sequences in basal transcription of the human telomerase RNA gene. FEBS Lett. 2003, 536: 111-119. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00038-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Christova R, Oelgeschlager T: Association of human TFIID-promoter complexes with silenced mitotic chromatin in vivo. Nat Cell Biol. 2002, 4: 79-82. 10.1038/ncb733View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Emami KH, Burke TW, Smale ST: Sp1 activation of a TATA-less promoter requires a species-specific interaction involving transcription factor IID. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26: 839-846. 10.1093/nar/26.3.839PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dynan WS, Tjian R: The promoter-specific transcription factor Sp1 binds to upstream sequences in the SV40 early promoter. Cell. 1983, 35: 79-87. 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90210-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pugh BF, Tjian R: Transcription from a TATA-less promoter requires a multisubunit TFIID complex. Genes Dev. 1991, 5: 1935-1945.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Li L, He S, Sun JM, Davie JR: Gene regulation by Sp1 and Sp3. Biochem Cell Biol. 2004, 82: 460-471. 10.1139/o04-045View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Duan R, Porter W, Safe S: Estrogen-induced c-fos protooncogene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells: role of estrogen receptor Sp1 complex formation. Endocrinology. 1998, 139: 1981-1990. 10.1210/en.139.4.1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Majello B, De Luca P, Suske G, Lania L: Differential transcriptional regulation of c-myc promoter through the same DNA binding sites targeted by Sp1-like proteins. Oncogene. 1995, 10: 1841-1848.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kumar AP, Butler AP: Transcription factor Sp3 antagonizes activation of the ornithine decarboxylase promoter by Sp1. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997, 25: 2012-2019. 10.1093/nar/25.10.2012PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gronostajski RM: Roles of the NFI/CTF gene family in transcription and development. Gene. 2000, 249: 31-45. 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00140-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Murtagh J, Martin F, Gronostajski RM: The Nuclear Factor I (NFI) gene family in mammary gland development and function. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2003, 8: 241-254. 10.1023/A:1025909109843View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nichols AF, Itoh T, Zolezzi F, Hutsell S, Linn S: Basal transcriptional regulation of human damage-specific DNA-binding protein genes DDB1 and DDB2 by Sp1, E2F, N-myc and NF1 elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 562-569. 10.1093/nar/gkg152PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Clifford EE, Parker K, Humphreys BD, Kertesy SB, Dubyak GR: The P2X1 receptor, an adenosine triphosphate-gated cation channel, is expressed in human platelets but not in human blood leukocytes. Blood. 1998, 91: 3172-3181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang L, Jacobsen SE, Bengtsson A, Erlinge D: P2 receptor mRNA expression profiles in human lymphocytes, monocytes and CD34+ stem and progenitor cells. BMC Immunol. 2004, 5: 16- 10.1186/1471-2172-5-16PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rustighi A, Tessari MA, Vascotto F, Sgarra R, Giancotti V, Manfioletti G: A polypyrimidine/polypurine tract within the Hmga2 minimal promoter: a common feature of many growth-related genes. Biochemistry. 2002, 41: 1229-1240. 10.1021/bi011666oView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Qin K, Rosenfield RL: Characterization of the basal promoter element of the human type 5 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase gene. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1728: 115-125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Auerbach SD, Loftus RW, Itani OA, Thomas CP: Human amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel gamma subunit promoter: functional analysis and identification of a polypurine-polypyrimidine tract with the potential for triplex DNA formation. Biochem J. 2000, 347 Pt 1: 105-114. 10.1042/0264-6021:3470105View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nakanishi M, Weber KT, Guntaka RV: Triple helix formation with the promoter of human alpha1(I) procollagen gene by an antiparallel triplex-forming oligodeoxyribonucleotide. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26: 5218-5222. 10.1093/nar/26.22.5218PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu Y, Liu XS, Wei L, Altman RB, Batzoglou S: Eukaryotic regulatory element conservation analysis and identification using comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 451-458. 10.1101/gr.1327604PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lacabaratz-Porret C, Launay S, Corvazier E, Bredoux R, Papp B, Enouf J: Biogenesis of endoplasmic reticulum proteins involved in Ca2+ signalling during megakaryocytic differentiation: an in vitro study. Biochem J. 2000, 350 Pt 3: 723-734. 10.1042/0264-6021:3500723View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Geiger M, Wrulich OA, Jenny M, Schwaiger W, Grunicke HH, Uberall F: Defining the human targets of phorbol ester and diacylglycerol. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2003, 5: 631-641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Vial C, Tobin AB, Evans RJ: G-protein-coupled receptor regulation of P2X1 receptors does not involve direct channel phosphorylation. Biochem J. 2004, 382: 101-110. 10.1042/BJ20031910PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Arts J, Herr I, Lansink M, Angel P, Kooistra T: Cell-type specific DNA-protein interactions at the tissue-type plasminogen activator promoter in human endothelial and HeLa cells in vivo and in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 311-317. 10.1093/nar/25.2.311PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ries S, Buchler C, Langmann T, Fehringer P, Aslanidis C, Schmitz G: Transcriptional regulation of lysosomal acid lipase in differentiating monocytes is mediated by transcription factors Sp1 and AP-2. J Lipid Res. 1998, 39: 2125-2134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Langmann T, Buechler C, Ries S, Schaeffler A, Aslanidis C, Schuierer M, Weiler M, Sandhoff K, de Jong PJ, Schmitz G: Transcription factors Sp1 and AP-2 mediate induction of acid sphingomyelinase during monocytic differentiation. J Lipid Res. 1999, 40: 870-880.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Hewson CA, Edbrooke MR, Johnston SL: PMA Induces the MUC5AC Respiratory Mucin in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells, via PKC, EGF/TGF-alpha, Ras/Raf, MEK, ERK and Sp1-dependent Mechanisms. J Mol Biol. 2004, 344: 683-695. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.059View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Chou SF, Chen HL, Lu SC: Sp1 and Sp3 are involved in up-regulation of human deoxyribonuclease II transcription during differentiation of HL-60 cells. Eur J Biochem. 2003, 270: 1855-1862. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03551.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Monaco MC, Sabath BF, Durham LC, Major EO: JC virus multiplication in human hematopoietic progenitor cells requires the NF-1 class D transcription factor. J Virol. 2001, 75: 9687-9695. 10.1128/JVI.75.20.9687-9695.2001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Misawa H, Yamaguchi M: Intracellular signaling factors--enhanced hepatic nuclear protein binding to TTGGC sequence in the rat regucalcin gene promoter: involvement of protein phosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000, 279: 275-281. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3934View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Hurst HC, Masson N, Jones NC, Lee KA: The cellular transcription factor CREB corresponds to activating transcription factor 47 (ATF-47) and forms complexes with a group of polypeptides related to ATF-43. Mol Cell Biol. 1990, 10: 6192-6203.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Okada Y, Matsuura E, Tozuka Z, Nagai R, Watanabe A, Matsumoto K, Yasui K, Jackman RW, Nakano T, Doi T: Upstream stimulatory factors stimulate transcription through E-box motifs in the PF4 gene in megakaryocytes. Blood. 2004, 104: 2027-2034. 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3107View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhao and Ennion; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement