Skip to main content
Figure 3 | BMC Molecular Biology

Figure 3

From: Efficient 5′-3′ DNA end resection by HerA and NurA is essential for cell viability in the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus islandicus

Figure 3

The nuclease activity of NurA and its interaction with HerA are essential for cell viability. (A) A schematic map depicting the procedures of the complementation analysis. pMID-nurA-T cells were transformed with pSSRA-NurA-C-His plasmids or empty vector. Three genotypes of the cells grown up after counter-selection were indicated as , , and . The star indicates a putative spontaneous mutation in pyrEF. (B) Genotype analysis of the cells grown up by PCR using nurA flanking primers and sequencing of the nurA on the isolated plasmid. “+”, the designed plasmid maintained; “R”, plasmid maintained, but nurA gene had reverted to wild-type. (C) Gel filtration analysis of the interaction between wild type HerA and NurA mutants I295L, I295E, F300Y, and F300E by a Superdex™ 200 10/300 GL column. A total of 500 μg HerA, 500 μg NurA, and the mixture were heated incubated at 60°C for 20 min before gel filtration. The sample fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. A small amount of NurA formed dimers in gels when NurA concentration was high. The elution peaks of the molecular markers are indicated by arrows at the bottom.

Back to article page