Exploring cellular memory molecules marking competent and active transcriptions
- Li Xin†1,
- Guo-Ling Zhou†1,
- Wei Song1,
- Xue-Song Wu1,
- Gong-Hong Wei1,
- De-Long Hao1,
- Xiang Lv1,
- De-Pei Liu1Email author and
- Chih-Chuan Liang1
© Xin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 07 September 2006
Accepted: 10 May 2007
Published: 10 May 2007
Development in higher eukaryotes involves programmed gene expression. Cell type-specific gene expression is established during this process and is inherited in succeeding cell cycles. Higher eukaryotes have evolved elegant mechanisms by which committed gene-expression states are transmitted through numerous cell divisions. Previous studies have shown that both DNase I-sensitive sites and the basal transcription factor TFIID remain on silenced mitotic chromosomes, suggesting that certain trans-factors might act as bookmarks, maintaining the information and transmitting it to the next generation.
We used the mouse globin gene clusters as a model system to examine the retention of active information on M-phase chromosomes and its contribution to the persistence of transcriptional competence of these gene clusters in murine erythroleukemia cells. In cells arrested in mitosis, the erythroid-specific activator NF-E2p45 remained associated with its binding sites on the globin gene loci, while the other major erythroid factor, GATA-1, was removed from chromosome. Moreover, despite mitotic chromatin condensation, the distant regulatory regions and promoters of transcriptionally competent globin gene loci are marked by a preserved histone code consisting in active histone modifications such as H3 acetylation, H3-K4 dimethylation and K79 dimethylation. Further analysis showed that other active genes are also locally marked by the preserved active histone code throughout mitotic inactivation of transcription.
Our results imply that certain kinds of specific protein factors and active histone modifications function as cellular memory markers for both competent and active genes during mitosis, and serve as a reactivated core for the resumption of transcription when the cells exit mitosis.
Higher eukaryotes contain several hundred cell types, each with a distinctive gene expression pattern. During differentiation, a committed expression pattern is set up through the sequential turning on and/or off of different sets of genes and this pattern is propagated through numerous symmetric cell divisions. Thus, multicellular organisms have evolved mechanisms for discriminating their gene expression states and maintaining these stages during cell differentiation. When eukaryotic cells enter mitosis, the chromatin becomes highly condensed, most transcription factors are displaced from the chromosomes and almost all transcription is abruptly turned off . How do eukaryotic cells remember their previous transcriptional profiles during cell division, rather than having to re-establish the appropriate expression pattern from scratch at the onset of the next cell cycle? In most situations, all cells carry the same genetic material, the genomic DNA, throughout their lives, so chromatin-based mechanisms including interactions among DNA, histones and non-histone protein factors and modifications of DNA and chromatin proteins may account for the transmission of gene expression states through cell division.
Previous studies have shown that DNase I-sensitive sites mark active genes on silenced mitotic chromosomes [2, 3]. This implies that certain factors withstand chromatin condensation and survive during mitosis to facilitate the rapid reactivation of genes in next cell cycle. A subsequent study has supported this 'bookmarking theory' . The basal transcription factor TFIID is partially retained on gene promoters in mitotic chromosomes to serve as such 'bookmark', enabling active transcription to be resumed rapidly on exit from mitosis [5, 6]. However, the promoter alone may not be enough for the required memory. Many distant regulatory elements have been shown to play important roles in maintaining proper tissue- and developmental stage-specific transcription [7, 8]. Some of these elements are DNase I-sensitive before the gene is activated. For example, in multilineage progenitor cells, erythroid-specific DNase I-hypersensitive sites (HSs) have arisen in the distal regulatory elements of the mouse β-globin gene cluster . An early study showed that these hypersensitive sites, once induced, can be propagated to daughter cells (over at least 20 generations) in the absence of the original inducer . We therefore speculated that in addition to TFIID, certain tissue-specific transcription factors might serve as 'bookmarks' on distant regulatory regions, which also mediate the propagation of chromatin states during cell division. In MEL cells, transcription of globin genes is not activated before induction, yet these genes can retain their transcriptional competence for generations. In this study, we used the globin gene clusters as a model system to investigate whether specific transcription factors remain on the distal regulatory elements in M-phase chromosomes in transcriptionally competent MEL cells. We found that the p45 subunit of the erythroid-specific activator NF-E2 is partially retained on its specific binding sites during mitosis, but another activator, GATA-1, is not. This suggests that NF-E2 can function as a 'bookmark' to maintain the active competence of the local chromatin domain during cell division.
Recent advances in epigenetic studies have indicated that histone modification is also closely correlated with transcriptional regulation. Active histone modifications such as hyperacetylation and H3-K4 and H3-K79 methylation often mark transcriptionally active regions, whereas H3-K9 methylation is always related to transcriptional repression. Combinations of histone modifications could constitute a set of histone codes that are recognized by specific non-histone proteins to mediate specific chromatin functions [11, 12]. Using two continuously active hepatic genes as models, a recent study revealed that localized histone hyperacetylation, H3-K4 tri- or di-methylation and H3-K79 dimethylation at the promoter and the 5' portion of the coding regions remain stable during mitotic chromatin inactivation . This suggests that epigenetic factors such as histone modifications should also be considered potential memory markers. Here we have investigated the active histone modification status on both the α- and the β-globin gene promoters and the distant hypersensitive sites on mitotic chromosomes in MEL cells. The results show that multiple active histone modifications are stably preserved on the mitotic chromosomes.
Erythroid-specific activator NF-E2, but not GATA-1, marking transcriptional competence of globin genes in MEL cell during mitosis
Epigenetic memory marking transcriptionally competent globin genes
Epigenetic memory marking the active transcription states of the genes
To investigate whether active histone modifications-H3-K4 dimethylation and K79 dimethylation are preserved at active regions during mitosis, we performed the similarly comparative ChIP analysis. The results showed that these two kinds of modification are also mainly confined to active gene promoters (Fig 7B). In asynchronous cells, the fully activated genes-c-myc and β-actin are hyperdimethylated at H3-K4; incompletely activated gene hsp70 are moderately dimethylated at H3-K4. Although RNA polymerase III-transcribed gene 7SK is active, similar to inactive genes as nef-3 and albumin, there is tiny enrichment of H3-K4 dimethylation on the gene. However, H3-K79 dimethylation, despite the moderate level, is distributed on the promoters of all the analyzed active genes regardless of the RNA polymerase used for transcription. In mitotic cells, these two kinds of active histone modification, similar to histone acetylation, are also preserved on the previously active gene promoter regions and the preserved levels are corresponding with gene expression states. Nevertheless, there is some decrease for H3-K4 dimethylation but no obvious change for H3-K79 dimethylation (Fig 7B). These data indicate that the localized H3-K4 dimethylation and K79 dimethylation at transcriptionally active regions can also serve as molecular memory marks along with histone acetylation. The above results also confirmed that the epigenetic marks composed of active histone modification combinations and localized at active gene regions can be transmitted to mitotic chromosomes for the maintenance of active gene expression states.
Studies on the α- and β-globin genes suggest that certain mechanisms in higher eukaryotic cells fix the stochastic expression patterns during cellular differentiation. Although there is a tight balance in the expression of α- and β-globin genes, these expression patterns are consistent with the predictions of the stochastic model [26, 27]. Analysis has revealed an imbalance between 2α- and 2β-globin gene expression in both cytoplasm and nucleus in a significant proportion of erythroid cells. Further elegant experiments have demonstrated that these stochastic expression patterns are established prior to transcriptional activation. Importantly, both active and silenced expression patterns are clonally inherited . The inherited stochastic patterns cannot be explained simply by random molecular encounters or fluctuations in the transitions between conformational states of a macromolecule, or by the amplification of feedback loops in a transcription factor network. Differentiated cells appear to have developed important mechanisms for remembering both transcriptionally active and silent states.
Previous studies have indicated that when cells enter mitosis, almost all transcription factors are peeled off the chromatin because the transcription complexes are disrupted . However, it has been found that TFIID is retained at active gene promoters during mitotic chromatin inactivation . During the process of transcription complex assembly, TFIID interacts first with the core promoter, so its retention on the mitotic chromosomes is an economical way of resuming transcription after mitosis. It has been observed that two enzyme classes, the histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and the histone deacetylases (HDACs), are spatially reorganized and displaced from the condensing chromosomes as the cells progress through mitosis . In another study  it was shown that histone acetylase (CBP, PCAF), chromatin remodeling complex component (Brg-1), SNF2H and FACT, along with RNA pol-II at the HNF-4, HNF-1 and albumin genes, are all dissociated from the chromatin during mitosis but re-recruited on mitotic exit , suggesting that they have roles in the reactivation of transcription.
By employing globin genes as a model system, we found in this study that the tissue-specific factor NF-E2p45, which is crucial for activating globin genes, is preserved on mitotic chromosomes but GATA-1 is not. This suggests that during cell division, NF-E2p45 can serve as a molecular memory marker that maintains the locally hypersensitive state of the globin gene clusters. Previous studies have shown that GATA-1 is involved in regulating transcription by undergoing modifications such as acetylation, phosphorylation and sumoylation, without the recruitment of other partners [17–19]. Chromatin remodeling complexes and histone modification enzymes, which are displaced from mitotic chromosomes, depend on other protein factors to reunite them with the chromatin . During globin gene activation, NF-E2 plays a key role in recruiting other protein factors such as TAFII130 and CBP, a coactivator of histone acetyltransferase activity . TFIID retained on the mitotic chromosomes could also recruit other basal transcription factors when transcription is activated. Hence, we predict that higher eukaryotes have evolved mechanisms for preserving certain proteins on mitotic chromosomes, which may have common functional features for recruiting other protein factors to ensure that transcription is efficiently reactivated at the onset of each cell cycle. It will therefore be worth exploring other similar protein factors and their memory functions in order to elucidate cellular memory mechanisms.
The binding to DNA of many protein factors involved in the regulation of gene expression often depends on alteration of the local chromatin structure, mediated by post-translational modifications of the terminal residues of histones. As a result, different histone modifications segregate the chromatin into different territories. Active chromatin regions are often hyperacetylated at histones H3 and H4 and hypermethylated at H3-K4 and H3-K79 . However, active histone modifications are highly dynamic. When chromatin condenses during mitosis, therefore, do these modifications function as memory 'determinants' to mark different states of gene expression? In this study, we selected transcriptionally competent globin gene clusters and genes in different transcriptional states to investigate the potential role of four active histone modifications (H3 and H4 acetylation, H3-K4 dimethylation and K79 dimethylation) as cellular memory markers during mitosis, using comparative ChIP analysis of both asynchronous and mitotic MEL cell populations. In asynchronous cells, multiple combinations of the four histone modifications are located at the distant HSs of the globin gene clusters and the gene promoter regions, and they mark different chromatin states of the genes. For example, fully activated c-myc and β-actin are hyperacetylated at both H3 and H4 and hyperdimethylated at H3-K4; incompletely activated hsp70 is hyperacetylated at both H3 and H4 and moderately dimethylated at H3-K4; potentially transcriptional α-globin and βmaj are moderately acetylated and dimethylated at H3-K4; the RNA polymerase III-transcribed gene 7SK is hyperacetylated at both H3 and H4 but not dimethylated at H3-K4. Both transcriptionally active and competent genes, including RNA polymerase II- and III-transcribed genes, are all moderately methylated at H3-K79. However, inactive genes have less of these active modifications. In mitotic cells, some active modifications, especially H3 acetylation and H3-K4 dimethylation, are well preserved on the mitotic chromosomes. These preserved active histone modifications provide epigenetic markers by which gene expression states and local chromatin states can be inherited through mitosis. For the distant regulatory elements, which play important roles in switching on many tissue- or developmental stage-specific genes and maintaining their normal transcription during development and differentiation, localized active histone modifications, together with certain transcription factors, also provide important memory markers for maintaining local chromatin states during mitosis and hence facilitating and stabilizing differentiation and development. Moreover, the preserved epigenetic markers might contribute to create a unique chromatin conformation and provide a re-activating core for the resumption of transcription in the next cell cycle. They may also have roles in distinguishing transcriptionally active from repressed regions, even in the absence of trans-acting factors, at the onset of the next cell cycle.
Moreover, active modifications such as H3-K4 methylation and H3 acetylation are enriched in the H3.3 variant of Drosophila. In contrast, H3-K9 dimethylation, the marker for repressed genes, is enriched in H3 [22, 23]. Another recent study showed that H3.3 is enriched in the promoters of active genes . Using the mouse λ5-VpreB1 locus as a model system, immuno-FISH analysis of mitotic cells revealed that H3.3 is strongly marked at the active λ5 gene on metaphase chromosomes. Moreover, this region is hyperacetylated at H3-K9 and -K14 and di- and tri-methylated at H3-K4 . These results strongly suggest that during mitosis, H3.3 might function as another epigenetic memory marker for maintaining transcriptionally active states along with active histone modification. Nevertheless, our speculation needs to be verified by testing more gene loci. It was also found that H3.3 incorporation into chromatin and its removal from chromatin depend on transcription . Therefore, it will be worth exploring how H3.3 coordinates with multiple active histone modifications to mediate transcriptional memory.
We conclude that both specific transacting factors and active histone modifications could function as cellular memory markers for competent and active genes during mitosis, and could serve as a reactivated core for the resumption of transcription after the cells exit mitosis.
Cell culture and mitotic arrest
Murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. The cells were arrested at the G2/M phase by treating with nocodazole (which synchronizes cells to metaphase  (0.1 μg ml-1, Sigma) for 16 h. The mitotic index was determined by flow cytometry.
The synchronized MEL cells were laid on the cover slips, and then fixed with 3.0% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15 min. Subsequently, cells were washed three times in PBS and then permeabilized in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min. After that, cells were blocked with 3%BSA/PBS containing 2% goat serum followed by primary antibody incubation at 22°C for 2 h including the antibodies against GATA-1 (N6) and NF-E2p45 (C-19) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), histone H3 phosphorylation (06–570), H3 acetylation (06–599), H4 acetylation (06–866), H3-K4 dimethylation (07–030), H3-K79 dimethylation (07–366) (Upstate), which are diluted in blocking solution. The cover slips were washed three times in PBS, and then incubated in the presence of FITC-conjugated-anti-rabbit immunoglobin G (IgG) (F0382; Sigma) for a further 60 min. Cover slips were washed again in PBS, incubated in 1 mg/ml DAPI or PI for 1 min and then mounted on slides with a 90% glycerol-PBS (pH 7.5)-based medium containing 1 mg/ml paraphenylenediamine and sealed with nail polish. Immunostaining signal of cell preparations was recorded by Laser Screen Confocal Microscope (Bio-Rad, Randiance 2100) attached to a laser sharp software.
Acid extraction of total histones and Western Blotting assay
The asynchronous MEL and mitosis-arrested MEL cell populations were concentrated by centrifugation (800 × g) and washed twice with 1 × PBS. The washed and concentrated cells were resuspended in 5 volumes of ice-cold buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 1.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; Both dithiothreitol and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride were added just prior to the use of buffer). Concentrated sulfuric acid was added to the suspension to give a concentration of 0.4 N. After incubation on ice for 30 min, the suspension was centrifuged at 11,000 × g at 4°C for 15 min. The resultant supernatant was decanted into another tube and mixed with 1 ml of acetone. After overnight incubation at -20°C, the precipitated proteins were collected by centrifugation at 11,000 × g at 4°C for 15 min. The pellet was washed twice with 1 ml of acetone and air-dried. The dried pellet was then mixed with 2× SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) loading buffer. After incubation at 4°C overnight, the supernatant was decanted into another tube and quantified for the western blotting assay.
For western blotting, the samples were boiled for 5 min and loaded onto a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The electrophoretically separated proteins were either stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue or transferred to immnobilon-P membrane (Millipore). The membrane filters were blocked with PBST (1× PBS, 0.05% Tween 20) containing 5% nonfat milk powder (PBST-Milk) at room temperature for 1 h and then washed three times each with PBS-T for 15 min. The primary antibody (anti-H3 acetylation: 1:10000, anti-H4 acetylation: 1:500, anti-H3-K4 dimethylation: 1:1000, H3-K79 dimethylation: 1:1000) diluted in PBST-Milk was applied at room temperature for 2 h or with agitation at 4°C overnight. After three washes with PBS-T, the secondary antibody-goat anti-rabbit HRP conjugated IgG(12–348, Upstate)(1:5000 dilution) in PBST-Milk was applied at room temperature with agitation for 1.5 hours. The filters were washed again and then developed using western blotting luminal reagent (SC-2048, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and exposed to film in darkroom for visualization.
The primers and primer sequences used in ChIP assay.
PCR products were resolved by agarose-gel electrophoresis and revealed by staining with ethidium bromide. For the comparative ChIP analysis, the linear range of amplification was determined for every sample by serial dilutions. An appropriate amount of DNA within the linear range was subsequently applied. All the comparative ChIP analyses were performed three repeats independently.
This work was supported by the grant from the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 30393110 and 30421003).
- Gottesfeld JM, Forbes DJ: Mitotic repression of the transcriptional machinery. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997, 22 (6): 197-202. 10.1016/S0968-0004(97)01045-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kerem BS, Goitein R, Diamond G, Cedar H, Marcus M: Mapping of DNAase I sensitive regions on mitotic chromosomes. Cell. 1984, 38 (2): 493-499. 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90504-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michelotti EF, Sanford S, Levens D: Marking of active genes on mitotic chromosomes. Nature. 1997, 388 (6645): 895-899. 10.1038/42282View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- John S, Workman JL: Bookmarking genes for activation in condensed mitotic chromosomes. Bioessays. 1998, 20 (4): 275-279. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199804)20:4<275::AID-BIES1>3.0.CO;2-PView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen D, Hinkley CS, Henry RW, Huang S: TBP dynamics in living human cells: constitutive association of TBP with mitotic chromosomes. Mol Biol Cell. 2002, 13 (1): 276-284. 10.1091/mbc.01-10-0523PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christova R, Oelgeschlager T: Association of human TFIID-promoter complexes with silenced mitotic chromatin in vivo. Nat Cell Biol. 2002, 4 (1): 79-82. 10.1038/ncb733View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nobrega MA, Ovcharenko I, Afzal V, Rubin EM: Scanning human gene deserts for long-range enhancers. Science. 2003, 302 (5644): 413- 10.1126/science.1088328View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spitz F, Gonzalez F, Duboule D: A global control region defines a chromosomal regulatory landscape containing the HoxD cluster. Cell. 2003, 113 (3): 405-417. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00310-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palstra RJ, Tolhuis B, Splinter E, Nijmeijer R, Grosveld F, de Laat W: The beta-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation. Nat Genet. 2003, 35 (2): 190-194. 10.1038/ng1244View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Groudine M, Weintraub H: Propagation of globin DNAase I-hypersensitive sites in absence of factors required for induction: a possible mechanism for determination. Cell. 1982, 30 (1): 131-139. 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90019-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jenuwein T, Allis CD: Translating the histone code. Science. 2001, 293 (5532): 1074-1080. 10.1126/science.1063127View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turner BM: Cellular memory and the histone code. Cell. 2002, 111 (3): 285-291. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01080-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kouskouti A, Talianidis I: Histone modifications defining active genes persist after transcriptional and mitotic inactivation. Embo J. 2005, 24 (2): 347-357. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600516PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sawado T, Igarashi K, Groudine M: Activation of beta-major globin gene transcription is associated with recruitment of NF-E2 to the beta-globin LCR and gene promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98 (18): 10226-10231. 10.1073/pnas.181344198PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anguita E, Hughes J, Heyworth C, Blobel GA, Wood WG, Higgs DR: Globin gene activation during haemopoiesis is driven by protein complexes nucleated by GATA-1 and GATA-2. Embo J. 2004, 23 (14): 2841-2852. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600274PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kruhlak MJ, Hendzel MJ, Fischle W, Bertos NR, Hameed S, Yang XJ, Verdin E, Bazett-Jones DP: Regulation of global acetylation in mitosis through loss of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases from chromatin. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (41): 38307-38319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyes J, Byfield P, Nakatani Y, Ogryzko V: Regulation of activity of the transcription factor GATA-1 by acetylation. Nature. 1998, 396 (6711): 594-598. 10.1038/25166View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collavin L, Gostissa M, Avolio F, Secco P, Ronchi A, Santoro C, Del Sal G: Modification of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 by SUMO-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101 (24): 8870-8875. 10.1073/pnas.0308605101PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Partington GA, Patient RK: Phosphorylation of GATA-1 increases its DNA-binding affinity and is correlated with induction of human K562 erythroleukaemia cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27 (4): 1168-1175. 10.1093/nar/27.4.1168PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Francastel C, Magis W, Groudine M: Nuclear relocation of a transactivator subunit precedes target gene activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98 (21): 12120-12125. 10.1073/pnas.211444898PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schubeler D, MacAlpine DM, Scalzo D, Wirbelauer C, Kooperberg C, van Leeuwen F, Gottschling DE, O'Neill LP, Turner BM, Delrow J, Bell SP, Groudine M: The histone modification pattern of active genes revealed through genome-wide chromatin analysis of a higher eukaryote. Genes Dev. 2004, 18 (11): 1263-1271. 10.1101/gad.1198204PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ahmad K, Henikoff S: The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly. Mol Cell. 2002, 9 (6): 1191-1200. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00542-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McKittrick E, Gafken PR, Ahmad K, Henikoff S: Histone H3.3 is enriched in covalent modifications associated with active chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101 (6): 1525-1530. 10.1073/pnas.0308092100PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz BE, Ahmad K: Transcriptional activation triggers deposition and removal of the histone variant H3.3. Genes Dev. 2005, 19 (7): 804-814. 10.1101/gad.1259805PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chow CM, Georgiou A, Szutorisz H, Maia e Silva A, Pombo A, Barahona I, Dargelos E, Canzonetta C, Dillon N: Variant histone H3.3 marks promoters of transcriptionally active genes during mammalian cell division. EMBO Rep. 2005, 6 (4): 354-360. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400366PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trimborn T, Gribnau J, Grosveld F, Fraser P: Mechanisms of developmental control of transcription in the murine alpha- and beta-globin loci. Genes Dev. 1999, 13: 112-124.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wijgerde M, Grosveld F, Fraser P: Transcription complex stability and chromatin dynamics in vivo. Nature. 1995, 377: 209-213. 10.1038/377209a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Krom M, van de Corput M, von Lindern M, Grosveld F, Strouboulis J: Stochastic patterns in globin gene expression are established prior to transcriptional activation and are clonally inherited. Mol Cell. 2002, 9: 1319-1326. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00558-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.