Assembly of splicing complexes on exon 11 of the human insulin receptor gene does not correlate with splicing efficiency in-vitro
© Webster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 05 February 2004
Accepted: 02 July 2004
Published: 02 July 2004
Incorporation of exon 11 of the insulin receptor gene is both developmentally and hormonally-regulated. Previously, we have shown the presence of enhancer and silencer elements that modulate the incorporation of the small 36-nucleotide exon. In this study, we investigated the role of inherent splice site strength in the alternative splicing decision and whether recognition of the splice sites is the major determinant of exon incorporation.
We found that mutation of the flanking sub-optimal splice sites to consensus sequences caused the exon to be constitutively spliced in-vivo. These findings are consistent with the exon-definition model for splicing. In-vitro splicing of RNA templates containing exon 11 and portions of the upstream intron recapitulated the regulation seen in-vivo. Unexpectedly, we found that the splice sites are occupied and spliceosomal complex A was assembled on all templates in-vitro irrespective of splicing efficiency.
These findings demonstrate that the exon-definition model explains alternative splicing of exon 11 in the IR gene in-vivo but not in-vitro. The in-vitro results suggest that the regulation occurs at a later step in spliceosome assembly on this exon.
The human insulin receptor (IR) is encoded by a single gene that is located on chromosome 19 and composed of 22 exons. The mature IR exists as two isoforms, designated A and B, which result from alternative splicing of the primary transcript. The A isoform lacking exon 11 binds both insulin and IGF-II with high affinity and is expressed ubiquitously; the B isoform containing exon 11 only binds insulin and is expressed predominantly in liver, muscle, adipocytes, and kidney [1, 2]. The alternatively spliced exon 11 encodes a 12-amino acid segment (residues 717–728) of the subunit of receptor that disrupts binding to IGF-II . Inclusion of this exon is developmentally and hormonally-regulated and is altered in a number of disease states, such as type II diabetes and myotonic dystrophy, that are associated with insulin resistance [4–10]. The dysregulation of the alternative splicing of the IR may have important consequences for insulin-sensitivity and responsiveness. In previous studies, we have investigated the regulation of splicing of this exon in-vivo using a model minigene system containing exons 10, 11, and 12 and parts of the intervening introns . Recognition of the exon appears to be rate-limiting as partially spliced RNAs were identified that lacked intron 10 but retained intron 11, but none were observed lacking only intron 11. We furthermore identified both enhancer and silencer elements in the precursor RNA that modulated incorporation of exon 11.
Splicing of pre-mRNA depends on the presence of relatively short RNA sequence elements, the 3' splice site, the 5' splice site, and the branch point sequence (reviewed in ref ). Removal of the intron occurs via two transesterification reactions; the first occurring between the 5' splice site and the 2'-OH of the branch point adenine, the second occurring between the 3'-OH of the 5' exon and the 3' exon. The sites are aligned for accurate excision by a complex network of RNA and protein interactions involving both splice sites and the branch point sequence in a large complex called the spliceosome. Assembly of the spliceosome begins with recognition of the 5' splice site by the U1 snRNP by base pairing. U2 snRNP is recruited to the branch point sequence by the accessory factor U2AF [13–15]. This factor is a heterodimer of a 65 kDa subunit that recognizes a polypyrimidine tract and a 35 kDa subunit that recognizes the 3' splice site and promotes binding of U2AF-65 [16–18]. Binding of U2AF to the 3' splice site is further stabilized by the branch point binding protein BBP/SF1 that also interacts with the Prp40 subunit of the U1 snRNP [19–21]. The complex containing the pre-RNA, and the U1 and U2 snRNPs is called the pre-spliceosomal complex or complex A in mammals. This complex then recruits the U4/U5/U6 tri-snRNP to form complex B, and the spliceosome undergoes a number of rearrangements to create the catalytically active splicing complex C. Each of the steps in assembly is facilitated by numerous extrinsic factors that may or may not become part of the final spliceosome .
Alternative cassette exons often contain splice sites that are weak matches to the consensus sequence and mutation of the sites to the consensus in many cases causes the exon to be spliced constitutively. Recognition of these splice sites is inherently poor but can be modulated by cis-acting elements in the RNA that bind trans-acting splicing factors (reviewed in ref ). These elements can either have a positive (splicing enhancers) or negative (splicing silencers) effect on splicing. Differences in the expression level, or activity of the trans-acting factors modulates the recognition of the alternative exon and leads to developmental or tissue specific differences in splicing. One model for enhancer function, the U2AF recruitment model, involves the stabilization of the interaction of the subunits of U2AF with the branch point sequence and 3' splice site. SR proteins have been shown to increase cross-linking of U2AF-65 to the 3' splice site by interacting with the 35 kDa subunit U2AF-35 . SR proteins have also been shown to interact with the U1-70K protein that is a component of the U1-snRNP [25, 26]. These interactions have led to the proposal that SR proteins bridge splice sites across introns, or exons, by binding to components of both the 5' and 3' splice sites. A number of studies have shown that the ability of SR proteins to bind to exonic enhancers correlates with their ability to activate splicing from weak splice sites, the inference being that the SR proteins were recruiting factors to the splice sites [27–30]. This has lead to the notion that alternative splicing is regulated at the level of splice site recognition. Consistent with this idea, a number of splicing factors have been shown to act as silencers by blocking access to splice sites and mutation of constitutive splice sites abrogates recognition of the sites [31, 32]. In this study, we tested the exon-definition model on exon 11 of the IR gene by mutating the splice sites flanking the exon. We also investigated the recognition of these splice sites by the splicing apparatus in-vitro and found that pre-spliceosmal splicing complexes are formed on all sites irrespective of splicing efficiency.
Mutation of splice sites surrounding exon 11 alters its incorporation into mRNA
The mutant minigenes were tested by transfection into HepG2 and HeLa cells. RNA was extracted and subjected to reverse-transcription and PCR using primers described previously . To ensure that only mature mRNA was analyzed, RNA was captured on oligo-dT before reverse transcription. The parental minigene containing the 2.3 Kb intron 10 showed 42% skipping of exon 11 in HepG2 cells and 66% in HeLa cells (pIRB, Fig. 1A). Thus, exon 11 in the minigene is recognized more efficiently in HepG2 cells than HeLa cells, which is consistent with the known splicing of the endogenous IR gene in these cells. We have previously shown that mutation of a single G residue at position -10 in the pyrimidine tract did not alter exon incorporation but increasing the length of the polypyrimidine tract caused the exon to be recognized constitutively in both HepG2 and HeLa cells (pIRB.MC0). Similarly, mutation of the 5' splice site on exon 11 to the consensus caused the exon to be spliced constitutively (pIRB.MC1, Fig. 1A). Therefore, strengthening either splice site flanking exon 11 caused the exon to be recognized more efficiently. Conversely, mutation of the 5' splice site on exon 10 or increasing the length of the polypyrimidine tract on exon 12 caused exon skipping to increase in both cell types (pIRB.MC15 and pIRB.MC11, respectively). Increasing the strength of the distal 3' splice site in the presence of a strong proximal site did not cause skipping of exon 11 (pIRB.MC5), however, indicating that exon skipping is only observed in the presence of non-consensus splice sites on exon 11.
These mutations were also tested in minigenes containing internal deletions in intron 10 as we had previously demonstrated the presence of a purine-rich enhancer at the 5' end and a silencer at the 3' end of intron 10, respectively. Minigene pIRA contains both the enhancer and silencer but the large internal deletion in intron 10 causes the juxtaposition of the purine-rich enhancer with the 3' splice site causing an increase in exon inclusion (Fig. 1B, pIRA). Mutation of neither the 3' splice site of exon 11 nor the 5' splice site in exon 10 in this background has a statistically significant effect on exon skipping, as the exon is already spliced efficiently due to the enhancer (Fig. 1B, pIRA.MC17 & pIRA.MC3). Removal of the purine-rich enhancer from minigene pIRA, resulting in minigene pIRK, restores exon incorporation to levels comparable to the parental minigene pIRB and once again mutation of the 3' splice site caused the exon to be incorporated constitutively in both cells (Fig. 1B, pIRK.MC7).
Intron 10 of the IR gene is spliced efficiently in-vitro
All four templates lacking the terminal 5' splice site were spliced inefficiently (Fig. 2B left lanes). Templates A and L are not spliced in the HeLa nuclear extract, and only very weak splicing was observed for template K. Three lariat intermediates, the free 5' exon, and the spliced product were only observed on template C, which contains the GA-enhancer and lacks the inhibitor. The spliced product and the uppermost lariat intermediate also showed exonucleolytic degradation. Inclusion of the natural splice site on the four templates increased the efficiency of splicing and generated splicing products 7-nucleotides longer (Fig. 2B center lanes). The increased splicing is consistent with the exon-definition model. There is also less degradation, which is consistent with the terminal splice site having a protective effect on RNA stability. The relative splicing efficiencies of these four templates mirrors the in-vivo results with the exception of template L. This is the smallest template and is spliced less efficiently in-vitro, although it is spliced efficiently in-vivo. This is most likely due to a size limitation with the in-vitro system, as introns smaller than 80 nucleotides are not spliced efficiently in HeLa extracts although they can be spliced in-vivo. Mutation of the natural splice site to the consensus further increased the efficiency of splicing on template K, but not on templates A, C, & L (Fig. 2B right lanes). Data from three experiments were combined to calculate the efficiency of splicing (step 1 and step 2) and the results are shown graphically (Fig. 2C). All of the regulation appears to be at the first step of splicing as first and second step splicing efficiencies are highly correlated.
Elimination of the splicing inhibitor from the template RNA caused an increase in splicing on all templates irrespective of the presence of the terminal 5' splice site (Fig. 2C compare templates A and C). This is consistent with the increase in exon 11 inclusion in minigenes pIRA and pIRC in-vivo in HepG2 and HeLa cells. Elimination of the purine-rich enhancer caused a decrease in intron splicing only on the template containing the natural 5' splice site from exon 11 (Fig. 2C compare templates Anat and Knat). This is consistent with the behavior of minigenes pIRA and pIRK in-vivo. The two templates A and K lacking the terminal 5' splice site are not spliced, and the presence of a consensus 5' splice site abrogates the effect of the enhancer (Fig. 2C compare A & K, Acon & Kcon, respectively). Mutation of this site to the consensus sequence caused the exon to be spliced constitutively in-vivo (Fig. 1B), thus the in-vitro splicing assay recapitulates the regulation seen in-vivo.
Both the 5' and 3' splice sites are protected from RNaseH digestion in-vitro
Splicing complexes are observed on all templates in-vitro irrespective of splicing
In this paper, we investigated how the small, 36-nucleotide, exon 11 of the insulin receptor gene is skipped to generate a mature insulin receptor A isoform. We demonstrated that skipping of exon 11 in-vivo requires sub-optimal splice sites, as increasing the strength of either the 5' or 3' splice site of exon 11 leads to constitutive incorporation of the exon. In contrast, we found that strengthening of the upstream and downstream splice donor and acceptor sites on the neighboring exons leads to decreased exon incorporation in-vivo. These results are consistent with the exon-definition model proposed by Berget, in which exons are defined in the context of genomic sequence by both flanking splice sites . Binding of the U1 snRNP to the 5' splice site of the exon facilitates recruitment of factors, such as SF1 and U2AF65/35 that recognize the upstream 3' splice site . Stabilization of the protein complex on the 3' splice site by these bridging interactions across the exon then facilitates interaction with the U1 snRNP bound to the 5' splice site of the previous exon allowing the intron to be defined [37, 38]. This method of exon definition may have evolved to minimize the recognition of cryptic 3' splice sites that are not associated with exons, as 3' splice site sequences are not strictly defined and occur with high frequency throughout the genome.
Small or microexons such as IR exon 11 impose a further constraint on exon definition. Although the U1 snRNP may recognize the 5' splice site on such a small exon, it may not be able to interact productively with the 3' splice site factors due to steric constraints over the small distance. Usually in these cases, increasing the length of the exon overcomes this constraint . Exonic splicing enhancers are occasionally found in such small exons, and may compensate for the steric hindrance to exon definition . Consistent with this, we have previously defined both positive and negative regulatory sequences in exon 11 in the IR gene. The exon-definition model may also explain the decrease in exon 11 recognition when splice sites on the flanking exons are strengthened. Splicing of RNA is co-transcriptional and generally proceeds in a linear manner along the RNA. Each exon may itself be defined on the nascent transcript by the RNA polymerase complex. If assembly of the U1/U2 snRNPs and/or other splicing factors that define a particular exon is slow, whether due to steric constraints or weak splice sites, the next downstream exon may be defined preferentially. This kinetic competition could lead to skipping of the exon.
We obtained similar results when splicing of exon 11 was studied in-vitro. Efficient splicing was only seen if a terminal 5' splice site was included in the RNA. In the absence of this terminal splice site, only a template that contained a purine-rich intronic enhancer was spliced efficiently. In the presence of the natural 5' splice site, all templates were spliced but to different extents. Again, the most efficiently spliced template contained the intronic enhancer, a template containing an inhibitory element was spliced less efficiently, and a template containing both was intermediate. Addition of a consensus splice site to the templates further increases the efficiency of splicing but the effect of the intronic inhibitor is lost, as is seen in-vivo. Thus, the in-vitro splicing results are also consistent with the exon-definition model.
Although we do not know how the intronic enhancer promotes splicing in the absence of the terminal splice site, two scenarios can be envisioned. The fact that this enhancer is very GA rich might indicate that SR proteins functionally replace the terminal 5' splice site and stabilize binding of U2AF to the 3' splice site. Exonic binding sites for the SR proteins SF2/ASF and SC35 have been shown to stabilize binding of U2AF to 3' splice sites [24, 26, 27, 30]. One argument against this model is that co-transfection of expression vectors for SRp20, SC35, SRp40, SRp55, or SRp75 did not alter exon incorporation in-vivo (data not shown). Unfortunately, this experiment is of limited value as most SR proteins are in excess, so further overexpression might not show a phenotype. Depletion of individual or groups of SR proteins would be more convincing but is harder to achieve. Alternatively, the enhancer may recruit the U1 snRNP directly, independently of the terminal 5' splice site. McCullough and Berget have shown that the U1 snRNP helps to define small exons by base-pairing with intronic GGG triplets . The purine-rich intronic enhancer in the IR gene contains nine GGG triplets, so targeting the U1 snRNP to the enhancer may stabilize the binding of U2AF to the 3' splice site in the same manner as when the U1 snRNP is bound to the 5' splice site of the exon. This enhancement may be position dependent, however, as insertion of random genomic sequences containing GGG sequences into exons has been shown to inhibit splicing .
Noticeably different results were obtained, however, when we examined splice site occupancy and splicing complex assembly. Using RNaseH to probe occupancy of the 5' and 3' splice sites, we observed that these sites were occupied on all of the splicing templates irrespective of how the templates splice in-vitro. This finding was confirmed by complex assembly assays. The spliceosomal A complex was observed on all templates, even those that did not splice efficiently. We verified that these corresponded to bona-fide pre-spliceosomal complexes by demonstrating that they were ATP-dependent and contained the U2 snRNP. This implies that the regulation of splicing on this template must occur after the initial recognition of the splice sites but before the first catalytic step, as there was good concordance between splicing intermediates and products for all templates. These findings are not consistent with the exon-definition model. However, a number of studies have questioned this model. Recognition of 5' splice sites by the U1 snRNP does not always correlate with splicing efficiency, especially for substrates that contain alternative 5' splice sites. Nasim et al. demonstrated that repression of proximal 5' splice site use by hnRNP A1 was related to RNA looping and not U1 snRNP binding . This may be a special case as the looping was mediated by duplicate high affinity hnRNP A1 binding sites flanking the alternative exon and could be mimicked by inverted repeat sequences. Eperon et al. showed that the SF2/ASF-mediated enhancement of proximal 5' splice site use was accompanied by enhanced binding of U1 snRNP to both 5' splice sites, but the hnRNP A1-mediated repression of proximal 5' splice site use was related to reduced U1 snRNP binding to both sites . They concluded that shift from the use of the distal 5' splice site by the addition of hnRNP A1 resulted not from a reduction in U1 snRNP binding, but by sequestration of the site.
At the 3' end of the intron, recent publications have also questioned the U2AF-recruitment hypothesis. Blencowe and co-workers found that the splicing accessory factor U2AF-65 bound to a double-sex (dsx)pre-mRNA irrespective of splicing . This mRNA, which lacked the exonic splicing enhancer, was not spliced in-vitro, but U2AF-65 was still bound to the 3' splice site. The binding of U2AF-65 required the presence of the U1 snRNP on the 5' splice site but did not require SR proteins. It's possible that another protein such as the BBP/SF1 was mediating the interaction between the 5' and 3' splice sites in the absence of SR proteins. The recruitment of SR proteins and splicing of the RNA was still dependent on the enhancer, however, suggesting a role for SR proteins other than to recruit U2AF-65. The authors suggested that this function may be to recruit the splicing co-activator SRm160/300 that is required for the formation of a functional spliceosome.
The recruitment model of exon-definition is attractive as it makes little teleological sense to assemble splicing complexes on non-functional splice sites. However, spliceosomal assembly on a number of decoy sites has been shown. Cote et al. showed that non-productive splicing complexes containing the U2 snRNP are formed between the 5' splice site of exon 9 and a pseudo 3' splice site sequence in the downstream intronic inhibitory element in the caspase 2 pre-mRNA . Similar dead-end complexes are formed on the immunoglobulin M2 exonic silencer . Sun et al. have investigated the splicing of pseudoexons that are present through out the genome . These pseudoexons have good matches to consensus splice site sequences but are not used. They showed that both the 5' splice site and the polypyrimidine tract are defective and identified an upstream inhibitory element. The mechanism for inhibition is not known but the authors suggest that it might involve binding of U2 snRNP in a dead-end complex. A potential pseudo 3' splice site also exists in intron 10 of the IR gene (U16GACAG). While we have no evidence for assembly on this site, it is worth noting that internal deletions of intron 10, which show enhanced exon incorporation in-vivo, lack this pseudo splice site.
Our findings raise a number of questions. Firstly, why are some pre-spliceosomal complexes non-functional on selected IR templates? One possible explanation is that splicing of exon11 in-vitro is regulated either at the level of recruitment of the U4/5/6 tri-snRNP or the subsequent rearrangements to form the active splicing complex, as has been proposed for dsx splicing. In this model, factors binding to the intronic regulatory sequences could stabilize the U1 snRNP interaction at the 5' splice site and prevent the stable accommodation of the tri-snRNP complex. This is supported by a recent study defining 5' splice sites by functional selection. Lund and Kjems highlighted an inherent discontinuity between stable complex A formation and progression to complex B and active splicing . In their experiments, extended complementarity between the 5' splice site and the U1 snRNA promoted complex A formation but inhibited subsequent splicing. Truncation of the U1 snRNA allowed a rapid transition from complex A to complex B and restored splicing. The authors concluded that stable U1 snRNA binding is advantageous for assembly of commitment complexes, but inhibitory for the entry of the U4/5/6 tri-snRNP due to delayed release of the U1 snRNP.
Our minigene transfection studies are consistent with the exon-definition model, but the in-vitro studies suggest that regulation may not be explained by the simple recruitment model. How can we reconcile the in-vivo and in-vitro results? The finding that the splice sites are occupied in-vitro does not necessarily imply the sites are occupied in-vivo. It may be that competitive splice site recognition is the dominant regulatory mechanism, but the slower kinetics of splicing in-vitro allows assembly of splicing complexes on weak splice sites that would otherwise be ignored. Alternatively, the deleted intron used for in-vitro splicing studies may have caused a shift from exon definition to intron definition. Spliceosomal complexes could have assembled due to interactions across introns, which would not occur in-vivo where the introns are 2.3 kB and 9 Kb. These complexes may be functionally distinct from complexes assembled across exons.
We have demonstrated that alternative splicing of exon 11 of the IR gene in-vivo involves sub-optimal splice sites consistent with the exon-definition model. However, we observed occupancy of the 5' splice site by U1 snRNP, and the formation of non-functional spliceosomal A complexes, containing U2-snRNP, on exon 11 RNA templates in-vitro. This observation suggests that the regulation of splicing of this exon in-vitro is not explained by the simple recruitment model. Further studies to analyze splice site recognition and spliceosomal complex assembly in-vivo will be required to resolve these questions.
Cell culture media and antibiotics were from Gibco (Grand Island, NY), reverse transcriptase (SuperScript II), Lipofectamine Plus and oligo-dT were purchased from Life Technologies (Rockville, MD) and fetal calf serum from Omega Scientific (Tarzana, CA). Nuclear extracts were purchased from Accurate Chemical & Scientific Corporation (Westbury, NY). RNase H was from USB Corporation (Cleveland, OH). RNA cap analog was purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverley, MA). Nucleotides were purchased from Amersham/Pharmacia (Piscataway, NJ), T7 RNA Polymerase was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). The QuickChange mutagenesis kit and CalPhos Maximizer transfection kit were from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). All plasmids were constructed using standard techniques. Point mutations were introduced into minigenes using the QuickChange mutagenesis kit and verified by dideoxysequencing. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MI) or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA).
Cell culture and transfections
HepG2 and HeLa cells were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 environment. HepG2 and HeLa cells were cultured in MEM-Earle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and gentamycin sulfate antibiotic. Cells were plated in 6-well dishes for transfection. Hela cells were transfected using the calcium phosphate method. HepG2 cells were transfected with Lipofectamine Plus following the manufacturers protocol. Splice site strength was calculated using Shapiro and Senapathy Splice Score http://home.snafu.de/probins/Splice/splice.html.
RNA was extracted from transfected cells using RNAzolB (TelTest, TX) following manufacturers directions and precipitated twice. To avoid interference from partially spliced intermediates, RNA was purified by mRNA Capture (Roche Biosciences, IN) before reverse transcription using SuperScript II and oligo-dT as primer. PCR amplification of IR splice products derived from the minigenes was performed as published previously. Splice products were resolved on 4% agarose gels (Latitude HT, BioWhittaker Molecular Applications, Rockland, ME) and quantified using a Kodak EDAS290 imaging system.
Templates for in-vitro transcription were generated by PCR from minigenes A, C, K, and L . The 5' PCR primer contained a T7 promoter to allow in-vitro transcription. Three different 3' PCR primers were used to generate templates either lacking the 5' splice site on exon 11, or containing the 7 nucleotide natural splice site (GUAUGAC), or a 7 nucleotide consensus splice site (GUAAGUA). Templates were gel purified before use.
Capped and labeled pre-mRNA templates were transcribed using T7 RNA polymerase and 32P-GTP as published previously . RNAs were gel-purified before use. Splicing reactions were performed by incubating 20 fmol of pre-mRNA at 30°C in the presence of 0.5 mM ATP, 8 mM MgCl2, 2.6% polyvinylalcohol, 60 mM KCl and 40% HeLa nuclear extract. Reaction products were extracted with phenol and precipitated in ethanol before electrophoresis on 5% sequencing gels. Gels were exposed to film at -70°C for different times. Quantification of splicing efficiency was performed by densitometric scanning of autoradiographs (Agfa Arcus II scanner and Kodak 1D software, Ver. 3.5) from multiple exposures of the gels. First step splicing efficiency was defined as the sum of free 5' exon plus spliced mRNA versus the total of free 5' exon, spliced mRNA and unspliced RNA template. Second step efficiency was defined as the spliced mRNA versus the total of free 5' exon, spliced mRNA plus unspliced RNA. All bands intensities were adjusted for the number of G residues.
RNase H protection assay
Duplicate splicing reactions were set up as above. One reaction was kept on ice while the other was incubated at 30°C for 30 min to allow the formation of splicing complexes. Oligonucleotides were added to a final concentration of 10 μM, then 2 U RNase H was added and the reaction incubated at 37°C for 5 min. Reaction products were extracted and analyzed by gel electrophoresis as before. The following oligonucleotides were used: 5' splice site, GTCCTGACCTGG; branch point sequence, CCTTTGAGGACAG; 3' splice site, CTGTGGAAACAAAAC; exon 10 control, GTGGGGACGAAA. The percentage of uncleaved RNA was determined by densitometric scanning of autoradiographs for both cleavage products and the remaining uncleaved RNA. Relative protection was calculated as the ratio of the percentage of uncleaved RNA in reactions incubated at 30°C versus the percentage of uncleaved RNA in reactions kept at 0°C. In some experiments, the U1 snRNP was depleted by treating the nuclear extract for 20 min at 30°C with 2 U RNase H and 10 μM of an oligonucleotide complementary to nucleotides 1–14 of the U1 snRNA (TGCCAGGTAAGTAT).
Spliceosomal complex assembly assay
Splicing reactions were performed as above in 40% HeLa nuclear extract. At the appropriate times, heparin was added to 5 μg/μl and the reaction analyzed on 5% non-denaturing, non-reducing acrylamide gels or 2% low-melting agarose gels. Acrylamide gels were run for 16 h at 4 W at room temperature, agarose gels were run for 3.5 h at 70 V at 4°C. Gels were fixed and dried under vacuum then exposed to film. In some experiments, the U2 snRNP was depleted by treating the nuclear extract for 20 min at 30°C with 2 U RNase H and 10 μM of an oligonucleotide complementary to nucleotides 1–15 of the U2 snRNA (GGCCGAGAAGCGAT) or a control oligonucleotide (GGGGTGAATTCTTTGCCA). In experiments in the absence of ATP, the nuclear extract was incubated at 30°C for 20 min before the addition of RNA to deplete residual ATP in the nuclear extract.
insulin-like growth factor
small nuclear RNA
small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle
- SR protein:
serine-arginine rich splicing factor
This work was supported by a Merit Review Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs (to N.J.G.W.) and by the Joint Research Board of St. Bartholomew's Hospital (to S.L.C.). N.J.G.W. is a faculty member of the UCSD Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program.
- Moller DE, Yokota A, Caro JF, Flier JS: Tissue-specific expression of two alternatively spliced insulin receptor mRNAs in man. MolEndocrinol. 1989, 3: 1263-1269.Google Scholar
- Norgren S, Arner P, Luthman H: Insulin receptor ribonucleic acid levels and alternative splicing in human liver, muscle, and adipose tissue: tissue specificity and relation to insulin action. JClinEndocrinolMetab. 1994, 78: 757-762. 10.1210/jc.78.3.757. 10.1210/jc.78.3.757Google Scholar
- Frasca F, Pandini G, Scalia P, Sciacca L, Mineo R, Costantino A, Goldfine ID, Belfiore A, Vigneri R: Insulin receptor isoform A, a newly recognized, high-affinity insulin-like growth factor II receptor in fetal and cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19: 3278-3288.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kellerer M, Sesti G, Seffer E, Obermaier-Kusser B, Pongratz DE, Mosthaf L, Haring HU: Altered pattern of insulin receptor isotypes in skeletal muscle membranes of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects. Diabetologia. 1993, 36: 628-632.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kosaki A, Webster NJ: Effect of dexamethasone on the alternative splicing of the insulin receptor mRNA and insulin action in HepG2 hepatoma cells. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 21990-21996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mosthaf L, Vogt B, Haring HU, Ullrich A: Altered expression of insulin receptor types A and B in the skeletal muscle of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 4728-4730.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Norgren S, Zierath J, Galuska D, Wallberg-Henriksson H, Luthman H: Differences in the ratio of RNA encoding two isoforms of the insulin receptor between control and NIDDM patients. The RNA variant without Exon 11 predominates in both groups. Diabetes. 1993, 42: 675-681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Norgren S, Li LS, Luthman H: Regulation of human insulin receptor RNA splicing in HepG2 cells: effects of glucocorticoid and low glucose concentration. BiochemBiophysResCommun. 1994, 199: 277-284. 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1225. 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1225Google Scholar
- Philips AV, Timchenko LT, Cooper TA: Disruption of splicing regulated by a CUG-binding protein in myotonic dystrophy. Science. 1998, 280: 737-741. 10.1126/science.280.5364.737View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Savkur RS, Philips AV, Cooper TA: Aberrant regulation of insulin receptor alternative splicing is associated with insulin resistance in myotonic dystrophy. Nat Genet. 2001, 29: 40-47. 10.1038/ng704View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kosaki A, Nelson J, Webster NJ: Identification of intron and exon sequences involved in alternative splicing of insulin receptor pre-mRNA. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 10331-10337. 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10331View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharp PA: Split genes and RNA splicing. Cell. 1994, 77: 805-815. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90130-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore MJ: Intron recognition comes of AGe. Nat Struct Biol. 2000, 7: 14-16. 10.1038/71207View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valcarcel J, Gaur RK, Singh R, Green MR: Interaction of U2AF65 RS region with pre-mRNA branch point and promotion of base pairing with U2 snRNA. Science. 1996, 273: 1706-1709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zamore PD, Patton JG, Green MR: Cloning and domain structure of the mammalian splicing factor U2AF. Nature. 1992, 355: 609-614. 10.1038/355609a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merendino L, Guth S, Bilbao D, Martinez C, Valcarcel J: Inhibition of msl-2 splicing by Sex-lethal reveals interaction between U2AF35 and the 3' splice site AG. Nature. 1999, 402: 838-841. 10.1038/45602View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu S, Romfo CM, Nilsen TW, Green MR: Functional recognition of the 3' splice site AG by the splicing factor U2AF35. Nature. 1999, 402: 832-835. 10.1038/45996View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zorio DA, Blumenthal T: Both subunits of U2AF recognize the 3' splice site in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1999, 402: 835-838. 10.1038/45597View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abovich N, Rosbash M: Cross-intron bridging interactions in the yeast commitment complex are conserved in mammals. Cell. 1997, 89: 403-412. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80221-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berglund JA, Chua K, Abovich N, Reed R, Rosbash M: The splicing factor BBP interacts specifically with the pre-mRNA branchpoint sequence UACUAAC. Cell. 1997, 89: 781-787. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80261-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rain JC, Rafi Z, Rhani Z, Legrain P, Kramer A: Conservation of functional domains involved in RNA binding and protein-protein interactions in human and Saccharomyces cerevisiae pre-mRNA splicing factor SF1. RNA. 1998, 4: 551-565. 10.1017/S1355838298980335PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kramer A: The structure and function of proteins involved in mammalian pre-mRNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996, 65: 367-409. 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.002055View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lopez AJ: Alternative splicing of pre-mRNA: developmental consequences and mechanisms of regulation. Annu Rev Genet. 1998, 32: 279-305. 10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.279View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zuo P, Maniatis T: The splicing factor U2AF35 mediates critical protein-protein interactions in constitutive and enhancer-dependent splicing. Genes Dev. 1996, 10: 1356-1368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kohtz JD, Jamison SF, Will CL, Zuo P, Luhrmann R, Garcia-Blanco MA, Manley JL: Protein-protein interactions and 5'-splice-site recognition in mammalian mRNA precursors. Nature. 1994, 368: 119-124. 10.1038/368119a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu JY, Maniatis T: Specific interactions between proteins implicated in splice site selection and regulated alternative splicing. Cell. 1993, 75: 1061-1070. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90316-IView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lavigueur A, La Branche H, Kornblihtt AR, Chabot B: A splicing enhancer in the human fibronectin alternate ED1 exon interacts with SR proteins and stimulates U2 snRNP binding. Genes Dev. 1993, 7: 2405-2417.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manley JL, Tacke R: SR proteins and splicing control. GenesDev. 1996, 10: 1569-1579.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Staknis D, Reed R: SR proteins promote the first specific recognition of Pre-mRNA and are present together with the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle in a general splicing enhancer complex. Mol Cell Biol. 1994, 14: 7670-7682.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Z, Hoffmann HM, Grabowski PJ: Intrinsic U2AF binding is modulated by exon enhancer signals in parallel with changes in splicing activity. RNA. 1995, 1: 21-35.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chan RC, Black DL: The polypyrimidine tract binding protein binds upstream of neural cell-specific c-src exon N1 to repress the splicing of the intron downstream. Mol Cell Biol. 1997, 17: 4667-4676.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valcarcel J, Singh R, Zamore PD, Green MR: The protein Sex-lethal antagonizes the splicing factor U2AF to regulate alternative splicing of transformer pre-mRNA. Nature. 1993, 362: 171-175. 10.1038/362171a0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Talerico M, Berget SM: Effect of 5' splice site mutations on splicing of the preceding intron. Mol Cell Biol. 1990, 10: 6299-6305.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eperon IC, Ireland DC, Smith RA, Mayeda A, Krainer AR: Pathways for selection of 5' splice sites by U1 snRNPs and SF2/ASF. EMBO J. 1993, 12: 3607-3617.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berget SM: Exon recognition in vertebrate splicing. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 2411-2414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Blencowe BJ: Distinct factor requirements for exonic splicing enhancer function and binding of U2AF to the polypyrimidine tract. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 35074-35079. 10.1074/jbc.274.49.35074View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Achsel T, Shimura Y: Factors involved in the activation of pre-mRNA splicing from downstream splicing enhancers. JBiochem(Tokyo). 1996, 120: 53-60.Google Scholar
- Chabot B: Directing alternative splicing: cast and scenarios. Trends Genet. 1996, 12: 472-478. 10.1016/0168-9525(96)10037-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Black DL: Does steric interference between splice sites block the splicing of a short c-src neuron-specific exon in non-neuronal cells?. Genes Dev. 1991, 5: 389-402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carlo T, Sterner DA, Berget SM: An intron splicing enhancer containing a G-rich repeat facilitates inclusion of a vertebrate micro-exon. RNA. 1996, 2: 342-353.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCullough AJ, Berget SM: An intronic splicing enhancer binds U1 snRNPs to enhance splicing and select 5' splice sites. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 9225-9235. 10.1128/MCB.20.24.9225-9235.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fairbrother WG, Chasin LA: Human genomic sequences that inhibit splicing. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 6816-6825. 10.1128/MCB.20.18.6816-6825.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nasim FU, Hutchison S, Cordeau M, Chabot B: High-affinity hnRNP A1 binding sites and duplex-forming inverted repeats have similar effects on 5' splice site selection in support of a common looping out and repression mechanism. RNA. 2002, 8: 1078-1089. 10.1017/S1355838202024056PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eperon IC, Makarova OV, Mayeda A, Munroe SH, Caceres JF, Hayward DG, Krainer AR: Selection of alternative 5' splice sites: role of U1 snRNP and models for the antagonistic effects of SF2/ASF and hnRNP A1. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 8303-8318. 10.1128/MCB.20.22.8303-8318.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cote J, Dupuis S, Jiang Z, Wu JY: Caspase-2 pre-mRNA alternative splicing: Identification of an intronic element containing a decoy 3' acceptor site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 938-943. 10.1073/pnas.031564098PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kan JL, Green MR: Pre-mRNA splicing of IgM exons M1 and M2 is directed by a juxtaposed splicing enhancer and inhibitor. Genes Dev. 1999, 13: 462-471.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun H, Chasin LA: Multiple splicing defects in an intronic false exon. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 6414-6425. 10.1128/MCB.20.17.6414-6425.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lund M, Kjems J: Defining a 5' splice site by functional selection in the presence and absence of U1 snRNA 5' end. RNA. 2002, 8: 166-179. 10.1017/S1355838202010786PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayeda A, Krainer AR: Mammalian in vitro splicing assays. Methods Mol Biol. 1999, 118: 315-321. 10.1385/1-59259-676-2:315PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.