SWI/SNF regulates the alternative processing of a specific subset of pre-mRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster
© Waldholm et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 22 June 2011
Accepted: 2 November 2011
Published: 2 November 2011
The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling factors have the ability to remodel nucleosomes and play essential roles in key developmental processes. SWI/SNF complexes contain one subunit with ATPase activity, which in Drosophila melanogaster is called Brahma (Brm). The regulatory activities of SWI/SNF have been attributed to its influence on chromatin structure and transcription regulation, but recent observations have revealed that the levels of Brm affect the relative abundances of transcripts that are formed by alternative splicing and/or polyadenylation of the same pre-mRNA.
We have investigated whether the function of Brm in pre-mRNA processing in Drosophila melanogaster is mediated by Brm alone or by the SWI/SNF complex. We have analyzed the effects of depleting individual SWI/SNF subunits on pre-mRNA processing throughout the genome, and we have identified a subset of transcripts that are affected by depletion of the SWI/SNF core subunits Brm, Snr1 or Mor. The fact that depletion of different subunits targets a subset of common transcripts suggests that the SWI/SNF complex is responsible for the effects observed on pre-mRNA processing when knocking down Brm. We have also depleted Brm in larvae and we have shown that the levels of SWI/SNF affect the pre-mRNA processing outcome in vivo.
We have shown that SWI/SNF can modulate alternative pre-mRNA processing, not only in cultured cells but also in vivo. The effect is restricted to and specific for a subset of transcripts. Our results provide novel insights into the mechanisms by which SWI/SNF regulates transcript diversity and proteomic diversity in higher eukaryotes.
ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors play key roles in eukaryotic genome regulation. The remodeling factors affect a diverse subset of cellular processes through their ability to influence the chromatin structure [reviewed in 1]. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling factors are dynamic multiprotein complexes that have the ability to remodel nucleosomes preferentially at the promoter regions of genes. The SWI/SNF complexes are recruited to their substrates by acetylated histone tails, and they use energy from ATP hydrolysis to modify DNA-protein contacts in the nucleosome. Their activities modulate the accessibility of regulatory sequences in the DNA. The outcome of such a regulation is either the activation or the repression of gene expression, depending on the genomic context and on the binding of specific co-regulators [reviewed in 2].
Chromatin remodeling complexes contain one subunit with ATPase activity. In humans, the catalytic ATPase subunit of the SWI/SNF complex is either the Brahma protein (hBrm) or the Brahma-related gene 1 protein (Brg1), whereas in Drosophila melanogaster there is a unique ATPase subunit, Brm. Brm, together with Moira (Mor) and Snf5-related 1 (Snr1), forms the core of the SWI/SNF complex in Drosophila. Additionally, a multitude of signature subunits associate with the SWI/SNF core and define functionally distinct SWI/SNF complexes, for instance BAP (for "Brahma-associated proteins") and PBAP (for "Polybromo-associated BAP") [3–6]. The signature subunit Osa is found in BAP, while BAP170, Polybromo (PB) and Syap define the PBAP complex [3, 7].
The SWI/SNF complexes play essential roles in key developmental processes [8–10]. The hBrm and Brg1 proteins are required for tissue-specific gene expression and cell cycle progression . In flies, SWI/SNF is needed for cell growth and survival in the wing imaginal disc , photoreceptor differentiation , immune system function , cell progression through mitosis  and normal embryonic segmentation [13, 14].
The regulatory activities of SWI/SNF have been attributed to its effect on chromatin structure and transcription regulation, but a number of recent observations (see below) have revealed that the SWI/SNF complex is also implicated in the regulation of the alternative processing of precursor mRNAs (pre-mRNAs). In eukaryotic cells, the pre-mRNA is processed through capping of the 5' end, splicing, and formation of the 3' end. Capping is a very early event that occurs shortly after the RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) leaves the promoter . Splicing is often co-transcriptional and takes place during transcription elongation, although it can also occur post-transcriptionally [16, 17]. In the last step of pre-mRNA maturation, the pre-mRNA is cleaved approximately 25 nt downstream of the polyadenylation signal, and the 3' end of the transcript is polyadenylated . Most transcripts synthesized by RNAP II undergo the above-mentioned RNA processing events, and pre-mRNA processing is usually regulated. Different types of factors determine the choice of exons incorporated into the mature mRNA, a process known as "alternative splicing". The usage of alternative cleavage and polyadenylation sites is also regulated. Recent estimates indicate that approximately 95% of the human pre-mRNAs experience alternative processing events, which provides a substantial source of protein variability [19, 20]. In Drosophila melanogaster, over 40% of the genes show multiple patterns of expression that suggest alternative processing or alternative promoter usage .
Batsche and coworkers  showed that expression of hBrm in HeLa cells favored the inclusion of variable exons in the CD44 mRNA, and proposed a kinetic model in which hBrm reduces the elongation rate of RNAP II over the CD44 variable exons, providing time for spliceosome assembly at the proximal, weak splice sites of the CD44 pre-mRNA. The influence of the RNAP II elongation rate on the choice of alternative splice sites had been previously shown for both human and Drosophila genes . Interestingly, expression of mutated hBrm with an inactive ATPase domain also promotes inclusion of the CD44 variable exons, which suggests that the function of hBrm in this context is independent of chromatin remodelling. Studies on the expression of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene in NCI-H1299 cells have revealed alternative inclusion of exons 7 and 8 in the presence of hBrm/Brg1 . Further, immuno-electron microscopy studies by Tyagi and coworkers  showed that Brm is associated with nascent Balbiani ring (BR) pre-mRNP particles in the salivary glands of Chironomus tentans. Cell fractionation studies confirmed the mRNP interaction of Brm in both Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells and human HeLa cells. In addition, Tyagi and coworkes  observed that depletion of dBrm by RNA interference (RNAi) in S2 cells affects alternative pre-mRNA splicing and polyadenylation decisions. In summary, the cellular levels of Brm affect the levels of certain mRNAs, and Brm participates in the regulation of alternative pre-mRNA processing in addition to its role in chromatin remodeling. The mechanisms by which Brm affects the processing of some pre-mRNAs are far from being understood. We have investigated whether the function of Brm in pre-mRNA processing is mediated by Brm alone or by the SWI/SNF complex. We have analyzed the effects of depleting other SWI/SNF subunits on pre-mRNA processing genome-wide, and we present evidence that other subunits in addition to Brm are involved in the regulation of pre-mRNA splicing and/or polyadenylation. We have also depleted Brm in flies and we have shown that SWI/SNF levels affect pre-mRNA processing in vivo.
Depletion of SWI/SNF subunits affects the relative levels of alternatively processed transcripts
Gene ontology analysis of genes affected by depletion of SWI/SNF in S2 cells
Genes with pre-mRNA processing affected
Log (odds ratio)
compound eye morphogenesis
sensory perception of light stimulus
regulation of RNA metabolic process
Genes with promoter usage affected
Log (odds ratio)
cell cycle process
mitotic spindle elongation
mitotic spindle organization
microtubule cytoskeleton organization
wing disc development
wing disc dorsal/ventral pattern formation
nucleotide biosynthetic process
structural constituent of ribosome
regulation of biological quality
The depletion of the individual signature subunits of the SWI/SNF complex - BAP170, PB or OSA - did not produce statistically significant effects on pre-mRNA splicing genome-wide, but the simultaneous depletion of the three signature subunits often mimicked the effects of depletion of individual core subunits (Additional file 2, Figure S1).
We analyzed the structure of the transcripts affected by the SWI/SNF depletions on pre-mRNA processing and found that the depletion of SWI/SNF subunits affected not only the alternative splicing of the primary transcripts but also the use of alternative polyadenylation sites. In most cases, the affected event was a choice between mutually exclusive splice sites and polyadenylation sites. Such alternative splicing-polyadenylation events are illustrated in Figure 2C.
Recent studies in human cells have led to the proposal that Brm can reduce the elongation rate of RNA polymerase II and thereby affect splice-site selection by promoting the usage of proximal sites . A similar mechanism might function in Drosophila cells. If so, depletion of Brm is expected to increase the use of distal sites. We analyzed whether the changes observed in the ten selected genes shown in Figure 2B followed a defined trend in terms of proximal or distal usage. The use of the distal sites was indeed favored in some cases. However, the use of a proximal processing site was increased following SWI/SNF depletion in other cases. This suggests that mechanisms additional to the one described above contribute to the effects of SWI/SNF on pre-mRNA processing (see Discussion).
Validation of the microarray results in S2 cells
We knocked down either Brm, Mor or Snr1 in S2 cells by RNAi, and we analyzed the effects of the knock-down treatments on the processing of the target transcripts by RT-qPCR. The efficiencies of the knock-down treatments were assessed by Western blotting (Figure 3A). For each of the genes, we designed primers aimed at detecting the alternatively processed transcripts. The primers targeted specific exons and exon-exon junctions. Figure 3 shows the results of the analysis of the Gpdh pre-mRNA processing. The microarray data show that depletion of either Brm, Mor or Snr1 results in decreased Gpdh-RA levels and increased levels of Gpdh-RC (Figure 3C). We sought to validate these microarray observations. For comparative purposes, we measured the levels of each alternative transcript by RT-qPCR, and we expressed the levels of each alternative transcript relative to the levels of the first exon, which is constitutive. Normalizing the data against the levels of a constitutive exon reveals the relative differences between isoforms and eliminates influences due to changes in transcription. Figures 3D, E, F show that the observations derived from the microarray analysis could be validated.
The analysis of the CG3884 pre-mRNA processing is shown in Figure 4. The microarray data had shown that depletion of SWI/SNF subunits reduced the overall levels of CG3884 expression and favored the formation of the RA transcript compared to RB (Figure 4B). The prevalence of the RA transcript was particularly significant after Brm depletion (see the large changes for Brm-RNAi in Figure 4B). Our validation experiments confirmed that depletion of Brm favors the formation of the RA isoform (Figure 4C). The level of each alternative transcript was normalised relative to the level of an upstream constitutive exon (see the position of primer pairs in Figure 4B) to avoid the influence of the overall CG3884 expression level and to measure exclusively the effects on alternative processing. Depletion of either Snr1 or Mor (Figures 4D, E) also showed a certain tendency towards the formation of RA transcripts, but the magnitude of the effects was less pronounced, in agreement with the microarray data.
Processing of the lola transcripts was also affected by depletion of SWI/SNF subunits. The annotations in FlyBase state that the lola gene (CG12052) has 26 different transcripts and encodes for 26 different polypeptides. This variation is achieved through alternative promoter usage, alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation. The microarray analysis revealed that the relative abundances of specific lola isoforms were sensitive to the levels of SWI/SNF. Figure 5 shows the analysis of the expression of the lola-RA and lola-RF transcripts, two transcripts that originate from the same pre-mRNA (i.e. from the same promoter). The microarray experiments showed that depletion of either Brm or Snr1 resulted in increased levels of RA transcripts and reduced levels of RF transcripts, whereas depletion of Mor did not have any significant effect. We analyzed the expression of these two isoforms in S2 cells upon depletion of Brm, Snr1 or Mor, and we quantified the transcript levels by RT-qPCR, as above. In the case of the lola analysis, the transcript levels were normalized to the levels of a house-keeping RNA, Act5C, because the constitutive lola exons are present in a large variety of transcripts that originate from at least three different promoters. Figures 5C, D, E show that our validation experiments reproduced the microarray data and confirmed that depletions of the SWI/SNF subunits Brm and Snr1 promote the formation of certain lola isoforms, in this case RA.
The fourth gene that we analyzed was mod(mdg4), also a gene with a highly complex pattern of expression. There are 29 annotated transcripts and 29 annotated polypeptides for mod(mdg4). Figure 6 summarizes the effects of SWI/SNF depletion on the levels of the RC and RA isoforms according to the microarray analysis, and shows that depletion of either Brm, Snr1 or Mor favors the RA isoform relative to RC in S2 cells (Figure 6B). Figure 6C shows the validation of the result from Brm, and Figure 6E that of Mor. Depletion of Snr1 did not have the severe effect observed in the microarray experiments (compare Figure 6B with Figure 6D).
In summary, we identified a specific subset of transcripts that were affected by depletion of more than one SWI/SNF subunit and we could validate in S2 cells many of the results derived from the microarray experiments. These observations suggest that the levels of SWI/SNF complex, not of Brm alone, influence the processing of a subset of transcripts.
Direct vs indirect effects of SWI/SNF levels on pre-mRNA processing
Analysis of transcript stability in S2 cells
1.84 ± 0.41
1.49 ± 0.11
1.98 ± 0.31
3.32 ± 1.33
1.39 ± 0.16
1.73 ± 0.24
2.32 ± 0.20
1.58 ± 0.17
2.01 ± 0.22
1.47 ± 0.20
1.30 ± 0.13
1.40 ± 0.07
1.64 ± 0.11
1.55 ± 0.02
1.64 ± 0.34
1.41 ± 0.16
1.92 ± 0.62
1.47 ± 0.30
1.83 ± 0.15
1.39 ± 0.12
1.63 ± 0.04
1.59 ± 0.31
1.30 ± 0.15
1.35 ± 0.14
1.67 ± 0.47
1.29 ± 0.04
1.60 ± 0.13
We also analyzed whether the depletion of SWI/SNF subunits had any impact on the stability of the alternative mRNAs. In most cases, depletion of SWI/SNF subunits did not affect the stability of the transcripts, being Gpdh-RC an exception. Indeed, Gpdh-RC was significantly stabilized by depletion of either Brm or Snr1 (Table 2). In all other cases, however, the decay rates were not affected by the levels of SWI/SNF. In summary, the analysis of the decay rates indicated that differences in the stability of the alternative transcripts cannot account for the changes observed upon depletion of SWI/SNF subunits.
In another series of experiments, we asked whether Brm, Snr1 and Mor were associated with the Gpdh, CG3884, lola and mod(mdg4) genes, and we carried out chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments to answer this question. We could detect the SWI/SNF subunits associated with each of the genes but not with an intergenic sequence used as a negative control (Additional file 2, Figure S2). These observations suggest that the effects of SWI/SNF depletion on pre-mRNA processing were direct.
The level of SWI/SNF affects pre-mRNA processing in vivo
Brm works in conjunction with other components of the SWI/SNF complex in pre-mRNA processing
Previous studies have shown that Brm influences the alternative processing of a subset of pre-mRNAs in human and insect cell lines [22, 24, 25] but the mechanisms responsible for such regulation are not known. In the studies mentioned above, a functional link between the levels of Brm and the splicing outcome has been established after experimental alteration of the Brm levels in cultured cells, either by over-expression or by RNAi-mediated depletion. These studies focused on the Brm subunit. We have now extended the previous study and asked whether depletion of other SWI/SNF subunits also results in alterations of pre-mRNA processing. In addition to Brm, we have now analyzed Mor, Snr1, PB, Bap170 and Osa in D. melanogaster S2 cells. We have mined microarray data from Moshkin and coworkers  and looked for genes whose relative abundances between alternative transcripts are changed by the RNAi treatment in a different manner than the abundances in mock-treated samples. The number of genes affected was low, but many of the detected events could be validated. This small collection of validated genes is valuable for future mechanistic studies.
The reasons for the low number of genes affected could be partly technical. First, the data used was obtained from expression arrays that do not cover all the splicing variants of the transcriptome of D. melanogaster. Second, the variances in the datasets were relatively high and, for this reason, we chose to avoid false positives by establishing stringent criteria and discarding genes that did not show consistent results in the replicates. In spite of these limitations, we identified a total of 45 genes for which the pre-mRNA processing levels changed after depletion of SWI/SNF subunits. Depletion of different SWI/SNF subunits affected different genes with a statistically significant overlap, in particular for the core subunits of the SWI/SNF complex. Indeed, we identified a group of ten genes that, according to the microarray data, were affected by depletion of at least two different core subunits. In summary, our results show that depletion of other core subunits apart from Brm influences pre-mRNA processing. This conclusion agrees with observations in human cells, where Brm modulates the splicing of the TERT transcripts in concert with the mRNA-binding protein p54(nrb) . In the same study, Ito and coworkers showed that p54(nrb) and core subunits of the SWI/SNF complex interact physically.
We have analyzed the decay of the transcripts affected by depletion of SWI/SNF subunits and we can rule out differential stability as a major cause for the differences observed in the relative abundances of alternative transcripts. Using ChIP, we have also shown that Brm, Snr1 and Mor are asociated with the genes affected. Altogether, these observations support the conclusion that the mechanism by which SWI/SNF affects pre-mRNA processing is direct and cotranscriptional.
The role of chromatin in the regulation of pre-mRNA processing
Alternative splicing and polyadenylation are major sources of transcript diversity and proteomic diversity in higher eukaryotes. Complex regulatory networks determine the pre-mRNA processing outcome and play critical roles in differentiation and development. Key elements in such regulatory networks are the splicing and polyadenylation factors that influence the choice of alternative processing sites by binding to cis-acting elements, either enhancers or silencers, in the pre-mRNAs . Recent research has revealed that, in addition to the RNA sequence itself, the chromatin environment and the transcription machinery contribute to the recruitment of regulatory factors to their target transcripts during transcription [reviewed by [28, 29]]. Genome-wide studies have shown that certain histone modifications are non-randomly distributed in exons and introns [30, 31], and that nucleosomes are enriched in exonic sequences [32, 33]. The functional significance of these observations is not fully understood, but there are examples of adaptor proteins that bind both to splicing factors and to specific histone modifications, and such adaptors may play important roles in the targeting of regulatory factors to the pre-mRNA . Another determinant of the splicing outcome is the elongation rate of RNAP II. A reduction of the RNAP II elongation rate at specific positions along the gene can facilitate the assembly of the splicing machinery at weak splice sites and promote the inclusion of proximal exons [reviewed by [35, 36]]. hBrm regulates the alternative splicing of the CD44 pre-mRNA in human cells by decreasing the elongation rate of RNAP II and inducing the accumulation of the enzyme at specific positions in the gene . In the case of the CD44 gene, Brm favors the usage of proximal processing sites. We have shown that in D. melanogaster the SWI/SNF complex regulates the processing of a subset of pre-mRNAs through somehow different mechanisms. In some of the cases that we have analyzed, depletion of SWI/SNF promotes the use of a proximal splice site (see, for instance, the up-regulation of the lola-RA transcript shown in Figure 5), which cannot be explained by the same mechanisms that act on the human CD44 gene. Several alternative mechanisms can be envisioned. In one scenario, SWI/SNF either decreases or increases the transcription rate, depending on the genomic context and on the presence of specific regulators. Alternatively, SWI/SNF could act by a mechanism that is independent from the transcription kinetics. We have previously shown that a fraction of SWI/SNF is associated with nascent transcripts , while other authors have shown that Brm and specific mRNA-binding proteins interact [22, 24]. It is tempting to speculate that SWI/SNF plays a more direct role in pre-mRNA processing, possibly by modulating the recruitment and/or assembly of splicing or polyadenylation factors.
SWI/SNF regulates pre-mRNA processing in vivo
Previous research on the role of Brm in pre-mRNA processing was carried out in cultured cells. We have now depleted Brm in larvae and detected changes in pre-mRNA processing in vivo. Depletion of Brm had no significant effect on two of the four genes analyzed, CG3884 and mod(mdg4). Depletion of Brm in vivo affected lola and Gpdh, in contrast, in a similar manner to its effect in S2 cells. It is important to point out that we analyzed RNA extracted from total larvae, not from individual organs, which might have occluded tissue-specific effects. Indeed, the gene expression data in FlyAtlas http://www.flyatlas.org/ shows that the expressions of the analyzed genes vary among organs and throughout development. Analyzing total larvae gives an average of the effects in the entire organism, which might not reflect the physiological regulation of the target genes in any specific tissue. However, the fact that Brm depletion affects the processing of the lola and Gpdh transcripts in larvae shows that the reported effect of SWI/SNF on pre-mRNA processing is not an artefact that occurs only in cultured cells.
The lola and Gpdh genes are structurally very different. Gpdh is a relatively short gene with three alternative mRNAs that encode nearly identical proteins. The alternative processing of the Gpdh pre-mRNA determines the sequence of the 3' UTRs, which can have a profound impact on the stability of the transcripts, their regulation by microRNAs and their translational properties. The lola gene, in contrast, is very long with at least 26 different transcripts that code for a plethora of protein isoforms characterized by different types of DNA-binding motifs. Therefore, in vivo regulation of lola by SWI/SNF affects the abundances of protein isoforms with different biological activities.
We have shown that SWI/SNF can modulate alternative pre-mRNA processing, not only in cultured cells but also in vivo. The effect is restricted to and specific for a subset of transcripts, both in S2 cells and in larvae. Our results provide novel insights into the mechanisms by which SWI/SNF regulates transcript diversity and proteomic diversity in higher eukaryotes.
The microarray data was extracted from Array Express, E-TABM-169 http://www.ebi.ac.uk/microarray-as/aew/. Drosophila Genome 2.0 Arrays (Affymetrix) were hybridized with total RNA purified from Drosophila S2 cells treated with dsRNA corresponding to Brm, Snr1, Mor, PB, Bap170, and Osa . The E-TABM-169 data contains four biological replicates for each of the RNAi treatments and six mock replicates. All the replicates were included in our initial analysis. A second analysis was carried out with only three and four replicates for treated and mock cells, respectively, after discarding deviant datasets identified by cluster analysis. In all cases, we mined the E-TABM-169 data, selected those genes that were represented by more than one probe set in the Drosophila Genome 2 arrays (974 genes) and identified among them the genes expressed in S2 cells. In the analysis that included all the data sets, we selected as "expressed" those probe sets that scored "present" in at least four out of six individual mock replicates, and in three out of the four treated replicates. In the second data analysis, we selected probe sets that scored "present" in at least three out of four mock experiments and two out of three treated replicates. We calculated the average signals for each expressed probe set, and we discarded probe sets for which the ratio of average to standard deviation was below 1.25, in order to exclude probe sets with large variances. We then calculated pair-wise for each gene the ratios between probe-set average signals. We set the criterion that both probe sets in each comparison satisfy the cut-off values for present signals and experimental variance, as described above. We finally selected probe-set pairs that showed at least a 2-fold ratio difference in the RNAi-treated experiments compared to mock. We used the gene models available at FlyBase  and the probe-set annotations at Affymetrix to analyze the structure of the genes selected. Gene ontology enrichment analyses were performed using the GOEAST software at http://omicslab.genetics.ac.cn/GOEAST/index.php
Animals and cell culture
Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells were cultivated at 28°C in Schneider's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 50 μg/ml penicillin and 50 μg/ml streptomycin. Drosophila melanogaster RNAi lines from the Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center were used. To account for differences in knockdown due to position effects, we used two available lines (#37720 and #37721) for Brm (CG5942). W 1118 and hs-GAL4 lines were obtained from the Bloomington stock center. All stocks were maintained on a standard cornmeal/molasses medium at 25°C.
RNA interference in S2 cells
Double-stranded RNAs complementary to Brm, Snr1, Mor, and GFP were synthesised by in vitro transcription (MegaScript RNAi kit, Ambion) from gene-specific PCR fragments with T7 promoters incorporated at both ends. The sequences of the primers used are specified in the Additional file 1, Table S5. 3 × 106 S2 cells were cultured in 6-well plates over-night, washed with serum-free and antibiotic-free Schneider's medium, and treated with 30 μg of dsRNA/well. Cells treated with dsRNA complementary to Brm and SNR1 were harvested at 24 and 48 hours, respectively, after dsRNA addition. A second administration with dsRNA against Mor was carried out at 48 hours, and the cells harvested 96 hours after administration.
RNA interference in Drosophila melanogaster larvae
hs-GAL4 virgin females were crossed with UAS-BrmRNAi males (strain #37721), and early third instar larvae from the cross were heat shocked for 2 h at 37°C. Control experiments were carried out in parallel by crossing hs-GAL4 virgin females with wild type males W 1118 . 24 h after the heat shock, late third instar larvae were collected for Western blot assay and RT-qPCR. Total RNA was extracted from ten larvae with Trizol according to the protocol provided by Invitrogen. cDNA synthesis was performed as described below. The results obtained with strain #37721 were confirmed using a second Brm RNAi strain, #37720.
RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells using the RNAqueous kit (Ambion) and DNase-treated with Turbo DNA-free (Applied Biosystems) according to the protocols provided by the manufacturers. Subsequently, cDNA synthesis was performed with 1 μg total RNA using Superscript III (Invitrogen). Quantitative PCR measurements were carried out in triplicate using a KAPA SYBR Fast qPCR Kit (KAPA Biosystem) in a QIAGEN Rotor-Gene Q system. Transcript levels were analyzed with isoform-specific primers (Table S5). The relative abundance of each transcript is presented as fold change compared to the reference sample, GFP for S2 cells and W 1118 for larvae, after normalizing the values obtained for each alternative transcript either to a common exon in the same transcript or to Actin 5C.
Analysis of RNA decay
RNA interference was carried out in S2 cells as previously described using dsRNA for Brm and Snr1, and subsequently the cells was treated with 2 μg/ml Actinomycin D for 0, 1.5 and 2.5 hours. RNA levels were quantified by RT-qPCR with isoform-specific primers (Table S5) and normalized to ribosomal 28S RNA levels.
ChIP was performed essentially as described by Takahashi et al. (2000) with some modifications (Hessle et al., 2009). Drosophila S2 cells were fixed at room temperature with 2% formaldehyde. The immunoprecipitated DNA was purified and analyzed by PCR using gene-specific primers (Table S5).
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting
Cell pellets were resuspended in SDS-PAGE sample buffer supplemented with 8 M urea and heated to 110°C. Larvae were ground in the same sample buffer, heated to 100°C for 10 min, vortexed, re-heated to 100°C and kept at this temperature for 5 min. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE using the Mini-Protean II system (BioRad) and transferred to polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore) in Tris-glycine buffer with 0.02% SDS and 4 M urea using a semi-dry electrophoretic transfer cell (BioRad). The antibodies were diluted in 0.05% Tween-20 and 1% milk in PBS and antibody incubations were carried out following standard procedures. The ECL system (GE Healthcare) was used for chemiluminiscent detection of horseradish peroxidase.
The anti-Brm antibody was raised in rabbit and has been characterized in a previous study (Tyagi et al. 2009). The antibodies against Mor and Snr1 were kindly provided by C.P. Verrijzer (Moshkin et al. 2007 and references therein). The monoclonal anti-alpha-tubulin antibody (clone B-5-1-2) was from Sigma-Aldrich.
We thank C.P. Verrijzer (Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) for the generous gift of antibodies, G. Farrants for English editing and A.B. Eberle for critical reading of the manuscript. We are very grateful to C.P. Verrijzer and Y.M. Moshkin for making their microarray data publicly available. Our research is financed by grants from The Swedish Research Council (VR-NT).
- Clapier CR, Cairns BR: The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009, 78: 273-30410. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.153223View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cairns BR: Chromatin remodeling: insights and intrigue from single-molecule studies. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007, 14: 989-99610. 10.1038/nsmb1333PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mohrmann L, Langenberg K, Krijgsveld J, Kal AJ, Heck AJR, Verrijzer CP: Differential targeting of two distinct SWI/SNF-related Drosophila chromatin-remodeling complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 3077-3088. 10.1128/MCB.24.8.3077-3088.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moshkin YM, Mohrmann L, van Ijcken WFJ, Verrijzer CP: Functional differentiation of SWI/SNF remodelers in transcription and cell cycle control. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 651-661. 10.1128/MCB.01257-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carrera I, Zavadil J, Treisman JE: Two Subunits Specific to the PBAP Chromatin Remodeling Complex Have Distinct and Redundant Functions during Drosophila Development. Mol Cell Biol. 2008, 28: 5238-525010. 10.1128/MCB.00747-08PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Terriente-Félix A, de Celis JF: Osa, a subunit of the BAP chromatin-remodelling complex, participates in the regulation of gene expression in response to EGFR signalling in the Drosophila wing. Dev Biol. 2009, 329: 350-361. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.03.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chalkley GE, Moshkin YM, Langenberg K, Bezstarosti K, Blastyak A, Gyurkovics H, Demmers JAA, Verrijzer CP: The transcriptional coactivator SAYP is a trithorax group signature subunit of the PBAP chromatin remodeling complex. Mol Cell Biol. 2008, 28: 2920-2929. 10.1128/MCB.02217-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elfring LK, Daniel C, Papoulas O, Deuring R, Sarte M, Moseley S, Beek SJ, Waldrip WR, Daubresse G, DePace A, Kennison JA, Tamkun JW: Genetic analysis of brahma: the Drosophila homolog of the yeast chromatin remodeling factor SWI2/SNF2. Genetics. 1998, 148: 251-265.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bultman S, Gebuhr T, Yee D, La Mantia C, Nicholson J, Gilliam A, Randazzo F, Metzger D, Chambon P, Crabtree G, Magnuson T: A Brg1 null mutation in the mouse reveals functional differences among mammalian SWI/SNF complexes. Mol Cell. 2000, 6: 1287-1295. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00127-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kwon CS, Wagner D: Unwinding chromatin for development and growth: a few genes at a time. Trends Genet. 2007, 23: 403-412. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.05.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roberts CWM, Orkin SH: The SWI/SNF complex--chromatin and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004, 4: 133-142. 10.1038/nrc1273View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janody F, Lee JD, Jahren N, Hazelett DJ, Benlali A, Miura GI, Draskovic I, Treisman JE: A Mosaic Genetic Screen Reveals Distinct Roles for trithorax and Polycomb Group Genes in Drosophila Eye Development. Genetics. 2004, 166: 187-200. 10.1534/genetics.166.1.187PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Treisman JE, Luk A, Rubin GM, Heberlein U: eyelid antagonizes wingless signaling during Drosophila development and has homology to the Bright family of DNA-binding proteins. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 1949-1962. 10.1101/gad.11.15.1949PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collins RT, Treisman JE: Osa-containing Brahma chromatin remodeling complexes are required for the repression of wingless target genes. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 3140-3152. 10.1101/gad.854300PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salditt-Georgieff M, Harpold M, Chen-Kiang S, Darnell JE: The addition of 5' cap structures occurs early in hnRNA synthesis and prematurely terminated molecules are capped. Cell. 1980, 19: 69-78. 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90389-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beyer AL, Osheim YN: Splice site selection, rate of splicing, and alternative splicing on nascent transcripts. Genes Dev. 1988, 2: 754-765. 10.1101/gad.2.6.754View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baurén G, Wieslander L: Splicing of Balbiani ring 1 gene pre-mRNA occurs simultaneously with transcription. Cell. 1994, 76: 183-192. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90182-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wahle E, Rüegsegger U: 3'-End processing of pre-mRNA in eukaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1999, 23: 277-295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pan Q, Shai O, Lee LJ, Frey BJ, Blencowe BJ: Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing. Nat Genet. 2008, 40: 1413-1415. 10.1038/ng.259View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S, Khrebtukova I, Zhang L, Mayr C, Kingsmore SF, Schroth GP, Burge CB: Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature. 2008, 456: 470-476. 10.1038/nature07509PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stolc V, Gauhar Z, Mason C, Halasz G, van Batenburg MF, Rifkin SA, Hua S, Herreman T, Tongprasit W, Barbano PE, Bussemaker HJ, White KP: A gene expression map for the euchromatic genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2004, 306: 655-660. 10.1126/science.1101312View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Batsché E, Yaniv M, Muchardt C: The human SWI/SNF subunit Brm is a regulator of alternative splicing. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006, 13: 22-29. 10.1038/nsmb1030View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- La Mata de M, Alonso CR, Kadener S, Fededa JP, Blaustein M, Pelisch F, Cramer P, Bentley D, Kornblihtt AR: A slow RNA polymerase II affects alternative splicing in vivo. Mol Cell. 2003, 12: 525-532. 10.1016/j.molcel.2003.08.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ito T, Watanabe H, Yamamichi N, Kondo S, Tando T, Haraguchi T, Mizutani T, Sakurai K, Fujita S, Izumi T, Isobe T, Iba H: Brm transactivates the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene and modulates the splicing patterns of its transcripts in concert with p54(nrb). Biochem J. 2008, 411: 201-209. 10.1042/BJ20071075View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tyagi A, Ryme J, Brodin D, Ostlund Farrants AK, Visa N: SWI/SNF associates with nascent pre-mRNPs and regulates alternative pre-mRNA processing. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5: e1000470- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000470PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zraly CB, Middleton FA, Dingwall AK: Hormone-response genes are direct in vivo regulatory targets of Brahma (SWI/SNF) complex function. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 35305-35315. 10.1074/jbc.M607806200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barash Y, Calarco JA, Gao W, Pan Q, Wang X, Shai O, Blencowe BJ, Frey BJ: Deciphering the splicing code. Nature. 2010, 465: 53-59. 10.1038/nature09000View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alló M, Schor IE, Muñoz MJ, La Mata de M, Agirre E, Valcarcel J, Eyras E, Kornblihtt AR: Chromatin and Alternative Splicing. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2011Google Scholar
- Luco RF, Alló M, Schor IE, Kornblihtt AR, Misteli T: Epigenetics in alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Cell. 2011, 144: 16-26. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.056PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kolasinska-Zwierz P, Down T, Latorre I, Liu T, Liu XS, Ahringer J: Differential chromatin marking of introns and expressed exons by H3K36me3. Nat Genet. 2009, 41: 376-381. 10.1038/ng.322PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spies N, Nielsen CB, Padgett RA, Burge CB: Biased chromatin signatures around polyadenylation sites and exons. Mol Cell. 2009, 36: 245-254. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.008PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tilgner H, Nikolaou C, Althammer S, Sammeth M, Beato M, Valcárcel J, Guigó R: Nucleosome positioning as a determinant of exon recognition. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009, 16: 996-1001. 10.1038/nsmb.1658View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersson R, Enroth S, Rada-Iglesias A, Wadelius C, Komorowski J: Nucleosomes are well positioned in exons and carry characteristic histone modifications. Genome Res. 2009, 19: 1732-1741. 10.1101/gr.092353.109PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luco RF, Pan Q, Tominaga K, Blencowe BJ, Pereira-Smith OM, Misteli T: Regulation of alternative splicing by histone modifications. Science. 2010, 327: 996-1000. 10.1126/science.1184208PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kornblihtt AR: Promoter usage and alternative splicing. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005, 17: 262-268. 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.04.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ip JY, Schmidt D, Pan Q, Ramani AK, Fraser AG, Odom DT, Blencowe BJ: Global impact of RNA polymerase II elongation inhibition on alternative splicing regulation. Genome Res. 2011, 21: 390-401. 10.1101/gr.111070.110PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tweedie S, Ashburner M, Falls K, Leyland P, McQuilton P, Marygold S, Millburn G, Osumi-Sutherland D, Schroeder A, Seal R, Zhang H, : FlyBase: enhancing Drosophila Gene Ontology annotations. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009, 37: D555-9. 10.1093/nar/gkn788PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.