Recombination Phenotypes of Escherichia coli greA Mutants
© Poteete; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 19 December 2010
Accepted: 31 March 2011
Published: 31 March 2011
The elongation factor GreA binds to RNA polymerase and modulates transcriptional pausing. Some recent research suggests that the primary role of GreA may not be to regulate gene expression, but rather, to promote the progression of replication forks which collide with RNA polymerase, and which might otherwise collapse. Replication fork collapse is known to generate dsDNA breaks, which can be recombinogenic. It follows that GreA malfunction could have consequences affecting homologous recombination.
Escherichia coli mutants bearing substitutions of the active site acidic residues of the transcription elongation factor GreA, D41N and E44K, were isolated as suppressors of growth inhibition by a toxic variant of the bacteriophage lambda Red-beta recombination protein. These mutants, as well as a D41A greA mutant and a greA deletion, were tested for proficiency in recombination events. The mutations were found to increase the efficiency of RecA-RecBCD-mediated and RecA-Red-mediated recombination, which are replication-independent, and to decrease the efficiency of replication-dependent Red-mediated recombination.
These observations provide new evidence for a role of GreA in resolving conflicts between replication and transcription.
The GreA protein is an evolutionarily-conserved bacterial transcriptional factor, which interacts directly with RNA polymerase. Binding of GreA to paused and backtracked transcriptional complexes induces RNA polymerase to hydrolyze the last few nucleotide residues at the 3' end of the nascent transcript protruding beyond the enzyme's catalytic center, and resume transcription, in vitro  and in vivo [2, 3]. The extensively characterized interaction between RNA polymerase and GreA leads most simply to the idea that GreA functions in transcriptional regulation. Consistent with this idea, E. coli lacking GreA protein exhibits altered levels of expression of some of its genes [4, 5], as well as of the transcript encoding bacteriophage λ proteins which are synthesized late in infection . However, the magnitude of the gene expression effects is small, and a clear understanding of GreA's biological function remains to be obtained. Some recent studies have provided evidence that GreA may have a role in resolving conflicts between replication and transcription [7, 8].
In this study, greA mutants are shown to have effects on homologous recombination which can be most readily explained by a replication fork-preserving function of wild type GreA. These mutants were isolated in a screen for host functions which affect the cell's interaction with the Redβ recombination protein of bacteriophage λ.
In wild-type E. coli, homologous recombination depends primarily on the function of two proteins, the RecA synaptase and the RecBCD helicase/nuclease. For genetic engineering purposes, RecBCD is often replaced by the Red recombination system of bacteriophage λ . The Red system, consisting of the single-strand annealing protein Redβ and the exonuclease λExo, can substitute for RecBCD in promoting RecA-dependent homologous recombination [10, 11]. In addition, however, Red confers new capabilities on the cell, including the ability of the cell's chromosome to recombine with short linear DNA species, even in the absence of RecA [12, 13]. In this RecA-independent mode of recombination, Red apparently acts by targeting the replisome, leading to either strand assimilation or a template switch [14, 15].
To probe interactions between the Red system and cellular proteins, Redβ was fused at its C-terminus to the SPA affinity tag  on a medium copy number plasmid, under control of the lac repressor. Redβ-SPA was found to be toxic, inhibiting the growth of wild type E. coli when induced. This toxicity is surprising, because Redβ itself is innocuous, and hundreds of non-toxic SPA-tagged E. coli proteins have been made and characterized . One possible explanation is that the synthetic toxicity of Redβ-SPA results from the delivery of the SPA tag to a critical site, possibly the normal site of Redβ action in the cell. As a hypothetical example, if Redβ normally binds to a replisome protein, it would necessarily have evolved to do so without interfering with replication. However, Redβ with the 69 amino acid residue SPA tag appended might bind to its normal site and clash sterically with another component of the replisome. According to this reasoning, cellular mutants altered in their interaction with Redβ could be selected as suppressors of Redβ-SPA toxicity. Several such suppressor mutants were isolated. Initial mapping showed that three of the mutations mapped to the same area in the E. coli chromosome. Fine-structure mapping and sequencing revealed that these three mutants each encoded a GreA protein with a single amino acid substitution: D41N (isolated twice), or E44K. The affected residues are particularly significant in GreA's activity. Both participate in the coordination of Mg++ ions in the catalytic core of RNA polymerase [18–20]. The greA-D41N mutation was found not to affect the level of either Redβ-SPA or Redβ as detected by western blot (not shown), ruling out the simplest explanation--that the greA mutants suppress the toxicity of Redβ-SPA by preventing its synthesis.
To study the unexpected relationship between GreA and Red, E. coli strains were constructed bearing the greA D41N and E44K mutations, as well as a D41A mutation and a simple greA deletion, in a variety of genetic backgrounds. The strains were found to have a number of recombination-related phenotypes.
λ plaque formationa
To characterize further the specificity of greA recombination effects, the effect of the greA-D41N mutation on RecA-mediated recombination was tested in a strain in which recBCD was replaced by red. As shown in Figure 3, the replacement has little effect, in either a GreA+ or a greA-D41N background. In particular, the greA mutation stimulates RecA-Red recombination at least as much as it stimulates RecA-RecBCD recombination.
The GreB protein of E. coli is very similar to GreA in structure and biochemical activities . The transcriptional effects of a greA deletion mutant are often greater in a strain in which greB is deleted as well [23, 6, 5, 8]. However, as shown in Table 1 and Figures 1, 2, and 3, deletion of greB had little or no effect on recombination, either by itself or in combination with greA-D41N.
The DksA protein of E. coli, compared to GreB, is more distantly related to GreA, but it shares a number of structural and mechanistic features with the Gre proteins, including an acid-tipped coiled coil which reaches into the secondary channel of RNA polymerase to regulate transcription [24, 25]. Chromosomal dksA mutants corresponding to the greA mutants described above were constructed and tested for recombination phenotypes: a deletion fusing the first three and last three codons, and a double substitution mutation neutralizing both of the acid fingertip residues, D71N/D74N [24, 26]. In contrast to the greA mutants, neither dksA mutant exhibited either depressed or elevated levels of Red-mediated or RecA-RecBCD-mediated recombination, nor was either resistant to Redβ-SPA (data not shown).
The mechanism by which the greA point mutations suppress Redβ-SPA toxicity was investigated by means of a complementation test. Wild type, D41N, and E44K alleles of greA, under control of their own promoters, were cloned in multicopy plasmids which are compatible with the Redβ-SPA expressing plasmids. The wild type greA plasmid was found to restore Redβ-SPA sensitivity to a chromosomal greA-D41N mutant, indicating that the suppression of Redβ-SPA toxicity does not result from a gain of function by the mutant GreA protein. Consistent with this conclusion, and more remarkably, the mutant plasmids do not confer Redβ-SPA resistance upon wild type E. coli, indicating that the wild type phenotype prevails even when the mutant gene has a higher copy number. However, interpretation of this latter result is complicated because the mutant plasmids significantly slow the growth of wild type cells, as expected based on the known toxicity of the mutant GreA proteins expressed at high levels .
The known biochemical properties of GreA substitution mutants suggest that one effect of the D41N or E44K mutation would be to increase the amount of time RNA polymerase spends stalled in certain backtracked transcriptional complexes. In the mutant, it is likely that other cellular proteins which respond to stalled transcriptional complexes will play a greater role in resolving them. One such protein is Mfd, which not only dissociates stalled transcription complexes, but at the same time recruits proteins that repair DNA lesions . This line of reasoning leads to the question of whether mutant GreA suppression of Redβ-SPA toxicity is mediated by Mfd. Accordingly, wild type and greA-D41N strains lacking the mfd gene were constructed. Deletion of mfd was found to have no effect on either the Redβ-SPA resistance of the D41N mutant, or the Redβ-SPA sensitivity of wild type. It can be concluded that Mfd is not required for greA-D41N suppression of Redβ-SPA toxicity.
Discussion and Conclusions
The experiments described here show that E. coli greA mutants exhibit elevated levels of RecA-mediated recombination, and depressed levels of Red-mediated, RecA-independent recombination. GreA is a transcription factor, so these differing effects could be due to changes in gene expression, but recombination and DNA metabolism functions are not among the genes identified as significantly up- or down-regulated in a greA null mutant . A more likely explanation comes from the idea that GreA functions to prevent stalling of replication forks that run into conflicts with transcription complexes [7, 8].
Replication in E.coli is highly processive, and maintains this processivity despite the presence on the template DNA of transcription complexes which have an intrinsic ability to stall replication forks . Stalled replication forks are a potentially dangerous source of genetic instability, because they generate double-strand breaks through a process of RuvABC-mediated reversal and cleavage . The dsDNA ends resulting from these breaks are recombinogenic , so loss of a function which promotes the progression of replication forks is predicted to stimulate RecA-RecBCD and RecA-Red recombination events, which proceed via mechanisms that are largely replication-independent . Red-mediated recombination in the absence of RecA, on the other hand, is itself strongly replication-dependent [15, 32], so loss of a function which promotes the progression of replication forks might be expected to diminish it.
The greA mutant phenotypes reported here are consistent with a model in which replication forks stall either more frequently or for a longer time in a cell in which GreA is inactive. Replication processivity in the mutant then becomes dependent upon other transcription-replication mediators. A functionally defective GreA protein, such as D41N or E44K, which can still bind to its normal site on RNA polymerase, might have an exacerbated effect, by competing with one or more of the other mediators.
Two recent studies present evidence for a role of GreA in promoting the progression of replication forks. (1) Deletion of greA increases the UV sensitivity of a ruvC mutant. This effect of the greA mutant is suppressed by the RNA polymerase open complex-destabilizing rpoB mutant H1244Q. The investigators also found that GreA and DksA together contribute to the viability of a ruvC strain. They interpreted their observations as indicating that these transcription factors act at DNA lesions to resolve conflicts between DNA replication and transcription . (2) Cultures of an E. coli dnaC-ts mutant were synchronized by temperature shift, then, after replication initiation, treated with serine hydroxamate to induce amino acid starvation. The treated cells completed the round of replication they had started, but failed to do so if they lacked DksA, or if they lacked both GreA and GreB. The replication block could be eliminated by additional treatment with rifampicin, or by a DksA-bypassing mutation in rpoB, P546L, indicating that RNA polymerase was responsible for the replication block, and that the transcription factors affected replication through their well-characterized interaction with RNA polymerase. The replication deficiency of the dksA mutant in this experiment could be complemented by overexpression of GreA from a plasmid. In synchronized dnaC mutant cells that were not treated with serine hydroxamate, deletion of dksA slightly reduced the rate of replication fork progression; deletion of dksA, greA, and greB all together substantially reduced it. . To these two lines of evidence, a third is now added: in otherwise wild type cells, not treated with DNA damaging agents or metabolic inhibitors, greA mutations stimulate replication-independent recombination, and depress replication-dependent recombination.
Stimulation of replication-independent, RecA-RecBCD-mediated recombination was not uniform, but rather was found to vary among different loci. This observation is consistent with the idea that the stimulation is due to the production of dsDNA ends as a byproduct of replication-transcription conflicts: such conflicts would not be expected to occur at a uniform frequency around the chromosome, because different loci are transcribed at different rates.
Alteration of either of GreA's key active site residues has stronger recombination effects than simply eliminating GreA. This observation is consistent with previous studies of many GreA mutants, including D41N and D41A as well as other substitutions for both D41 and E44. These mutants generally reduce or eliminate GreA-induced transcript cleavage, but not binding to RNA polymerase [18–20]. Unlike wild type GreA, the mutant proteins inhibit elongation when used at high concentration in vitro . One unexplained observation of the present study is that the D41A substitution was found to have smaller effects on recombination than the D41N substitution, whereas Laptenko et al.  found little if any difference in biochemical activities between these two mutants.
Wang and coworkers propose that the various transcription-replication mediators, including DksA, GreA, GreB and Mfd, could be specialized to prevent transcription-replication conflict under different conditions . The experiments described here provide additional support for this interpretation: based on the recombination and Redβ-SPA sensitivity phenotypes, among these proteins, only GreA appears to have a significant role in mediating transcription-replication conflicts that arise during rapid growth in rich medium. Some qualitative observations on the growth properties of greA and dksA mutants are also consistent with this idea. The greA point mutants grow noticeably more slowly than either wild type or the greA deletion on rich medium (LB), but about as well as wild type on minimal medium (M9 glucose-thiamine). In contrast, the dksA D71N/D74N mutant grows about as well as wild type on LB, but only a little better on M9 glucose-thiamine than the dksA deletion mutant, which, as previously reported, grows very poorly on minimal medium .
. Temperature-sensitive, with heat-inducible FLP
. bla-Ptac-gam-bet-exo-lacI, temperature-sensitive mutant pSC101 origin
Plasmid containing bla-P32-aacC. See the description of pTP1232 below.
pKM208 × SP01,02 pcr of pJL148. The Red-mediated recombination event fuses the SPA tag to the C-terminal end of bet, deletes most of exo, and adds neo.
Deletion of bla from pTP1205 by digestion with PvuI and religation
pKM208 × cat29,30 pcr of Tn9 cat. The Red-mediated recombination event replaces a segment of pKM208 between lacI and the replication origin with the cat gene, flanked by BamH1 sites.
Deletion of cat from pTP1214 by digestion with BamH1 and religation
pTP1215 × cat27,28 pcr of Tn9 cat. The Red-mediated recombination event replaces bla and the f1 replication origin with cat. Smaller, chloramphenicol resistance-conferring version of pKM208.
A segment of λ wild type DNA was amplified by SR2,3 pcr. The product was digested with BamH1 and XbaI, and ligated with a BamH1- and XbaI-ended plasmid segment consisting of the Tn903 aph gene and the pSC101 replication origin.
Deletion of sequences between the EcoRV and XbaI sites of pTP1222. The resulting plasmid contains λ sequences from 45262 in the S gene to 45828 in the R gene.
pTP1228, 1230, 1231
Wild type, D41N, and E44K alleles of greA, respectively, amplified by PCR with primers greA5 and greA6, and cloned between the EcoR1 and BamH1 sites of a derivative of pBR322 lacking the sequences between the BamH1 and PvuII sites.
Contains the sequences used to construct TP1234, DNA from which in turn was used as the template for PCR synthesis of the 587-bp dsDNA used in the tests of Red-mediated chromosomal gene replacement (sequence shown in Figure 4). It includes the bla gene of pBR322, the synthetic, unregulated promoter P32 (closely related to CP32 ), the lacZ ribosome binding site, and the N-terminal end of lacZ.
Reduced genome version of MG1655
Strains constructed for this study. All are in the MG1655 background
TP798 × bpa1,aof2 pcr of pTP1068
TP933 × PRO1,2 pcr of Tn903 aph
MG1655/pKM208 × greA9,X pcr of Tn10 tet
TP1195/pKM208 × oligo D41N
MG1655 × P1•TP796
TP1198 × P1•TP796
MG1655/pKM208 × greAY,Z pcr of Tn10
TP1195/pKM208 × oligo D41A
TP1195/pKM208 × oligo greAD
TP1204 × P1•TP796
TP1205 × P1•TP796
TP1205 × P1•TP1199
TP1203/pKM208 × oligo E44K
MG1655 × P1•JW3369
TP1216 × P1•TP796
TP1216 × P1•TP1199
TP1218/pCP20 passaged at 42°
TP1198 × P1• JW3369
MG1655 × P1•TP965
TP1198 × P1•TP965
TP1204 × P1•TP965
TP1216 × P1•TP965
TP1198 × P1•TP798
TP1224/pCP20 passaged at 41°
TP1222 × P1•TP965
greA-D41N greBΔFRT lacIPΔbla'-kan-'lacZ
TP1231 × P1•TP965
TP1225/pTP1216 × pTP1232 linear
TP1222 × P1•TP796
greA-D41N greBΔFRT recAΔtet
TP1231 × P1•TP796
TP1193 × P1•TP965
TP1205 × P1•TP965
MG1655 × P1•JW1100
TP1198 × P1•JW1100
TP1216 × P1•JW1100
MG1655/pKM208 × cat40,41 pcr of Tn9
TP1252/pCP20 passaged at 41°
TP1253/pCP20 passaged at 41°
TP1254/pCP20 passaged at 41°
TP1255/pKM208 × oligo dksNN
TP1262 × P1•TP796
TP1255/pKM208 × oligo dksAD
TP1263 × P1•TP796
Kanamycin enrichment for chloramphenicol-sensitive or tetracycline-sensitive variants
Following electroporation, bacteria were diluted into 15 ml of LB, and left standing overnight at 30°C for complete recovery from electroporation and outgrowth of fully sensitive recombinants. 0.2 ml of the culture was diluted into 5 ml LB and aerated at 37°C until a density of about 7 × 107/ml was reached. At that point, 2.5 ml of culture was mixed with 2.5 ml LB plus 100 μl of either chloramphenicol at 1 mg/ml or tetracycline at 0.4 mg/ml, and aerated at 37°C for 40 min. At that time, 2 ml of culture was mixed with 2 ml LB plus 40 μl chloramphenicol or tetracycline, plus 4 μl kanamycin at 20 mg/ml (for a final kanamycin concentration of 20 μg/ml), and aerated at 37°C for 40 min, then left standing overnight at room temperature. Portions of the culture were plated on LB, and the resulting colonies were tested for chloramphenicol or tetracycline sensitivity. Clones bearing the intended deletion were identified by the use of PCR and sequencing.
λNK1098 bears the mutations cI857 and P-am80, as well as a mini Tn10 tet element and the Tn10 transposase fused to Ptac. It is similar to λNK1323 , but its transposase is wild type, rather than the Altered Target Specificity double mutant version borne by λNK1323. The amber mutation R5 , used in marker rescue experiments, was sequenced and found to change λ 45710 from G-C to A-T, which turns R codon 73, UGG, into UAG. The γ210 mutation , used in plating tests, was sequenced and found to change λ 33076 from G-C to A-T, which turns gam codon 53, CAG, into UAG. The deletion-substitution mutation redΔcat, used in plating tests, was constructed by the use of Red-mediated recombination , with a dsDNA made by PCR amplification of Tn9 cat with oligo primers cat38 and cat39 (Table 3). The deletion-substitution leaves in place the first three codons of bet and the last three codons of exo.
Gene-replacement recombination test
I thank Hieuhanh Nguyen, Emily Rittershaus, and Mylorde Cherenfant for technical assistance; Martin Marinus and Jack Greenblatt for strains; and Sergei Borukhov and Jade Wang for helpful discussions.
- Borukhov S, Polyakov A, Nikiforov V, Goldfarb A: GreA protein: a transcription elongation factor from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89 (19): 8899-8902. 10.1073/pnas.89.19.8899PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toulme F, Mosrin-Huaman C, Sparkowski J, Das A, Leng M, Rahmouni AR: GreA and GreB proteins revive backtracked RNA polymerase in vivo by promoting transcript trimming. EMBO J. 2000, 19 (24): 6853-6859. 10.1093/emboj/19.24.6853PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hatoum A, Roberts J: Prevalence of RNA polymerase stalling at Escherichia coli promoters after open complex formation. Mol Microbiol. 2008, 68 (1): 17-28. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06138.xPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Susa M, Kubori T, Shimamoto N: A pathway branching in transcription initiation in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 59 (6): 1807-1817. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05058.xPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stepanova E, Lee J, Ozerova M, Semenova E, Datsenko K, Wanner BL, Severinov K, Borukhov S: Analysis of promoter targets for Escherichia coli transcription elongation factor GreA in vivo and in vitro. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189 (24): 8772-8785. 10.1128/JB.00911-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marr MT, Roberts JW: Function of transcription cleavage factors GreA and GreB at a regulatory pause site. Mol Cell. 2000, 6 (6): 1275-1285. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00126-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trautinger BW, Jaktaji RP, Rusakova E, Lloyd RG: RNA polymerase modulators and DNA repair activities resolve conflicts between DNA replication and transcription. Mol Cell. 2005, 19 (2): 247-258. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tehranchi AK, Blankschien MD, Zhang Y, Halliday JA, Srivatsan A, Peng J, Herman C, Wang JD: The transcription factor DksA prevents conflicts between DNA replication and transcription machinery. Cell. 2010, 141 (4): 595-605. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.036PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Court DL, Sawitzke JA, Thomason LC: Genetic engineering using homologous recombination. Annu Rev Genet. 2002, 36: 361-388. 10.1146/annurev.genet.36.061102.093104View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weisberg RA, Sternberg N: Transduction of recB- hosts is promoted by λ red+ function. Mechanisms in recombination. Edited by: Grell RF. 1974, 107-109. pubNew York: Plenum Publishing Corp, View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poteete AR, Volkert MR: Activation of recF-dependent recombination in Escherichia coli by bacteriophage λ and P22-encoded functions. J Bacteriol. 1988, 170: 4379-4381.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murphy KC: Use of bacteriophage λ recombination functions to promote gene replacement in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 2063-2071.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu D, Ellis HM, Lee EC, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Court DL: An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 5978-5983. 10.1073/pnas.100127597PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellis HM, Yu D, DiTizio T, Court DL: High efficiency mutagenesis, repair, and engineering of chromosomal DNA using single-stranded oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98 (12): 6742-6746. 10.1073/pnas.121164898PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poteete AR: Involvement of DNA replication in phage lambda Red-mediated homologous recombination. Mol Microbiol. 2008, 68 (1): 66-74. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06133.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zeghouf M, Li J, Butland G, Borkowska A, Canadien V, Richards D, Beattie B, Emili A, Greenblatt JF: Sequential Peptide Affinity (SPA) system for the identification of mammalian and bacterial protein complexes. J Proteome Res. 2004, 3 (3): 463-468. 10.1021/pr034084xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Butland G, Peregrin-Alvarez JM, Li J, Yang W, Yang X, Canadien V, Starostine A, Richards D, Beattie B, Krogan N: Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature. 2005, 433 (7025): 531-537. 10.1038/nature03239View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laptenko O, Lee J, Lomakin I, Borukhov S: Transcript cleavage factors GreA and GreB act as transient catalytic components of RNA polymerase. EMBO J. 2003, 22 (23): 6322-6334. 10.1093/emboj/cdg610PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Opalka N, Chlenov M, Chacon P, Rice WJ, Wriggers W, Darst SA: Structure and function of the transcription elongation factor GreB bound to bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell. 2003, 114 (3): 335-345. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00600-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sosunova E, Sosunov V, Kozlov M, Nikiforov V, Goldfarb A, Mustaev A: Donation of catalytic residues to RNA polymerase active center by transcription factor Gre. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (26): 15469-15474. 10.1073/pnas.2536698100PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zissler J, Singer E, Schaefer F: The role of recombination in the growth of bacteroiophage λ. I. The Gamma gene. The bacteriophage lambda. Edited by: Hershey AD. 1971, 455-468. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
- Borukhov S, Sagitov V, Goldfarb A: Transcript cleavage factors from E. coli. Cell. 1993, 72 (3): 459-466. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90121-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orlova M, Newlands J, Das A, Goldfarb A, Borukhov S: Intrinsic transcript cleavage activity of RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92 (10): 4596-4600. 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4596PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perederina A, Svetlov V, Vassylyeva MN, Tahirov TH, Yokoyama S, Artsimovitch I, Vassylyev DG: Regulation through the secondary channel--structural framework for ppGpp-DksA synergism during transcription. Cell. 2004, 118 (3): 297-309. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.030View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paul BJ, Barker MM, Ross W, Schneider DA, Webb C, Foster JW, Gourse RL: DksA: A critical component of the transcription initiation machinery that potentiates the regulation of rRNA promoters by ppGpp and the initiating NTP. Cell. 2004, 118 (3): 311-322. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blankschien MD, Lee JH, Grace ED, Lennon CW, Halliday JA, Ross W, Gourse RL, Herman C: Super DksAs: substitutions in DksA enhancing its effects on transcription initiation. EMBO J. 2009, 28 (12): 1720-1731. 10.1038/emboj.2009.126PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selby CP, Sancar A: Molecular mechanism of transcription-repair coupling. Science. 1993, 260 (5104): 53-58. 10.1126/science.8465200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mirkin EV, Mirkin SM: Replication fork stalling at natural impediments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007, 71 (1): 13-35. 10.1128/MMBR.00030-06PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seigneur M, Bidnenko V, Ehrlich SD, Michel B: RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks. Cell. 1998, 95 (3): 419-430. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81772-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuzminov A: Collapse and repair of replication forks in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1995, 16 (3): 373-384. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02403.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stahl MM, Thomason L, Poteete AR, Tarkowski T, Kuzminov A, Stahl FW: Annealing vs. invasion in phage λ recombination. Genetics. 1997, 147: 961-977.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stahl FW, McMilin KD, Stahl MM, Craseman JM, Lam S: The distribution of crossovers along unreplicated lambda bacteriophage chromosomes. Genetics. 1974, 77: 395-408.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang PJ, Craig EA: Identification and characterization of a new Escherichia coli gene that is a dosage-dependent suppressor of a dnaK deletion mutation. J Bacteriol. 1990, 172 (4): 2055-2064.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murphy KC, Campellone KG: Lambda Red-mediated recombinogenic engineering of enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic E. coli. BMC Molecular Biology. 2003, 4: 11- 10.1186/1471-2199-4-11PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kolisnychenko V, III GP, Herring CD, Feher T, Posfai J, Blattner FR, Posfai G: Engineering a reduced Escherichia coli genome. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 640-647. 10.1101/gr.217202PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sklar R: Enchancement of nitrosoguanidine mutagenesis by chloramphenicol in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1978, 136 (1): 460-462.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ortenberg R, Gon S, Porat A, Beckwith J: Interactions of glutaredoxins, ribonucleotide reductase, and components of the DNA replication system of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (19): 7439-7444. 10.1073/pnas.0401965101PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL, Mori H: Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006, 2: 2006-0008. 10.1038/msb4100050.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kleckner N, Bender J, Gottesman S: Uses of transposons with emphasis on Tn10. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 204: 139-180. full_textView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Campbell A: Sensitive mutants of bacteriophage lambda. Virology. 1961, 14: 22-32. 10.1016/0042-6822(61)90128-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oppenheim AB, Rattray AJ, Bubunenko M, Thomason LC, Court DL: In vivo recombineering of bacteriophage lambda by PCR fragments and single-strand oligonucleotides. Virology. 2004, 319 (2): 185-189. 10.1016/j.virol.2003.11.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bolivar F, Rodriguez RL, Betlach MC, Boyer HW: Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles. I. Ampicillin-resistant derivatives of the plasmid pMB9. Gene. 1977, 2 (2): 75-93. 10.1016/0378-1119(77)90074-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bachmann BJ: Derivations and genotypes of some mutant derivatives of Escherichia coli K-12. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology. Edited by: Neidhardt FC, III RC, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE. 1996, 2460-2488. Washington, D.C.: ASM Press, Google Scholar
- Poteete AR, Fenton AC, Nadkarni A: Chromosomal duplications and cointegrates generated by the bacteriophage lambda Red system in Escherichia coli K-12. BMC Molecular Biology. 2004, 5: 22- 10.1186/1471-2199-5-22PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cherepanov PP, Wackernagel W: Gene disruption in Escherichia coli: TcR and KmR cassettes with the option of Flp-catalyzed excision of the antibiotic-resistance determinant. Gene. 1995, 158 (1): 9-14. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00193-AView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jensen PR, Hammer K: The sequence of spacers between the consensus sequences modulates the strength of prokaryotic promoters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998, 64 (1): 82-87.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Toole GA, Pratt LA, Watnick PI, Newman DK, Weaver VB, Kolter R: Genetic approaches to study of biofilms. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 310: 91-109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar