Selection of reference genes for normalisation of real-time RT-PCR in brain-stem death injury in Ovis aries
© Passmore et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 08 October 2008
Accepted: 23 July 2009
Published: 23 July 2009
Heart and lung transplantation is frequently the only therapeutic option for patients with end stage cardio respiratory disease. Organ donation post brain stem death (BSD) is a pre-requisite, yet BSD itself causes such severe damage that many organs offered for donation are unusable, with lung being the organ most affected by BSD. In Australia and New Zealand, less than 50% of lungs offered for donation post BSD are suitable for transplantation, as compared with over 90% of kidneys, resulting in patients dying for lack of suitable lungs. Our group has developed a novel 24 h sheep BSD model to mimic the physiological milieu of the typical human organ donor. Characterisation of the gene expression changes associated with BSD is critical and will assist in determining the aetiology of lung damage post BSD. Real-time PCR is a highly sensitive method involving multiple steps from extraction to processing RNA so the choice of housekeeping genes is important in obtaining reliable results. Little information however, is available on the expression stability of reference genes in the sheep pulmonary artery and lung. We aimed to establish a set of stably expressed reference genes for use as a standard for analysis of gene expression changes in BSD.
We evaluated the expression stability of 6 candidate normalisation genes (ACTB, GAPDH, HGPRT, PGK1, PPIA and RPLP0) using real time quantitative PCR. There was a wide range of Ct-values within each tissue for pulmonary artery (15–24) and lung (16–25) but the expression pattern for each gene was similar across the two tissues. After geNorm analysis, ACTB and PPIA were shown to be the most stably expressed in the pulmonary artery and ACTB and PGK1 in the lung tissue of BSD sheep.
Accurate normalisation is critical in obtaining reliable and reproducible results in gene expression studies. This study demonstrates tissue associated variability in the selection of these normalisation genes in BSD sheep and underlines the importance of selecting the correct reference genes for both the animal model and tissue studied.
Lung transplantation represents the only prospect of improved survival and quality of life for patients with end stage pulmonary disease. Brain stem death (BSD) is a pre-requisite for the majority of heart and lung transplantation, yet this process adversely affects organ function, with lung being the most adversely affected. In Australia and New Zealand, less than 50% of lungs offered for donation post BSD are suitable for transplantation, as compared with over 90% of kidneys, resulting in patients dying for lack of suitable lungs . We have been investigating the impact of BSD on pulmonary structure, remodelling and function to understand the process in the hope of ameliorating organ injury. Management of the BSD donor has been shown to positively impact both the number of organs which can be successfully transplanted and the function in these organs. Early organ dysfunction has a major impact on both short and long term survival as well as prolonged ICU and hospital stays, with the associated costs and risks of nosocomial infections in these immunocompromised patients. Hence, a clear understanding of the molecular changes associated with BSD may lead to further improvements of organs for transplantation. We have previously developed a 4 hour BSD model in the rat . A clinically relevant model of BSD is an important key towards the understanding of the lung dysfunction post BSD, and we have subsequently developed a novel, clinically relevant 24 hour ovine model. The ovine models are treated in an animal ICU setting, with similar electrolyte management and hormonal resuscitation (methylprednisolone, tri-iodothyrosine (T3) and vasopressin) to mimic treatment given to human lung transplant donors prior to transplantation.
The haemodynamic changes in the systemic circulation in BSD are well described and are due to an initial catecholamine storm followed by relative hypotension, secondary to ischaemia of the sympathetic chain of the spinal cord . We have previously described in the ovine model that pulmonary pressures post BSD rise by levels of 5 or more, as compared to 2–3 times in the systemic circulation . The changes are more sustained and may therefore contribute to the changes in pulmonary microcirculation following BSD. Ongoing studies within our group are assessing changes in gene expression in both pulmonary artery and parenchymal tissue, as both may be affected by the same genes, and the differences in the localisation, organ structure and cell types needs to be taken into consideration. Similar gene expression levels in both organs will determine whether the pulmonary artery can be used as a valid representation of lung expression changes in the event of BSD. The determination of common stably expressed genes in both organs will enable reliable identification of gene expression changes in the donor lung prior to transplantation using excess pulmonary artery samples.
Gene expression in the organ donor is known to correlate to outcome post transplantation. In a recent study, gene expression of donor tissue prior to transplantation was correlated with severity of PGD and long term transplant outcome . Gene expression studies using Real Time RT PCR are an integral part of understanding the impact BSD has on lung function. A clearer understanding of gene expression changes post BSD may lead to novel avenues of research to improve the lung function in both the donor and recipient. However, the donor population is inherently heterogeneous and the management varies substantially between centres. Use of an animal model allows for a more homogenous population and standardisation of management, minimising variation in assessing gene expression.
Accurate normalisation is critical in accounting for varying amounts of cDNA input and enzyme activity. As this is a novel ovine model, the first step in obtaining reliable data from this model is to standardise the housekeeping genes. The use of internal controls is the standard method for correcting for differences in input and enzyme activity and therefore the choice of internal standard is important in obtaining consistent and reliable results. Several studies have shown the importance of using multiple, stably expressed reference genes [6–10] and that changes in the housekeeping gene can lead to changes in the significance and expression of the target gene. We elected to use the geNorm program  which has been widely used by many researchers and has been statistically validated  to evaluate the expression of six candidate normalisation genes (ACTB, GAPDH, HGPRT, PGK1, PPIA and RPLP0) and their expression stability in pulmonary artery and lung.
The aim of this study was to develop a set of reference genes that can be used for normalisation of expression data in the pulmonary artery and lung of BSD sheep. The global aim is to develop a more complete understanding of the changes seen in the target gene population in the sheep post BSD.
Primer information for candidate normalisation genes.
Forward primer (5' → 3')
Reverse primer (5' → 3')
Amplicon size (bp)
Function of candidate normalisation genes.
Full gene name
Primer conc (nM)
Cytoskeletal structural protein
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
Nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism
phosphoglycerate kinase 1
peptidylprolyl isomerase A
Protein metabolism and modification
ribosomal protein, large, P0
Protein metabolism and modification
Real time RT PCR is a sensitive and accurate technique for measuring gene expression but it is important to correct for such factors as differences in sample input and enzyme efficiency. This can be achieved by normalising to a reference gene. Ideally a reference gene is ubiquitously expressed across all tissue types and under all experimental conditions. In sheep BSD however, little is known about the ideal genes to use for normalisation and many previous studies have only utilised a single reference gene in normalising gene expression data [13–15]. This is not ideal as variation in the housekeeping gene can lead to changes in the quantification of the gene of interest. The use of multiple reference genes is therefore important in obtaining accurate results, particularly in detecting small differences in gene expression. In order to achieve this we used the technique described by Vandesompele et al as a statistically validated technique which uses mean pairwise variation to determine the optimal number of reference genes.
We chose six commonly used reference genes from the literature. There was tissue-associated variability in the genes selected for normalisation, with PPIA and ACTB being the most stably expressed in pulmonary artery and PGK1 and ACTB the most stable in lung. When controls were analysed separately in the different tissue types the reference genes selected were identical showing a consistent level of expression for each reference gene in both control and BSD groups. Several studies have shown that housekeeping genes show variability within each tissue [16–18] emphasising that the stability of each housekeeping gene needs to be studied in each separate tissue and experimental set-up.
Interestingly ACTB is the most stably expressed gene in both pulmonary artery and lung. Traditionally this gene has been used in many studies to normalise gene expression data but recently has been shown to vary considerably depending on the cell type and tissue .
GeNorm analysis indicated that only two reference genes were needed for accurate normalisation. A cut-off value of 0.15 has been recommended  below which the inclusion of additional reference genes is not required. The addition of a third gene was shown to increase the variability in pulmonary artery and lung, therefore we used the geometric mean of the two most stably expressed genes.
The optimal number of subjects for such a study is unclear. The financial restraints and ethical considerations must be thought of simultaneously with the scientific merit of increasing the cohorts. Whilst a larger number in each study group may have been of interest, the high stability of the selected reference genes this study indicates that the chosen sample size is appropriate and at the very least serves as a good guide. This study lays the groundwork for a better understanding of the molecular changes occurring in BSD and ultimately in optimising donor management in the lung transplant population.
This study identifies a new set of reference genes in pulmonary artery (PPIA and ACTB) and lung (PGK1 and ACTB) that can be used for normalisation of expression data in a 24 h BSD sheep model. It also demonstrates tissue-associated variability in the selection of these genes and emphasises the importance of selecting the most stably expressed genes across lung and pulmonary artery tissue for standard normalisation in gene expression studies.
Induction of BSD and sample collection
Eight sheep (4 controls; 4 BSD) were anaesthetised using Propofol (500–1200 mg/hr) and intubated with an endotracheal tube. All experimental procedures were conducted with the approval of the University of Queensland animal ethics committee (Reference PCH/389/06). Animals underwent placement of a urinary catheter, an arterial cannula followed by placement of a pulmonary arterial catheter. A size 10 tracheostomy (Portex™) was placed in the exposed trachea, the occiput cleared of adventitia and the bone plate exposed. An Intracranial Pressure "bolt" was introduced into a specifically designed rig to stabilise the device. A size 12 Foley catheter was introduced into a separate burr hole and then inflated with saline over a 30 minute period in the experimental animals. In the control animals the same procedure was followed except the catheter was not inflated. Animals were subsequently moved to specifically designed metabolic cages and sedation ceased at 12 hrs, whereupon hormone resuscitation was started with a 500 mg bolus of methylprednisolone, infusion of tri-iodothyrosine (T3) and vasopressin. At the end of the 24 hr period animals were euthanized while anaesthetised and pulmonary artery and lung specimens were immersed in RNA later (Ambion, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C and then kept at -80°C until RNA extraction.
Isolation of RNA and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Ambion, CA, USA) and samples purified with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). All samples were DNase treated (Ambion, CA, USA) and subsequently analysed on an Agilent Bioanalyser (Agilent Technologies) to determine RNA concentration and quality . Samples with a RNA integrity number (RIN) ≥ 6.5 were used. First strand cDNA was synthesized from 400 ng RNA using random primer and AMV Reverse Transcriptase (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).
Real Time RT-PCR
Gene sequences were obtained from the NCBI database  and primers were designed using PrimerExpress (Applied Biosystems) and specificity checked using NCBI BLAST. Primers for HPRT, PGK1 and RPLP0 genes were based on areas of consensus between cow, human and sheep as only partial sequences were available for Ovis aries. The targets were evaluated for secondary structure formation using DNA calculator (Sigma) and primers were purchased from Invitrogen (Table 1).
Real time Quantitative PCR was performed using a Rotor-Gene 6000 real-time rotary analyzer (Corbett Research) with SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Reactions consisted of 5 μL SYBR Green Master Mix, 100 nM, 300 nM or 900 nM of forward and reverse primers and 2 μL of cDNA (equivalent to 20 ng) and nuclease free water to a final volume of 10 μL. The cycling conditions were as follows: cDNA was denatured at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s (gain set at 10 for SYBR Green). Melt curve analysis was programmed at the end of the run, 60–90°C with increments rising by 0.5°C each step and a 5 s hold at each degree to determine reaction specificity and the absence of contamination, mispriming and primer dimer. Each PCR product had a single melt curve. A no-template and reverse transcription negative control was included for each primer set and PCR products were subsequently analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis to check for correct products.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Threshold cycle (Ct) values from the Rotor-Gene software version 1.7 (Corbett Research) were exported to Microsoft Excel for further analysis. All measurements were performed in triplicate for each gene and samples were quantified from standard curves, using serial dilutions of a cDNA pool of all PA and lung samples. This data was then analysed using geNorm 3.4 software to determine the most stable reference genes and the minimum number required to calculate a reliable normalisation factor using the geometric mean of multiple samples .
The authors would like to thank Dr Kathy Wilson for her veterinary support, Kimble Dunster for technical assistance and Tamara Marshall and Amanda Corley for their expert care of the animals and assistance in collecting samples.
- ANZOD Registry Report 2008. Annual Report of the Australia and New Zealand Organ Donation Registry (ANZOD). Edited by: Excell L, Hee K, Russ G. 2008, 1-51. Adelaide: Australia and New Zealand Organ Donation Registry
- Sutherland AJ, Ware RS, Winterford C, Fraser JF: The endothelin axis and gelatinase activity in alveolar macrophages after brain-stem death injury: a pilot study. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007, 26 (10): 1040-1047. 10.1016/j.healun.2007.07.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wood KE, Becker BN, McCartney JG, D'Alessandro AM, Coursin DB: Care of the potential organ donor. The New England journal of medicine. 2004, 351 (26): 2730-2739. 10.1056/NEJMra013103View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fraser JF, Nataatmadja M, Passmore M, Corley A, Dunster K, Dunning J, Kermeen F: Brain Stem Death Induced Pulmonary Hypertension – More Pronounced and Prolonged Than Left Ventricular Changes in an Ovine Model. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2008, 27 (2): S101-S102. 10.1016/j.healun.2007.11.123.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anraku M, Cameron MJ, Waddell TK, Liu M, Arenovich T, Sato M, Cypel M, Pierre AF, de Perrot M, Kelvin DJ, et al: Impact of Human Donor Lung Gene Expression Profiles on Survival after Lung Transplantation: A Case-Control Study. Am J Transplant. 2008, 8 (10): 2140-2148. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02354.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garcia-Crespo D, Juste RA, Hurtado A: Selection of ovine housekeeping genes for normalisation by real-time RT-PCR; analysis of PrP gene expression and genetic susceptibility to scrapie. BMC Vet Res. 2005, 1: 3- 10.1186/1746-6148-1-3PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohl F, Jung M, Xu C, Stephan C, Rabien A, Burkhardt M, Nitsche A, Kristiansen G, Loening SA, Radonic A, et al: Gene expression studies in prostate cancer tissue: which reference gene should be selected for normalization?. J Mol Med. 2005, 83 (12): 1014-1024. 10.1007/s00109-005-0703-zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erkens T, Van Poucke M, Vandesompele J, Goossens K, Van Zeveren A, Peelman LJ: Development of a new set of reference genes for normalization of real-time RT-PCR data of porcine backfat and longissimus dorsi muscle, and evaluation with PPARGC1A. BMC Biotechnol. 2006, 6: 41- 10.1186/1472-6750-6-41PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ayers D, Clements DN, Salway F, Day PJ: Expression stability of commonly used reference genes in canine articular connective tissues. BMC Vet Res. 2007, 3: 7- 10.1186/1746-6148-3-7PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoogewijs D, Houthoofd K, Matthijssens F, Vandesompele J, Vanfleteren JR: Selection and validation of a set of reliable reference genes for quantitative sod gene expression analysis in C. elegans. BMC Mol Biol. 2008, 9: 9- 10.1186/1471-2199-9-9PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F: Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002, 3 (7): RESEARCH0034- 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szabo A, Perou CM, Karaca M, Perreard L, Quackenbush JF, Bernard PS: Statistical modeling for selecting housekeeper genes. Genome Biol. 2004, 5 (8): R59- 10.1186/gb-2004-5-8-r59PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grubor B, Gallup JM, Ramirez-Romero R, Bailey TB, Crouch EC, Brogden KA, Ackermann MR: Surfactant protein D expression in normal and pneumonic ovine lung. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology. 2004, 101 (3–4): 235-242. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.05.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hein WR, Barber T, Cole SA, Morrison L, Pernthaner A: Long-term collection and characterization of afferent lymph from the ovine small intestine. Journal of immunological methods. 2004, 293 (1–2): 153-168. 10.1016/j.jim.2004.07.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laud K, Hornez L, Gourdou I, Belair L, Arnold A, Peyrat JP, Djiane J: Expression of BRCA1 gene in ewe mammary epithelial cells during pregnancy: regulation by growth hormone and steroid hormones. European journal of endocrinology/European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2001, 145 (6): 763-770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bustin SA: Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. Journal of molecular endocrinology. 2002, 29 (1): 23-39. 10.1677/jme.0.0290023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tichopad A, Didier A, Pfaffl MW: Inhibition of real-time RT-PCR quantification due to tissue-specific contaminants. Molecular and cellular probes. 2004, 18 (1): 45-50. 10.1016/j.mcp.2003.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warrington JA, Nair A, Mahadevappa M, Tsyganskaya M: Comparison of human adult and fetal expression and identification of 535 housekeeping/maintenance genes. Physiological genomics. 2000, 2 (3): 143-147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schroeder A, Mueller O, Stocker S, Salowsky R, Leiber M, Gassmann M, Lightfoot S, Menzel W, Granzow M, Ragg T: The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol Biol. 2006, 7: 3- 10.1186/1471-2199-7-3PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Centre for Biotechnology Information. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.